Soundings ArchiveJul-Dec 2016December 12, 2016 November 2, 2016 September 19, 2016 July 15, 2016 Jan-June 2016June 06, 2016 February 04, 2016 Jul-Dec 2015October 29, 2015 August 27, 2015 Jan-Jun 2015June 15, 2015 June 1, 2015 April 20, 2015 March 16, 2015 January 9, 2015 Jul-Dec 2014November 26, 2014 November 13, 2014 September 09, 2014 Jan-Jun 2014June 25, 2014 May 30, 2014 May 9, 2014 March 27, 2014 January 24, 2014 Jul-Dec 2013November 18, 2013 October 16, 2013 September 5, 2013 August 12, 2013 July 22, 2013 Jan-Jun 2013June 14, 2013 May 21, 2013 April 29, 2013 April 4, 2013 March 12, 2013 February 8, 2013 January 24, 2013 January 4, 2013 Jul-Dec 2012December 14, 2012 November 14, 2012 November 7, 2012 October 10, 2012 September 25, 2012 August 31, 2012 August 15, 2012 July 31, 2012 July 10, 2012 Jan-Jun 2012June 18, 2012 June 1, 2012 May 22, 2012 201120102009Fall 2009 Soundings 20082007December 2007 E-Update 1994January 1994 June 1994 1993January 1993 March 1993 July 1993 October 1993 1992February 1992 April 1992 June 1992 August 1992 November 1992 1991January 1991 June 1991 July 1991 September 1991 December 1991 1990April 1990 January 1990 1989June 1989 March 1989 1988November 1988 July 1988
|
SoundingsA fresh take on the region's salty affairs Taking the Estuary's Vital Signs with the Coastal Condition AssessmentBy: Katia Griffin-Jakymec Last summer, APNEP completed an intensive field sampling effort that took APNEP staff and partner volunteers to 33 sites located throughout the Sounds, from the northern reaches of Currituck Sound to the brackish waters of Bogue Sound near Swansboro. Our objective was to measure indicators of water quality, sediment type and benthic macro-invertebrates (those little critters like worms that live in the sediment) within a nine-week field season. With the clock ticking, we had to move quickly. After ordering equipment, completing training, assembling crews, it was time to get our feet wet!
The 33 sample sites APNEP visited span the Sounds. From August to October, the APNEP field team became part of a nationwide estuarine monitoring program that the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) undertakes every five years. Known as the National Coastal Condition Assessment (NCCA), this monitoring effort uses a rigorous, standardized protocol to measure numerous indicators from coast to coast to answer questions such as: what percent of the nation’s coastal waters are in good, fair and poor condition for key indicators of water quality, ecological health and recreation? And, how much do key stressors like nutrients and contaminated sediments make an impact?
Dean Carpenter and Marygrace Knight filter water to collect a sample. Just as we all need to visit a physician to take vital signs such as breathing capacity and blood pressure during our annual exams, we also need to monitor our estuarine waters periodically to determine their condition and how they’re changing. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous are like the diet of the estuary: they form the basis of the food chain as food for microscopic phytoplankton, algae and billowing tendrils of submerged aquatic vegetation, but excessive nutrients can also have negative effects, causing plant life to grow rapidly and choke out sunlight and oxygen. The Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system is at the base of an immense watershed, therefore much of the fertilizer, chemicals and stormwater that ends up on our lawns and streets in Raleigh, Greenville, Washington, Edenton and the towns and farmland in between wash down into the estuary, which is why it’s so important to monitor. Measuring water quality and sediment chemistry is just like taking the vital signs of the estuary.
Peter Rowe and Marygrace Knight collect a sample from the sediment grab, moments after it was lowered into the water to graze the bottom of Pamlico Sound. Earlier in the year APNEP program scientist Dean Carpenter found a window of opportunity to monitor our estuarine system more intensely so USEPA assigned APNEP 33 randomly distributed sites throughout the Sounds, doubling the original 33 USEPA contractors had already begun sampling. You might be thinking, why double the number of monitoring sites? While the National Coastal Condition Assessment baseline effort is designed to provide statistically significant findings about the nation as a whole, or about a multi-state regional subset, it is not designed to address more local scales. After consulting with USEPA statisticians, we learned that to gain statistically significant data about the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system specifically it would be necessary to double the site number. As luck would have it USEPA statisticians already had 33 extra sites set aside in case any of the original sites were too unsafe or unreasonable to sample. This undertaking took us from end to end of the more than 3,000 square miles of open water in the system. In becoming the first National Estuary Partnership to take on this kind of sampling intensification, APNEP staff will evaluate whether such an effort has merits for long-term monitoring.
After samples are collected, they are filtered, labeled and shipped immediately to the lab. There was no such thing as a typical day in the field. This undertaking also brought plenty of surprises, such as caravanning down a flooded Route 12 on the Outer Banks, bracing as storm cells on the horizon moved toward us, negotiating a sample site located in the Ocracoke ferry path and another in Hatteras Inlet brimming with white caps, and planning for a possible Hurricane Joaquin landfall. After hours of sampling we came ashore to immediately filter, label and package the samples for overnight shipment by afternoon’s end, leading to some creative methods of getting a cooler onto a FedEx truck, in one instance chasing the truck onto the runway tarmac. Let’s just say there are some FedEx staff on the coast that might remember us. We thank you, FedEx heroes!
The APNEP research vessel is primed to sample a site in Currituck Sound. Once the samples reached the lab they were analyzed for dissolved nutrients, chlorophyll-a, dissolved oxygen, salinity, pH, algal toxin, microsystin, Enterococcus, organics, metals and benthic macro-invertebrates, just to name a few of the measured indicators. We await the results and look forward to sharing them. The countless hours spent sampling under the beaming sun and in rain showers, of heavy lifting, careful filtering, and FedEx truck-whispering will pay off with a deeper knowledge of the complex systems we call our Sounds.
The sun rises over Pamlico Sound as estuarine life hums beneath the surface. This type of undertaking doesn’t come together overnight, and it would never have been possible without support from our partners and colleagues. Like everything we do at APNEP, our fieldwork was a product of teamwork and collaboration. In addition to the core field team of Dean Carpenter and Marygrace Knight, many colleagues graciously offered their time to join as crewmembers. We want to especially thank (in no particular order) John Finnegan and Judith Radcliffe of the Natural Heritage Program, Nancy Guthrie of the Clean Water Management Trust Fund, Clay Caroon and Caitlin Forster of the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, Rhonda Evans and Simona Platukyte of USEPA Region 4, Peter Rowe, David Carpenter, and fellow APNEP staff Jim Hawhee and Katia Griffin-Jakymec. Another shout-out is due for our valiant and faithful warrior of a watercraft, R/V Stumpy, a.k.a., the Stallion of the Sounds. We could not have accomplished this undertaking without the support of so many partners, so thank you!
The field team stands triumphant after a full day of sampling.
Web Content Display
Want to hear more from APNEP? Sign up for our mailing list or check out the links below: |