Post Implementation Review

• The Sponsor/Domain Owner is responsible for articulating outcome-based performance measures in the form of measures of effectiveness.
• The Sponsor/Domain Owner is responsible for planning the PIR, gathering data, analyzing the data, and assessing the results. 
• The program manager is responsible for maintaining an integrated program schedule that facilitates the PIR on behalf of the Sponsor/Domain Owner. 
• The program manager is responsible for translating Sponsor/Domain Owner planning into specific PIR implementation events.  

Implementation Guidance:  The Sponsor/Domain Owner initially articulates high-level, outcome-based performance measures in the form of measures of effectiveness in the Initial Capabilities Document or Business Plan. Development of the Capability Development Document, Capability Production Document, contract, and build specifications follows, each providing increasingly detailed performance outcomes. During integration and test, procedures called out in the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) should verify compliance with the build specification. The Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) and associated test products describe verification of compliance with the contract specification during developmental test and evaluation (DT&E) and verification of compliance with the Capability Production Document during operational test and evaluation (OT&E). Finally, the PIR benefits analysis evaluates system compliance with the original MOEs documented in the Initial Capabilities Document.

PIR Verification of the ICD

• Navy Enterprise Maintenance Automated Information System (NEMAIS) PIR Summary
• GTN 21 Draft Performance Measurement Plan
• GTN 21 Draft PIR Plan
• NCES Draft Performance Measurement Plan

PIR Guidance from Allied Nations

• New South Wales Government CIO PIR Guidance