Header for US Department of Transportation Blog

You are here

Improving the safety of your rail transit ride

Improving the safety of your rail transit ride

America’s rail transit systems already offer one of the safest ways to travel about your local community, and we at the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) are working to make public transportation by rail even safer.

That's why, last Friday, Secretary Foxx announced a new proposed rule that will improve, modernize and transform rail transit safety oversight to help ensure the increased level of safety expected by the millions of passengers who use rail transit every day.

Photo of BART train

The proposed rule would replace existing federal regulations with ones designed to better oversee the effectiveness of a transit agency’s system safety program.  It is meant to provide more comprehensive and clear requirements for state agencies that have oversight responsibility for rail transit systems that are not already regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration.

In addition, FTA has published today an interim safety certification program

Both of these efforts are major milestones in implementing new safety regulatory authority established under MAP-21.

We want to hear from you about our plans to improve rail transit safety.  Public comments on the proposed rule will be accepted for 60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register, during the week of February 23, 2015.

We look forward to hearing your comments, continuing the conversation, and putting forward the best regulations possible for the safety and efficiency of transit riders nationwide.

Post new comment

Comments

Ms. Sarah Feinberg Acting Administrator Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: PRESS RELEASE NUMBER: 2015-07 Dear Ms. Feinberg: I was saddened to see the accident on Metrolink’s Ventura County Line this morning, resulting in tragic injuries and loss of life. The effects on families and friends must not be underestimated. Although Federal Railroad Administration investigators undoubtedly will conduct an investigation to determine the factors that contributed to this accident, a straightforward and even cursory examination of the photos of the scene reveals why this accident was as bad as it was. Specifically, the train was being run in a ‘reverse’ mode, that is, with the driving engine at the back, pushing the train, instead of at the front, pulling it. Had the accident occurred with the engine at the front, the accident would still have been as bad for the driver of the vehicle that somehow ended up on the tracks in front of an oncoming train at 60 mph. But for the train itself, due to the significantly greater mass of the engine, a shorter and more compact frame, followed by the passenger cars, it would have been a minor accident, not the one that resulted. You see, with the engine pushing the cars, which are much lighter than the engine, and the long lever-arm of the undercarriage of the cars, it took very little mass underneath to derail the cars, and once derailed, they went flying. It has been said, in FRA’s press release on the matter, that “Safety must be every railroad's absolute top priority. [It is FRA’s mandate to] establish what lapses, if any, occurred and order any necessary corrective actions."  I would suggest that, until this matter of running trains backwards is addressed, the problem will persist. Sincerely, Dirk J. Bouma, PE

Therese, I was doing some research and came across this article. I was wondering if we are looking for ways to keep our road and America’s rail transit systems safe while lowering the noise level. We had a transit system placed in Lewisville, Texas. Very easy commute to downtown. The issue is the trains sounded there horns at each intersection starting at 4 AM with houses less than 100 yards away. We voted to get a "no train horn zone" that was passed. Since the trains couldn't blow their horns, they placed horns on top of the crossing guards which were louder than the trains. Anyway, I don't think enough attention is paid to the noise, and there has to be a better way of keeping cars safe without waking up 1/4 mile of people. Thanks, Brian
Submit Feedback >