DERBS Comments
The following comments were submitted in response to BPA's request for feedback on the rate design alternatives for BPA's Dispatchable Energy Resource Balancing Service (DERBS) rate presented at the August 24, 2016 BP-18 Generation Inputs Workshop.
BP-18 Rate Case - August 10, 2016 Workshop Topics Comments
- Transmission Rates Risk Mitigation
- Error Correction Proposal
- NT Cost Allocation
BP-18 Power Rates - August 9, 2016 Workshop Topics Comments
BP-18 Transmission Rates - Draft Southern Intertie Rates Comments
Comments on Franklin PUD's Short Distance Discount Proposal
DERBS Sub-team Feedback
The following comments were submitted by the DERBS sub-team members in response to BPA's request for feedback on the possibility of moving to nameplate for the DERBS billing determinant.
NT Load Forecast Comments
The following comments were submitted in response to the NT Load Forecast discussion at the
Unauthorized Increase Charge Comments
The following comments were submitted in response to the Unauthroized Increase Charge discussion at the June 29, 2016 BP-18 Transmission Rates Workshop.
BP-18 Transmssion Rates - Southern Intertie Hourly Non-Firm Rate Comment Period for June 3, 2016
The following comments were submitted in response to BPA's request for feedback on the IS HNF staff leanings for the BP-18 Initial Proposal, presented at the May 24, 2016 BP-18 Transmission Rates workshops.
BP-18 Transmssion Rates - Load Forecast for NT Cost Allocation Comment Period for June 3, 2016
The following comments were submitted in response to BPA's request for feedback on which load forecast should be used for the NT cost allocation, presented at the May 6, 2016 and May 24, 2016 BP-18 Transmission Rates workshops.
Comments on Generation Inputs
Comments on the Snohomish PUD Error Correction Process Straw Proposal
The following comments were submitted to BPA in response to Snohomish PUD's request for feedback on their Error Correction Process Straw Proposal presented at the BP-18 Transmission Rates Workshop on May 6, 2016.
BP-18 Transmission Rates - Comment Period for May 6, 2016
The following comments were submitted in response to BPA's request for feedback on the proposed Southern Intertie Hourly Non-Firm rate methodology and other rate considerations presented at the BP-18 Rate Case Workshop on April 20, 2016.
BP-18 Rate Case Parking Lot Issues
The following comments were submitted in response to BPA's request for power and transmission rate topics customers would like to discuss during BP-18 Rate Case workshops.
- Avista, Avangrid Renewables, Idaho Power, PacifiCorp, PGE, and PSE joint comments: Financial Reserves Policy
- Avista, Avangrid Renewables, Idaho Power, PacifiCorp, PGE, and PSE joint comments: Repayment Model
- Franklin PUD Comments
- Franklin PUD Comments (submitted 5/31/16)
- ICNU Comments
- NRU Comments
- Powerex Comments
- Snohomish PUD Comments
Southern Intertie Hourly Non-Firm Workshop Comment Period for Jan. 22, 2016
The following were submitted in response to BPA's request for customers' evaluations of alternatives based on criteria and principles outlined in the draft White Paper (version 2), and considerations in support of and in opposition to alternatives.