U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


eSubscribe
eSubscribe Envelope

FHWA Home / Safety / Roadway Safety Data Program (RSDP)

Safety Data and Analysis Noteworthy Practices

State and local highway agencies are implementing new approaches to improve the quality of their roadway safety data systems. These practices describe how State and local agencies are implementing innovative approaches to address their safety data and analysis needs.

The following practices are taken from the Roadway Safety Noteworthy Practices Database. These practices describe how State and local agencies are implementing innovative approaches to address their safety data needs.

Publication Year Title State
2014

Illinois DOT Provides Local Public Agencies with Assistance on the Use of Safety Data
Through the use of improved safety data sharing abilities, Illinois has improved its project submittal process; safety projects are submitted more quickly than ever before. IDOT's technical assistance and data-sharing efforts allow the agency to support Illinois' counties as they program projects to improve the safety of local roads in the State.

Illinois
2014

Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Provides Reduced Data-collection Costs to Local Agencies While Ensuring Data Consistency
In an attempt to streamline the data collection process and reduce costs, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development  has encouraged local agencies and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to join a larger statewide data collection effort.


Integrating Safety Analysis in Project Development in Louisiana
Through this effort, LADOTD increased safety awareness throughout the Department and with local agencies. Cost savings, though difficult to precisely quantify, improved the State's ability to use available funding for safety improvement in multiple contexts, and resulted in successful implementation of low-cost alternatives, and reduced crash risk during construction.

Louisiana
2014

Michigan’s Roadsoft Program Enables Local Agencies to Collect and Maintain Data, while Preserving Local Ownership and Control 
This case study, available as part of the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Integration of State and Local Safety Data project, describes Michigan's efforts to integrate local roadway data into… More. (From State and Local Data Integration Case Study online soon)


Michigan Undertakes Initiatives to Encourage a Data-Driven Approach to Local Roadway Safety
These initiatives help bolster the State's multifaceted roadway safety program by providing local agencies with meaningful, timely access to crash data, as well as tools for data analysis and training to manage their safety processes.

Michigan
2014

Ohio, with Stakeholder Input, Develops Consistent Mapping and Data Standards for State and Local Roads
This case study, available as part of the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Integration of State and Local Safety Data project, describes Ohio's efforts to integrate local roadway data into their… More. (From State and Local Data Integration Case Study online soon)

Ohio
2014 Tennessee Updates Roadway Information Management System (TRIMS) State Roads Database to Include Local Road Data
This case study, available as part of the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Integration of State and Local Safety Data project, describes Tennessee's efforts to integrate local roadway data into… More. (From State and Local Data Integration Case Study online soon)
Tennessee
2014 Wisconsin's Information System for Local Roads Expands Local Access to Data while Integrating State and Local Safety Data Systems
This case study, available as part of the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Integration of State and Local Safety Data project, describes Wisconsin's efforts to integrate local roadway data into… More. (From State and Local Data Integration Case Study online soon)
Wisconsin
2014

UDOT's Advanced Data Collection Methods Result in Better Quality of Roadway/Asset Data and Improved Internal Management of Data
The data collection effort performed by UDOT was a first-of-its-kind, surveying the entire state roadway network and obtaining a wide set of data elements.  LiDAR (a term that combines "light" and "radar") was used by the selected vendor to collect a variety of asset data. The LiDAR technology creates a three dimensional model of the assets scanned along the roadway, and is performed in a single pass at highway speeds.

Utah
2014

Interoffice Safety Groups at Washington State DOT Use Quantitative Data Evaluation to Determine Strategies Across the "4Es"
Washington State Department of Transportation  relies upon these three cross-cutting groups to ensure that expert judgment guides the transportation planning and project selection process in Washington State. These three groups play an important role in identifying the State’s safety needs and providing guidance to WSDOT regional offices in support of safety project selection.

 
2013 Florida Highway Patrol Piloting Signal Four Analytics, a Web-based Crash Mapping and Analysis Tool 
Traffic crash data is available now in greater detail than ever, but making sense of this data remains a challenge to law enforcement, transportation planners, and traffic engineers. These professionals… More.
Florida
2013 Idaho Uses Highway Safety Manual Methodology to Identify Priority Locations for Safety Improvements
To improve cost effectiveness in funding safety projects, Idaho Transportation Department used an innovative, data-driven program for safety analysis on roadways throughout the State. The project includes… More.
Idaho
2012 Florida Uses Predictive Methods found in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) for Alternative Selection in Florida (HSM Case Study 3)
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO's) Highway Safety Manual Part C Predictive Method (Chapters 10-12) estimates crash frequency and severity. The predictive…More.
Florida
2011 Florida Uses Web Tool to Develop State-Specific Crash Reduction Factors
Crash reduction factors (CRF) provide agencies with an estimate of the expected crash reduction and/or benefits associated with various countermeasures. However, since local conditions (e.g., roadway… More.
Florida
2011 Idaho Uses Predictive Methods in IHSDM to Evaluate Safety in Idaho 8 Corridor
Idaho used FHWA's Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) along the Idaho 8 corridor to evaluate existing traffic, roadway geometry, and predict crashes using these and the corridor's recent crash… More
Idaho
2011 Illinois Develops SPFs for All State Routes and Intersections
While the development of SafetyAnalystTM and the Highway Safety Manual was still underway, Illinois decided to incorporate a new analysis technique to assist the state in moving forward with the implementation… More.
Illinois
2011 Louisiana Hires Law Enforcement Expert to Improve Data Collection among Law Enforcement Agencies
The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LDOTD) is responsible for collecting motor vehicle crash data for the entire State of Louisiana, as well as maintaining the state crash database.  More.
Louisiana
2011 New Jersey Provides Data Decision Support Tool to SHSP Partners
The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) recognized a need to provide transportation safety data in a more user-friendly format. Providing easier access to data and enhanced analytic capabilities… More.
New Jersey
2011 Ohio DOT Implements New Roadway Safety Management Process with AASHTOWare SafetyAnalystTM
ODOT's use of AASHTOWare Safety AnalystTM allowed it to develop multiple screening methods in the network screening process resulting in greater identification of rural corridors and projects.  More.
Ohio
2010 Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Adds Epidemiologist to Strengthen Crash Analysis Capabilities
To thoroughly investigate the behavioral aspects of highway safety, a number of datasets must be merged. In Georgia, the DOT provides location-specific crash data to the Governor's Office of Highway Safety… More.
Georgia
2010 Michigan DOT Uses MOU to Define Roles Among Data Generators
The Michigan DOT (MDOT), Department of State, and State Police signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) defining crash data management and funding. The State agencies invested in a team of three people… More.
Michigan
2010 New Jersey Partnership Provides Technical Support to Local Agencies on Crash Data Analysis
To support SHSP implementation at all levels, New Jersey identified a need to increase technical safety support to local agencies. The Transportation Safety Resource Center (TSRC) was established by hiring… More.
New Jersey
2010 Ohio Develops Centralized Data Source for All SHSP Partners
The SHSP process requires data from a variety of sources to support the emphasis areas. If a central data source is not available, emphasis area teams may use conflicting data. When the safety data used… More.
Ohio
2010 SHSP Committee Provides Forum for Data Collection Improvements
Since data is the foundation of transportation safety planning, the Ohio Department of Transportation identified data improvement as one of the priority emphasis areas in its SHSP. Each year the Federal… More.
Ohio

Visit the Roadway Safety Noteworthy Practices Database

Many State and local agencies are successfully implementing innovative approaches to safety program and project planning, implementation, and evaluation. Read about them in the Roadway Safety Noteworthy Practices Database where practices span 14 different roadway safety topics.

Submit Your Practice

Is your agency using an innovative practice to collect, analyze, or manage roadway safety data?  If so, we would like to feature it in the Noteworthy Practices Database.  Learn more.

Quick Find: Direct Access to Top Resources
Safe Roads for a Safer Future - Investment in roadway safety saves lives
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000