820K88120        DRAFT
                                                               August,  1987
                                    DISULFOTON

                                 Health Advisory
                             Office of Drinking Water
                       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
I.  INTRODUCTION

        The Health Advisory  (HA) Program, sponsored by the Office of  Drinking
   Water (ODW), provides information on  the health effects, analytical  method-
   ology and treatment technology that would be useful in dealing with  the
   contamination of drinking water.  Health Advisories describe nonregulatory
   concentrations of drinking water contaminants at which adverse health  effects
   would not be anticipated to occur over specific exposure durations.  Health
   Advisories contain a margin of safety to protect sensitive members of  the
   population.

        Health Advisories serve as informal technical guidance to assist  Federal,
   State and local officials responsible for protecting public health when
   emergency spills or contamination situations occur.  They are not  to be
   construed as legally enforceable Federal standards.  The HAs are subject to
   change as new information becomes available.

        Health Advisories are developed  for one-day, ten-day, longer-term
   (approximately 7 years, or 10% of an  individual's lifetime) and lifetime
   exposures based on data describing noncarcinogenic end points of toxicity.
   Health Advisories do not quantitatively incorporate any potential  carcinogenic
   risk from such exposure.  For those substances that are known or probable
   human carcinogens, according to the Agency  classification scheme (Group A or
   B),  Lifetime HAs are not recommended.  The  chemical concentration  values for
   Group A or B carcinogens are correlated with carcinogenic risk estimates by
   employing a cancer potency (unit risk) value together with assumptions for
   lifetime exposure and the consumption of drinking water.  The cancer unit
   risk is usually derived from the linear multistage model with 95%  upper
   confidence limits.  This provides a low-dose estimate of cancer risk to
   humans that is considered unlikely to pose  a carcinogenic risk in  excess
   of the stated values.  Excess cancer  risk estimates may also be calculated
   using the One-hit, Weibull, Logit or  Probit models.  There is no current
   understanding of the biological mechanisms  involved in cancer to suggest that
   any one of these models is able to predict  risk more accurately than another.
   Because each model is based on differing assumptions, the estimates  that are
   derived can differ by several orders  of magnitude.

-------
    Disulfoton                                                  August,  1987

                                         -2-


II.  GENERAL INFORMATION  AMD  PROPERTIES

    CAS No.  298-04-4

    Structural Formula
                                                     - S-C,H5
               0,0-Diethyl-S-[2-(ethylthio)-ethyl],  phosphorodithioate

    Synonyms


         •  Disulfoton;  Disyston; Disystox; Dithiodemeton; Bayer  19639;  Di-syston;
            Ethyl  thiometon; Frumin AL; M-74  (Meister,  1983).

    Uses

         0  Systemic  insecticide-acaricide  (Meister,  1983).

    Properties  (Meister,  1983; Windholz et al.,  1983)
            Chemical Formula
            Molecular Weight               274.38
            Physical State  (at  25°C)       Pale  yellow liquid
            Boiling Point                  108eC (0.01  mm  Hg);  132  to  133°C (1.5 mm Hg)
            Melting Point
            Density (20«C)                 1.144
            Vapor Pressure  (at  20°C)       1.8 x 10-4  mn Hg
            Water Solubility  (at  23°C)     25 mg/L
            Log Octanol/Water Partition
              Coefficient
            Taste Threshold
            Odor Threshold
            Conversion Factor             ~
    Occurrence
         *  Disulfoton has been  found  in  only 1  of  the surface  water  samples
            and none  of the  ground  water  samples analyzed  from  835  samples
            taken at  764 locations.   (STORET,  1987).

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                     -3-


Environmental Fate

     0  Disulfoton has a low mobility in Hugo sandy loam soil; 28% of the
        pesticide applied to a 6-inch-high soil column was eluted with a
        total of 110 feet of dilute buffer (McCarty and King, 1966).  In
        another study, disulfoton sulfoxide and disulfoton sulfone were more
        mobile in sandy loam, clay loam and silty clay loam soils than the
        parent compound.  Aging 32p-

-------
     Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                          —4—


III. PHARMACOKINETICS

     Absorption

          0  Puhl and Fredrickson (1975)  administered by gavage single oral
             doses of disulfoton-o-ethyl-1-14c (99% purity) to Sprague-Dawley
             rats (12/sex/dose).   Males received 1.2 mg/kg and females received
             0.2 mg/kg.  In the  10 days following dosing, an average of 81.6,
             7.0 and  9.2% of the  dose was recovered in the urine, feces and
             expired  air, respectively.  Males excreted 50% of the administered
             dose in  the urine in the first 4 to 6 hours; females required
             30 to 32 hours.  These data indicate that disulfoton is absorbed
             readily  from the gastrointestinal tract.

     Distribution

          0  In the study by Puhl and Fredrickson (1975), described above,
             4.1 and  16.1% of the administered dose was detected in the livers of
             males and females,  respectively, and 0.4 and 1.2% of the dose was
             detected in the kidneys of males and females, respectively, 48 hours
             postdosing.

     Metabolism

          0  March et al. (1957)  studied the metabolism of disulfoton in vivo and
             in vitro in mice (strain not specified).  In the in vivo portion of
             the study, mice received radiolabeled disulfoton intraperitoneally
             (dose not specified).  Results indicated that unspecified urinary
             metabolites consisted mainly of hydrolysis products.  In vitro
             metabolism data indicated the presence of dithio-systox sulfoxide
             and sulfone, and the thiol analog sulfoxide and sulfone.  The dithio-
             systox sulfoxide was present in the greatest quantity followed by
             thiol analog sulfoxide, dithio-systox sulfone and thiol analog
             sulfone.  Based on  a review of these data (U.S. EPA, 1984a), it was
             concluded that the  metabolism of disulfoton in mice involves at least
             two reactions:  (1)  the sequential oxidation of the thioether sulfur
             and/or oxidative desulfuration; and (2) hydrolytic cleavage of the
             ester, producing phosphoric acid, thiophosphoric acid and dithio-
             phosphoric acid.

          0  In the above study  by Puhl and Fredrickson  (1975), the major urinary
             metabolites detected in both sexes were diethylphosphate (DEP) and
             diethylphosphorothioate (DEPT).  These products were formed from
             hydrolysis of disulfoton and/or its oxidation products.  Minor urinary
             metabolites included the oxygen analog sulfoxide, oxygen analog
             sulfone and disulfoton sulfoxide.
     Excretion
             In the above study by Puhl and Fredrickson (1975), 96 to 99% of the
             administered dose was recovered (81.6% in urine, 7.0% in feces and
             9.2% as expired carbon dioxide during a 10-day postdosing period.
             Excretory pathways were similar for males and females, but the rate
             of excretion was slower for females.

-------
    Disulfoton                                                    August,  1987

                                         -5-


IV.  HEALTH EFFECTS

    Humans

       Short-term Exposure

         0  No  significant  anticholinesterase effects were observed in human
            subjects  (five  test subjects, two controls)  who received disulfoton
            in  doses  of 0.75 mg/day (orally)  for 30 days (Rider et al., 1972).

         0  Quinby  (1977) reported that three carpenters were sprayed accidentally
            with disulfoton while the compound was being applied by airplane to
            a wheat field  adjacent to their work site.  The individuals were
            reexposed as they handled contaminated building materials in the
            days following  spraying.   Exposure levels were not identified.  The
            older  two carpenters experienced  coronary attacks and one had at
            least  two severe cerebral vascular effects subsequent to exposure.
            The author postulated that the effects may have been due to disturbances
            of  clotting mechanisms.

       Long-term Exposure

         0  No  Long-term human studies were identified for disulfoton.

    Animals

       Short-term  Exposure

         0  Reported acute oral LD50 values for adult rats administered disulfoton
            (approximately 94 to 96% purity when identified) ranged from 1.9 to
            2.6 mg/kg for females and 6.2 to 12.5 mg/kg for males  (Crawford  and
            Anderson, 1973b; Bombinski and DuBois, 1957); a value of 5.4 mg/kg was
            reported for weanling male rats (Brodeur and Dubois, 1963).
            In guinea pigs, acute oral LD^g values ranged from 8.9 to 12.7 mg/kg
            (Bombinski and Dubois, 1957; Crawford and Anderson, 1973a).

            Mihail (1978) reported acute oral LD50 values of 7.0 mg/kg and 8.2
            mg/kg in male and female NMRI mice, respectively.

            Hixson (1982) reported that the acute oral LD5Q of disulfoton  (98%
            pure) in white Leghorn hens was 27.5 mg/kg.  Hixson (1983) reported
            the results of an acute delayed neurotoxicity study in which 20 white
            Leghorn hens were administered technical disulfoton (97.8% pure) by
            gavage at a dose level of 30 mg/kg on two occasions, 21 days apart.
            The study also employed live animals for each of the negative controls,
            antidote controls and positive controls.  Disulfoton did not produce
            acute delayed neurotoxicity under the conditions of this study.
            Based on this information, a No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level  (NOAEL)
            of 30 mg/kg (the only dose tested) was identified  in this study.

            Taylor (1965) reported the results of a demyelination study in which
            white Leghorn hens (six/dose) were administered disulfoton in  the diet

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August,  1987

                                     -6-
        for 30 days  at concentrations of 0,  2,  10 or 25 ppm.   Assuming that
        1  ppm in the diet of hens is equivalent to 0.06 mg/kg/day (Lehman,
        1959), these dietary levels correspond  to doses of  about 0,  0.1,  0.6
        and 1.5 mg/kg/day.   The author indicated that no evidence of demyelina-
        tion was observed in any of the tissues examined.   Based on this
        information, a NOAEL of 1.5 mg/kg/day (the highest  dose tested) was
        identified.

   Dermal/Ocular Effects

     0  DuBois (1957) reported that the acute dermal LD5Q of  technical
        disulfoton in male Sprague-Dawley rats was 20 mg/kg.   Mihail (1976)
        reported acute dermal 1.050 values of 15.9 mg/kg and 3.6 mg/kg in male
        and female Wistar rats, respectively.

     0  No information was found in the available literature  on the effects
        of ocular exposure to disulfoton.

   Long-term Exposure

     6  Hayes (1983) presented the results of a 23-month feeding study in
        which CD-1 mice (50/sex/dose) were administered disulfoton (98.2%
        pure) at dietary concentrations of 0, 1, 4 or 16 ppm.  Assuming that
        1  ppm in the diet of mice is equivalent to 0.15 mg/kg/day (Lehman,
        1959), these dietary levels correspond to doses of  about 0, 0.15, 0.6
        and 2.4 mg/kg/day.  No treatment-related effects were observed in
        terms of body weight, food consumption or hematology.  A statistically
        significant increase in mean kidney weight and kidney-to-body weight
        ratio was noted in high-dose females; this increase may have been
        associated with a nonsignificant increase in the incidence of malignant
        lymphomas of kidneys in this group.  Plasma, red blood cell and brain
        cholinesterase (ChE) activity was decreased significantly in both
        sexes at the highest dose tested (16 ppm).  However,  since ChE activity
        was measured only in the control and high-dose groups, a NOAEL for
        this effect could not be determined.

     0  In a study by Hoffman et al.  (1975), beagle dogs (four/sex/dose)  were
        administered disulfoton  (95.7% pure) at dietary concentrations of 0,
        0.5 or 1.0 ppm for  2 years.  Assuming that  1 ppm in the diet of dogs
        is equivalent to 0.025 mg/kg/day (Lehman, 1959), these dietary levels
        correspond to doses of about 0,  0.0125 and  0.025 mg/kg/day.  A fourth
        group of animals received disulfoton in the diet at 2 ppm for 69
        weeks, then  5 ppm for weeks  70 to 72, and finally  8 ppm from week 73
        until termination (104 weeks); these doses correpond to 0.05, 0.125 and
        0.2 mg/kg/day, respectively.  No treatment-related effects were observed
        in terms of  general appearance,  behavior, ophthalmoscopic examinations,
        food consumption, body weight, organ weight, hematology, clinical
        chemistry or histopathology.  Additionally, no effects on ChE activity
        were observed in animals that received 0.5  or  1.0 ppm  (0.0125 or
        0.025 mg/kg/day).   However, exposure at 2.0 ppm (0.05 mg/kg/day)
        for 69 weeks caused ChE  inhibition in plasma and red blood cells  in
        both sexes.  Maximum inhibition  occurred  at week 40,  when males
        exhibited 50% and 33% inhibition of  Che in  red blood cells and plasma;

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                     -7-
        respectively;  females exhibited 22 and 36% inhibition of ChE in red
        blood cells and plasma,  respectively.  At a dose level of 8 ppm
        (0.2 mg/kg/day), males exhibited 56 to 66% and 63 to 70% inhibition
        of red blood cell and plasma ChE, respectively; females exhibited 46
        to 53% and 54 to 64% inhibition of red blood cell and plasma ChE,
        respectively.   Based on these data, a NOAEL of U0 ppm (0.025 mg/kg/day)
        was identified.

     0  Carpy et al. (1975) presented the results of a 2-year feeding study
        in which Sprague-Dawley rats (60/sex/dose) were administered disulfoton
        (95.7% pure) at dietary concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 ppm.
        Based on data presented by the authors, these dietary levels correspond
        to doses of about 0, 0.02, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg/day for males and 0,
        0.03, 0.04 and 0.1  mg/kg/day for females.  At week 81 of the study,
        the 0.5-ppm dose was increased to 5.0 ppm (0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg/day for
        males and females,  respectively) since no adverse effects were observed
        in the 1.0-ppm dose group.  No treatment-related effects were observed
        in terms of food consumption, body weight, hematology, clinical
        chemistry, urinalysis and histopathology.  A trend was observed at
        all dose levels toward increased absolute and relative spleen, liver,
        kidney and pituitary weights in males and toward decreased weights of
        these organs in females.  In males receiving 5 ppm, the increases
        were statistically significant (p <0.05) for absolute spleen and
        liver weights.  In females receiving 5 ppm, the decrease in absolute
        and relative kidney weights was statistically significant (p <0.05).
        At all levels tested, the brain showed a trend toward decreased
        absolute and relative weights in males and increased weights in
        females.  Additionally,  statistically significant inhibition of
        plasma, red blood cell and brain ChE was observed in both sexes at
        2.0 and 5.0 ppm.  At 1.0 ppm brain ChE in females was inhibited 11%
        (p <0.01).  Based on this information, a Lowest-Observed-Adverse-
        Effect-Level (LOAEL) of 1.0 ppm (0.04 ing/kg/day for females) was
        identified for ChE inhibition.  It was concluded (U.S. EPA, 1984a)
        that a NOAEL for systemic toxicity could not be identified due to the
        inadequacy of histopathology and necropsy data.

     0  Hayes (1985) presented the results of a 2-year feeding study in
        which Fischer 344 rats (60/sex/dose) were administered disulfoton
        (98.1% pure) at dietary concentrations of 0, 0.8, 3.3 or 13 ppm.
        Assuming that 1 ppm in the diet of rats is equivalent to 0.05 mg/kg/day
        (Lehman, 1959), these dietary levels correspond to doses of about
        0, 0.04, 0.17 and 0.65 mg/kg/day.  Mortality was generally low for
        all groups with the exception of increased mortality in high-dose
        females during the last week of the study.  No compound-rela ted
        effects were observed in terms of clinical chemistry, hematology or
        urinalysis.  A dose-related trend in ChE inhibition was observed in
        both sexes at all dose levels.  Statistically significant inhibition
        of plasma, red blood cell and brain ChE occurred in all dose groups
        throughout the study.  Histopathologically, a statistically significant
        increase (p <0.05) in corneal neovascularization was observed in both
        sexes at 13 ppm (0.65 mg/kg/day).  A dose-related increase in the
        incidence of optic nerve degeneration was also observed.  This effect
        was statistically significant (p <0.05) in mid-dose males and in mid-
        and high-dose females.  Additionally, a significantly (p <0.05)

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                     -8-
        higher incidence of cystic degeneration of the Harderian gland was
        observed in females at all doses and in mid-dose males.  A significantly
        (p <0.05) increased incidence of atrophy of the pancreas also was
        observed in high-dose males.   On the basis of ChE inhibition, this
        study identified a LOAEL of 0.8 ppm (0.04 mg/kg/day) (lowest dose
        tested).

   Reproductive Effects

     0  Taylor (1966) conducted a three-generation reproduction study in
        which albino Holtzman rats (20 females and 10 males) were administered
        disulfoton (98.5% pure) at dietary concentrations of 0, 2, 5 or 10 ppnu
        Assuming that 1 ppm in the diet of rats is equivalent to 0.05 mg/kg/day
        (Lehman, 1959), these dietary levels correspond to doses of about
        0, 0.1, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg/day.  At 10 ppm (0.5 mg/kg/day), litter
        size was reduced by 21% in the Pa and 33% in the Fb in both the first
        and third generations.  Also in these generations, a 10 to 25% lower
        pregnancy rate was noted for Fa matings.  Histopathologically, ?3b
        litters at 10 ppm (0.5 mg/kg/day) exhibited cloudy swelling and fatty
        infiltration of the liver (both sexes), mild nephropathy in kidneys
        (females) and juvenile hypoplasia of the testes.  No histopathological
        examinations were conducted on the 2- and 5-ppm dose groups.

        Cholinesterase determinations revealed a 60 to 70% inhibition of red
        blood cell ChE in F^b litters and their parents at 5 and 10 ppm  (0.25
        and 0.5 mg/kg/day).  At 2 ppm (0.1 mg/kg/day), the inhibition was
        insignificant in males and moderate (30 to 40%) in females.  Based on
        these data, a LOAEL of 2 ppm (0.1 mg/kg/day) was identified for ChE
        inhibition.  It was concluded (U.S. EPA, 1984a) that a reproductive
        NOAEL could not be determined due to deficiencies in data reporting
        (e.g., insufficient data on reproductive parameters, no statistical
        analyses, incomplete necropsy report and insufficient histopathology
        data).

   Developmental Effects

     0  Lamb and Hixson (1983) conducted a study in which CD rats (25/dose)
        were administered disulfoton (98.2% pure) by gavage at levels of 0,
        0.1, 0.3 or 1 mg/kg/day on days 6 through 15 of gestation.  Mean
        plasma and red blood cell ChE activities were decreased significantly
        in dams receiving 0.3 and 1 mg/kg/day.  Examination of the fetuses
        after Cesarean section reflected no increases in the incidence of
        soft tissue, external or skeletal abnormalities.  However, at the
        1.0-mg/kg/day dose level, increased incidences of incompletely ossified
        parietal bones and sternebrae were observed.  This is considered a
        fetotoxic effect, since it is indicative of retarded development.
        Based on the information presented in this study, a developmental
        NOAEL of 0.3 mg/kg/day was identified based on fetotoxic effects.  A
        NOAEL of 0.1 mg/kg/day was identified for ChE inhibition in treated dams,

     0  Tesh et al.  (1982) conducted a teratogenicity study in which New
        Zealand White rabbits were administered disulfoton (97.3% pure) at
        initial doses of 0, 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg on days 6 through 18 of

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                     -9-
        gestation.  Due to mortality and signs of toxicity, the high dose was
        reduced to 2.0 mg/kg/day and finally to 1.5 mg/kg/day.  The control
        group consisted of 15 animals,  the low- and mid-dose groups consisted
        of 14 does each and the high-dose group contained 22 animals.  No
        signs of maternal toxicity were observed in the low- or mid-dose
        groups.  In the high-dose group, signs of maternal toxicity included ,
        muscular tremors, unsteadiness  and incoordination, increased respiratory
        rate and increased mortality.  No compound-related effects on maternal
        body weight or fetal survival,  growth and development were observed.
        Based on this information, a NOAEL of 1.0 mg/kg/day was identified for
        maternal toxicity.  The NOAEL for teratogenic and fetotoxic effects was
        1.5 mg/kg/day (the highest dose tested).

   Mutagenicity

     0  Hanna and Dyer (1975) reported  that disulfoton (99.3% pure) was
        mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium strains C 117, G 46, TA 1530 and
        TA 1535, and in Escherichia coli strains WP 2, WP 2uvrA, CM 571,
        CM 611, WP 67 and WP 12.  These tests were performed without metabolic
        activation; however, demeton, the major metabolite of disulfoton,
        was also mutagenic in these microbial tests (U.S. EPA, 1984a).

     0  Simmon (1979) presented the results of an unscheduled DNA synthesis
        assay using human fibroblasts (W 138).  Disulfoton (purity not specified)
        was positive in this assay only in the absence of metabolic activation.

   Carcinogenic!ty

     8  Carpy et al. (1975) presented the results of a 2-year feeding study
        in which Sprague-Dawley rats (60/sex/dose) were administered disulfoton
        (95.7% pure) at dietary concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 ppm.
        Based on data presented by the  authors, these dietary levels correspond
        to doses of about 0, 0.02, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg/day for males and 0,
        0.03, 0.04 and 0.1 mg/kg/day for females.  At week 81 of the study,
        the 0.5-ppm dose was increased  to 5.0 ppm (reported to be equivalent
        to 0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg/day for males and females, respectively) since
        no adverse effects were observed in the 1.0-ppm dose group.  The
        number of tumor-bearing animals at all dose levels was comparable to
        that of controls suggesting that, under the conditions of this study,
        disulfoton is not oncogenic.  However, a review of this study (U.S.
        EPA,  1984a) concluded that due  to numerous deficiencies (e.g., invalid
        high dose, insufficient necropsy data, insufficient histology data),
        the data presented were inadequate for an oncogenic evaluation.

     0  Hayes (1983) presented the results of a 23-month feeding study in
        which CD-1 mice (50/sex/dose) were administered disulfoton (98.2%
        pure) at dietary concentrations of 0,- 1, 4 or 16 ppm.  Assuming that
        1  ppm in the diet of mice is equivalent to 0.15 mg/kg/day (Lehman,
        1959), these dietary levels correspond.to doses of about 0, 0.15, 0.6
        and 2.4 mg/kg/day.  The incidence of specific neoplasms was similar
        among treated and control animals.  There, was an increased incidence
        of malignant lymphoma (the most frequently observed neoplastic lesion)
        in both males and females at 16 ppm (2.4 mg/kg/day) when compared with

-------
   Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                        -10-
           controls, but this change was not statistically significant.  Therefore,
           under the conditions of this study, disulfoton was not oncogenic in
           mice at dietary concentrations up to 16 ppm (2.4 mg/kg/day).

        0  Hayes (1985) presented the results of a 2-year feeding study in
           which Fischer 344 rats (60/sex/dose) were administered disulfoton
           (98.1% pure) at dietary concentrations of 0,  0.8, 3.3 or 13 ppm,
           corresponding doses of about 0,  0.04, 0.17 and 0.65 mg/kg/day (Lehman,
           1959).  The most commonly occurring neoplastic lesions included
           leukemia, adenoma of the adrenal cortex, pheochromocytoma,  fibroadenoma
           of the mammary glands, adenoma and carcinoma  of the pituitary glands,
           interstitial cell adenoma of the testes, and  uterine stromal polyps.
           The incidences of these lesions showed no dose-related trend and were
           not significantly different in treated versus control animals.
           Therefore, under the conditions of this assay, disulfoton was not
           oncogenic in male or female Fischer 344 rats  at dietary concentrations
           up to 13 ppm (0.65 mg/kg/day).


V. QUANTIFICATION OF TOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS

        Health Advisories (HAs) are generally determined for one-day,  ten-day,
   longer-term (approximately 7 years) and lifetime exposures if adequate data
   are available that identify a sensitive noncarcinogenic end point of toxicity.
   The HAs for noncarcinogenic toxicants are derived using the following formula:

                 HA = (NOAEL or LOAEL) x (BW) , 	   /L (	   /L)
                        (UF) x (	 L/day)

   where:

           NOAEL or LOAEL = No- or Lowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level
                            in mg/kg bw/day.

                       BW = assumed body weight of a child (10 kg) or
                            an adult (70 kg).

                       UF = uncertainty factor (10, 100  or 1,000), in
                            accordance with NAS/ODW guidelines.

                ^^_^ L/day = assumed daily water consumption of a child
                            (1 L/day) or an adult (2 L/day).

   One-day Health Advisory

        No suitable information was found in the available literature for  the
   determination of a One-day HA value for disulfoton.  It is, therefore,
   recommended that the Ten-day HA value for a 10-kg child of 0.01 mg/L (10 ug/L),
   calulated below, be used at this time as a conservative estimate of the One-day
   HA value.

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987
Ten-day Health Advisory

     The developmental toxicity study by Lamb and Hixson (1983) has been
selected to serve as the basis for the Ten-day HA value for disulfoton.
In this study, CD rats were administered disulfoton (98.2% pure) by gavage
at doses of 0, 0.1,  0.3 or 1  mg/kg/day on days 6 through 1 5 of gestation.
Mean plasma and red  blood cell ChE activities were decreased significantly
in dams receiving 0.3 and 1 mg/kg/day.  Based on this information, a NOAEL of
0.1 mg/kg/day was identified.  The only other study of comparable duration
was a rabbit teratology study (Tesh et al., 1982).  This study identified
NOAELs of 1.0 mg/kg/day for maternal toxicity and 1.5 mg/kg/day (the highest
dose tested) for developmental toxicity.  The rabbit appeared to be less
sensitive to disulfoton than the rat, therefore the rat study was selected
for this calculation.

     Using a NOAEL of 0.1 mg/kg/day, the Ten-day HA for a 1 0-kg child is
calculated as follows:

          Ten-day HA = (0-1 mg/kq/day) (10 kg) . 0.01 mg/L (10 ug/L)
                           (100) (1 L/day)

where:

        0.1 mg/kg/day « NOAEL, based on the absence of ChE effects in female
                        rats administered disulfoton by gavage on days 6
                        through 1 5 of gestation.

                1 0 kg * assumed body weight of a child.

                  1 00 = uncertainty factor chosen in accordance with NAS/ODW
                        guidelines for use with a NOAEL from an animal study.

              1 L/day = assumed daily water consumption by a child.

Longer-term Health Advisory

     The 2-year dog feeding study by Hoffman et al.  (1975) has been selected
to serve as the basis for  the Longer-term HA values  for disulfoton.  In  this
study, beagle dogs were administered disulfoton (95.7% pure)
at dietary concentrations  of 0, 0.5 or 1.0 ppm (0, 0.0125 and 0.025 mg/kg/day).
A fourth group of dogs received disulfoton at 2.0
ppm  (0.05 mg/kg/day) for 69 weeks, then 5.0 ppm (0.125 mg/kg/day) for weeks
70 to 72, and finally 8.0  ppm (0.2 mg/kg/day) from weeks  73 to  104.  Exposure
to 2.0 ppm  (0.05 mg/kg/day) for 69 weeks caused plasma and red blood cell ChE
inhibition in both sexes.  Brain ChE inhibition was  also  noted at termination
in this group.  Based on this information, a NOAEL of 1.0 ppm  (0.025 mg/kg/day)
was  identified.  No other  suitable studies were available for consideration
for  the Longer-term HA.  Since the effects in the study by Hoffman et al.  (1975)
were observed following 69 weeks of exposure, the study is considered to be
of appropriate duration for derivation of a Longer-term HA.

     Using a NOAEL of 0.025 mg/kg/day, the Longer-term HA for a  1 0-kg child
is calculated as follows:

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August,  1987

                                     -12-
     Longer-term HA - (0.025 mg/kg/day) (10 kg) „ 0.0025 mg/L (3 ug/L)
                           (100) (1 L/day)

where:

        0.025 ing/kg/day = NOAEL, based on the absence of ChE effects in dogs
                          administered disulfoton in the diet; ChE effects
                          were noted at the higher dose during the first 40
                          to 69 weeks of exposure and thereafter.

                  10 kg - assumed body weight of a child.

                    100 « uncertainty factor, chosen in accordance with
                          NAS/ODW guidelines for use with a NOAEL from an
                          animal study.

                1 L/day * assumed daily water consumption of a child.

     Using a NOAEL of 0.025 mg/kg/days, the Longer-term HA for a 70-kg
adult is calculated as follows:

     Longer-term HA = (0-025 mg/kg/day) (70 kg) = 0.0088 mg/L (9 ug/L)
                           (100) (2 L/day)

where:

        0.025 mg/kg/day » NOAEL, based on the absence of ChE effects in dogs
                          administered disulfoton in the diet; ChE effects
                          were noted at the higher dose during the first 40
                          to 69 weeks of exposure and thereafter.

                  70 kg = assumed body weight of an adult.

                    100 = uncertainty factor, chosen in accordance with
                          NAS/ODW guidelines for use with a NOAEL from an
                          animal study.

                2 L/day = assumed daily water consumption of an adult.

Lifetime Health Advisory

     The Lifetime HA represents that portion of  an individual's total exposure
that is attributed to drinking  water and  is considered  protective of noncar-
cinogenic  adverse health effects over  a lifetime exposure.  The Lifetime HA
is  derived in a three-step process.  Step  1 determines  the Reference Dose
(RfD), formerly called the Acceptable  Daily Intake (ADI).  The RfD is an esti-
mate of a  daily exposure to  the human  population that is  likely to be without
appreciable  risk of deleterious effects over a  lifetime,  and  is derived from
the NOAEL  (or LOAEL), identified from  a chronic  (or subchronic) study, divided
by  an  uncertainty factor.  From the RfD, a Drinking Water Equivalent Level
(DWEL) can be determined (Step  2).  A  DWEL is a  medium-specific (i.e., drinking^
water) lifetime exposure level, assuming  100% exposure  from that medium, at
which  adverse, noncarcinogenic  health  effects would not be expected to occur.

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                     -13-
The DWEL is derived from the multiplication of the RfD by the assumed body
weight of an adult and divided by the assumed daily water consumption of an
adult.  The Lifetime HA is determined in Step 3 by factoring in other sources
of exposure, the relative source contribution (RSC).  The RSC from drinking
water is based on actual exposure data or, if data are not available, a
value of 20% is assumed for synthetic organic chemicals and a value of 10%
is assumed for inorganic chemicals.  If the contaminant is classified as a
Group A or B carcinogen, according to the Agency's classification scheme of
carcinogenic potential (U.S. EPA, 1986a), then caution should be exercised in
assessing the risks associated with lifetime exposure to this chemical.

     The studies by Hayes (1985) and Carpy et al. (1975) have been selected
to serve as the bases for the Lifetime HA values for disulfoton.  Each of
these studies identifies a LOAEL of 0.04 mg/kg/day.  In the Hayes (1985)
study, Fischer 344 rats were administered disulfoton (98.1% pure) at dietary
concentrations of 0, 0.8, 3.3 or 13 ppm (0, 0.04, 0.17 and 0.65 mg/kg/day)
for 2 years.  Dose-related, statistically significant inhibition of ChE in
plasma, red blood cell and brain was observed in both sexes at all doses;
also, a dose-related optic nerve degeneration was observed in females.  Based
on this information, a LOAEL of 0.04 mg/kg/day was identified.  In the Carpy
et al.  (1975) 2-year study, Sprague-Dawley rats were administered disulfoton
(95.7% pure) at dietary concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 ppm (0, 0.02,
0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg/day for males and 0, 0.03, 0.04 and 0.1 mg/kg/day for
females).  At week 81 of the study, the 0.5 ppm dose was increased to 5.0 ppm
(equivalent to 0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg/day for males and females, respectively).
Statistically significant inhibition of plasma and red blood cell ChE was
observed in both sexes at 2.0 and 5.0 ppm.  Additionally, at 1 ppm (0.04
mg/kg/day), brain ChE was inhibited significantly (p <0.01) in females.
Since the initial low dose used in the study (0.5 ppm) was raised to 5.0 ppm,
the 1.0-ppm dose is the lowest dose tested and represents the study LOAEL.

     Using a LOAEL of 0.04 mg/kg/day, the Lifetime HA is calculated as follows:

Step 1:  Determination of the Reference Dose (RfD)

                  RfD =  (0.04 mg/kg/day) = 0.00004 mg/kg/day
                            (1,000)

where:

      0.04 mg/kg/day = LOAEL,  based on ChE inhibition anf optic nerve
                       degeneration in rats exposed to disulfoton in the
                       diet for 2 years.

               1,000 = uncertainty factor, chosen in accordance with NAS/ODW
                       guidelines for use with a LOAEL from an animal study.

Step 2:  Determination of the Drinking Water Equivalent Level (DWEL)

         DWEL = (0.00004 mg/kg/day) (70 kg) = Q.0014 mg/L (1 ug/L)
                         (2 L/day)

-------
    Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                         -14-


    where:

            0.00004 mg/kg/day * RfD.

                        70 kg = assumed body weight of an adult.

                      2 L/day - assumed daily water consumption of an adult.

    Step 3:  Determination of the Lifetime Health Advisory (HA)

              Lifetime HA - (0.0014 mg/L)(20%) = 0.0003 mg/L (0.3 ug/L)

    where:

            0.0014 mg/L * DWEL.

                    20% = assumed relative source contribution from water.

    Evaluation of Carcinogenic Potential

         0  Three studies were available on the carcinogenicity of disulfoton.
            The chronic study in rats by Carpy et al. (1975)  was inadequate for
            an oncogenic evaluation.   The remaining two studies presented results
            indicating that disulfoton was not carcinogenic in mice (Hayes, 1983)
            or in rats (Hayes, 1985).

         e  The International Agency  for Research on Cancer has not evaluated the
            carcinogenicity of disulfoton.

         *  Applying the criteria described in EPA's guidelines for assessment of
            carcinogenic risk (U.S. EPA, 1986a), disulfoton may be classified in
            Group E:  no evidence of  carcinogenicity in humans.  This category is
            used for substances that  show no evidence of carcinogenicity in at least
            two adequate animal tests or in both epidemiologic and animal studies.
            However, disulfoton and its metabolites are mutagenic compounds (see
            section on Mutagenicity).

VI. OTHER CRITERIA, GUIDANCE AND STANDARDS

         0  The National Academy of Sciences (NAS,  1977) has calculated an ADI of
            0.0001 mg/kg/day, based on a NOAEL of 0.01 mg/kg/day from a subchronic
            dog feeding study on phorate (a closely related organophosphorus
            insecticide) and an uncertainty factor of 100, with a Suggested-No-
            Adverse-Response-Level (SNARL) of 0.0007 mg/L.

         •  The World Health Organization (WHO, 1976) has identified an ADI of
            0.002 mg/kg/day based on  chronic data from a 2-year chronic feeding
            study in dogs (Hoffman et al., 1975) with a NOAEL of 0.025 mg/kg/day.

         0  U.S. EPA Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) has established residue
            tolerances for disulfoton at 0.1 to 0.75 ppm in or on a variety of
            raw agricultural commodities (U.S. EPA,  1985).  At the present time,
            these tolerances are based on a Provisional ADI (PADI) of 0.00004

-------
      Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                           -15-

              mg/kg/day.  As for the RfD calculation, this PADI is calculated based
              on a LOAEL of 0.8 ppm (0.04 mg/kg/day)  for both ChE inhibition and
              optic nerve degeneration that were identified in the 2-year rat
              feeding study by Hayes (1985) and using a safety factor of 1,000.


 VII. ANALYTICAL METHODS

           0  Analysis of disulfoton is by a gas chromatographic (GC) method appli-
              cable to the determination of certain nitrogen-phosphorus-containing
              pesticides in water samples (U.S. EPA,  1986b).  In this method,
              approximately 1 L of sample is extracted with methylene chloride.
              The extract is concentrated and the compounds are separated using
              capillary column GC.  Measurement is made using a nitrogen-phosphorus
              detector.  The method detection limit has not been determined for
              disulfoton, but it is estimated that the detection limits for
              analytes included in this method are in the range of 0.1 to 2 ug/L.


VIII. TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

           0  No information was found in the available literature regarding treat-
              ment technologies used to remove disulfoton from contaminated water.

-------
    Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                         -16-


IX.  REFERENCES

    Bombinski, T.J.,  and  K.P.  Dubois.*  1957.  Itie acute mammalian toxicity and
         pharmacological  actions  of Di-Syston.   Report No. 1732.  Unpublished
         study received Nov.  20,  1957 under 3125-58;  prepared by Univ. of Chicago,
         Dept. of  Pharmacology,  submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City,
         MO.   CDL:100153-B.   MRID 00069347.

    Brodeur,  J., and  K.P. Dubois.*  1963.  Comparison of acute toxicity of
         anticholinesterase  insecticides to weanling  and adult male rats.  jCn
         Proceedings  of the  Society for Experimental  Biology and Medicine.
         Vol.  114.  New York:   Academic Press,   pp. 509-511.  MRID 05004291.

    Carpy,  S., C.  Klotzsche  and  A. Cerioli.*  1975.  Disulfoton:  2-year feeding
         study in  rats:  AGRO DOK CBK 1854/74.   Report No. 47069.  Unpublished
         study received December 15,  1976 under 3125-58; prepared by Sandoz,
         Ltd., Switzerland,  submitted by Mobay  Chemical Corp., Kansas City, MO.
         CDL:095641-C.   MRID 00069966.

    Chemagro  Corporation.  1969.   Di-Syston soil persistence studies.  Unpublished
         study.

    Crawford,  C.R., and R.H.  Anderson.*  1973a.  The  acute oral toxicity of Di-Syston
         technical  to guinea pigs.  Report No.  39113.  Unpublished study received
         December  15, 1976 under 3125-58; submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp.,
         Kansas City, MO.  CDL:095640-F.  MRID  00071872.

    Crawford,  C.R., and R.H.  Anderson.*  1973b.  The  acute oral toxicity of several
         Di-Syston  metabolites to female and male rats.  Report No. 39687.
         Unpublished  study received December 15, 1976 under 3125-58; submitted by
         Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, MO.  CDL:095640-G.  MRID 00071873.

    Doull,  J.*  1957.  The acute inhalation toxicity  of Di-Syston to rats and
         mice. Report No. 1802.   Unpublished study received November 20, 1957
         under 3125-58; prepared by Univ. of Chicago, Dept. of Pharmacology,
         submitted  by Mobay  Chemical Corp., Kansas City, MO.  CDL:1001 53-D.
         Fiche Master ID 00069349.

    DuBois, K.P.*   1957.   The dermal toxicity of Di-Syston to rats.  Report No.
         2063. Unpublished  study received January 23, 1958 under unknown admin.
         no.;  prepared by Univ.  of Chicago, Dept. of  Pharmacology, submitted by
         Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, MO.  CDL:109216-8.  MRID 00043213.

    DuBois, K.P.,  and F.K. Kinoshita.*  1971.  Effect of repeated inhalation
         exposure  of  female  rats to Di-Syston.   Submitted 30571.  Unpublished
         study received November 30,  1971 under 3125-119; prepared by Univ. of
         Chicago,  Toxicity Laboratory, submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas
         City, MO.  CDL:10059-A.   MRID 00087935.

    Flint,  D.R., D.D. Church,  H.R. Shaw and J.  Armour II.  1970.  Soil runoff,
         leaching  and adsorption, and water stability studies with Di-Syston:
         Report No. 2899.  Unpublished study submitted by Mobay Chemical
         Kansas City, MO.

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987
                                                            «
                                     -17-
Hanna, P.J., and K.F. Dyer.  1975.  Mutagenicity of organophosphorus compounds
     in bacteria and Drosophila.  Mutat. Res.  28:405-420.

Hayes, R.H.*  1983.  Oncogenicity study of disulfoton technical on mice.  An
     unpublished report of study No. 80-271-04 prepared by the Corporate
     Toxicology Department, Mobay Chemical Corp., Stilwell, KS.  Dated Aug. 10,
     1983.  MRID 0000000.

Hayes, R.H.*  1985.  Chronic feeding/oncogenicity study of technical disulfoton
     (Di-Syston) with rats.  Unpublished study no. 82-271-01.  Prepared by
     Mobay Chemical Corp.  Accession No. 258557.

Hixson, E.J.*  1982.  Acute oral toxicity of Di-Syston technical in hens.  An
     unpublished report (No. 341) prepared by the Environmental Health Research
     Institute of Mobay Chemical Corp., Stilwell, KS.  Study No. 82-018-01,
     dated Oct. 25, 1982.  MRID 00000000.

Hixson, E.J.*  1983.  Acute delayed neurotoxicity study on disulfoton.
     Toxicology Report No. 365 (Study No. 82-418-01) prepared by Agricultural
     Chemicals Divison, Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, MO., dated Mar. 7,
     1983.  MRID 00000000.

Hoffman, K., C.H. Weischer, G. Luckhaus et al.*  1975.  S 276 (Disulfoton)
     chronic toxicity study on dogs (two-year feeding experiment).  Report
     No. 5618; Report No. 45287.  Unpublished study received Dec.  15, 1976
     under 3125-58; prepared by A.G. Bayer, W. Germany, submitted  by Mobay
     Chemical Corp., Kansas City, MO.  CDL:095640-N.  MRID 00073348.

Kadoum, A.M., and D.E. Mock.  1978.  Herbicide and insecticide residues in
     tailwater pits:  water and pit bottom soil from irrigated corn and
     sorghum fields.  J. Agric. Food Chem.  26:45-50.

Kawamori, I., T. Saito and K. lyatomi,  1971a.  Fate of organophosphorus
     insecticides in soils.  Part I.  Botyu-Kagaku.  36:7-12.

Kawamori, I., T. Saito and K. lyatomi.  1971b.  Fate of organophosphorus
     insecticides in soils.  Part II.  Botyu-Kagaku.  36:12-17.

Lamb, D.W., and E.J. Hixson.*  1983.  Embryotoxic and teratogenic  effects of
     disulfoton.  Unpublished study no. 81-611-02.  Prepared by Mobay Chemical
     Company.

Lehman, A.J.  1959.  Appraisal of the safety of chemicals in foods, drugs
     and cosmetics.  Assoc. Food Drug Off. U.S.

Lichtenstein, E., K. Schulz, R. Skrentny and Y. Tsukano.  1966.  Toxicity and
     fate of insecticide residues in water:  insecticide residues  in water
     after direct application or by leaching of agricultural soil.  Arch.
     Environ. Health.  12:199-212.

Loeffler, W.W.  1969.  A summary of Dasanit and Di-Syston soil persistence
     data:  Report No. 25122.  Unpublished study submitted by Mobay Chemical
     Corporation, Kansas City, MO.

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987
                                        i          '
                                     -18-
March, R.B., T.R. Fukuto and R.L.  Metcalf.*  1957.  Metabolism of P-32-dithio-
     systox in the white mouse and American cockroach:  Submitter 1830.
     Unpublished study.  MRID 00083215.

McCarty, P.L., and P.H. King.  1966.  The movement of pesticides in soils.
     Pages 156-171, jri Proceedings of the 21st Industrial Waste Conference:
     May 3-5, 1966, Lafayette, IN.  Purdue University Engineering Extension
     Series No. 121.  pp. 156-176.

Meister, R., ed.  1983.  Farm chemicals handbook.  Willoughby, OH:  Meister
     Publishing Company.

Mihail, F.*  1978.  S 276 (Disyston active ingredient) acute toxicity studies.
     Report No. 7602a prepared by  A.G. Bayer, Institut Fur Toxikologie, for
     Mobay Chemical Corp.  June 12, 1978.  MRID 00000000.

Mobay Chemical Corporation.  1964.  Synopsis of analytical and residue infor-
     mation on Di-syston (clover).  Includes method dated Mar. 5, 1964.

Mobay Chemical Corporation.  1972.  Dasanit - Di-syston:  analytical and
     residue information on tobacco.  Includes methods dated Mar. 5, 1964;
     Mar. 28, 1966; Oct. 27, 1967; and others.  Unpublished study, including
     published data.

NAS.  1977.  National Academy of Sciences.  Volume I.  Drinking water and
     health.  Washington, DC:  National Academy Press.

Puhl, R. J., and D.R. Fredrickson.*  1975.  The metabolism and excretion of
     Di-Syston by rats.  Unpublished report submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp.,
     Report No. 44261, prepared by Chemagro Agricultural Division, Mobay
     Chemical Corp.  Dated May 6,  1975.  MRID 00000000.

Qiinby, G.E.  1977.  Poisoning of  construction workers with disulfoton.
     Clin. Toxicol.  10:479.

Rider, J.A., J. I. Swader and E.J. Pulette.  1972.  Anticholinesterase toxicity
     studies with Guthion, Phosdrin, Di-syston and Trithion in human subjects.
     Proc. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol.  31:520.

Simmon, V.F.*  1979.  In vitro microbiological mutagenicity and unscheduled
     DNA synthesis studies of eighteen pesticides.  Report No. EPA-600/1-79-042.
     Unpublished study including submitter summary, received April 3, 1980
     under 279-2712/; prepared by  SRI International, submitted by FMC Corp.,
     Philadelphia, PA.  CDL:099350-A.  MRID 00028625.

STORET.  1987.

Suett, D.L. 1975.  Persistence and degradation of chlorfenvinphos, chlormephos,
     disulfoton, phorate and primiphos-ethyl following spring and late-summer
     soil application.  Unpublished study submitted by ICI Americas, Inc.,
     Wilmington, DE.

-------
Disulfoton                                                   August, 1987

                                     -19-
Taylor, R.E.*  1965.  Letter sent to Chemagro Corporation dated Jan.  5,  1965:
     Report on demyelination studies on hens.  Report No. 15107.  Unpublished
     study received March 24,  1965 under 6F0478;  prepared by Harris Labora-
     tories, Inc., submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, MO.
     CDL.-090534-C.  MRID 00057265.

Taylor, R.E.*  1966.  Letter sent to D. MacDougall dated May 5, 1966:  Di-Syston,
     three generation rat breeding studies:  Submitter 18154.  Unpublished
     study received March 7, 1977 under 3125-252; prepared by Harris  Labora-
     tories, Inc., submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, MO.
     CDL:096021-L.  MRID 00091104.

Tesh, J.M. et al.*  1982.  S 276:  Effects of oral administration upon
     pregnancy in the rabbit.   An unpublished report (Bayer No. R 2351)
     prepared by Life Science Research, Essex, England and submitted  to
     A.G. Bayer, Wuppertal, Germany.  Dated Dec. 22, 1982.  MRID 00000000.

Thornton, J.S., J.B. Hurley, and J.J. Obrist.  1976.  Soil thin-layer mobility
     of twenty-four pesticide chemicals:  Report No. 51016.  Unpublished
     study submitted by Mobay Chemical Corporation, Kansas City, MO.

U.S. EPA.*  1984a.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Disulfoton
     (Di-Syston) Registration Standard.  Washington, DC:  Office of Pesticide
     Programs.

U.S. EPA.  1985.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Code of Federal
     Regulations.  40 CFR 180.183.  July 1, 1985.

U.S. EPA.  1986a.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Guidelines  for
     carcinogen risk assessment.  Fed. Reg.  51(185):33992-34003.  September  24.

U.S. EPA.  1986b.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  U.S. EPA Method  #1  -
     Determination of nitrogen and phosphorus containing pesticides in ground
     water by GC/NPD, January 1986 draft.  Cincinnati, OH:  U.S. EPA's Environ-
     mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory.

WHO.  1976.  World Health Organization.  Pesticide Residues Series No. 5,
     City, Country or State:  World Health Organization,  p. 204.

Windholz, M., S. Budavari, R.F. Blumetti, E.S. Otterbein, eds.  1983.  The
     Merck index — an encyclopedia of chemicals and drugs, 10th ed.
     Rahway, NJ:  Merck and Company, Inc.
•Confidential Business Information submitted to the Office of Pesticide
 Programs

-------