You have reached a collection of archived material.
The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.
Office of the General Counsel
S9601475
Dear Captain[xxx]:
We have reviewed the backpay claim that you submitted on October 25, 1996, concerning[xxx], a civilian employee at Naval Air Station. Mr. [xxx] claims that while a Motor Vehicle Operator, WG-5703-05, he performed duties at the grade 6 level from January 1991 until he received an accretion of duties promotion on May 29, 1994. Initially, we note that we may not settle claims that are subject to a negotiated grievance procedure under a collective bargaining agreement and that, until October 23, 1993, such an agreement was in effect in Mr. [xxx]'s unit. Accordingly, we may consider only that portion of Mr. [xxx]'s claim that accrued after that date. For the reasons expressed herein, that portion of Mr. [xxx]'s claim is denied.
A federal employee is entitled only to the salary of his appointed position regardless of the duties he performs. 69 Comp. Gen. 140 (1989); 52 Comp. Gen. 631 (1973); Joe M. Butto, B-212417, October 21, 1983; Rasp, supra; and Elizabeth McLaughlin, B-186556, July 27, 1976. The United States Supreme Court has held that neither the Back Pay Act nor the Classification Act creates a right to backpay for past periods of alleged wrongful grade classification. Butto, supra, citing Testan v. United States, 424 U.S. 392 (1976).
Sincerely yours,
Murray M. Meeker
Senior Attorney