Most files are in portable document format (PDF), which requires the use of a pdf reader.
RECENT
- Arris Group Inc. v. C-Cation Technologies LLC, Paper 10, No. IPR2015-00635 (1 May 2015)
- AOL Inc v. Coho Licensing, Paper 12, No. IPR2014-00771 (24 March 2015)
- Conopco Inc v. Procter and Gamble Co., Paper 25, No. IPR2014-00506 (10 December 2014)
- TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Electronics, Inc., Paper 18, No. IPR2014-00293 (27 June 2014)
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. C-Cation Techs., LLC, Paper 12, No. IPR2014-00454 (29 August 2014)
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc., Paper 8, No. IPR2014-00487 (11 September 2014)
- Unified Patents, Inc. v. PersonalWeb Techs., LLC, Paper 13, No. IPR2014-00702 (24 July 2014)
- Prism Pharma Co., Ltd. v. Choongwae Pharma Corp., Paper 14, No. IPR2014-00315 (8 July 2014)
- Unilever, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co., Paper 17, No. IPR2014-00506 (7 July 2014)
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc., Paper 17, No. IPR2014-00436 (19 June 2014)
- Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Limited, Paper 19, No. IPR2013-00324 (21 November 2013)
- ZTE Corp. v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc., Paper 12, No. IPR2013-00454 (25 September 2013)
- Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd., Paper 55, No. IPR 2012-00022 (7 August 2013)
- Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd., Paper 67, No. IPR 2012-00022 (29 August 2013)
- Int'l Flavors & Fragrances Inc. v. The United States of America, Paper 12, No. IPR2013-00124 (20 May 2014)
- Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., Paper 26, No. IPR2012-00027 (11 June 2013)
- Garmin Int'l Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs LLC, Paper 26, No. IPR2012-00001 (5 March 2013)
- Panduit Corp. v. ADC Telecomms, No. 2011-003296 (24 February 2012)
- Dung v. Buehler, No. 105,893 (23 July 2013) (Paper 121)
- Ex parte Bayer Cropscience, LP, No. 2011-005039 (16 May 2011)
- Ex parte Bayer Cropscience, LP, No. 2011-005039 (29 February 2012)
- Ex parte Talkowski, No. 2012-002290 (24 May 2013)
- Thomas v. Pippin, No. 105,801 (24 April 2013) (Paper 99)
- Thomas v. Pippin, No. 105,801 (6 March 2013) (Paper 97)
-
Motorola Mobility LLC v. Patent of Michael Arnouse, Paper 20 No. IPR2013-00010 (30 January 2013)
- Ex parte Cadarso, No. 2010-008797 (3 April 2013, original) (26 April 2013, corrected)
- Ex parte Smith, No. 2012-007631 (14 March 2013)
- Ex parte Erol, No. 2011-001143 (13 March 2013)
- Ex parte Lakkala, No. 2011-001526 (13 March 2013)
- Ex parte Vegas Amusement, Inc., No. 2012-001010 (9 December 2011)
- Ex parte Smith, No. 2011-003337 (28 February 2012)
- Ex Parte Boer, No. 2009-010590 (21 May 2012)
- Ex Parte Antor Media Corp., No. 2010-007531 (21 October 2012)
- Ex Parte Antor Media Corp., No. 2010-007531 (23 March 2011)
- Ex Parte Jerg, No. 2011-000044 (17 April 2012)
- Motorola Mobility LLC v. Patent of Michael Arnouse, Paper 6 No. IPR2013-00010 (15 October 2012)
- Odman v. Kent, No. 105,748 (28 March 2011) (Paper 34)
- Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. v. Patent of Dexcom, Inc., No. 2011-003298 (3 May 2011)
- Ex Parte Smart, No. 2009-015036 (03 January 2011)
- Belkin International, Inc v. Optimumpath, LLC., No. 2011-003697 (30 March 2011)
- Ex Parte Fletcher, No. 2009-007416 (26 January 2010)
- California Institute of Technology v. Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. No. 105,496 (29 October 2010) (Paper 126)
- Ex Parte Givens, No. 2009-003414 (6 August 2009)
- Ex Parte Baxter International, Inc., No. 2009-006493 (18 March 2010)
- Ex Parte Borden, No. 2008-004312 (7 January 2010)
- Ex Parte Belinne, No. 2009-004693 (10 August 2009)
- Ex Parte Moon, No. 2008-005829 (22 July 2009)
- Ex Parte Maeda, No. 2008-006267 (22 July 2009)
- Ex Parte Frenk, No. 2009-005654 (19 June 2009)
- Ex Parte Toth, No. 2009-009323 (15 June 2009)
- Ex Parte Toth, No. 2008-004543 (15 June 2009)
- Amegen, Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc., No. 105,613 (5 June 2009) (Paper 79)
- Ex Parte Daniels, No. 2008-0568 (20 May 2009)
- Ex Parte Janakiraman, No. 2008-0998 (6 May 2009)
- Rodriguez Rilo v Benedict, No. 105,684 (RT) (23 March 2009) (Paper 17)
- Ex Parte Sami Chemicals and Extracts, LTD., No. 2007-3482 (2 February 2009)
- Barany v. McGall, No. 105,351 (6 February 2009) (Paper 59)
- Ex Parte Chuang, No. 2008-5143 (13 November 2008)
A-C
A
- Ex Parte Adams., No. 2007-0441 (14 March 2007)
- Anderson v. Dionex Corp., No. 104,446 (18 October 2000)
- Anderson v. Eppstein, No. 103,708 (11 May 2001) (Paper 361)
- Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd., Paper 55, No. IPR 2012-00022 (7 August 2013)
- Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Ltd., Paper 67, No. IPR 2012-00022 (29 August 2013)
- Ex Parte Ashkenazi., No. 2005-2208 (20 October 2005)
- Ashurst v. Brugger, No. 105-482 (25 April 2007) (Paper 44)
B
- Bamberger v. Cheruvu, No. 103, 844 (2000) (Paper 409)
- Bamberger v. Cheruvu, No. 103,844 (2000) (Paper 405)
- Ex Parte Batteux, No. 2007-0622 (27 March 2007)
- Ex Parte Beineke, No. 2007-4215 (31 July 2008)
- Ex Parte Beineke, No. 2007-3882 (30 July 2008)
- Ex Parte Bilski, No. 2002-2257 (26 September 2006)
- Ex Parte Bobrowski, No. 2008-0580 (31 March 2008)
- Ex Parte Bradshaw, No. 2006-2744 (19 July 2007)
- Bronshtein v. Roser, No. 104, 727 (2001) (Paper 55)
- Bronshtein v. Roser, No. 104, 727 (2001) (Paper 54)
- Bronshtein v. Roser, No. 104, 727 (2001) (Paper 29)
- Bronshtein v. Roser, No. 104, 727 (2001) (Paper 27)
C
- R.C. v. T.I., No. 104,EEE (1999)
- Cabilly v. Boss, No. 102,572 (2001)
- Ex Parte Casey, No. 2007-4317 (28 February 2008)
- Charlton v. Rosenstein, No. 104,148 (9 June 2000)
- Correa v. Roberts, No. 105,019 (30 September 2003) (Paper 72)
- Cromlish v. D.Y., No. 104,289 (9 January 2001)
- Ex Parte Curry, No. 2005-0509 (30 June 2005)
D-F
D
- Dadgar v. Gill, No. 104,249 (1999)
- Ex Parte Dart, No. 2007-1325 (22 August 2007)
- Davis v. Hendron, No. 104,044 (1999)
- DeBoer v. Gordon, No. 105,004 (2003) (Paper 18)
- Dionne v. Liotta, No. 104,333 (2001)
E
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Cameron, No. 104,104 (2001)
- Ellsworth v. Moore, No. 104,528 (2001)
F
- Furman v. Cheng, No. 104,523 (2001)
G-I
G
- Genise v. Desautels, No. 104,835 (22 May 2003) (Paper 71)
- Genise v. Desautels, No. 104,834 (12 May 2003) (Paper 66)
- Giatras v. Fukuda, No. 103, 618 (1999)
- Gibson v. Sturman, No. 105,016 (2002) (Papers 42 & 43)
- Glaxco Wellcome, Inc. v. Cabilly, No. 104,532 (30 April 2001)
- Glaxco Wellcome, Inc. v. Cabilly, No. 104,532 (28 November 2000) (precedential)
- Ex Parte Gleave, No. 2005-2447 (31 January 2006)
- Gray v. Heeres, No. 104,079 (1999)
- Gregory v. Tsui, No. 104,228 (4 January 2002) (Paper 100), aff'd mem., No. 02-1345 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
- Griggs v. Rose, No. 103,729 (1999)
- Guthrie v. Espiau, No. 105,393 (18 April 2007) (Paper 94)
H
- Han v. Livak, No. 104,670 (2002) (Paper 68)
- Ex Parte Hansen, No. 2007-3424 (13 May 2008)
- Herman v. Barnes, No. 104,812 (10 April 2003)
- Ex Parte Hicks, No. 2007-2715 (13 November 2007)
- Hillman v. Shyamala, No. 104,436 (28 November 2000)
- Housey v. Berman, No. 104,347 (29 January 2001)
I
- Intellectual Concepts, LLC v. Zannier, Inc., No. 105,617 (19 September 2008) (Paper 66)
J-L
J
- Johnston v. Beachy, No. 104,DDD (1999)
- Johnston v. Beachy, No. 104,286 (30 July 2001)
- Ex Parte Jud, No. 2006-1061 (30 January 2007)
K
- Karim v. Jobson, No. 105,376 (28 February 2007) (Paper 99)
- Kaufman v. Talieh, No. 105,233 (19 November 2004) (Paper 23)
- Khavari v. D.T., No. 104,696 (2001)
- Ex Parte Kim, No. 2007-3980 (29 May 2008)
- Kopf-Sill v. Yager, No. 104,718 (2002) (Paper 81)
- Ex Parte Kraus, No. 2005-0841 Supplement (21 September 2006) (Paper 52)
- Ex Parte Kraus, No. 2005-0841 (7 April 2005) (Paper 50)
- Kundu v. Ragunathan, No. 104,843 (18 October 2002) (Paper 51)
L
- Lalonde v. Li, No. 105,607 (JL) (19 March 2008) (Paper 23)
- Ex Parte Langemyr, No. 2008-1495 (28 May 2008)
- Ex Parte Lazzara, No. 2007-0192 (13 November 2007)
- Ex Parte Lazzara, No. 2007-0192 (30 May 2007)
- Lee v. McIntyre, No. 104,461 (21 April 2000)
- Ex Parte Liebermann, No. 2007-0012 (17 May 2007)
- LeVeen v. Edwards, No. 104,290 (2002) (Paper 351)
- LeVeen v. Edwards, No. 104,290 (2002) (Paper 348)
- LeVeen v. Edwards, No. 104,290 (11 December 2000) (Paper 240)
- LeVeen v. Edwards, No. 104,290 (11 December 2000) (Paper 241)
M-O
M
- B.M. v. H.G., No. 104,CCC (1999)
- Ex Parte Mathias, No. 2005-1851 (10 August 2005)
- Matsushima v. H.A., No. 104,354 (25 May 200)
- Ex Parte McBrearty, No. 2007-1340 (27 July 2007)
- Ex Parte McCann, No. 2008-0785 (29 May 2008)
- Ex Parte May, No. 2006-1776 (30 April 2007)
N
- G.N. v. S.W., No. 104,VVV (7 October 2000)
- Nagaraj v. Rickerby, No. 104,817 (2002) (Paper 51)
- Nau v. Ohuchida, No. 104,258 (1999) (Paper 62)
- Nau v. Ohuchida, No. 104,258 (1999) (Paper 57)
- Nevel v. Hoeller, No. 104,025 (10 May 2000)
- Noelle v. Armitage, No. 104,724 (15 May 2003) (Papers 89 & 92)
- Noelle v. Armitage, No. 104,724 (2002) (Paper 33)
- Noelle v. Lederman, No. 104,415 (2001)
O
- Ondeyka v. Shelley, No. 104,709 (2001)
P-R
P
- Perego v. Drehmel, No. 105,467 (9 March 2007) (Paper 63)
- Ex Parte POD-NERS, L.L.C., No. 2007-3938 (29 April 2008)
- Ex Parte Porro, No. 2008-0184 (11 March 2008)
- Preputnick v. Provencher, No. 104,693 (2002) (Paper 60)
Q
R
- Rabbani v. Notomi, No. 105,427 (25 January 2008) (Paper 145)
- Ex Parte Righi, No. 2007-0590 (25 July 2007)
- Rohr v. McNulty, No. 104,804 (2003) (Paper 39)
- Rohrman v. Alt, No. 104,626 (2001)
- Rose v. Frazer, No. 104,773 (2002) (Paper 73)
- Rose v. Frazer, No. 104,773 (2001) (Paper 23)
- Rowells v. Vichinsky, No. 105,518 (6 March 2007) (Paper 19)
- Ryan v. Young, No. 105,504 (4 March 2008) (Paper 116)
S-U
S
- A.S. v. B.R., No. 104, AAA (1998)
- Sanada v. Reynolds, No. 105,029 19 March 2003 (Paper 21)
- Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg., No. 104,311 (2002) (Paper 293)
- Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg., No. 104,311 (2002) (Paper 292)
- Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg., No. 104,311 (25 May 2001) (Paper 165)
- Sauer, Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg., No. 104,311 (9 January 2001) (Paper 147)
- Schaenzer v. Knight, No. 105,058 (29 October 2003) (Paper 41)
- Ex Parte Scholl, No. 2007-3653 (13 March 2008)
- Scott v. Gbur, No. 104,763 (2002) (Paper 31)
- Sever v. Glickman, No. 104, 722 (2001)
- Ex Parte Shaw, No. 1997-3258 Supplement (19 December 2005) (Paper 109)
- Ex Parte Shaw, No. 1997-3258 (21 May 2004) (Paper 94)
- Ex Parte Shealy, No. 2006-1601 (23 April 2007)
- Shiokawa v. Maienfisch, No. 104,525 (20 September 2000)
- Singh v. Brake, No. 102,728 (1998)
- Singer v. Rehfuss, No. 103,711 (2000)
- Spalding v. Hartsell, No. 104,699 (2002) (Paper 92)
- Ex Parte Srinivasan, No. 2007-0512 (01 May 2007)
- Stiller v. Heid, No. 105,044 (16 September 2003) (Paper 38)
- Strelchenko v. Campbell, No. 104,809 (2002) (Paper 26)
- Strelchenko v. University of Massachusetts, No. 104,808 (18 March 2003) (Paper 88)
- Sullivan v. Bingel, No. 104,818 (2003) (Paper 73)
T
- Therriault v. Garbe, No. 104,263 (18 January 2000)
- Tropix, Inc. v. Lumigen, Inc. No. 104,459 (18 October 2000)
- Tseng v. Doroodian-Shoja, No. 104,482 (2001) (Paper 85 & 91)
- Ex Parte Tullis, No. 2006-0210 (17 May 2006)
U
- University of New Mexico v. Fordham University, No. 104,761 (2002) (Paper 47)
- University of New Mexico v. Fordham University, No. 104,761 (2001) (Paper 21)
- University of Washington v. Eli Lilly & Co., No. 104,733 (2002) (Paper 45)
V-Z
V
W
- F.M.W. v. D.A.T., No. 104,BBB (1998)
- Wang v. Kovesdi, No. 104,825 (2003) (Paper 75)
- Ex Parte Wasynczuk, No. 2008-1496 (2 June 2008)
- Waterman v. Birbaum, No. 104,500 (18 October 2000)
- Ex Parte Wellerdieck, No. 2007-1119 (04 May 2007)
- Wertz v. Rose, No. 104,421 (28 March 2003) (Paper 39)
- Winter v. Fujita, No. 104,283 (19 April 2000)
- Wojciak v. Nishiyama, No. 104,539 (2001) (Paper 72)
- Wojciak v. Nishiyama, No. 104,539 (2001) (Paper 54)
- Wolf v. Tomalia, No. 104,274 (1999)
- Ex Parte Wright, No. 2006-0003 (06 April 2006)
X
- XX v. YY, No. 1xx,xxx (2000)
Y
- Yurek v. Yamada, No. 104,627 (2001)
Z
- Zhou v. Keagy, No. 104,649 (2002) (Paper 53) aff'd mem, No. 02-1528 (Fed. Cir. 2003)