Click here to skip navigation
This website uses features which update page content based on user actions. If you are using assistive technology to view web content, please ensure your settings allow for the page content to update after initial load (this is sometimes called "forms mode"). Additionally, if you are using assistive technology and would like to be notified of items via alert boxes, please follow this link to enable alert boxes for your session profile.
An official website of the United States Government.
Skip Navigation

In This Section

Pay & Leave Claim Decisions

You have reached a collection of archived material.

The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.

Office of the General Counsel

Date: September 2, 1998
Matter of: [xxx]
File Number: s98001828

OPM Contact: Jo-Ann Chabot

A former employee of the District of Columbia government filed a claim for overtime, compensatory time, and sick leave. The claimant states that he was not paid overtime or compensatory time even though he did not take a lunch break, or any other breaks, and was required to report to work 30 minutes early and to work for 10 to 12 minutes past his quitting time for 58 days. The claimant also states that he was not paid for the 36 hours of sick leave that he earned, but did not use, while he was employed with the District of Columbia government. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) cannot render a decision concerning this matter.

Under 31 U.S.C. 3702, OPM's authority is limited to the settlement of "claims involving Federal civilian employees' compensation and leave, " and does not extend to claims for compensation and leave that have been filed against the District of Columbia government. Moreover, a claim against the District of Columbia is not a claim against the United States because the District of Columbia government is a legal entity separate and distinct from the United States government. 36 Comp. Gen. 457 (1956); 1 Comp. Gen. 451 (1922); Corrie Sue Freeman, B-199477 (May 3, 1982); Hedin Construction Corp. B-168704 (Jan. 16, 1970). Accordingly, we may not consider this claim because we do not have jurisdiction to settle claims against the District of Columbia government.