Volume 26, Issue 5
PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cold range edges of marine fishes track climate change better than warm edges

Alexa Fredston‐Hermann

Corresponding Author

Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

Correspondence

Alexa Fredston‐Hermann, Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2400 Bren Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

Email: fredstonhermann@ucsb.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca Selden

Department of Biological Sciences, Science Center, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Malin Pinsky

Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Steven D. Gaines

Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Benjamin S. Halpern

Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 February 2020
Citations: 3

Abstract

Species around the world are shifting their ranges in response to climate change. To make robust predictions about climate‐related colonizations and extinctions, it is vital to understand the dynamics of range edges. This study is among the first to examine annual dynamics of cold and warm range edges, as most global change studies average observational data over space or over time. We analyzed annual range edge dynamics of marine fishes—both at the individual species level and pooled into cold‐ and warm‐edge assemblages—in a multi‐decade time‐series of trawl surveys conducted on the Northeast US Shelf during a period of rapid warming. We tested whether cold edges show stronger evidence of climate tracking than warm edges (due to non‐climate processes or time lags at the warm edge; the biogeography hypothesis or extinction debt hypothesis), or whether they tracked temperature change equally (due to the influence of habitat suitability; the ecophysiology hypothesis). In addition to exploring correlations with regional temperature change, we calculated species‐ and assemblage‐specific sea bottom and sea surface temperature isotherms and used them to predict range edge position. Cold edges shifted further and tracked sea surface and bottom temperature isotherms to a greater degree than warm edges. Mixed‐effects models revealed that for a one‐degree latitude shift in isotherm position, cold edges shifted 0.47 degrees of latitude, and warm edges shifted only 0.28 degrees. Our results suggest that cold range edges are tracking climate change better than warm range edges, invalidating the ecophysiology hypothesis. We also found that even among highly mobile marine ectotherms in a global warming hotspot, few species are fully keeping pace with climate.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 3

  • Catchability of reef fish species in traps is strongly affected by water temperature and substrate, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 10.3354/meps13337, 642, (179-190), (2020).
  • Overwintering survivorship and growth of young-of-the-year black sea bass Centropristis striata, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0236705, 15, 8, (e0236705), (2020).
  • Subpolar gyre and temperature drive boreal fish abundance in Greenland waters, Fish and Fisheries, 10.1111/faf.12512, 0, 0, (2020).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.