December 3, 2020
Open Session
Hirshhorn Museum Sculpture Garden Revitalization
(File Number 7889)The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) approved preliminary site development plans, with the exception of proposed changes to the garden’s reflecting pool and inner partition wall, submitted by the Smithsonian Institution to revitalize the Hirshhorn Museum’s Sculpture Garden.
Located on the National Mall and designed by Gordon Bunshaft, the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, opened in 1974 and featured a sunken garden bordered by concrete retaining walls on three sides, a planted berm opening to the National Mall, and a central reflecting pool. Visitors accessed the sunken garden from several sets of stairs and sculpture was displayed in a series of gravel-paved austere terraces framed by internal concrete walls and hedges. However, the lack of shade and gravel surface made it very hot in the summer. To alleviate this, in 1981 landscape architect Lester Collins modified the design to improve accessibility and visitor comfort by adding ramped walkways (now brick paved and defined by planting beds and lawn), trees, and ground cover plantings to the design. The museum and sculpture garden are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (including design features in the original design). The garden elements added by Collins were recently determined to also contribute to the garden’s significance.
The Smithsonian seeks to upgrade the Sculpture Garden to better showcase its sculpture collection, enhance the visitor experience, improve connections with the National Mall and the museum, create flexible space for artists and new programming, replace failing infrastructure, and meet current codes. Proposed changes include a flexible lawn space for performances and temporary exhibitions (West Gallery); a series of interconnected open “galleries” for the museum’s bronze sculptures (East Gallery); expanded reflecting pools and a performance stage (Central Gallery); improved entrances and new overlooks; replacement of the original perimeter concrete walls with new concrete walls; replacement of the interior concrete partition wall with one of stacked stone; new stacked stone walls; new accessibility ramps; new planter walls that also function as seating; new accessibility ramps to make it easier for people to reach the gardens; and reopening and modernizing an underground tunnel that connects the museum with the garden.
An extensive public comment session took place before the Commission deliberated, with people expressing both support for the proposal and concern about its impact on the garden’s historic elements. A theme throughout the testimonies was how important and special the museum and garden are to people. Commissioners noted this and expressed their support for the Smithsonian’s efforts to revitalize the garden, expand exhibit space, and improve accessibility and connections to the National Mall and Hirshhorn Museum. They highlighted the importance of balancing the visitor experience with changing programming needs and historic preservation.
However, Commissioners had concerns with two of the proposed components and asked for further input and work to solve design challenges, including helping them better understand the programmatic need driving changes to the historic pool design. They recommended that the Smithsonian explore an alternative to the expanded pool design that retains the historic character-defining dimensions of the existing pool. They also recommended that the Smithsonian try to find a way to make the new stone walls more compatible with, while still differentiated from, the historic perimeter materials. Suggestions for how to do this included material, color tone, or stacking pattern.
“We are witnessing an exciting design process to rehabilitate the Hirshhorn Sculpture Garden. The debate is between the balance of historic significance and design ideas,” noted NCPC Vice Chair Thomas Gallas.
Located on the National Mall and designed by Gordon Bunshaft, the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, opened in 1974 and featured a sunken garden bordered by concrete retaining walls on three sides, a planted berm opening to the National Mall, and a central reflecting pool. Visitors accessed the sunken garden from several sets of stairs and sculpture was displayed in a series of gravel-paved austere terraces framed by internal concrete walls and hedges. However, the lack of shade and gravel surface made it very hot in the summer. To alleviate this, in 1981 landscape architect Lester Collins modified the design to improve accessibility and visitor comfort by adding ramped walkways (now brick paved and defined by planting beds and lawn), trees, and ground cover plantings to the design. The museum and sculpture garden are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (including design features in the original design). The garden elements added by Collins were recently determined to also contribute to the garden’s significance.
The Smithsonian seeks to upgrade the Sculpture Garden to better showcase its sculpture collection, enhance the visitor experience, improve connections with the National Mall and the museum, create flexible space for artists and new programming, replace failing infrastructure, and meet current codes. Proposed changes include a flexible lawn space for performances and temporary exhibitions (West Gallery); a series of interconnected open “galleries” for the museum’s bronze sculptures (East Gallery); expanded reflecting pools and a performance stage (Central Gallery); improved entrances and new overlooks; replacement of the original perimeter concrete walls with new concrete walls; replacement of the interior concrete partition wall with one of stacked stone; new stacked stone walls; new accessibility ramps; new planter walls that also function as seating; new accessibility ramps to make it easier for people to reach the gardens; and reopening and modernizing an underground tunnel that connects the museum with the garden.
An extensive public comment session took place before the Commission deliberated, with people expressing both support for the proposal and concern about its impact on the garden’s historic elements. A theme throughout the testimonies was how important and special the museum and garden are to people. Commissioners noted this and expressed their support for the Smithsonian’s efforts to revitalize the garden, expand exhibit space, and improve accessibility and connections to the National Mall and Hirshhorn Museum. They highlighted the importance of balancing the visitor experience with changing programming needs and historic preservation.
However, Commissioners had concerns with two of the proposed components and asked for further input and work to solve design challenges, including helping them better understand the programmatic need driving changes to the historic pool design. They recommended that the Smithsonian explore an alternative to the expanded pool design that retains the historic character-defining dimensions of the existing pool. They also recommended that the Smithsonian try to find a way to make the new stone walls more compatible with, while still differentiated from, the historic perimeter materials. Suggestions for how to do this included material, color tone, or stacking pattern.
“We are witnessing an exciting design process to rehabilitate the Hirshhorn Sculpture Garden. The debate is between the balance of historic significance and design ideas,” noted NCPC Vice Chair Thomas Gallas.
Watch the VideoPentagon Reservation Stormwater Management Design and Security Upgrades
(File Number 8215)Commissioners approved preliminary and final site development plans for stormwater management design and security upgrades at the Pentagon Reservation submitted by the U.S. Department of Defense’s Washington Headquarters Service. Consisting of six projects, the first five upgrades will reduce the reservation’s discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff. These include adding bioretention areas and tree boxes in several parking lots, resulting in an increase in stormwater management facilities (13 to 33), an increase in the number of tree boxes (14 to 41), and the removal of 190 parking spaces.
The sixth project focuses on security and safety upgrades at the campus, including along a 1,200-foot-long walkway between the Pentagon Transit Center (including the Metro station) and the National 9/11 Pentagon Memorial. Components include an 8-foot-high fence on the side facing the Pentagon that would complete the building’s perimeter security, new entry points for employees, a cable and rail system on the side of the street to protect pedestrians, landscaping, and trees.
Previously, the Commission found that the proposed design was not welcoming to pedestrians and suggested several ways to alleviate this. In response to these comments, the design was altered to include a planting strip along the entire fence line, the walkway widened, stone pillars added into the fence and gate design, two of the entrance gates widened, the number and size of the stone-clad bollards reduced (seven to five, from 54” to 40”), and landscaping added to the tree strips. The Commission requested confirmation of a 42” height for a security fence. Commissioners thanked the design team for addressing their earlier comments, noting that this design is a significant improvement.
The sixth project focuses on security and safety upgrades at the campus, including along a 1,200-foot-long walkway between the Pentagon Transit Center (including the Metro station) and the National 9/11 Pentagon Memorial. Components include an 8-foot-high fence on the side facing the Pentagon that would complete the building’s perimeter security, new entry points for employees, a cable and rail system on the side of the street to protect pedestrians, landscaping, and trees.
Previously, the Commission found that the proposed design was not welcoming to pedestrians and suggested several ways to alleviate this. In response to these comments, the design was altered to include a planting strip along the entire fence line, the walkway widened, stone pillars added into the fence and gate design, two of the entrance gates widened, the number and size of the stone-clad bollards reduced (seven to five, from 54” to 40”), and landscaping added to the tree strips. The Commission requested confirmation of a 42” height for a security fence. Commissioners thanked the design team for addressing their earlier comments, noting that this design is a significant improvement.
Surgery, Radiology, and Lab Medicine Building Addition
(File Number 8235)The Commission also approved preliminary site and building plans submitted by the National Institutes of Health for a nine story (with two additional below grade levels) 547,290 gross square feet Surgery, Radiology and Laboratory Medicine addition to the existing Clinical Research Center. However, they noted significant concerns regarding the building size related to the site. The new addition will house the relocation of several medical departments and further the Clinical Center Complex as a premier, world-class research facility.
While appreciating the importance of the proposed addition and the need to locate adjacent to the Clinical Research Center, Commissioners had many concerns about the proposed addition’s size and scale, expressing that the building was too large for the site. At issue was how to properly fit the needed program into a building on the limited site. While approving the preliminary plans, NCPC wants to see significant changes in the proposed design by the next review phase, including a façade that addresses the numerous design considerations raised by the Commissioners.
While appreciating the importance of the proposed addition and the need to locate adjacent to the Clinical Research Center, Commissioners had many concerns about the proposed addition’s size and scale, expressing that the building was too large for the site. At issue was how to properly fit the needed program into a building on the limited site. While approving the preliminary plans, NCPC wants to see significant changes in the proposed design by the next review phase, including a façade that addresses the numerous design considerations raised by the Commissioners.
Antenna Submissions Guidelines Update
(File Number 6947)The Commission adopted proposed updates to the agency’s Antenna Submissions Guidelines. First adopted by NCPC in 1988 and last updated in 2001, the guidelines seek to protect the skyline, historic resources, and scenic character of the nation’s capital and provide a safe environment for employees, visitors, and residents. However, they needed an upgrade to in response to advances in technology and an increased demand for multiple types of telecommunication infrastructure.
The new guidance will address the impacts of new telecommunication infrastructure on federal buildings and land. The updates will become effective 60 days after a notice is placed in the Federal Register and will then be used by the Commission and staff when reviewing antenna projects. The guidelines do not pertain to small cell infrastructure in the public right-of-way as this is regulated by the District of Columbia. Commissioners appreciated the work that went into the update and believe that it will make a big difference in the agency’s review of antennas and the impact of this on the city.
The new guidance will address the impacts of new telecommunication infrastructure on federal buildings and land. The updates will become effective 60 days after a notice is placed in the Federal Register and will then be used by the Commission and staff when reviewing antenna projects. The guidelines do not pertain to small cell infrastructure in the public right-of-way as this is regulated by the District of Columbia. Commissioners appreciated the work that went into the update and believe that it will make a big difference in the agency’s review of antennas and the impact of this on the city.
Information Presentation: Monumental Core Streetscape Design Guidelines
(File Number 7886)A scheduled information presentation by NCPC staff on the development of Streetscape Design Guidelines for Washington’s monumental core was postponed to the January 7, 2021 Commission meeting.
The Commission voted Commissioner Beth White (Presidential Appointee-At Large) as the new Vice Chair.
The Commission voted Commissioner Beth White (Presidential Appointee-At Large) as the new Vice Chair.
Consent Calendar
The Commission votes on Consent Calendar items without staff presentations or public testimony.
8230: 11th Street Bridge Park Transfer of Jurisdiction
8233: Data Storage Center Phase 3
Delegated Decisions
Projects for which the Commission delegated decision-making authority to the Chairman, or Executive Director.
8087 Joint Base Andrews Military Working Dog Kennels
8229 Internal Revenue Service Federal Building Flagpole Installation and Site Improvements
8231 Southeast Federal Center Parcel F Redevelopment – The Yards
8232 Capital Crescent Trailhead and Staircase Restoration
8234 Carnegie Library Rehabilitation - Window Glazing Replacement and New Fence
ZC 19-27 Text Amendment to Reorganize Subtitles D, E, and F
ZC 19-27A Text Amendment to Reorganize Subtitles G and H
ZC 20-13 Text Amendment to Subtitle K, Section 238.3 to Allow Office Uses in the SEFC-3 Zone
ZC 20-17 Text Amendment to Subtitle Z to Suspend Certain Types of Conditions for Approved Campus Plans During the 2020-2021 Academic Year
ZC 20-02 Text Amendments to Subtitles B, C, F, G, I, K, U, X, and Z for Inclusionary Zoning
ZC 20-26 Text Amendment to Subtitles Y and Z for Administrative Approvals of Validity Period of Approvals During COVID-19 Pandemic
