Home

News, announcements, training, search functions, Ask-a-Professor, and similar services with direct links supporting DoD acquisition.

Acquisition Process

Three processes cooperate to deliver capabilities needed by warfighters: the requirements process (JCIDS); the acquisition process (DAS); and the program and budget development process (PPBE). Includes links to DoD and Service policies, guidance, tools, and resources:

Policy

Encyclopedic source of acquisition policy that follows a hierarchy of policy issuance (i.e., executive, legislative, federal, etc.) and filtered according to organization, career field, and special topics.

Communities
of Practice

Links to communities of practice and special interest areas, the latest contribution and discussion posts for open ACC communities, community highlights, and links to related communities.

Training and
Continuous Learning

Information on training and continuous learning that supports DoD acquisition, information that helps manage professional training portfolios, and information on training available from DAU and DoD and Services activities.

Industry

Information on DoD industry partners that helps the participation and execution of DoD processes; including industry support pages, news, information, and links to private sector acquisition contractors.

Applications

AT&L Knowledge Management Systems (AKMS) applications.

 
 

Functional Gateways

Sixteen functional knowledge gateways, one for each of the defense acquisition career fields.

Special Topics

Links to gateways about important topics outside the general portals and beyond the standard career fields:


         Bill Kobren, Director

Bill Kobren
Director
Logistics & Sustainment Center


RSS Feed RSS Feed

Gateway Links

Overview
Certification Guide
Continuous Learning
Enroll in a Course
Mission Assistance
Ask A Professor
Director's Blog

Archives

August 2009 (2)
September 2009 (10)
October 2009 (8)
November 2009 (6)
December 2009 (8)
January 2010 (9)
February 2010 (8)
March 2010 (8)
April 2010 (11)
May 2010 (9)
June 2010 (11)
July 2010 (9)
August 2010 (10)
September 2010 (9)
October 2010 (10)
November 2010 (10)
December 2010 (9)
January 2011 (10)
February 2011 (9)
March 2011 (12)
April 2011 (9)
May 2011 (11)
June 2011 (10)
July 2011 (10)
August 2011 (12)
September 2011 (14)
October 2011 (13)
November 2011 (9)
December 2011 (11)
January 2012 (12)
February 2012 (20)
March 2012 (14)
April 2012 (11)
May 2012 (12)
June 2012 (12)
July 2012 (11)
August 2012 (11)
September 2012 (14)
October 2012 (12)
November 2012 (9)
December 2012 (10)
January 2013 (12)
February 2013 (8)
March 2013 (11)
April 2013 (9)
May 2013 (12)
June 2013 (10)
July 2013 (10)
August 2013 (14)
September 2013 (14)
October 2013 (10)
November 2013 (14)
December 2013 (8)
January 2014 (8)
February 2014 (12)
March 2014 (12)
April 2014 (11)
May 2014 (12)
June 2014 (11)
July 2014 (9)
August 2014 (10)
September 2014 (14)
October 2014 (10)
November 2014 (10)
December 2014 (9)
January 2015 (14)
February 2015 (12)
March 2015 (10)
April 2015 (11)
May 2015 (12)
June 2015 (10)
July 2015 (11)
August 2015 (11)
September 2015 (11)
October 2015 (12)
November 2015 (12)
December 2015 (10)
January 2016 (10)
February 2016 (12)
March 2016 (16)
April 2016 (16)
May 2016 (16)
June 2016 (14)
July 2016 (11)
August 2016 (19)
September 2016 (19)
October 2016 (20)
November 2016 (7)


Bloggers Only

Login

   Home Skip Navigation LinksAT&L Functional Gateways > Life Cycle Logistics > Director Bill Kobren's Blogs


Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Job Support Tools 

Tags: Acquisition Workforce, DAU Learning Assets, Life Cycle Logistics, Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP), Logistics Tools & References, Product Support & Sustainment, Systems Engineering

Attention LOG 211 Supportability Analysis course graduates, product support engineers, life cycle logisticians and/or anyone engaged in the DoD product support analysis/supportability analysis process: If you were not already aware, our College of Contract Management (CCM) colleagues here at DAU have put together a suite of three Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Job Support Tools in support of their CMQ 260 FMEA course. Although specifically designed to assist Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Contract Management (Quality) experts working with their contractors in trying to understand how they developed their FMEA and how to better read and understand the results, these tools may prove to be useful to the broader systems engineering and life cycle logistics defense acquisition workforce communities.

 

The three FMEA tools are:

 

·         Job Support Tool 1: FMECA Probability of Occurrence. Job Support Tool 1 was developed to help you better understand what the Probably of Occurrence codes mean. Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) probability of occurrence is determined using analysis, calculations, comparison to similar products/processes, and past documented failure modes. When part failure rate data is not available, the probability of occurrence of each failure is grouped into discrete levels that establish the qualitative failure probability level for each entry.

 

·         Job Support Tool 2: Severity Rating Criteria.  This Job Support Tool is designed to help you understand what each severity level means.  Severity Rating Criteria are not defined in MIL-STD-1629A. However, criteria are defined in IEC 60812, automotive industry specifications and by NASA. This criteria uses a scale of 1-10 to rate how severe a failure is. If questions arise regarding the severity of a given failure effect, it may be helpful to refer to the product FMEA/CIL (critical items list) for further insight or an estimate of the severity rating. These tables can be used as a reference to the severity rating criteria

 

·         Job Support Tool 3: Risk Mitigation Techniques Advantages and Disadvantages. This Job Support Tool lists the risk mitigation techniques that can be used when trying to decide what to do with a certain risk. Of course, there are advantages and disadvantages to each technique’s use. It is important that suppliers take into consideration what is the best way to address each risk. This chart provides a side by side view of the risk mitigation technique advantages and disadvantages.

 
Posted by Bill Kobren CPL on 13-Jul-16
0 Comments | Bookmark this post with:        
 

Comments

Leave a comment


Comment Topic Name: (*required)
URL Link to Topic Information: (e.g. https://dap.dau.mil)
Your Email: (*required, but not displayed for public access)
Comment Body: (*required)

Enter the code in the box below. (*required)