|
Who is responsible We All Are! |
Level | Technical Performance/Life Cycle Sustainment | Schedule | Cost |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Minimal or no consequence to technical performance. | Minimal or no impact | Minimal or no impact |
2 | Minor reduction in technical performance or supportability; can be tolerated with little or no impact on program. | Able to meet key dates | Budget increase or unit production cost increase (<1% if Budget) |
3 | Moderate reduction in technical performance or supportability with limited impact on program objectives. | Minor schedule slip; able to meet key milestones with no schedule float | Budget increase or unit production cost increase (<5% if Budget) |
4 | Significant degradation in technical performance or major shortfall in supportability; may jeopardize program success. | Program critical path affected | Budget increase or unit production cost increase (<10% if Budget) |
5 | Severe gradation in technical performance; cannot meet KPP or key technical/supportability threshold; will jeopardize program success. | Cannot meet key program milestones | Exceeds APB threashold (>10% if Budget) |
Include risk management in program and technical planning.
Continuously implement risk management process during program execution.