1. General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
The OSHA Analytical Laboratory received a set of field samples requesting the analysis of norethindrone and
mestranol. These air samples had been collected on FWS-B filters. This report describes the analytical procedure
developed for the analysis of norethindrone.
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy).
There is limited evidence for the carcinogenicity of norethindrone in animals. (Ref. 5.1)
1.1.3 Potential workplace exposure
No estimate of worker exposure to norethindrone could be found. Norethindrone is not produced in the United
States. (Ref. 5.3)
1.1.4 Physical properties (Ref. 5.1 and 5.2)
Molecular weight: |
298.4 |
Molecular formula: |
C20H26O2 |
CAS #: |
68-22-4 |
Melting point: |
203-204°C |
Solubility: |
Soluble in ethanol, acetone, chloroform, pyridine, and dioxane. |
Synonyms: |
17-hydroxy-19-norpregn-4-en-20-yn-3-one; anhydroxynorprogesterone; 19-norethisterone;
norpregneninolone; Conceplan; Mini-Pe; Noriday; Anovule |
Structure: |
![Norethindrone chemical structure Norethindrone chemical structure](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20120925230240im_/http://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/partial/pv2070/structure.gif) |
Description: |
White crystalline powder with a slightly bitter taste. |
UV scan: |
|
1.2 Limit defining parameters
The detection limit of the analytical procedure is 1.9 ng per injection. This is the amount of analyte which will
give a peak whose height is approximately five times the baseline noise.
2. Sampling procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 Samples are collected by using a personal sampling pump that can be calibrated to within ±5% of the
recommended flow rate with the sampling device in line.
2.1.2 Mine Safety Appliances (MSA) membrane filter type FWS-B (PVC) 5.0 micron 37-mm diameter, or equivalent.
2.1.3 Backup pad, 37-mm diameter, Millipore AP10, MF support pad, or equivalent.
2.1.4 Filter holder, 37-mm polystyrene cassette, Millipore M000037AO, or equivalent.
2.2 Reagents
None
2.3 Sampling technique
2.3.1 Assemble the filter in the two-piece cassette holder and close firmly. The filter is supported by the
backup pad. Secure the cassette holder together with tape.
2.3.2 Attach the outlet of the filter cassette to the personal sampling pump inlet with flexible tubing. Air
being sampled should not pass through any hose or tubing prior to entering the sampler.
2.3.3 Attach the sampler vertically in the employee's breathing zone in such a manner that it does not impede
work performance.
2.3.4 After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the sampling device and reinstall the end-plugs on the
cassettes.
2.3.5 Wrap each sample end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21).
2.3.6 Submit at least one blank for each set of samples. The blank should be handled in the same manner as the
samples, except no air is drawn through it.
2.3.7 Record the air volume (in liters of air) for each sample, and list any possible interferences.
2.3.8 Bulk samples submitted for analysis must be sent in a separate container from air samples.
2.4. Extraction efficiency
Twelve FWS-B filters were each spiked with 15.5 µg of norethindrone along with mestranol. Three of the filters were
extracted in 3 ml of isopropanol by shaking for 30 min. and then analyzed. The results are listed in table 2.4.
2.5 Retention efficiency
To the remaining nine filters from above, 500 L of humid air (80% relative humidity) was drawn through each filter.
Three of the filters were extracted with 3 mL of isopropanol by shaking for 30 min. and then analyzed. The results are
listed in table 2.5.
2.6 Sample storage
The remaining six samples from above were stored. Three of the samples were stored at ambient temperature in a
drawer, and three were stored in a refrigerator. After six days of storage, the samples were extracted with 3 mL of
isopropanol by shaking for 30 min. and then analyzed. The results are given in the tables below. |
Table 2.4
Extraction Efficiency
|
amount
spiked, µg
|
amount found,
µg
|
recovered,
%
|
|
15.5
15.5
15.5
|
15.6
15.1
15.2
|
100.6
97.4
98.1
98.7
|
Table 2.5
Retention Efficiency
|
amount
spiked, µg
|
amount found,
µg |
recovered,
%
|
|
15.5
15.5
15.5
|
15.3
15.4
15.3
|
98.7
99.4
98.7
98.9
|
|
Table 2.6.1
Ambient Storage
|
|
Table 2.6.2
Refrigerated Storage
|
amount
spiked, µg |
amount found,
µg |
recovered,
% |
|
amount
spiked, µg |
amount found,
µg |
recovered,
% |
|
|
|
15.5
15.5
15.5 |
15.1
15.1
15.1
![mean mean](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20120925230240im_/http://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/partial/pv2070/mean.gif) |
97.4
97.4
97.4
97.4 |
|
15.5
15.5
15.5 |
15.1
15.2
15.2
![mean mean](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20120925230240im_/http://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/partial/pv2070/mean.gif) |
97.4
98.1
98.1
97.9 |
2.7 Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1 The recommended air volume is 500 L.
2.7.2 The recommended flow rate is 2.0 L/min.
2.8 Interferences
It is not known if any compounds will interfere with the collection of norethindrone.
2.9 Safety precautions
2.9.1 Attach the sampling equipment in such a manner that it will not interfere with work performance or employee
safety.
2.9.2 Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area being sampled.
3. Analytical procedure
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 A balance capable of weighing to the nearest tenth of a milligram. A Mettler HL52 balance was used in this
evaluation.
3.1.2 Mechanical shaker.
3.1.3 A high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) equipped with an ultraviolet (UV) detector, a manual or an
automatic injector, and a strip chart recorder. A Waters system that included a WISP autosampler, model 6000-A pump,
and a model 440 fixed wavelength detector was used in this evaluation.
3.1.4 HPLC column capable of separating norethindrone from any interferences. A (25 cm × 4.6 mm i.d.) Alltech
C18 (10 micron) column was used in this evaluation.
3.1.5 An electronic integrator, or some other suitable method for measuring detector response. The
Hewlett-Packard 3357 Laboratory Data System was used in this evaluation.
3.1.6 Vials, 4-mL with Teflon-lined septum.
3.1.7 Volumetric flasks and pipets.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 HPLC grade acetonitrile (ACN).
3.2.2 HPLC grade water. A Millipore Milli-Q system was used to prepare the water for this evaluation.
3.2.3 HPLC grade isopropanol.
3.2.4 Norethindrone, Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, MO.
3.3 Standard preparation
Stock standards were prepared by weighing 15 mg of norethindrone, placing in 25-mL volumetric flasks, and diluting
to volume with isopropanol. Dilutions of the stock standards were made by pipet to obtain working range standards.
Stock and dilute standards were stored in a freezer.
3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.1 Transfer the FWS-B filters to separate 4-ml WISP vials.
3.4.2 Pipet 3.0 mL of isopropanol into each vial and seal with a Teflon-lined septum.
3.4.3 Shake the vials for 30 minutes.
3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Instrument conditions
Column: |
Alltech C18 10-Fm, (25 cm × 4.6 mm i.d.) |
Eluent: |
ACN/H2O 70:30 |
Flow rate: |
1 mL/min |
Detector: |
Ultraviolet detector (Waters 440)
Wavelength = 254 nm |
Retention time: |
6.4 min |
Injection volume: |
20 µL/injection |
3.5.2 Chromatogram:
3.6 Interferences
3.6.1 Any collected compound having a similar retention time and absorbs at 254 nm is an interference.
3.6.2 HPLC conditions may be varied to circumvent an interference.
3.6.3 Retention time alone is not proof of chemical identity. Analysis by other means should be sought whenever
possible for confirmation of identity.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 A calibration curve is constructed by plotting detector response versus standard concentration.
3.7.2 The concentration of norethindrone in a sample is determined from the calibration curve.
3.7.3 The air concentration is then determined by the following formula.
mg
m³ |
= |
(µg/mL in sample)(extraction volume in mL)
(air volume in liters)(extraction efficiency) |
3.8 Safety precautions
3.8.1 Avoid skin contact and air exposure to norethindrone.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all solvents.
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses at all times.
4. Recommendations for further study
Glass fiber filters should be tested for extraction efficiency, retention efficiency, and storage stability. Also,
other procedures should be examined to obtain a lower detection limit.
5. References
5.1 IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, Volume 21, International
Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 1979, pp. 441-460.
5.2 Merck Index, Tenth Edition, Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, N.J. 1983.
5.3 IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, Volume 6, International Agency
for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 1974, pp. 179-189.
|