Home

News, announcements, training, search functions, Ask-a-Professor, and similar services with direct links supporting DoD acquisition.

Acquisition Process

Three processes cooperate to deliver capabilities needed by warfighters: the requirements process (JCIDS); the acquisition process (DAS); and the program and budget development process (PPBE). Includes links to DoD and Service policies, guidance, tools, and resources:

Policy

Encyclopedic source of acquisition policy that follows a hierarchy of policy issuance (i.e., executive, legislative, federal, etc.) and filtered according to organization, career field, and special topics.

Communities
of Practice

Links to communities of practice and special interest areas, the latest contribution and discussion posts for open ACC communities, community highlights, and links to related communities.

Training and
Continuous Learning

Information on training and continuous learning that supports DoD acquisition, information that helps manage professional training portfolios, and information on training available from DAU and DoD and Services activities.

Industry

Information on DoD industry partners that helps the participation and execution of DoD processes; including industry support pages, news, information, and links to private sector acquisition contractors.

Applications

AT&L Knowledge Management Systems (AKMS) applications.

 
 

Functional Gateways

Sixteen functional knowledge gateways, one for each of the defense acquisition career fields.

Special Topics

Links to gateways about important topics outside the general portals and beyond the standard career fields:


         Fred Schlich

Professor Fred Schlich
Overhead Management of
Defense Contracts


RSS Feed RSS Feed

Archives

October 2015 (3)
November 2015 (3)
December 2015 (3)
January 2016 (1)
May 2016 (1)
June 2016 (1)
January 2017 (2)

Tag Cloud

Audit, Better Buying Power, Cost Analysis, Cost Control, Cost Effectiveness, Cost Efficiencies, Defective Pricing, Defense Contracts, DFARS Deviation, Indirect Costs, Indirect Rates, IR&D, Overhead, Reduce Costs, Should Cost,

Bloggers Only

Login

   Home Skip Navigation LinksCommunities of Practice > Indirect Costs


IR&D DFARS Class Deviation Effects Cost Allowability 

Tags: Indirect Rates, Indirect Costs, Defense Contracts, IR&D, DFARS Deviation

For those of you who have responsibility for oversight of contractor Independent Research and Development (IR&D) costs and rates, make sure you understand DFARS Deviation 2017-O0002 Enhancing the Effectiveness of IR&D (01 December 2016). This changes an important detail in a relatively new requirement that must be met for IR&D costs to be allowable.

As background, determination of cost allowability in Federal contracts falls within agency purview and is regulated by the FAR.   FAR Part 31 Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, applies whenever a contracting officer performs cost analysis or a contract clause governs the allowance of cost (e.g., FAR 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment (Jun 2013) clause).

The Department of Defense has special requirements for IR&D costs to be allowable. DFARS 231.205-18 Independent Research and Development and Bid and Proposal Costs, in subsection (c)(iii)(C)(4) states “For IR&D projects initiated in the contractor’s fiscal year 2017 and later, as a prerequisite for the subsequent determination of allowability, the contractor shall—(i) Engage in a technical interchange with a technical or operational DoD Government employee before IR&D costs are generated…” [Emphasis added]. DFARS Deviation 2017-O0002 replacing “before IR&D costs are generated” with “sometime during the contractor’s fiscal year 2017.” While effective, this deviation offers contractors opportunity to initiate IR&D projects while they are phasing in new processes and procedures. This supports Departments goals of encouraging contractor research and development in areas of importance to DoD.

On Jan 4, 2017 the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Testing, and Logistics, Mr. Frank Kendall issued a implementation memorandum in which he stressed that the new IR&D rule merely codifies long-standing practices and there is no added Government approval expected or required. The memo in full text can be referenced at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/Implementation_of_DFARS_Final_Rule_2016-D002,_Enhancing_the_Effectiveness_of_Independent_Research_and_Development.pdf

Class Deviation 2017-O0002 Enhancing the Effectiveness of IR&D can be referenced at: http://www.acq.osd.mil./dpap/policy/policyvault/CD_2017_O0002_enhancing_effectiveness_of_IRAD-updated.pdf

If you would like in-depth understanding of how to determine the allowability of independent research & development costs and subsequent effects on allocation of these cost, you may want to consider registering for CON 232 Overhead Management of Defense Contracts.

 

 
Posted by FredSchlich on 9-Jan-17
0 Comments | Bookmark this post with:        
 

Comments

Leave a comment


Comment Topic Name: (*required)
URL Link to Topic Information: (e.g. https://dap.dau.mil)
Your Email: (*required, but not displayed for public access)
Comment Body: (*required)

Enter the code in the box below. (*required)