Cameras in Courts
The Judicial Conference cameras in court policy lists the circumstances under which judges may authorize the use of cameras in courtrooms.
The Ninth Circuit Judicial Council, in cooperation with the Judicial Conference, has authorized the three districts in the Ninth Circuit (District Court for the Northern District of California, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court for the Western District of Washington) that participated in the 2011-2015 cameras pilot to continue the pilot program under the same terms and conditions to provide longer term data and information to the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management.
Available Court Videos
View video recordings of the cases from the District Court for the Northern District of California, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court for the Western District of Washington.
Filter by court, subject matter, and procedural posture to find the case you want to view.
Title | Name | Subject Matter | Procedural Posture | Last Updated |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport Authority, Guam et al | District of Guam | Civil Rights | Motion to Certify Class | September 21, 2016 |
F.L.B. et al v. Lynch et al | Western District of Washington | Civil Rights | Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief | July 8, 2016 |
JEFM et al v. Holder et al | Western District of Washington | March 24, 2016 | ||
Twitter, Inc. v. Lynch, et al | Northern District of California | Civil Rights, First Amendment, National Security | Motion to Dismiss | March 14, 2016 |
United States of America v. City of Seattle | Western District of Washington | Civil Rights, Criminal Law Related Civil Cases, Diversity, Search and Seizure | Status Conference | August 26, 2015 |
Aguero and Pangelinan v. Calvo and Garrido | District of Guam | Civil Rights | Motion for Summary Judgment | June 5, 2015 |
Stalwart Capital, LLC v. iCap Pacific Northwest Opportunity and Income Fund, LLC et al | Western District of Washington | Diversity | Motion for Summary Judgment | April 30, 2015 |
Aziz v. Knight Transportation, Inc. | Western District of Washington | Contract | Motion for Summary Judgment | March 18, 2015 |
Perez v. Acme Universal, Inc. et al | District of Guam | Labor and Employment | Motion to Dismiss | March 31, 2014 |
Jewel v. NSA | Northern District of California | Civil Rights, Search and Seizure | Motion for Summary Judgment | March 19, 2014 |
American Freedom Defense Initiative et al v. King County | Western District of Washington | Civil Rights | Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief | January 27, 2014 |
K.M. et al v. Regence Blue Shield et al | Western District of Washington | ERISA | Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, Motion to Certify Class | January 22, 2014 |
Kyko Global, Inc. et al v. Prithvi Information Solutions, Ltd et al | Western District of Washington | Fraud | Motion to Dismiss | January 21, 2014 |
Keller v. City of Auburn, et al | Western District of Washington | August 28, 2013 | ||
Baxter v. MBA Group Insurance Trust, MBA Group Insurance Trust Health and Welfare Plan, and Regence Blueshield. | Western District of Washington | ERISA | Motion for Summary Judgment | June 27, 2013 |
Hightower v. City and County of San Francisco | Northern District of California | Civil Rights | Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief | January 17, 2013 |
United States of America v Guam Waterworks | District of Guam | Environmental/Land Use | Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations | October 7, 2011 |