China

China is a relative newcomer to peacebuilding, but its recent moves to participate in Afghan peace talks, influence and fund progress in Burma’s peace process, invest in Pakistan, and contribute to United Nations peacekeeping missions illustrate a growing role in conflict zones of strategic interest to the United States. China’s increased engagement presents opportunities for reducing violent conflict, but U.S. and Chinese interests and approaches do not always align. Through research, dialogue, and training, the U. S. Institute of Peace provides evidence-based analysis of China’s activities and impact, identifies areas for collaboration where appropriate, and develops strategies for preventing differences from exacerbating instability or undermining broader peacebuilding efforts.

Domestic Dimensions of China's Foreign Policy

Thu, 04/07/2016 - 09:00
Thu, 04/07/2016 - 16:30
Subtitle: 
How Internal Dynamics Shape China's Actions Abroad

No country weighs more heavily on America's economy, cybersecurity and strategic posture in Asia than China. China's foreign policies are being shaped by changes within the country that can be hard to measure and evaluate. USIP and Georgetown University gathered a dozen experts for a daylong assessment of how China's internal economic, political and security pressures are influencing policies critical to the United States and peace and security around the world.

Read the event coverage, Puzzled by China’s Foreign Policy? Look Inside Instead.

China's international behavior and its domestic agenda are closely intertwined  across a wide range of policy issues.  For example, China's energy needs have  driven many of its overseas investments. The government's concerns about the ethnic autonomy  or separatist movements in Tibet and Xinjiang, respectively, shape its strategy toward South Asia and Muslim countries. President Xi Jinping's attempts to consolidate power domestically affect his international priorities and are changing the role of China's army , especially through the anti-corruption campaign.

9:00-9:30 Registration

9:30-9:45 Welcome

Thomas Banchoff, Vice President for Global Engagement, Georgetown University
Ambassador William B. Taylor, Executive Vice President, U.S. Institute of Peace

9:45-11:00 The Domestic Political and Economic Situation
This panel will address how the domestic political and economic situation is shaping Chinese foreign and security policy. As China modernizes, how are the expectations of the people changing and what are the ways this may impact Chinese external behavior? How does the economic slowdown change China’s strategic priorities?  How have recent economic and political developments affected China’s attitudes toward “non-interference” overseas? How does the economic climate shape the relationship between the people and Party? What are the sources of Chinese nationalism and does it constrain or empower China internationally? How are concerns about separatist movements, as well as the new threat of ISIS, shaping China’s strategy toward South Asia and Muslim countries? How do the demands of domestic censorship shape China’s approach to cyber internationally?  

Scott Harold, Full Political Scientist and Associate Director, Center for Asia-Pacific Policy, RAND Corporation
Jessica Chen Weiss, Associate Professor of Government, Cornell University 
Melanie Hart, Director, China Policy, Center for American Progress
Moderator: Jennifer Staats, Director for China Programs, United States Institute of Peace

11:00-11:15 Coffee Break

11:15-12:30 Contentious Elite Politics
This panel will address the leadership characteristics of Xi Jinping, the degree of factionalism at the highest levels of the Party, and the causes and effects of the anti-corruption campaign. How do elite politics shape Xi’s approach to foreign and security policy? Are certain groups empowered at the expense of others? What are the broader repercussions of his anti-corruption campaign? Are there any important trends in the Party’s relationship with the state that have implications for China’s role on the world stage? Are there voices at the top that want to see China play a more active role in shaping peace and conflict dynamics in other countries and regions?

Chris Johnson, Senior Advisor and Freeman Chair in China Studies, CSIS
Richard McGregor, Public Policy Fellow, Wilson Center 
David Shambaugh, Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, George Washington University
Moderator: Kristen Looney, Assistant Professor, Georgetown University

12:30-14:15 Networking Luncheon

14:30-15:45 The Changing Role of the PLA
This panel will address the PLA’s relationship with the Party and the people. As the military professionalizes, is it developing an independent voice and influence in policy making? Xi has prioritized soft modernization – the improvement of recruitment, retention, training and force development. How do changing societal factors impact the desire to improvement the quality of the force? What is the public perception of PLA and how does the relationship between society and the military impact Chinese external security behavior?  How has the effort to modernize the PLA affected China’s participation in peacekeeping missions and other training activities?  Are there elements of the PLA that want to see China take a more active role in influencing peace and security dynamics in other countries?  What steps might the PLA take to protect China’s overseas interests?

Phillip Saunders, Distinguished Research Fellow, National Defense University
Jacqueline Deal, President, Long-Term Strategy Group
Kristen Gunness Chief Executive Officer, Vantage Point Asia LLC
Moderator:  Oriana Skylar Mastro, Assistant Professor, Georgetown University

15:45-16:15 Concluding Remarks: Alternative Futures?
Oriana Skylar Mastro, Assistant Professor, Georgetown University
David Maxwell, Associate Director of the Security Studies Program, Georgetown University
Jennifer Staats, Director for China Programs, United States Institute of Peace

Type of Event or Course: 
Countries: 

U.S.-China Cooperation in Peace and Security with Ambassador Cui Tiankai

Thu, 04/10/2014 - 09:00
Thu, 04/10/2014 - 10:00

The U.S. Institute of Peace hosted a timely discussion and question-and-answer session with Ambassador Cui Tiankai of the People’s Republic of China.

Read the event coverage, China’s Ambassador Says Ties with U.S. Are No Longer 'Zero-Sum Game'

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel's April visit to China and President Barack Obama's Asia trip soon thereafter underscored the importance of – and some of the tensions underlying – U.S.-China relations. The conversation was continued on Twitter with #USIPChina.

Kristin Lord, Welcoming Remarks
Acting President, U.S. Institute of Peace

Stephen Hadley, Moderator
Chairman of the Board, U.S. Institute of Peace

Countries: 
Type of Event or Course: 

Keynote Address: Vice Premier Liu Yandong

Thu, 11/21/2013 - 16:30
Thu, 11/21/2013 - 17:30

Vice Premier Liu Yandong of the People’s Republic of China addresses the advancements in U.S.-China relations.

Read the event coverage, At USIP, Chinese Vice Premier Liu Urges More People-to-People Exchanges

Jim Marshall, Welcoming Remarks
President, U.S. Institute of Peace

CHEN Jining, Overview of Schwarzman Scholars Program
President, Tsinghua University

Mr. Stephen Schwarzman, Introduction of Vice Premier Liu
Schwarzman Scholars and chairman and CEO of the Blackstone Group

LIU Yandong, Keynote Address
Vice Premier of the People's Republic of China

Madam Liu gave a keynote address to celebrate the advancement of bilateral relations through academic exchanges in conjunction with the annual U.S.-China Consultation on People-to-People Exchange.

Type of Event or Course: 
Issue Areas: 
Countries: 

Secretary Kerry Defends Obama Foreign Policy

Secretary of State John Kerry contested what he called “revisionist commentary” about the Obama administration’s foreign policy, laying out a defense of achievements such as a global climate change agreement and the Iran nuclear accord, as part of the U.S. Institute of Peace’s “Passing the Baton” conference on Jan. 10. Kerry also shared his concerns about what he called the “fact-less political environment” and the President-elect’s penchant for communicating foreign policy positions on Twitter. 

“What troubles me a little bit is that people are not separating a remarkable transformation that has taken place globally, naturally, from things that we’re really responsible for,” Kerry said in a discussion with Judy Woodruff, anchor and managing editor of PBS NewsHour. “Arab Spring -- we didn’t start the Arab Spring. We couldn’t have stopped the Arab Spring. We couldn’t have put a lid on it.”

Thu, 01/12/2017 - 11:12
Type of Article: 

States of Fragility and Global Violence: An OECD Report

Tue, 01/24/2017 - 09:30
Tue, 01/24/2017 - 11:30
Subtitle: 
Improving Policies by Better Measuring How Weak States Risk Falling into Crisis

Over 15 years, nearly half of all people, 3.34 billion, have suffered from political violence or lived under its shadow, notes a new OECD report. Violence is on the rise and, surprisingly, conflict is not the leading cause of death.  Fragile contexts, especially those where governments are ineffective and social contracts with their populations broken—drive much of this violence, plus refugee flight, pandemic diseases and other catastrophes. So understanding and measuring fragility is vital to U.S. and international policies that aim to prevent crises.  Join the U.S. Institute of Peace and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development for the Washington launch of an OECD report—States of Fragility 2016—that offers a new approach to monitoring the fragility of states at risk.

Experts: 

Twenty-two percent of the global population now live in countries where human development is hampered by fragility and violence. On Tuesday, January 24, USIP, OECD, and other specialists will discuss OECD’s States of Fragility report, which presents a new approach for measuring the extent of fragility.

Type of Event or Course: 

U.S. National Security Chiefs Talk Leadership, Partners

The national security advisors to President Barack Obama and President-elect Donald Trump stood shoulder-to-shoulder on a stage at the U.S. Institute of Peace yesterday and shook hands to a standing ovation at a two-day conference on foreign and national security policy. In speeches, National Security Advisor Susan Rice and her designated successor, retired U.S. Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, struck a tone of cooperation on the transition between administrations. The conference, called “Passing the Baton,” included Secretary of State John Kerry, Senator Lindsey Graham and hundreds of incoming, outgoing and former officials as well as independent experts. 

USIP Staff

Discussions at the conference focused on laying foundations for a bipartisan foreign policy after an extraordinarily divisive election campaign. Rice and Flynn outlined what they said has been intensive work to ensure a smooth transition of national security functions with the Jan. 20 inauguration of President Trump. Rice said her office “has produced more than 100 memos” for Flynn’s incoming team.

Wed, 01/11/2017 - 15:25
Type of Article: 

China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: A Road to Peace?

Three weeks ago, trucks carrying goods from China began offloading containers to ships at the Pakistani port of Gwadar, marking the operational opening of the Chinese built-and-financed China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The scale of the $51 billion infrastructure scheme will change Pakistan in ways that offer hope for easing its internal conflicts and its destabilizing fear of international isolation, experts said in a discussion at the U.S. Institute of Peace. 

Fred Strasser

CPEC, which includes upgraded highways and rail lines, new power plants and the deepwater port at Gwadar to ease the path for exports from western China, is creating new, positive confidence in Pakistan’s security and foreign policy establishment, said Hussain Nadim, a Pakistan expert at USIP and a former special assistant to the country’s minister of planning, development and reforms.

Mon, 12/05/2016 - 17:16
Issue Areas: 
Type of Article: 
Countries: 
Partners (HTML): 

China’s Troop Contributions to U.N. Peacekeeping

China, traditionally reluctant to intervene, has become a major contributor to UN peacekeeping operations. However, given its available assets, the country has the capacity to increase its commitments and play a key role in improving peacekeeping operations. This brief examines China’s rise as a global security provider and what can be done to drive its further engagement in the peacekeeping landscape.

Summary

  • On average, China contributes more troops to United Nations (UN) peacekeeping missions than any other permanent member of the UN Security Council. The country dispatches high-value, hard-to-source enabler troops and has recently begun to provide combat troops, marking a significant change in its deployment profile.
  • Like other countries, China’s decisions to deploy troops are motivated by its desire to protect national interests, gain operational experience, and secure a positive reputation and high status.
Courtney J. Fung
Tue, 07/26/2016 - 11:28
Countries: 

China and the Responsibility to Protect: From Opposition to Advocacy

Initially opposed to the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), China has become a consistent advocate of the principle, endorsing its application in multiple countries while urging a constrained, multilateral approach to the use of force. This brief examines the trajectory and significance of China’s support for R2P. Given the country’s rising role in shaping the rules of global governance, continuing to gain its buy-in will be crucial in achieving the principle’s mandate.

Courtney J. Fung

Summary

  • Despite its initial opposition to the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), China is now considered more than a cautious supporter.
  • During the drafting of R2P, China—traditionally protective of sovereignty and reluctant to intervene1—dispatched harsh critiques of the new concept but gradually increased its engagement in the debate.
  • Over time, its efforts were successful in reaffirming support for a state-centric system by narrowing the emerging principle.
Wed, 06/08/2016 - 09:33
Countries: 
Partners (HTML): 

Articles & Analysis

Secretary of State John Kerry contested what he called “revisionist commentary” about the Obama administration’s foreign policy, laying out a defense of achievements such as a global climate...

By:

The national security advisors to President Barack Obama and President-elect Donald Trump stood shoulder-to-shoulder on a stage at the U.S. Institute of Peace yesterday and shook hands to a...

By:
USIP Staff

Three weeks ago, trucks carrying goods from China began offloading containers to ships at the Pakistani port of Gwadar, marking the operational opening of the Chinese built-and-financed China-...

By:
Fred Strasser

Videos & Webcasts

Secretary of State John Kerry contested what he called “revisionist commentary” about the Obama administration’s foreign policy, laying out a defense of achievements such as a global climate...

While China continues to grow as an economy and a military and political power, its overall influence relative to the United States has passed its peak, former Secretary of State George Shultz...

No country weighs more heavily on America's economy, cybersecurity and strategic posture in Asia than China. China's foreign policies are being shaped by changes within the country that can be...

Learn More

Publications

By:
Courtney J. Fung
China, traditionally reluctant to intervene, has become a major contributor to UN peacekeeping operations. However, given its available assets, the country has the capacity to increase its...
By:
Courtney J. Fung
Initially opposed to the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), China has become a consistent advocate of the principle, endorsing its application in multiple countries while urging a constrained,...