Logo of genannLink to Publisher's site
Genome Announc. 2014 Jul-Aug; 2(4): e00617-14.
Published online 2014 Jul 10. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00617-14
PMCID: PMC4110763
PMID: 25013135

Draft Genome Sequence of Environmental Vibrio cholerae 2012EL-1759 with Similarities to the V. cholerae O1 Classical Biotype

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae 2012EL-1759 is an environmental isolate from Haiti that was recovered in 2012 during a cholera outbreak. The genomic backbone is similar to that of the prototypical V. cholerae O1 classical biotype strain O395, and it carries the Vibrio pathogenicity islands (VPI-1 and VPI-2) and a cholera toxin (CTX) prephage.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Cholera toxin-producing Vibrio cholerae O1 was first detected in Haiti in October 2010, and both the epidemiological and genomic data are consistent with the notion of a single exogenous source for the ongoing outbreak (1,3). Because the ingestion of contaminated drinking water is the primary mode of cholera transmission, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiated the surveillance of surface waters in Haiti to assess the risk of exposure from water and seafood (4). In addition to recovering the toxigenic epidemic strain, nontoxigenic non-O1/O139 V. cholerae isolates that were positive by PCR for tcpA were also recovered from Haitian waters (Kahler, Haley, Chen, Mull, Tarr, Turnsek, Katz, Humphrys, Freeman, Boncy, Colwell, Huq, and Hill, unpublished data). Because tcpA is part of the tcp gene cluster that encodes the toxin coregulated pilus (TCP), a major colonization factor and the receptor for the cholera toxin phage (CTXΦ) (5), we characterized a representative isolate by whole-genome sequencing.

Whole-genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina MiSeq, according to the manufacturer’s protocols, to generate 2 × 150 bp reads, which were assembled using SPAdes version 3.0 and scaffolded using SOPRA version 1.4.6 to give an assembly size of 3.98 Mb, with an N50 of 363 kb (6, 7). The gene predictions and annotations were performed using the Computational Genomics Pipeline (CG-Pipeline) version 0.4 and RAST (8, 9), which predicted and annotated 3,533 coding genes. The G+C content is 47.5%.

A phylogeny was constructed based on core genes, and 2012EL-1759 was found to be most closely related to the V. cholerae O1 classical biotype strain O395, with only 2,285 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences across the core genome. The annotated genome includes the Vibrio pathogenicity island (VPI), a 40-kb region that encompasses the tcp gene cluster (10). The presence of a complete VPI suggests that the strain can express the TCP. We used MAUVE (11) to show that the VPI region, including tcpA, is more similar to the VPI of the classical biotype than to the VPI of the El Tor biotype, and the tcpA gene differs from the classical allele at two nucleotide sites. The cholera toxin genes (ctxAB) were not detected by PCR, nor were they found in the genome assembly or in the Illumina reads. However, core CTXΦ genes (cep, orfU, ace, and zot) and an RS1 element (rstRCalcutta, rstA, and rstB) appeared to be in the dif site on chromosome 1. There was no evidence of core phage genes present in the dif site on chromosome 2, but rst genes were present.

Boyd, Heilpern, and Waldor (12) described a model of ctxAB cassette acquisition; we suggest that the genome represented by isolate 2012EL-1759 might acquire ctxAB and give rise to a toxigenic clone that has a genomic backbone and accessory elements similar to those of the V. cholerae O1 classical biotype. The value of environmental surveillance and characterization is that we can compare them with outbreak isolates. If the environmental strain described here does give rise to a novel toxigenic strain in Haiti, we would properly be able to attribute its presence to emergence from the environment.

An article on the environmental sampling for this strain has been submitted for publication (Kahler et al., unpublished data).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. JNEW00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, JNEW01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official opinion of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This work was supported by the Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Footnotes

Citation Katz LS, Turnsek M, Kahler A, Hill VR, Boyd EF, Tarr CL. 2014. Draft genome sequence of environmental Vibrio cholerae 2012EL-1759 with similarities to the V. cholerae O1 classical biotype. Genome Announc. 2(4):e00617-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00617-14.

REFERENCES

1. Frerichs RR, Keim PS, Barrais R, Piarroux R. 2012. Nepalese origin of cholera epidemic in Haiti. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18:E158–E163. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03841.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Hendriksen RS, Price LB, Schupp JM, Gillece JD, Kaas RS, Engelthaler DM, Bortolaia V, Pearson T, Waters AE, Upadhyay BP, Shrestha SD, Adhikari S, Shakya G, Keim PS, Aarestrup FM. 2011. Population genetics of Vibrio cholerae from Nepal in 2010: evidence on the origin of the Haitian outbreak. mBio 2(4):e00157-11. 10.1128/mBio.00157-11 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Katz LS, Petkau A, Beaulaurier J, Tyler S, Antonova ES, Turnsek MA, Guo Y, Wang S, Paxinos EE, Orata F, Gladney LM, Stroika S, Folster JP, Rowe L, Freeman MM, Knox N, Frace M, Boncy J, Graham M, Hammer BK, Boucher Y, Bashir A, Hanage WP, Van Domselaar G, Tarr CL. 2013. Evolutionary dynamics of Vibrio cholerae O1 following a single-source introduction to Haiti. mBio 4(4):e00398-13. 10.1128/mBio.00398-13 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Hill VR, Cohen N, Kahler AM, Jones JL, Bopp CA, Marano N, Tarr CL, Garrett NM, Boncy J, Henry A, Gómez GA, Wellman M, Curtis M, Freeman MM, Turnsek M, Benner RA, Jr, Dahourou G, Espey D, DePaola A, Tappero JW, Handzel T, Tauxe RV. 2011. Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 in water and seafood, Haiti. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17:2147–2150 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Waldor MK, Mekalanos JJ. 1996. Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin. Science 272:1910–1914. 10.1126/science.272.5270.1910 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19:455–477. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Dayarian A, Michael TP, Sengupta AM. 2010. SOPRA: scaffolding algorithm for paired reads via statistical optimization. BMC Bioinformatics 11:345. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-345 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Kislyuk AO, Katz LS, Agrawal S, Hagen MS, Conley AB, Jayaraman P, Nelakuditi V, Humphrey JC, Sammons SA, Govil D, Mair RD, Tatti KM, Tondella ML, Harcourt BH, Mayer LW, Jordan IK. 2010. A computational genomics pipeline for prokaryotic sequencing projects. Bioinformatics 26:1819–1826. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq284 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Karaolis DK, Johnson JA, Bailey CC, Boedeker EC, Kaper JB, Reeves PR. 1998. A Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity island associated with epidemic and pandemic strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:3134–3139. 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3134 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Boyd EF, Heilpern AJ, Waldor MK. 2000. Molecular analyses of a putative CTXφ precursor and evidence for independent acquisition of distinct CTXφs by toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 182:5530–5538. 10.1128/JB.182.19.5530-5538.2000 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)