Observations show snowpack has declined across much of the western United States over the period 1950–99. This reduction has important social and economic implications, as water retained in the snowpack from winter storms forms an important part of the hydrological cycle and water supply in the region. A formal model-based detection and attribution (D–A) study of these reductions is performed. The detection variable is the ratio of 1 April snow water equivalent (SWE) to water-year-to-date precipitation (P), chosen to reduce the effect of P variability on the results. Estimates of natural internal climate variability are obtained from 1600 years of two control simulations performed with fully coupled ocean–atmosphere climate models. Estimates of the SWE/P response to anthropogenic greenhouse gases, ozone, and some aerosols are taken from multiple-member ensembles of perturbation experiments run with two models. The D–A shows the observations and anthropogenically forced models have greater SWE/P reductions than can be explained by natural internal climate variability alone. Model-estimated effects of changes in solar and volcanic forcing likewise do not explain the SWE/P reductions. The mean model estimate is that about half of the SWE/P reductions observed in the west from 1950 to 1999 are the result of climate changes forced by anthropogenic greenhouse gases, ozone, and aerosols.
Attribution of Declining Western U.S. Snowpack to Human Effects
Authors:
David W. Pierce*, Tim P. Barnett*, Hugo G. Hidalgo*, Tapash Das*, Céline Bonfils+, Benjamin D. Santer+, Govindasamy Bala+, Michael D. Dettinger#, Daniel R. Cayan*,#, Art Mirin+, Andrew W. Wood@, and Toru Nozawa& Affiliationsa*Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California Affiliations
+Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California Affiliations
#U.S. Geological Survey, La Jolla, California Affiliations
@University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Affiliations
&National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Received: 4 January 2008
Final Form: 18 April 2008
Published Online: 1 December 2008
December 2008
![Publication Cover](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20170114044806im_/http://journals.ametsoc.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/ams/journals/content/clim/2008/15200442-21.23/15200442-21.23/production/15200442-21.23.cover.jpg)
Share this Article
Featured Collections
Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) -BAMS, JAMC,MWR, WAF
LatMix -BAMS, JPO, JTECH
PANDOWAE -MWR, JAS, WAF, JTECH
Most Read JCLI Articles
(past 12 months)
. |
Newman et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 12
|
. |
Poli et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 11
|
. |
Mears et al.
May 2016, Vol. 29, No. 10
|
. |
Welhouse et al.
March 2016, Vol. 29, No. 5
|
. |
Cheng et al.
January 2016, Vol. 29, No. 1
|
. |
Dobricic et al.
April 2016, Vol. 29, No. 8
|
Most Cited (past 12 months)
-
1. MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and ApplicationsRienecker et al.July 2011, Vol. 24, No. 14 -
2. Improvements to NOAA’s Historical Merged Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis (1880–2006)Smith et al.May 2008, Vol. 21, No. 10 -
3. Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global WarmingHeld et al.November 2006, Vol. 19, No. 21 -
4. A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration IndexVicente-Serrano et al.April 2010, Vol. 23, No. 7 -
5. An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for ClimateReynolds et al.July 2002, Vol. 15, No. 13 -
6. Daily High-Resolution-Blended Analyses for Sea Surface TemperatureReynolds et al.November 2007, Vol. 20, No. 22