Mandatory Spending

Function 550 - Health

Adopt a Voucher Plan and Slow the Growth of Federal Contributions for the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program

CBO periodically issues a compendium of policy options (called Options for Reducing the Deficit) covering a broad range of issues, as well as separate reports that include options for changing federal tax and spending policies in particular areas. This option appears in one of those publications. The options are derived from many sources and reflect a range of possibilities. For each option, CBO presents an estimate of its effects on the budget but makes no recommendations. Inclusion or exclusion of any particular option does not imply an endorsement or rejection by CBO.

Billions of Dollars 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2021–
2025
2021–
2030
  Adopt a Voucher Plan, With Growth Based on the CPI-U
Change in Mandatory Outlaysa 0 0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.6 -2.2 -2.9 -3.7 -4.6 -5.5 -3.1 -22.0
Change in Revenuesb 0 0 * * * * * -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.4
  Decrease (-) in the Deficit From Changes in Mandatory Outlays and Revenuesc 0 0 -0.4 -1.0 -1.6 -2.2 -2.9 -3.7 -4.5 -5.3 -3.0 -21.5
Change in Discretionary Spending  
  Budget authority 0 0 -0.4 -0.9 -1.4 -1.9 -2.5 -3.3 -4.0 -4.8 -2.8 -19.3
  Outlays 0 0 -0.4 -0.9 -1.4 -1.9 -2.5 -3.3 -4.0 -4.8 -2.8 -19.3
  Adopt a Voucher Plan, With Growth Based on the Chained CPI-U
Change in Mandatory Outlaysa 0 0 -0.5 -1.2 -1.8 -2.5 -3.3 -4.2 -5.1 -6.0 -3.5 -24.5
Change in Revenuesb 0 0 * * * * * -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.6
  Decrease (-) in the Deficit From Changes in Mandatory Outlays and Revenuesc 0 0 -0.5 -1.1 -1.8 -2.4 -3.2 -4.1 -5.0 -5.9 -3.4 -23.9
Change in Discretionary Spending  
  Budget authority 0 0 -0.5 -1.1 -1.6 -2.2 -2.8 -3.7 -4.5 -5.4 -3.2 -21.7
  Outlays 0 0 -0.5 -1.1 -1.6 -2.2 -2.8 -3.7 -4.5 -5.4 -3.2 -21.7
 

Data sources: Congressional Budget Office; staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.
This option would take effect in January 2023.
CPI-U = consumer price index for all urban consumers; * = between -$50 million and zero.
a. Includes estimated savings by the Postal Service, whose spending is classified as off-budget.
b. Estimates include the effects on Social Security payroll tax receipts, which are classified as off-budget.
c. Changes in discretionary spending are not included in the total because they would be realized only if future appropriations were adjusted accordingly and because the Congress uses different procedures to enforce its budgetary goals related to discretionary spending.

The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program provides health insurance coverage to federal workers and annuitants, as well as to their dependents and survivors. Policyholders, whether they are active employees or annuitants, generally pay 25 percent of the premium for lower-cost plans and a larger share for higher-cost plans; the federal government pays the rest of the premium.

This option consists of two alternatives to replace the current premium-sharing structure with a voucher, which would be excluded from income and payroll taxes. Under both alternatives, the value of the voucher in 2023 for each type of coverage (self only, self plus one, and family) would be equal to the government’s average expected contributions to FEHB premiums in 2022 adjusted for inflation. Under the first alternative, the value of the voucher in 2023 and each subsequent year would be determined using the projected rate of inflation as measured by the consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U). The second alternative would index the voucher to the chained CPI-U, which is another measure of inflation designed to account for changes in spending patterns and to address several types of statistical biases that exist in the traditional CPI measures. The chained CPI-U has grown by an average of about 0.25 percentage points per year more slowly since 2001 than the traditional CPI-U.

Both alternatives would reduce mandatory spending for the FEHB program because the federal government would make lower payments for premiums for annuitants and postal workers than under current law. In addition, they would have other effects on mandatory spending because some FEHB participants would leave the program. The net effect of those disenrolled FEHB participants on changes in mandatory spending would be small relative to savings from the voucher. Revenues would also be affected because of changes in the number of people with employment-based health insurance. Both alternatives would also reduce discretionary spending by lowering federal agencies’ payments toward FEHB premiums for current employees and their dependents, provided that appropriations were reduced to reflect those lower payments.