NIH-FDA Draft Clinical Trial Protocol Template: Stakeholder Feedback Needed!
In the recently released NIH-Wide Strategic Plan (FY 2016-2020), the agency declared our commitment to “fostering approaches to enhance the speed and efficiency with which [clinical] trials are conducted.” On March 17, we unveiled a piece of that ongoing effort for input from stakeholders: a draft clinical trial protocol template released in today’s Guide to Grants and Contracts.
Developed jointly by NIH and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the protocol template provides a standard format with instructional and sample text that NIH funded investigators can use when preparing protocols for phase 2 or 3 clinical trials that require an Investigational New Drug application (IND) or Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) application.
The agencies’ goal in developing the template is to ensure investigators prepare protocols that are organized consistently and contain all the information necessary to enable efficient and timely review. The draft template is consistent with guidance on protocol development found in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E6 Good Clinical Practice. A copy of the draft template as well as instructions on how to comment can be viewed on the NIH OSP Website.
We encourage stakeholders to submit comments on the utility of the template and the clarity of the accompanying instructional guidance. We would specifically welcome feedback from investigators, investigator-sponsors, institutional review board members, and any other stakeholders who are involved in protocol development and review on the readability and clarity of the instructions contained in the template. Stakeholder feedback will be critical when NIH and FDA consider the next steps in this process.
Add comment
Carrie D. Wolinetz, Ph.D.
Associate Director for Science Policy, NIH
Search Under The Poliscope
Blogroll
Archives
- June 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (2)
- December 2015 (2)
- January 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (2)
- December 2016 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
Comments