Experimental retrievals of rain rates using the CloudSat spaceborne 94-GHz radar reflectivity gradient method over land were evaluated by comparing them with standard estimates from ground-based operational S-band radar measurements, which are widely used for quantitative precipitation estimations. The comparisons were performed for predominantly stratiform precipitation events that occurred in the vicinity of the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) KGWX and KSHV radars during the CloudSat overpasses in the vicinity of these ground radar sites. The standard reflectivity-based WSR-88D rain-rate retrievals used in operational practice were utilized as a reference for the CloudSat retrieval evaluation. Spaceborne and ground-based radar rain-rate estimates that were closely collocated in space and time were generally well correlated. The correlation coefficients were approximately 0.65 on average, and the mean relative biases were usually within ±35% for the whole dataset and for individual events with typical rain rates exceeding ~2 mm h−1. For events with lighter rainfall, higher biases and lower correlations were often present. The normalized mean absolute differences between satellite- and ground-based radar retrievals were on average ~60%, with an increasing trend for lighter rainfall. Such mean differences are comparable to combined retrieval errors from both ground-based and satellite radar remote sensing approaches. Evaluation of potential effects of partial beam blockage on the ground-based radar measurements was performed, and the influence of the choice of relation between WSR-88D reflectivity and rain rate that was utilized in the ground-based rain-rate retrievals was assessed.
Intercomparisons of CloudSat and Ground-Based Radar Retrievals of Rain Rate over Land
Authors:
Sergey Y. MatrosovAffiliationsCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, and NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado
Received: 6 March 2014
Final Form: 30 July 2014
Published Online: 14 October 2014
October 2014
Share this Article
Featured Collections
Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) -BAMS, JAMC,MWR, WAF
LatMix -BAMS, JPO, JTECH
PANDOWAE -MWR, JAS, WAF, JTECH
Most Read JAMC Articles
(past 12 months)
. |
Agee et al.
August 2016, Vol. 55, No. 8
|
. |
Feng et al.
July 2016, Vol. 55, No. 7
|
. |
Christy et al.
March 2016, Vol. 55, No. 3
|
. |
Zhou et al.
March 2016, Vol. 55, No. 3
|
. |
Pfeifroth et al.
January 2016, Vol. 55, No. 1
|
. |
Ortega et al.
April 2016, Vol. 55, No. 4
|
Most Cited (past 12 months)
-
1. The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An UpdateKainJanuary 2004, Vol. 43, No. 1 -
2. On the Average Value of Correlated Time Series, with Applications in Dendroclimatology and HydrometeorologyWigley et al.February 1984, Vol. 23, No. 2 -
3. Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud ModelLin et al.June 1983, Vol. 22, No. 6 -
4. A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous TerrainDaly et al.February 1994, Vol. 33, No. 2 -
5. Lanczos Filtering in One and Two DimensionsDuchonAugust 1979, Vol. 18, No. 8 -
6. ClimateWNA—High-Resolution Spatial Climate Data for Western North AmericaWang et al.January 2012, Vol. 51, No. 1