In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.01 and pursuant to the Base Realignment and Closure Commission 2005 recommendation #176, this issuance establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides direction for engineering support provided by the Military Services to the DLA in support of DLA Supply Classes II and IX.

Pursuant to the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5144.02 (Reference (a)), this instruction:
a. Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides direction for the planning, acquisition, fielding, allocation, management, and use of SATCOM resources as a component of the DoD information enterprise.
b. Cancels References (b) through (g).

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense by Title 10, United States Code,
this issuance:
• Establishes the mission, organization and management, responsibilities and functions, relationships,
authorities, and administration of DIUx.
• Establishes an internal governance council, the DIUx Technology Review Group, to oversee the
activities of DIUx.

a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 3150.2 (Reference (a)) to update established policy and assign responsibilities for DoD Nuclear Weapons Surety for the oversight of safety, security, and control of U.S. nuclear weapons and nuclear weapon systems in DoD custody.
b. Assigns responsibility for the nuclear weapons technical inspection (NWTI) system

a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 4105.67 (Reference (a)) as a DoD instruction (DoDI) in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5124.02 (Reference (b)) to establish policy, assign responsibilities, and prescribe procedures for procurements using NAF.
b. Authorizes DoD nonappropriated fund instrumentalities (NAFIs) to enter into certain contracts and agreements with other federal agencies and instrumentalities in accordance with the authorities in sections 2484(h)(2)(A) and 2492 of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.) (Reference (c)).
c. Incorporates and cancels DoDI 4105.71 (Reference (d)) and DoDI 7060.03 (Reference (e)).

This instruction reissues DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5210.65 (Reference (a)) in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.01 (Reference (b)), Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum (Reference (c)), and paragraph E1.3 of DoDI 5200.08 (Reference (d)) to establish policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for:
a. The execution of the DoD Chemical Agent Security Program.
b. Physical security, information security, and personnel reliability for Schedule 1 chemicals in the possession of the DoD (referred to in this instruction as “chemical agents”), as defined by the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) (Reference (e)).

In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.01 (Reference (a)), this instruction:

a. Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides direction for the acquisition of contracted services.

b. Establishes and implements a management structure for the acquisition of contracted services.

c. Consistent with statutory and regulatory requirements for the acquisitions of services, authorizes DoD Component decision authorities to tailor the procedures in this instruction to best achieve cost, schedule, and performance objectives.

d. Uses a data collection system (Federal Procurement Data System – Next Generation (FPDS-NG)) to provide management information with regard to each purchase of services by a DoD Component.

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense by Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.) (Reference (a)), this directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 5105.62 (Reference (b)) to update the mission, organization and management, responsibilities and functions, relationships, authorities, and administration of DTRA.

a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 8320.03 (Reference (a)) as a DoD instruction (DoDI) in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5134.01 (Reference (b)) to establish policy and assign responsibilities for creation, maintenance, and dissemination of UID standards to account for, control, and manage DoD assets and resources.
b. Supports the National Military Strategy of the United States of America (Reference (c)) and the requirements of DoDI 8320.02 (Reference (d)) for sharing data, information, and information technology (IT) services by enabling sharing, analyzing, and disseminating authoritative, unambiguous on-demand data associated with unique identifiers with mission partners in a global environment.
c. Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for:
(1) Establishment of the DoD’s integrated enterprise-wide UID strategy consistent with the requirements of DoDD 8000.01 (Reference (e)) to enable net-centric operations.
(2) Development, management, and use of unique identifiers and their associated data sources to preclude redundancy.
d. Assigns responsibilities for the maintenance and implementation oversight of the DoD UID standards listed in Enclosure 2.

This directive:
a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 5101.10 (Reference (a)) to establish policy and assign responsibilities pursuant to section 113 of Title 10, United States Code (Reference (b)) for the management of subsistence across the spectrum of military operations.
b. Designates the Director, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), as the DoD EA for Subsistence in accordance with DoDD 5101.1 (Reference (c)).
c. Identifies the roles and responsibilities of the DoD EA for Subsistence and his or her relationship to the DoD Components with respect to all aspects of subsistence support for the Military Services.

a. Manual. This manual is composed of several volumes, each containing its own purpose. In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.12, DoD Instruction (DoDI) 4140.01, and DoDI 4160.28, (References (a), (b), and (c)), this manual prescribes uniform procedures for the disposition of DoD personal property and establishes the sequence of disposition processes for personal property of the DoD Components.
b. Volume. This volume of this manual provides guidance for:
(1) Abandonment or destruction (A/D).
(2) Disposal of foreign excess personal property (FEPP).
(3) Precious metals recovery program (PMRP).
(4) Reclamation.
(5) Handling hazardous and special case property.

This directive:
a. Reissues and renames DoD Directive (DoDD) 5101.9 (Reference (a)) to establish policy and assign responsibilities for the management of the Class VIIIA medical materiel across the spectrum of military operations.
b. Designates the Director, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) as the DoD Executive Agent (DoD EA) for Medical Materiel, in accordance with DoDD 5101.1 (Reference (b)).
c. Establishes the relationship of the DoD EA for Medical Materiel to the other DoD Component heads worldwide, in peacetime, wartime, for homeland defense, defense support of civil authorities (DSCA) in accordance with DoDD 3025.18 (Reference (c)), and other contingencies.

In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5105.84 (Reference (a)), this instruction:
a. Reissues DoD Instruction 7041.3 (Reference (b)) to establish policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for conducting cost-effective economic analyses evaluating the costs and benefits of any government decisions to initiate, renew, or expand program or project alternatives under the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-94 (Reference (c)).
b. Authorizes the Defense Economic Analysis Council (DEAC) as the means to pursue uniform economic policy throughout DoD, resolve any issues that may arise, and represent joint Military Service opinion to OSD.

Reissues DoD Instruction (DoDI) 8320.04 (Reference (b)) to establish policy and assign responsibilities for the process of uniquely identifying tangible personal property and their associated selected attributes. The unique item identifier (UII) will be used globally as the common data key in financial, property accountability, acquisition, and logistics (including supply and maintenance) automated information systems to enable asset accountability, valuation, life-cycle management, and counterfeit materiel risk reduction.

This manual is composed of several volumes, each containing its own purpose, and reissues DoD 4140.1-R. The purpose of the overall manual, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.12, is to: Implement policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for DoD materiel
managers and others who work within or with the DoD supply system consistent with DoD Instruction (DoDI) 4140.01; Establish standard terminology for use in DoD supply chain materiel management.

This volume applies to OSD, the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commanders, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the DoD.

a. Reissues and renumbers DoD Directive (DoDD) 8570.01 (Reference (a)) to update and expand established policies and assigned responsibilities for managing the DoD cyberspace workforce.
b. Authorizes establishment of a DoD cyberspace workforce management council to ensure that the requirements of this directive are met. The council will be comprised of representatives from the Offices of the DoD Chief Information Officer (DoD CIO), Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)), Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P)), Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USD(I)), the Joint Staff, the Director, National Security Agency/Chief, Central Security Service (DIRNSA/CHCSS), and other DoD Components.
c. Unifies the overall cyberspace workforce and establishes specific workforce elements (cyberspace effects, cybersecurity, and cyberspace information technology (IT)) to align, manage and standardize cyberspace work roles, baseline qualifications, and training requirements. This directive does not address operational employment of the work roles. Operational employment of the cyberspace workforce will be determined by the Joint Staff, Combatant Commands, and other DoD Components to address mission requirements.

This Instruction establishes policy, assigns responsibility, and provides procedures for the development and/or modification of wireless communications waveform to improve network interoperability in accordance with the guidance in DoD Instruction 5025.01 and the authority in DoD Directives 5144.1 and 4630.05. 

This instruction: a. Reissues DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5200.39 (Reference (a)) in accordance with the authorities in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5143.01 (Reference (b)) and DoDD 5134.01 (Reference (c)).
b. Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for the identification and protection of CPI.
c. Establishes policy in accordance with DoDD 5000.01 (Reference (d)) and DoDI 5000.02 (Reference (e)).
d. Incorporates and cancels the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) memorandum (Reference (f)).

This regulation sets forth policies for planning and managing Army materiel systems’ reliability, availability, and
maintainability (RAM) during development, procurement, deployment, and sustainment. It applies to all combat or
mission essential developmental, non-developmental, commercial items adapted for military use, and product improved
hardware and software systems. Materiel systems also include but are not limited to stand-alone or embedded
automatic data processing equipment hardware and software; support and ancillary equipment comprising the total
materiel system; and multi-Service materiel systems when the Army is lead Service.

This regulation has been revised
to update the policy, responsibilities,
and mandatory procedures for the acquisition
and sale of utilities and related services. It covers policies , responsibilities ,and procedures for the preparation , re -view, approval, award, and post-award administration
of solicitations and contracts for the acquisition of utilities services ; and contracts , memorandums of under -standing, inter-service or intragovernmental support agreements for the sale ofutilities and related services.

This instruction reissues DoDD 4540.5 as a DoD Instruction in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5134.01 to establish policy, update responsibilities, and prescribe procedures for DoD transportation of U.S. nuclear weapons, including logistic transportation, operational transport, and emergency logistic movement. It als incorporates and cancels DoD 4540.5-M, and authorizes the establishment of the Nuclear Transportation Working Group (NTWG).

This Instruction establishes the DoD Real Property Categorization System (RPCS) for the categorization of real property and the Real Property Categorization Panel (RPCP), in accordance with DoD Instruction 5105.18, “DoD Intergovernmental and Intragovernmental Committee Management Program,” July 10, 2009, as the group responsible for the development and maintenance of the RPCS and the assignment of categories to real property inventories.

a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 3222.3 (Reference (a)) as a DoD instruction (DoDI) in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5144.02 (Reference (b)).
b. Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides instructions for the management and implementation of the DoD E3 Program to ensure mutual electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and effective E3 control among ground-, air-, maritime, and space-based platforms, electronic and electrical systems, subsystems, and equipment, and with the existing natural and man-made electromagnetic environment (EME).
c. Establishes and assigns representation to the DoD E3 Integrated Product Team (IPT). The charter for the DoD E3 IPT is at Enclosure 2 of this instruction.
d. Incorporates and cancels DoDD C-3222.5 (Reference (c)).

This Directive reissues DoDD 5400.07 to update policies and responsibilities for implementing the DoD FIOA Program in accordance with Section 552 of title 5, U.S.C. (commonly known as the "FOIA"). It continues to authorize DoD 5400.7-R to implement the FOIA Program, and implements Executive Order 13392 within the Department of Defense. This Diecrtive continues to delegate authorities and responsibilities for the effective administration of the FOIA Program consistent with DoDD 5105.53.

a. Reinforce the importance of implementing and maintaining an effective explosives safety management program (ESMP).
b. Stress the importance of mitigating explosives safety risks to the extent possible and managing residual risk in accordance with the above references when explosives safety standards cannot be met.

Under the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense by section 113 of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), this directive assigns the responsibilities, functions, relationships, and authorities of the DoD CIO.  It cancels DoD Directive (DoDD) 5144.1 and transfers the responsibilities and functions of the disestablished Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration (ASD(NII)) to the DoD CIO, as specified in this directive.  This Directive authorizes the DoD CIO, as a Principal Staff Assistant (PSA) reporting directly to the Secretary of Defense, to establish DoD policy in DoD issuances within the responsibilities, functions, and authorities assigned in this directive, in accordance with DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5025.01.

Performance-Based Logistics (PBL) is the Department of Defense strategy to improve weapon system readiness by obtaining life cycle product support of weapon systems, subsystems, and components as an integrated package based on output measures, such as materiel availability, materiel reliability, and reduced ownership cost. The Secretary of Defense PBL Awards recognize government/industry teams that have demonstrated outstanding achievements in providing our warfighters with exceptional operational capability through PBL agreements and are examples of "Better Buying Power" in action. We received 2011 PBL award nomination packages from the Services and the Missile Defense Agency, and evaluations were conducted by a team of representatives from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Defense Acquisition University (DAU), and the Aerospace Industries Association (AlA). The winners resulting from those evaluations are contained in this memo.

This directive establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and describes authorities of the Arms Transfer and Technology Release Senior Steering Group (ATTR SSG) and the Technology Security and Foreign Disclosure Office (TSFDO) in accordance with the guidance in the Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum (Reference (a)).

This pamphlet prescribes procedures
for the policy set forth in AR 700 – 127 relating to the Army’s implementation of performance-based life cycle product support , including performance -based logistics, through the Army’s Integrated Product Support Program.

In accordance with sections 113 and 131 through 137 of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.) (Reference (a)); Presidential Memorandum (Reference (b)); Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12333, 13526, and 13587 (References (c), (d), and (e)); section 922 of Public Law 112-81 (Reference (f)); National Security Directive 42 (Reference (g)), and Committee on National Security Systems Directive 504 (Reference (h)), this directive:
a. Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities within DoD to develop and maintain an insider threat program to comply with the requirements and minimum standards to prevent, deter, detect, and mitigate actions by malicious insiders who represent a threat to national security or DoD personnel, facilities, operations, and resources.
b. Identifies appropriate training, education, and awareness initiatives that may be made available to DoD personnel and contractors in accordance with Reference (b).
c. Ensures appropriate DoD policies, including but not limited to counterintelligence (CI), cybersecurity, security, civilian and military personnel management, workplace violence, emergency management, law enforcement (LE), and antiterrorism (AT) risk management, are evaluated and modified to effectively address insider threats to DoD.
d. Cancels Secretary of Defense Memorandum (Reference (i)).
e. Incorporates and cancels Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum (Reference (j)).

In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5143.01 (Reference (a)), this instruction establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for investigating and adjudicating eligibility to hold a CAC consistent with References (b) through (n). The CAC is the DoD personal identity verification (PIV) credential. This instruction incorporates and cancels Enclosure 4, DoD Instruction 5200.02 (Reference (o)).

The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable.

This regulation establishes responsibilities
and policy for the Army’s
Cost and Economic Analysis Program.

This Instruction:
a. Converts Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-032 to a DoD Instruction (DoDI) and cancels the DTM to implement section 317 of Public Law 111-84, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5134.01.
b. Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures regarding the use of open-air burn pits and the prohibition of the disposal of covered waste in open-air burn pits during contingency operations, except in circumstances in which no alternative disposal method is feasible.

(1) Is composed of two volumes, each containing its own purpose, and reissues DoD Manual (DoDM) 8910.1-M (Reference (a)). The purpose of the overall manual, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5105.53 (Reference (b)), DoD Instruction (DoDI) 8910.01 (Reference (c)), and the Secretary of Defense memorandum (Reference (d)), is to provide guidance to collect information from the public, other federal agencies, or the OSD and DoD Components.
(2) Provides guidance to Information Management Control Officers (IMCO) on the operation of their OSD and DoD Component information collection management programs; and provides the procedures to approve and license with a report control symbol (RCS) DoD internal information collections and approve DoD public information collections.

This directive reissues DoDD 4500.56.  It implements OMB Circular No. A-126, Public Law 104-106, and the White House Memorandum, "Use of Government Aircraft for Official Business."  It establishes policies for the transportation of DoD passengers and cargo and the use of government aircraft, and cancels and incorporates guidance contained in DTM 09-002 concerning the use of government aircraft.  This directive establishes policies for Operational Support Airlift (OSA) aircraft transportation, and establishes the Exective Airlift Scheduling Activity (EASA).  This directive supersedes all previous memorandums concerning the travel of DoD senior officials, and cancels Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum and provices new guidance regarding the establishment of a DoD-wide OSA common movement management system.

This Directive establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for a DoD  Eecutive Agent and Single Manager for Military Ground-Based CREW (hereafter eferred to as CREW) Technology. It establishes a Joint CREW Program Board, a CREW Military Technical Acceptance Board (MTAB), and a CREW Science and Technology (S&T) Board, and a Single Manager to assist in the execution of these assigned responsibilities.

This Directive establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for defense crisis management within the Department of Defense and the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense in 10 U.S.C. 113 and the authority delegated to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (USD(P)) in DoD Directive 5111.1.

Purpose. The Army requires enough water to carry out its missions without significant disruptions. This directive, which supersedes the reference, sets policy and assigns responsibilities for identifying, asserting and preserving the Army’s water rights.
Background. Water is scarce throughout much of the Western United States and becoming scarcer in some parts of the Eastern United States. Increasing demand for water to support growing populations and economic development places stress on the same supplies of ground and surface water that Army installations depend on to fulfill their missions. Over the past decade, several Army installations have become involved in litigation over water rights. As competition for water increases, more Army installations are likely to become involved in disputes over water. Consequently, it is critical that we protect the Army’s water rights and its ability to carry out its missions.

This regulation prescribes policies and procedures for the supply of munitions in Joint operations.

The Army and the Marine Corps will use this pamphlet in conjunction with AR 385–63 and MCO 3570.1C to establish and maintain a comprehensive range safety program.

The PBL is synonymous with performance based product support.  The Army preference is that all performance based product support leverage existing organic product support capabilities, to the maximum extent possible, while other non-organic alternatives are considered.

This publication bridges the gap between individual and collective marksmanship training. It addresses both fire and maneuver with emphasis on LFXs for dismounted infantry. This publication is for use by all leaders of infantry units and should be used in conjunction with ARTEP 7-8-MTP and ARTEP 7-7J-MTP. It provides guidance and examples to help the commander set up his own LFXs based on his unit’s
METL. It complements existing training manuals and assists commanders in planning, executing, and evaluating LFXs. Some duplication occurs among chapters. The intent is to allow junior leaders executing training to read and copy only those chapters pertaining to them.

In accordance with the authority in DoDD 5111.11 and the Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum, this instruction reissues DoDI 2040.02, establishes DoD policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for the international transfer of dual-use and defense-related technology, articles, and services, and directs the use of a DoD automated export license system.

This pamphlet provides discretionary guidance on materiel acquisition management. It is to be used with DoDD 5000.1, DoDI 5000.02, and AR 70–1. It contains information relevant to research, development, and acquisition, and life cycle management of Army materiel to satisfy approved Army requirements. This revision adds clothing and individual equipment information and procedures for Configuration Steering Boards. It replaces type classification and materiel release information and updates acquisition program baseline, terminology, and organizational information.

This regulation defines responsibilities  and prescribes policies of Army Training Support System programs on Army controlled installations to ensure that training support system resources are allocated properly to support the Army’s training strategies.

This directive reissues DoD Directive 3210.6 to update established policy and assigned responsibilities for the DGARS, and provides for DoD Components’ use of the policies and procedures in the regulations published in Chapter I, Subchapter C of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations and Chapter XI of Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations. These references are also known and referred to collectively in this directive as the “DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations. This directive cancels DoD 3210.6-R.

The DoD relies on a defense-in-depth approach for cybersecurity support to operational missions and tasks. The tasks required to protect systems, detect adversarial activity, and respond to threats in an effective manner are executed by organizations across all three tiers of the DoD Computer Network Defense (CND) hierarchy, with Tier 2 and Tier 1 CND Service Providers (CNDSPs) performing the majority of the detect and respond functions. Therefore, the ability to effectively "train as we fight" depends on the active participation of all three tiers during exercises.

In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5134.01 and DoDD 4715.1E, this instruction reissues DoD Instruction 4715.5 to update established policy and assigned responsibilities for managing environmental compliance to protect human health and safety outside the United States on installations under DoD control.

This instruction reissues DoD Instruction 1000.17 in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5105.53.  It also updates established policies, assigned responsibilities, and procedures for detailing DoD personnel (military or civilian) to organizations outside the DoD.

This instruction reissues DoD Instruction 3201.4 to establish policy, assign responsibilities, and prescribe procedures pursuant to DoD Directive 5134.3, DoDI 3201.01, and DoDI 3210.1 for implementation of the ILIR program at the DoD research and development laboratories and centers in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5134.01.

This instruction is composed of several volumes, each containing its own purpose. The purpose of the overall instruction, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5124.02, is to establish and implement policy, establish procedures, provide guidelines and model programs, delegate authority, and assign responsibilities regarding civilian personnel management within the Department of Defense.

This directive reissues DoDD 5030.19, and establishes DoD policy and assigns responsibility under the statutory authorities, Executive orders, and policies relating to Federal Aviation matters.  It also designates the USD(AT&L), on behalf of the Secretary of Defense, to provide policy guidance and oversign of DoD interactions with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on all National Airspace System (NAS) matters.

Effective immediately, when using FAR 52.219-9 (or any of its alternates) or DFARS 252.219-7003 (or its alternate), contracting officers shall use the language in Attachment 1 in
lieu ofF AR 52.219-9(1)(2)(i)(C) and (D); and, shall use the language in Attachment 2 in lieu of the current definition for Summary Subcontract Report (SSR) Coordinator and SSR submission guidance found at DF ARS 252.219-7003 paragraphs (a) and (h).

This manual reissues DoD 3150.08-M in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5134.08. It also implements policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides comprehensive procedures to ensure consistency with the National Response Framework (NRF) and compliance wtih the DoDI 3150.10.

This Instruction reissues DoDI 1327.6 and incorporates and cancels DoDD 1327.5 and USD(P&R) Memorandum "Establishment of Non-Chargable Rest and Recuperation Leave Program and Revision of the Rest and Resuperation Leave Program", in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5124.02, to establish policy and procedures for leave, liberty (pass), and administrative absences that shall: be consistent with uniformity required of the Armed Forces of the United States; provide respite from the work environment in ways that shall contribute to improved performance and increased motivation; and ensure maximum use of earned leave, minimize the loss of leave, and reduce the cost payments for unused accrued leave.

This regulation updates policies for developing and documenting organizational requirements and authorizations, and for establishing certain force development functions in the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G–3/5/7.

This instruction establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures to estimate and compare the full costs of active duty military and DoD civilian manpower and contract support.  It provides a consistent approach for all DoD Components to estimate costs of manpower and provides a list of the potential cost factors assosicated with manpower that should be considered in the decision-making process even when the manpower costs are not the only factor.  This instruction also incorporates and cancels Directive-type Memorandum 09-007. 

This directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 2140.2 in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5118.03 to establish policy, assign responsibilities, and issue guidance for calculating and assessing NC recoupment charges on sales of items developed for or by the DoD to non-U.S. Government (USG) customers, consistent with sections 2761(e)(1)(B), 2761(e)(2), and 2767(b) of Title 22, United States Code (also known as “sections 21(e)(1)(B), 21(e)(2), and 27(b) of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended").

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense by Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), this directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.10 to update the mission, organization and management, responsibilities and functions, relationships, authorities, and administration of DARPA.

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense by Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.) (Reference (a)), this directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 5105.73 (Reference (b)) to update the mission, organization and management, responsibilities and functions, relationships, authorities, and administration of DTIC.

This Directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 3000.3 to update the authority, established policy, and assigned responsibilities for the management of the DoD NLW program.  Also, it continues the designation of the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) as the DoD Executive Agent (EA) for NLW in accordance with DoDD 5101.1.

This memorandum expands the details provided in the November 13, 2012 memorandum to acquisition professionals as DoD continues the efforts to achieve greater efficiency and productivity in defense spending.

This regulation establishes the Army Force Modernization Proponent System.  It establishes the policy, responsibilities, relationships, and procedures necessary to execute the Army Force Modernization Proponent System.

This regulation concerns contracts and purchases made using simplified acquisition procedures executed and administered in a secure environment. It also establishes policies, procedures, documentation, reporting requirements, and oversight responsibilities for such contracts.

This Directive reissues DoDD 5101.2 to update policy, functions, and responsibilities, relationships, and authorities for the DoD EA for Space and the Defense Space Council (DSC). It continues the designation of the Secretary of the Air Force as the DoD EA for Space, in accordance with DoDD 5101.1. It designates the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) as the OSD focal point for space programs, and assigns the USD(AT&L) as the OSD Principal Staff Assistant (PSA) to oversee the activities of teh DoD EA for Space.

Establishes policies and assigns responsibilities to provide linkages between the management, production, and application of DoD IMD under the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USD(I)), in accordance with DoD Directive (DoDD) 5143.01, and accommodation of IMD in the DoD acquisition processes under the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)), in accordance with DoDD 5134.01.

This directive establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for DoD contingency basing outside the United States.

In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.01, this Instruction reissues DoD Instruction (DoDI) 4165.56 to update established policy, assigned responsibilities, and prescribed procedures for the management and accountability of relocatable buildings in use by the DoD.

In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5124.01, this Instruction reissues DoD Instruction 1342.15 to establish policies, assign responsibilities, and prescribe procedures regarding School Advisory Committees (SACs), Installation Advisory Committees (IACs), Component Command Advisory Councils (CCACs), Theater Education Councils (TECs), and the Dependents Education Council (DEC) for the overseas school system operated by the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) in accordance with Chapter 25A of title 20, United States Code (U.S.C.) and DoD Directive 1342.20.

This Directive establishes DoD policy and assigns responsibilities for the development and use of autonomous and semi-autonomous functions in weapon systems, including manned and unmanned platforms.  Also establishes guidelines designed to minimize the probability and consequences of failures in autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems that coul lead to unintended engagements.

The USD(AT&L) is responsible to provide principal oversight for the establishment of standards for testing, safety and reliability, hardward and software V&V, anti-tamper mechanisms, and information assurance.  Is respoinsible to provide principal oversight for the establishment of science and technology and research and development priorities; to oversee adequated development testing to assess the risk of failures that could lead to unintended engagements; and in coordination with USD(P) and CJCS, to review and consider for approval weapon system submitted.

Better Buying Power (BBP) is the implementation of best practices to strengthen the Defense Department’s buying power, improve industry productivity, and provide an affordable, value-added military capability to the Warfighter. Launched in 2010, BBP encompasses a set of fundamental acquisition principles to achieve greater efficiencies through affordability, cost control, elimination of unproductive processes and bureaucracy, and promotion of competition. BBP initiatives also incentivize productivity and innovation in industry and Government, and improve tradecraft in the acquisition of services.

Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities to minimize the risk that DoD’s warfighting mission capability will be impaired due to vulnerabilities in system design or sabotage or subversion of a system’s mission critical functions or critical components, as defined in this Instruction, by foreign intelligence, terrorists, or other hostile elements.  Also implements the DoD’s TSN strategy, described in the Report on Trusted Defense Systems as the Strategy for Systems Assurance and Trustworthiness, through Program Protection and information assurance (IA) implementation to provide uncompromised weapons and information systems.

This Instruction reissues DoDI 4151.22 to update policy in accordance with DoDD 5134.01 to update policy for CBM+ as an essential readiness enabler and primary strategy for achieving cost-effective weaponsystem life cycle sustainment.  It also updates established policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for the Military Departments and Defense Agencies for implementstion of CBM+ pursuant to DoDD 4151.18 and DoDI 5000.02.

Assigns responsibilities for item unique identification planning and implementation.  Also provides policy to institutionalize the use of item unique identification throughout the life cycle for items subject to item unique identification criteria.

Provides specific time requirements for notification of testing, submission of transportability reports, and approvals.  Updates and defines the roles and responsibilities of the materiel developers, the capability developers, testers, and the Military Surface Transportability Program.

To facilitate collaboration within the acquisition workforce and with customer organizations, the Department organizes its send for services and supplies & equipment using taxonomy that maps Product Service Codes, as set forth in the Federal Procurement Data System Product and Service Codes Manual.

This Instruction reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 5230.24 as a DoD Instruction (DoDI) in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5134.01 and pursuant to section 133 of title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.) to establish DoD policies, assign responsibilities, and prescribe procedures for marking and managing technical documents, including research, development, engineering, test, sustainment, and logistics information, to denote the extent to which they are available for secondary distribution, release, and dissemination without additional approvals or authorizations. It establishes a standard framework and markings for managing, sharing, safeguarding, and disseminating technical documents in accordance with policy and law. It facilitates implementation of DoDD 5230.25 by enabling document originators to signify to what extent technical documents must be controlled in accordance with procedures of that Directive.

This Instruction, in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5106.01, establishes policies and assigns responsibilities for receiving, reporting, and investigating contractor disclosures of a violation of Federal criminal law involving fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, or gratuity violations found in title 18, United States Code (U.S.C.) or a violation of the False Claims Act, section 3729 of title 31, U.S.C., in connection with the award, performance, or closeout of any contract or subcontract.

This Instruction establishes policy and assigns responsibilities concerning the integrity of scientific and engineering activities that the DoD conducts, and science and engineering information it uses to support public policy and management decisions in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.01, and the guidance in Presidential Memorandum and Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Memorandum.

This policy implements the US Army RDECOM procedures for SE and Project Management (PM).  The policy outlines the best practices and procedures to be followed in the development and execution of projects and products throughout the Command.

Federal agencies have taken significant additional steps to improve communications between Federal agencies and the vendor community. We want to continue the discussion by addressing in this memorandum the misconceptions that may be held by some in the vendor community.

The updated MAIS Oversight List includes baselined and un-baselined programs that meet these definitions and must report under chapter 144A of title 10, U.S.C. The list is sorted by the lead DoD acquisition component and indicates each program's Acquisition Category, Milestone Decision Authority, Overarching Integrated Product Team, and Joint Capability Area assignments.

Frank Kendall, Acting Undersecretary of Defense (AT&L), discusses his priorities in relation to the recently released defense strategy. At a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Kendall said his highest priority program is the government workforce and having a more capable and qualified acquisition community.

Kendall said, “If we’re going to be successful, we’re going to have to change. We have to change how we think about the money, how we value it, how we spend it and how we do our business. The change has to be real. It can’t be superficial...we’ve got to change what we actually do. It takes a lot of work. It takes tenacity.”

Should-Cost Templates are provided to guide PMs of ACAT I programs to prepare their Should-Cost information for presentation to Milestone Decision Authority at decision meetings and execution reviews (MS B and later). PMs for ACAT II and III programs are also encouraged to use the templates as guidance.

Starting in November 2011, CON 115, Contracting Fundamentals, will replace CON 110, Mission Support Planning, as a core training requirement for PM Level II DAWIA certification. After December 2011, Defense Acquisition University (DAU) will no longer offer CON 110.

This Manual reissues DoD 5000.04-M-1 as DoDM 5000.04-M-1 in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5000.04 and DoDI 5000.02. It serves as the primary requirements document for the development, implementation, and operation of the contractor cost data reporting (CCDR) and software resources data reporting (SRDR) systems, collectively referred to as the CSDR system, and provides guidance and detailed requirements for implementing the mandatory CCDR and SRDR policies established in DoDD 5000.04, DoDI 5000.02, and DoD 5000.2-M. It provides procedures and instructions that DoD stakeholders in the CCDR and SRDR processes must follow to ensure that the data reported through the CSDR system is accurate and consistent and is quickly made available to DoD cost and software estimators.

The need for Better Buying Power, realized through affordable and well-executed programs and improved efficiency in all the we do, is even greater in the budget environment we are now experiencing. My priorities as Acting USD(AT&L) are tightly aligned with the principles Secretary Panetta has expressed - maintain the best military in the world, avoid a hollow force, take a balanced approach to achieving efficiencies, and keep faith with our men and women in uniform - and they are unchanged from those priorities Dr. Carter and I articulated consistently, with one addition brought on by the current budget situation.

This regulation implements requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 as implemented in EO 12196; 29 CFR 1960; DoDI 6055.1; DoDI 6055.04; and DoDI 6055.07. It provides new policy on Army safety management procedures with special emphasis on responsibilities and organizational concepts.

For product development programs, some understandable confusion exists as to how to implement both "should-cost" and "affordability as a requirement," particularly early in a program's life cycle before engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) and production. The two are compatible, but they must be balanced differently across the product life cycle. The emphasis prior to Milestone B should be on defining and achieving affordability targets. Past this point, the emphasis shifts to defining and achieving should-cost estimates. This memorandum offers greater detail on should-cost and affordability.

Under the authority of DoD Directive 5134.01 and DoD Directive 3020.49, and pursuant to section 862 of the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) as amended by section 853 of the 2009 NDAA and section 832 of the 2011 NDAA, this Instruction establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for the regulation of the selection, accountability, training, equipping, and conduct of personnel performing private security functions under a covered contract during contingency operations, humanitarian or peace operations, or other military operations or exercises. It also assigns responsibilities and establishes procedures for incident reporting, use of and accountability for equipment, rules for the use of force, and a process for administrative action or the removal, as appropriate, of PSCs and PSC personnel.

For those programs where the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) is the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA), OIPTs are a wellestablished and integral part of our defense acquisition oversight and milestone decision review process. While OIPTs are not decision-making bodies, they provide a mechanism to coordinate and conduct staff preparation for DAE program decisions and to help execute those decisions. This memorandum is intended to clarify the expectations for OSD OIPT Leaders and the respective OIPTs that they lead.

The Program Management (PM) Functional Integrated Product Team (FIPT) met on September 8, 2010. The Component and 4th Estate Directors, Acquisition Career Management, agreed that several online courses (BCF 102, BCF 103, and LOG 103) be added as requirements for PM Level III certification, and that two courses (ACQ 265 and ACQ 370) be added as PM Level III Core Plus beginning in Fiscal Year 2012. More information can be found in the attached memo.

This Instruction reissues DoDI 5200.1 as a DoD Instruction in accordance with the guidance in DoDI 5025.01 and the authority in DoDD 5143.01, while cancelling DoDD 8520.1.  It updates policy and responsibility for collateral, Special Access Program (SAP), and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI), and controlled unclassified information (CUI) within an overarching DoD Information Security Program under DoDD 5143.01, and Executive Order 13526; parts of 2001 and 2003 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR); section 403-5(a) of title 50, U.S.C.; DoDD 5205.07; and, Presidential Memorandum "Designation and Sharing of Controlled Unclassified Information".  This Instruction also establishes policy and assigns responsibility regarding the protection, use, and dissemination of SCI within the Department of Defense pursuant to DoDD 5143.01 and Section 403-5(a) of title 50, U.S.C. and Executive Order 12333, and finally, authorizes the publication of DoD 5200.1-R and DoD 5105.21-M-1, consistent with DoDI 5052.01. 

This Manual is composed of several volumes, each containing its own purpose. In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.01 (Reference (a)) and DoDD 5134.12 (Reference (b)), this Manual implements the policy in DoD Instruction (DoDI) 4160.28 (Reference (c)), assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for assessing demilitarization (DEMIL) requirements and performing physical DEMIL of DoD personal property.

As noted in the "Better Buying Power" memorandum issued last year, the process for conducting Technology Readiness Assessments (TRAs) has strayed from its original intent and should be reformed. TRAs should focus only on technology maturity, as opposed to engineering and integration risk, and the responsibility for ensuring that technology maturity risk is adequately identified and mitigated should rest with the Program Manager (PM), Program Executive Officer, and Component Acquisition Executive, subject to ASD(R&E) review. New instructions for conducting TRAs are contained in updated "TRA Guidance" (http://www.acq.osd.mil/ddre/publications/docs/TRA2011.pdf).

This memorandum provides amplifying guidance to the contracting community regarding the November 24, 2010, DPAP memorandum "Improving Competition in Defense Procurement."  It clarifies that the November 24, 2010, guidance is applicable only to competitive procurements above the simplified acquisition threshold and specifically identifies its applicability to commercial items. Further details are provided within the memorandum.

This Instruction establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for the DoD DEMIL program in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5134.01 for mandatory DEMIL training, oversight of DEMIL functions, DEMIL code assignment accuracy, and DEMIL life cycle planning in accordance with section 1051 of Public Law 105-261.

Designates the Commander, USAMC as the Army's LMI with the mission to synchronize the distribution and redistribution of Army materiael in accordance with DoD and Army directives and priorities.

This regulation prescribes responsibilities and policy for the development of warfighting concepts, the determination of capability requirements, integration of capabilities, and implementation of capabilities innovation throughout the Army.  This regulation also prescribes the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) responsibilities and policy for the implementation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), and how TRADOC’s capability development efforts integrate with the Defense Acquisition System.

This Directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 5100.1. It establishes the functions of the Department of Defense and its major Components, supporting the core mission areas of the Armed Forces, which are broad DoD military operations and activities required to achieve the strategic objectives of the National Security Strategy, National Defense Strategy, and National Military Strategy, in accordance with title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.).

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense by sections 113 and 138a of Title 10, United States Code, this Directive sets forth the responsibilities and functions, relationships, and authorities of the ASD(L&MR).

Identifies the roles and responsibilities of all parties to the acquisition process.  Also describes the pre-award activities and documents support services contract acquisitions from advance planning and service contract approval to contract formulation.  Sets forth oversight and surveillance guidelines for the successful administration of contracts.

This training circular (TC) provides information about Army ranges. With Army regulation (AR) 350-19, this circular
provides guidance for developing and operating Army ranges. It is a working guide for Installation Range Managers, Master
Gunners, training managers, range and mobilization planners, engineers, coordinators, and mandated range project review
boards at all levels of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve. It is the primary guide for the installation
range development plan (RDP) and for developing the Army Master Range Plan (AMRP).

This memorandum outlines the general procedures and schedule for this year's integrated Program/Budget Review. The Guidance for the Development of the Force (GDF) and the Joint Programming Guidance (JPG) will be combined into the Defense Planning and Programming Guidance (DPPG). The Department will develop only single year budgets each year. The annual Program/Budget Reviews will focus on a 5-year period each cycle, with a single year extention to promote greater stability from budget to budget. The Department will conduct a number of Front End Assessments (FEAs) to address major issues identified by the Secretary.

To comply with the requirements of section 8101 of the DoD Appropriations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111-118), please issue direction to all organizations within your Military Department or Defense Agency that may obligate or transfer for obligation Basic Research appropriations.

Section 813 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2007 required the Department to establish a Panel on Contracting Integrity (Panel) to identify contracting vulnerabilities that may lead to fraud, waste, and abuse in the defense contracting system. The Panel identified surveillance of services acquisitions as an area of vulnerability.

Effective immediately, contracting officers shall use the attached deviation from Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 45.104, Responsibility and liability for Government property.

a. Establishes policy for identifying the composition of the MRTFB in accordance with the authority in DoD Directive 5134.01 (Reference (a)).
b. Implements policy and assigns responsibilities for the management and operation of the MRTFB in accordance with Reference (a), DoD Directive 5105.71 (Reference (b)), and DoD Directive 3200.11 (Reference (c)).
c. Establishes procedures for changing the composition of the MRTFB and incorporates and cancels the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) Memorandum (Reference (d)).
d. Establishes uniform procedures for the management of the MRTFB.
e. Establishes MRTFB reporting requirements.

Describes the Army’s revised process for determining warfighting materiel and nonmateriel capabilities and assigns roles and responsibilities (chaps 1 and 2).
Assigns responsibilities for the combat development portion of the materiel acquisition management process (chap 2).
o Mandates the use of the formats and procedures prescribed by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3170.01F, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual 3170.01C, as well as subsequent versions of these publications, in preparation of materiel and nonmateriel capabilities documents (chaps 3,
4, and 5).
Updates policies for preparing, coordinating, and obtaining validation and approval of capabilities documents and conducting supporting analyses (chaps 3, 4, and 5).

In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5144.1 (Reference (a)) and the guidance in DoD Instruction 5025.01 (Reference (b)), establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for the use of commercial WLAN devices, systems, and technologies to achieve and increase joint interoperability, appropriately protect DoD information, and enhance overall security to sufficiently protect DoD information by embracing open standards for WLAN devices, systems, and technologies.

To effectively achieve its missions, the Department of Defense must develop and update its software-based capabilities faster than ever, to anticipate new threats and respond to continuously changing requirements. The use of Open Source Software (OSS) can provide advantages in this regard. This memorandum provides clarifying guidance on the use of OSS and supersedes the previous DoD CIO memorandum dated
May 28,2003 (reference (a)).

Although the GAO reported our award fee policy is consistent with the Office of Management and Budget's award fee guidance, they found cases where our policy is not being applied. Accordingly, I want to emphasize the importance of consistently adhering to current guidance for all affected award fee contracts.

a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 5134.9 (Reference (d)) to reflect establishment of the Missile Defense Executive Board (MDEB) and the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) Life Cycle Management Process consistent with Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandums (References (e) and (f)).
b. Supersedes and cancels USD(AT&L) Memorandum (Reference (g)). The MDEB structure replaces the previous OSD review, guidance, and approval processes including the Missile Defense Support Group.

This publication prescribes the procedures and requirements applicable to shippers, committee
members and Transportation Service Providers (TSP) providing commercial transportation and
related services to the Department of Defense (DOD) and other authorized users of the Defense
Transportation System (DTS).
Astray freight shipments are costly to both the US Government and the Transportation Service
Provider industry. The following guideline outlines procedures for resolving astray freight
issues under the GOCARE program for all shippers and provides TSPs with a point of contact,
i.e., SDDC G9 GOCARE or local GOCARE Committee Members (CM).

This instruction reissues DoDD 2010.6 as a DoDI in accordance with the authority in DoDD 5234.01 to establish policies and procedures for materiel interoperability and standardization with allies and coalition partners pursuant to section 2457 of title 10 of U.S.C.  In accordance with DoDD 5000.01 and DoDI 5000.02, this instruction provides DoD procedures and responsibilities for materiel interoperability and standardization with allies and coalition partners, and describes the role of Reciprocal Defense Procurement Memorandums of Understanding (RDP MOUs) in promoting interoperability.

This directive establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for program management for the preparation and execution of acquisitions for contingency operations, in accordance with section 854 of Public Law 109-364 and section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008.

Recent changes to statutory requirements and regulatory requirements in the recent update to DoD Instruction 5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, make it necessary to strengthen and improve transparency in cost estimation review procedures. As a result, beginning now a signed and documented Component-level cost position will be required for all Milestone (MS) A, B, C, and Full-Rate Production Decisions for all Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs).

A memorandum outlining review criteria for the acquisition of services. These reviews seek to ensure that the requirements are clear and well defined, the acquisition approach and business strategy are appropriate and that there are mechanisms in place to provide for proper oversight of contractor performance.

This Instruction reissues DoDD 4650.1 as a DoDI in accordance with the guidance in DoDI 5025.01 and the authority in DoDD 5144.1. It also establishes policy, assigns responsibility, and provides instructions for management, and use of the electromagnetic spectrum, and implements section 305 of chapter 8 of title 47, United States Code; Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-11, Part 2, Sec. 33.4; and the Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Radio Frequency Management. 

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense under section 113 of Title 10, U.S.C., and the delegation of authority under Deputy Secretary of Defense memorandum "Delegations of Authority", this Directive reissues DoDD 5111.3 to update the responsibilities, functions, relationships, and authorities of the PDUSD(P), as prescribed herein.

This Instruction reissues DoDI 5160.68 under the authority of DoDD 5134.01. It implements DoDD 5160.65 by specifying the functional responsibilities and mission functions to be performed by the Secretary of the Army or designee as SMCA and by the Military Service and USSOCOM customer on conventional ammunition management actions. The SMCA, Military Service, and USSOCOM customers shall jointly develop and distribute joint conventional ammunition policies and procedures (JCAPPS) through the Joint Ordance Commanders Group. 

In accordance with the authority in DoDD 5111.1 and the guidelines and responsibilities as assigned in DoDD 3020.40 and DoDI 3020.45, this Manual provides uniform procedures for the execution of DCIP activities. This volume provides comprehensive procedures for implementation of a defense critical infrastructure (DCI) identification process across all the DoD Components and defense infrastructure sectors using a mission-focused process that includes all DoD functions as described in DoDD 5100.1. All DCI assets will be designated as task critical assets (TCAs), with a subset of this list being designated as defense critical assets (DCAs). This volume also incorporates and cancels the Criticality Process Guidance Document.

The "Panel on Contracting Integrity" is a Department-wide cross section of senior leaders with a mission to eliminate areas of vulnerabilities within the defense contracting system where fraud, waste, and abuse occur. The Panel identified two areas of vulnerability in Interagency acquisition - pre- and post-award oversight processes and the consideration of feeds during the selection of interagency contracts.

This memorandum reiterates the importance of properly protecting controlled unclassified  information (CUI) placed on information systems connected to the internet, especially those that use file transfer protocol (FTP), peer-to-peer (P2P), and other protocols that are inherently insecure and posesignificant security risks.

This Instruction consolidates and reissues DoDD 5120.39 and DoDD 5120.42, as an Instruction according to the guidance in DoDI 5025.01 and the authority in DoDD 5124.02 to: update and restate established uniform policies and practices pursuant to chapter 53, subchapter 4 of title 5, U.S.C.; and incorporate changes to the established policies, practices, and schedules for DoD appropriated and nonappropriated civilian employees. It designates the DoD Wage Committee as a DoD Federal Advisory Committee consistent with DoDI 5105.04. This Instruction establishes the Wage and Salary Division located in the Defense Human Resources Activity (DHRA), Civilian Personnel Management Service (CPMS), as the DoD Wage Fixing Authority technical staff to advise the DoD Wage Fixing Authority and DoD Wage Committee.  Lastly, it defines the authorities of the Nonappropriated Fund (NAF) Personnel Policy Division, located in the DHRA, CPMA, to advise on NAF personnel policy and compensation. 

Implementing life cycle management is a top priority for the Department of Defense. To achieve that objective, DoD must seamlessly integrate its acquisition and life cycle sustainment policies. To that end, this memorandum establishes a strategy and provides direction to achieve the following: reinforce the implementation of mandatory life cycle sustainment metrics; align resources to achieve readiness levels; track performance throughout the life cycle; implement performance-based life cycle product support strategies.

In accordance with the authority in Section 113 of title 10, U.S.C., this Directive incoporates and cancels Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum, "DoD-Wide Continuous Process Improvement (CPI)/Lean Six Sigma (LSS)". This directive also establishes policy and assigns responsibilities to institutionalize CPI/LSS as one of the primary approaches to assessing and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of DoD processes in support of te Department's national defense mission.

This memorandum directs the immediate implementation of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) memorandum, July 19, 2007, subject as above, Enclosure 1, on Army Acquisition Category (ACAT) I and II programs.

This standard was developed to document uniform test methods for the evaluation of materials used in military packaging applications. Reference to the test methods included herein ensures standardization of testing procedures and also eliminates unnecessary repetition of detailed test instructions within each individual packaging material specification.

Purpose. Phytosanitary requirements (i.e., measures to maintain plant health, including the protection of natural flora and plant products through direct and indirect damage by
pests) for wood packaging materials (WPM) have been imposed by the United Nations (UN) guidelines protecting forests worldwide against pest infestation. The Department of
Defense (DoD) and its components engaged in packaging of materiel for transnational shipments shall comply with the procedures in International Standards for Phytosanitary
Measures Publication No. 15 (ISPM 15) and DoD Manual 4140.01-M-1, Compliance for Defense Packaging: Phytosanitary Requirements for WPM, dated, September 7, 2007. The goal of Phytosanitary processing is to eliminate the migration of pest infestation worldwide via WPM products.

This Directive reissues DoDD 5100.87 to update the mission, organization and management, responsibilities and functions, relationships, and authorities of the DoDHRA, under the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)), in accordance with DoDD 5124.02. It establishes the Defense Language Office (DLO), the Sexual Assult Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO), and the Defense Travel Management Office (DTMO) within the DoDHRA.

This regulation and DA Pam 70-3 implement the Army's acquisition policy for programs in acquisition categories (ACATs) I through III. This regulation assigns responsibilities to Army organizations in accordance with DoDD 5000.01 and DoDI 5000.02. The Army will apply the direction contained in DoDD 5000.01 and DoDI 5000.02 to all acquisition programs while streamlining and tailoring the procedures within statutory and program requirements. This regulation also specifies Army's acquisition workforce management responsibilities and defines clothing and individual equipment (CIE) acquisition responsibilities.

This Directive reissues DoDD 3200.11 to updated a realign the policy and responsibilities for the MRTFB. It reassigns responsibilities relating to the MRTFB from the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) consistent with Section 196 of title 10, U.S.C. and DoDD 5105.71. To the extent DoDD 5141.2 is inconsistent with the assignments made by this Directive, it is superseded by this Directive.
1.3- Authorizes issuance of DoD Instructions to promulgate policies herein, and continues to authorize publication of DoD 3200.11-D in accordance with DoDI 5025.01.

This regulation implements Federal, State, and local environmental laws and DoD policies for preserving, protecting, conserving, and restoring the quality of the environment. This regulation should be used in conjunction with 32 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 651, which provides Army policy on National Environmental Policy Act requirements and supplemental program guidance, which the proponent of this regulation may issue as needed to assure that programs remain current.

This Directive reissues DoD Directive 5500.7 to update policy and responsibilities for the DoD ethics program, and continues to authorize DoD 5500.7-R and part 3601 of Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, parts 733, 2634-2638, 2640-2641, and 3601 and Chapter XVI, Subchapter B. It implements Chapter XVI, Subchapter B, and part 733 of Title 5, C.F.R., Executive Order 12674; Public Law 95-521; sections 3326 and 3374 of title 5, United States Code (U.S.C.); sections 801-940 (commonly known and hereafter referred to as the “Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)”) and section 1060 of title 10, U.S.C.; sections 202, 203, 205, 207-209, and 219 of title 18, U.S.C.; section 1353 of title 31, U.S.C.; section 908 of title 37, U.S.C.; section 423 of title 41, U.S.C.; part 3.104-6 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation; and chapter 304 of title 41, Code of Federal Regulations.

This Instruction reissues DoDD 4640.6 as a DoD Instrction, under a new number and title, in accordance with the guidance in Acting Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum, "DoD Directives Review - Phase II" and the authority in DoDD 5144.1. It implements National Telecommunications and Information System Security Directive No. 600, "Communications Security (COMSEC) Monitoring" by establishing DoD policies and responsibilities for conducting COMSEC monitoring of DoD telecommunications systems.

This Directive reissues DoDD 4400.1 to delegate authority and to update policy and responsibilities regarding use of the authorities of Appendix 2061 of Title 50 Appendix, United States Code, Appendix 468 of Title 50, United States Code, and Section 2538 of Title 10, United States Code. This Directive continues to authorize DoD 4400.1-M and other DoD Manuals to implement this Directive, and designates the Secretary of the Air Force as the DoD Executive Agent for the Defense Production Act Title III Program.

This regulation sets forth policies and responsibilities for Army input to and use of the Hazardous Materials Information Resource System (HMIRS). It applies to all hazardous materials (HAZMAT) managed, procured, used, or manufactured by the Department of the Army (DA).

Reissues DoDD 5000.39 to implement M&S management which shall develop plans, programs, procedures, issuances, and pursue common and cross-cutting M&S tools, data, and services to achieve DoD’s goals

This regulation prescribes the policies, responsibilities, processes and/or procedures for airworthiness qualification and system specification compliance of manned and unmanned aircraft systems and subsystems, including the installation of allied equipment and modifications to Army aircraft. Army aircraft as used herein includes all aviation materiel and aircraft that are Army assigned, bailed, borrowed, loaned, leased, owned, or otherwise authorized for operation by Army personnel, or after modification under an Army contract.

Updates the principles and concepts within Army Quality Program Management and defines the core competencies fundamental to an effective quality program.

As he IUID capability continues to mature across the Department of Defense, it is important for each of us to keep strategic objectives in focus--facilitating materiel readiness and progressing toward an unqualified audit opinion.

This Directive authorizes the ASD(LA), as a Principal Staff Assistant (PSA) reporting directly to the Secretary of Defense, to promulgate DoD policy in DoD Instructions within the responsibilities, functions, and authorities assigned herein. It also provides guidance for centralized direction, integration, and control of DoD legislative affairs and liaison activities with the U.S. Congress.

This regulation implements the policies and procedures of Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 5000.1, DoDD 3200.11, and DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5000.2, and the Defense Acquisition Guidebook and specifically prescribes implementing policies and assigns responsibilities for test and evaluation (T&E) activities during the systems acquisition processes. It applies to all systems (materiel and command, control, communications, and computers (C4), intelligence (I), and information technology (IT) (C4I/IT) developed, evolved, acquired, and managed under the auspices of Army Regulation (AR) 70-1 and the Defense Acquisition Guidebook. This regulation applies to Army participation in joint test and evaluation (JT&E) and multi-service operational test and evaluation (MOT&E). It also provides guidance and establishes procedures governing the Test Schedule and Review Committee TSARC), a continuing intradepartmental Army committee.

The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) issued a memorandum requiring Army Program Executive Officers (PEOs) to improve processes for EVM, IMS, and IBR within their offices. The memo establishes that: "Effective immediately, each PEO is directed to establish common processes to provide for accurate EVM and IMS implementation and maintenance.

1.1. Reissues reference (a) as a DoD Instruction according to the guidance in reference (b).
1.2. Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for the management of DoD research and development (R&D) laboratories.

Under the authority of DoDD 5134.1 and in conformance with DoDD 5124.2, this Instruction establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for a coordinated DoD noise program. It also provides for establishment of a DoD Noise Working Group (DNWG).

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense by Sections 113 and 133a of Title 10 USC, this Directive reissues DoD Directive 5134.13 to update the responsibilities, functions, relationships, and authorities of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology (DUSD(A&T)), under the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)), consistent with DoD Directive 5134.1.

1.1. Reissues reference (a) as a DoD Instruction to comply with reference (b); and
1.2. Implements the scientific research policy in reference (c) and guiding principles in
reference (d) for the government-university research partnership.

This regulation assigns responsibilities and provides policy and guidance for managing and operating U.S. Army ranges and training lands to support their long-term viability and utility to meet the National defense mission; planning, programming, funding, and executing the core programs comprising the Army's Sustainable Range Program, the Range and Training Land Program, and Integrated Training Area Management Program; integrating program functions to support sustainable ranges; assessing range sustainability; managing the automated and manual systems that support sustainable ranges. 

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense under reference (a), this Directive establishes the Defense Technology Security Administration (DTSA) and defines its mission, responsibilities and functions, relationships, and authorities, as prescribed herein.

This Policy Letter establishes the government-wide framework for creating a federal acquisition workforce with the skills necessary to deliver best value supplies and services, find the best business solutions, and provide strategic business advice to accomplish agency missions

Authorizes the following: Defense Environmental Security Council (DESC); the Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Policy Board (ESOHPB); and the DESC CommitteeStructure. Armed Forces Pest Management Board (AFPMB), consisting of the AFPMB Council and Committee structure, the Directorate, and the Defense Pest Management Information Analysis Center (DPMIAC).

This Directive reissues DoDD 1100.4, replaces DoDD 1100.9 and 1100.18, and implements Sections 126a, 129, 153, 801-946, 1580, 1586, and 2434 of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.). It authorizes the update of DoDD 5100.73 to provide further guidance for the implementation of this Directive.

This Directive reissues DoDD 5000.52, implements Chapter 87 of Title 10, United States Code, and updates policies and responsibilities for an education, training, and career development program for the DoD Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (AT&L) Workforce. It establishes a single Acquisition Corps throughout the Department of Defense, and cancels DoD Instruction 5000.58 and DoD 5000.58-R and DoD 5000.58-G; Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology Memorandum; Principle Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology Memorandum; and Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) Memorandum.

This document delineates the strategic construct for innovative sustainment, bounded by applicable policy and standards, to ensure a consistent support structure for the warfighter.  It consolidates into a single document recommended approaches to sustainment with associated policy and standards for key support areas.

This Directive:
1.1. Reissues reference (a) to update the policy and responsibilities for electromagnetic spectrum management and use by the Department of Defense.
1.2. Implements the provisions of references (b), (c), and (d) within the Department of Defense.

Attachment establishes DoD Policies and assigns responsibilities for managing information technology (IT) investments as portfolios.  Decisions on what IT investments to make, modify or terminate shall be based on architectures, risk tolerance levels, potential returns, outcome goals and performance.

This regulation implements Section 3701 et seq., Title 15 United States Code (15 USC 3701); Executive Order (E.O.) 12591; Department of Defense Directive 5535.3; and Department of Defense Instruction 5535.8 and prescribes policies and responsibilities for domestic technology transfer within the Department of the Army (DA).

The purpose of this pamplet is to integrate operations and contracting for support of operations. For purposes of this pamphlet, "operations" includes the full spectrum of armed conflict and military operations other than war (MOOTW), both domestic and overseas, as directed by appropriate authority.

This Directive reissues DoD Directive 1400.31 to update and establish DoD policies, and assigns responsibilities for implementing this Directive under the statutory authority for emergency planning and preparedness, and management functions of the DoD civilian work force.

This Directive reissues DoD Directive 2010.9 and implements Subchapter I, Chapter 138, Sections 2341-2350 of Title 10, United States Code by updating policy for the acquisition from and transfer to authorized foreign governments of logistics support, supplies, and services.

This memorandum provides guidance for existing and future acquisition programs to implement the plans for Global Information Grid Enterprise Services (GIG ES).

Two memorandums concerning the "Designing and Assessing Supportability in DoD Weapon Systems: A Guide to Increased Reliability and Reduced Logistics Footprint."

This Joint Operating Procedure,
which implements the policies of
Department of Defense Directive 4120.11
and the Project Charter for Mobile Electric
Power, has been revised extensively
to clarify directions for the management
of Mobile Electric Power  Generating
Sources (MEPGS). Major changes are the
consolidation of AR 700 - 72 and AFR
400-49.

This regulation/order prescribes Headquarters (HQ), Department of the Army (DA), and U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) range safety policies and responsibilities for firing ammunition, lasers, guided missiles, and rockets and provides guidance for the application of risk management in range operations.  For Army and Marine Corps users, DA Pamphlet (Pam) 385–63 prescribes range safety standards and procedures to be used in conjunction with this regulation/order. When standards in DA Pam 385–63 conflict with those of other military services, Federal agencies, or host nations, the standards providing the higher degree of protection apply.

This regulation establishes the policies, responsibilities, and procedures for the proper management of damaged equipment containing depleted uranium or radioactive commodities and any equipment contaminated by depleted uranium or radioactive commodities. In addition, provide commanders guidance on how these procedures may be modified consistent with operational risk and risk management principles per FM 101-5.

The Clinger-Cohen Act (CCA) of 1996 required the Department to appoint a DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO) and CIO for each Military Department. The CIO's primary responsibility is to oversee investments in information technology (IT) (including National Security Systems (NSSs)) to ensure that the Department's IT systems are interoperable, secure, properly justified and contribute to mission goals.

1.1. Implement the responsibilities of the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)), for entering into RDT&E
exchanges with allied and friendly nations, as assigned in subparagraphs 3.2.10. and
3.2.16. of reference (b).
1.2. Update procedures and responsibilities for carrying out RDT&E information
exchanges with allied and friendly nations to facilitate international cooperative research
and development projects and research conducted under reference (c).

Given the recent terrorist attacks against the United States, a compelling need has emerged to expedite the deployment of new or planned increments of functionality provided by Information Technology (including national security systems) that will enable improvements to mission capabilities required to support Operation Enduring Freedom.

1.1. Implements policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures under reference (a) to establish a means of measuring and improving the responsiveness of
the DoD logistics system to customer requirements.
1.2. Implements reference (b) for the purpose of establishing a DoD-wide performance for customer wait time.
1.3. Implements reference (c) for the purpose of establishing a DoD-wide approach to the development of a standard of performance for the DoD logistics system
to respond to customer requirements for materiel.