U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Print-friendly PDF version (271kB)
FHWA's RSPCB Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Program supports and sponsors peer exchanges and workshops hosted by agencies.
Date
May 18-19, 2011
Location
Concord, New Hampshire
Hosts
New Hampshire Department of Transportation
Key Participants
New Hampshire Highway Safety Agency
New Hampshire State Police
New Hampshire Department of Motor Vehicles
New Hampshire Bureau of Turnpikes
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
New Hampshire Department of Justice
New Hampshire State Liquor Commission
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Utah Department of Transportation
Washington State Department of Transportation
FHWA New Hampshire Division Office
FHWA Office of Safety
FHWA Resource Center
U.S. DOT Volpe Center
FHWA's Office of Safety sponsors Peer to Peer (P2P) events.
Learn more
2. Preparing for New Hampshire's Peer Event
3. Proceedings for New Hampshire's Peer Event
4. Key Findings and Lessons Learned
This report provides a summary of a peer exchange sponsored by the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT) that focused on updating New Hampshire's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and establishing a Toward Zero Deaths (TZD) initiative in the State.
NHDOT applied to the Roadway Safety Professional Capacity Building (RSPCB) Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Program in an effort to build consensus around an updated SHSP. Deciding to apply for technical assistance resulted from NHDOT's participation at a P2P event hosted by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. NHDOT's overarching goal for their P2P event was engaging State highway safety stakeholders in an open dialogue to identify opportunities for cooperation.
NHDOT's objectives in requesting the peer exchange were to:
The event focused on sharing information and best practices for developing and implementing an effective SHSP. In selecting peers, NHDOT sought States with strong data collection and analysis capabilities, experience with SHSP marketing campaigns, and success sustaining and implementing the SHSP. Selected peers at the event included the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) presented via web conference.
Through discussions and breakout sessions following the peer presentations, New Hampshire's safety stakeholders identified emphasis-area teams and champions and established preliminary goals, strategies, performance metrics, and timelines. Stakeholders also analyzed New Hampshire's current SHSP, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
The success of New Hampshire's peer event was due to the proactive efforts of NHDOT and the FHWA New Hampshire Division Office. NHDOT applied for its peer exchange within days of returning from a similar event in Vermont and assumed an extraordinary level of responsibility for planning the event and managing its logistics. Key staff from NHDOT, FHWA New Hampshire Division Office, and the FHWA Office of Safety spent four months preparing for the peer exchange. The process included the following steps:
The purpose of the workshop was to prepare for updating the SHSP and re-engage New Hampshire's highway safety stakeholders. Since the release of New Hampshire's previous SHSP in 2007, NHDOT noticed innovative practices among agencies in other States, including extensive use of performance tracking measures, engagement with the public through marketing campaigns, and the emergence of initiatives focused on Zero Deaths targets. NHDOT's goals for the peer exchange included learning from other States' experiences and incorporating successful elements into New Hampshire's SHSP update.
Workshop participants included 49 professionals representing 30 organizations and the four "E's" (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services) (see Appendix A for a complete list of participants). The peer exchange began with welcoming remarks from leadership of NHDOT, the New Hampshire Department of Safety (NHDOS), and the New Hampshire Highway Safety Agency (NHHSA) (see Appendix B for the agenda). Staff from the FHWA New Hampshire Division Office, NHDOS, and NHDOT then presented an overview of the workshop and background information about highway safety in New Hampshire. Next, peer agencies discussed their experience and perspective on creating a successful SHSP. Following the peer presentations on day one, breakout groups assessed the strengths and weaknesses of New Hampshire's current SHSP and opportunities for improvement. The following day, breakout groups reconvened to determine membership in a SHSP Core Group and confirm emphasis areas for the updated plan.
The NHDOT Commissioner welcomed participants to the peer exchange and emphasized NHDOT's commitment to safety. He shared his strong desire for agencies to work together to ensure that they use all available resources to make highways as safe as possible for the traveling public. He also thanked all of the participating agencies for coming together to learn, share best practices, and develop a plan for strategically moving forward.
The NHDOS Assistant Commissioner discussed the impact of traffic collisions in New Hampshire and nationwide. He detailed the many challenges facing highway safety today, including distracted driving, driving under the influence of legal and illegal drugs, drivers with mental health problems, and elderly drivers. All of these challenges must be addressed despite looming budget cuts. He also emphasized the need for improved collection and management of collision data to more effectively implement countermeasures.
Finally, the NHHSA Coordinator detailed New Hampshire's unique perspective on roadway safety. He cited New Hampshire's official motto – "Live free or die" – as a unique challenge in addressing highway safety. The fact that New Hampshire has the largest legislative body in the country can be an obstacle for passing safety-related legislation. He presented an overview of New Hampshire's recent successes in highway safety including:
Highway Safety Improvement Program
The FHWA New Hampshire Division Office's Safety and Operations Engineer presented an overview of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The purpose of the HSIP is to make infrastructure improvements to reduce the number of fatal and severe injury crashes on all public roads. To receive HSIP funding, each State is required to create a SHSP, which involves analysis of crash data to identify emphasis areas and crash problems related to the emphasis areas, selection of appropriate countermeasures, and prioritization of projects in an HSIP. The HSIP must also align with the State Transportation Improvement Program. If a State demonstrates in its SHSP that its infrastructure safety needs are met, up to 10 percent of its HSIP funding may be applied to non-infrastructure safety strategies.
Safety Data
The NHDOS Business Systems Analyst described New Hampshire's data program and management systems. NHDOS understands the importance of crash data collection and analysis to target the most cost-effective solutions to safety problems. NHDOS collects data that are categorized by crash characteristics, as well as information about the vehicle, driver, and other involved persons. New Hampshire's fatal crash data has historically been easier to request and query than non-fatal crash data, although NHDOS is currently funding a project to reduce wait times for non-fatal data from a few months to a few hours. New Hampshire's crash data are available in an annual report published by NHDOS, which summarizes annual crash data and contextualizes the year's crash data against historic trends.
Motorcycle Safety
The Chief Project Manager for NHDOT presented observations based on his participation in a motorcycle scanning tour hosted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. The objective of the tour was to identify cost-effective options to address motorcycle safety and learn about opportunities to integrate them into infrastructure design, barrier design, maintenance practices, intersection operations, and pavement treatments. The scanning tour found areas of opportunity for motorcycle safety in rider education and training as well as infrastructure designs capable of accommodating motorcycles.
Prior to the event, the SHSP Core Group compiled a list of questions related to gaps in New Hampshire's program that the group had identified. The three participating peer agencies tailored their discussions to respond to these questions. An overview of their presentations follows.
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
WSDOT's Director of Enterprise Risk Management discussed Washington's SHSP process. Washington developed its first highway safety plan in 2000, which coincided with establishing its Zero Fatalities vision. While the Director acknowledged that the State's traditional 4E approach has contributed to significant reductions in fatalities, he also suggested that solutions involving significant data analysis can provide additional reductions in fatalities. He described several key elements that have contributed to the agency's success:
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT)
PennDOT's Safety Management Division Chief and the Transportation Planning Specialist responsible for coordinating Pennsylvania's SHSP process discussed their experience and successful practices via web conference. Based on data, Pennsylvania focuses on seven emphasis areas from its SHSP, which its Multi-Agency Safety Team (MAST) oversees. MAST is composed of leaders from SHSP stakeholder agencies and controls the direction of the plan. The group meets quarterly to assess the status of implementation activities. About 40 organizations are involved in Pennsylvania's SHSP: each organization is represented by a steering committee member who is briefed on the status of the SHSP on an annual basis. Highlights from the discussion on Pennsylvania's SHSP success factors are outlined below.
Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)
UDOT's Traffic and Safety Division Safety Programs Engineer provided a history of Utah's SHSP development. While preparing to host the 2002 Winter Olympics, Utah's annual fatalities spiked to almost 400. To address this increase, Utah's transportation planning projects focused primarily on infrastructure improvements. As a result, Utah's SHSP initially looked like an engineering document and was not consumable by other safety partners. With the introduction of The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) in 2006, Utah used 10 percent flex funding to establish its Zero Fatalities marketing initiative and the SHSP was updated for a wider safety stakeholder audience. The Zero Fatalities campaign has been the key to integrating safety into Utah's culture and highlighting its importance to all stakeholder groups by helping Utah to:
Zero Fatalities has been successful in its public outreach efforts targeting teens. The organization has a full-time coordinator who works with high school students and has created a teen safe driving program called "Don't Drive Stupid" that identifies a core group of leaders in each high school to be Zero Fatalities ambassadors. Utah publishes an annual memorial book of every teen that dies in a traffic crash, which includes biographies written by family members, which has been an effective way to reach drivers during their influential teen years. Zero Fatalities also initiated a seatbelt campaign in elementary schools, not just as a way to increase the use of seatbelts and booster seats, but also to relay a message about seatbelts to parents and grandparents. Through its multi-faceted efforts to create and implement an effective SHSP, Utah reduced fatalities by 37 percent in 2010, from a peak of 373 in 2000.
Following the peer presentations, participants divided into breakout groups designed to allow diverse stakeholders to work together and build relationships in a collaborative setting. Participants represented their individual organizations as champions but also learned from other members of the group. Each breakout group discussed the strengths and weaknesses of New Hampshire's current SHSP as well as opportunities for improvement. On the second day, groups discussed the composition of New Hampshire's SHSP Core Group, emphasis areas to include in New Hampshire's updated SHSP, and strategies and timelines for each emphasis area. Planning worksheets were supplied for groups to document their work and a facilitator moderated each of the sessions. Findings and recommendations from the breakout groups are summarized below by topic.
Strengths of New Hampshire's SHSP
New Hampshire's SHSP has affected the way that NHDOT conducts its business, particularly with regard to motorcycles. Other strengths of New Hampshire's SHSP and related efforts include:
Weaknesses of SHSP
The groups identified a few weaknesses of New Hampshire's current SHSP including:
Opportunities for Improvement
Based on peer discussions and lessons learned from peer presentations, the groups outlined several opportunities for improving the SHSP in its next iteration:
Based on breakout group discussions during the second day of the event, the membership of the SHSP Core Group was established, which will include representatives from the following organizations:
Next, the participants developed lists of emphasis area team champions and members. The groups also established draft goals, with strategies and performance measures for each. New Hampshire's emphasis areas include roadway departure, intersections, motorcycles and other vulnerable users, driver and passenger protection, teen drivers, elderly drivers, impaired drivers, speeding, distracted driving, and comprehensive data improvement. (See Appendix C for a table summarizing the work of an example emphasis area group – roadway departure – including goals, strategies, and performance measures.) Strategies focused on the following common themes:
Participants also developed the following list of requirements for New Hampshire's updated SHSP:
All emphasis area groups agreed to hold an initial meeting within four months of the peer exchange and committed to holding subsequent meetings on a regular basis (e.g., monthly or quarterly).
New Hampshire's peer exchange successfully engaged the State's primary highway safety stakeholders to launch an update to the SHSP. Event participants contributed to a critical analysis of New Hampshire's existing SHSP, outlined ten preliminary emphasis areas for an update of the Plan, and determined membership recommendations and a timeline for the SHSP Core Group and emphasis area teams. Stakeholders learned about successful practices in other States and how to incorporate them into planning for New Hampshire's SHSP update. Participants made particular note of the value of Washington's prioritization of emphasis areas, Pennsylvania's focus on tracking performance, and Utah's success in marketing its SHSP activities to the public.
Noteworthy practices learned from the event included the following:
Participants and key staff involved in planning the event appreciated the opportunity to learn from peer States and facilitators. They indicated that the peer presentations provided excellent support and guidance to begin the update process for New Hampshire's SHSP. In particular, participants commented that peer presentations were helpful to better understand how to apply performance measures to track SHSP-related activities and the SHSP's potential role to establish a safety brand to raise public awareness. Multiple participants indicated that the event was an ideal opportunity to understand the needs of various partners involved in roadway safety and build consensus around those needs. Participants also appreciated facilitators' subject matter expertise and event coordination experience.
Peer Presenters | |
---|---|
Scott Jones Safety Programs Engineer Utah Department of Transportation Traffic and Safety Office Phone: (801) 965-4285 Email: wsjones@utah.gov |
Gary Modi Chief, Safety Management Division Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Office Phone: (717) 783-1190 Email: gmodi@state.pa.us |
John Milton Director, Enterprise Risk Management Washington State Department of Transportation Office Phone: (360) 704-6363 Email: miltonj@wsdot.wa.gov |
Jeff Roecker Transportation Planning Specialist Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Office Phone: (717) 525-5766 Email: jroecker@state.pa.us |
FHWA/Volpe | |
Tamiko Burnell Transportation Specialist FHWA Office of Safety Office Phone: (202) 366-1200 Email: tamiko.burnell@dot.gov |
Susan Smichenko Community Planner Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Office Phone: (617) 494-3438 Email: Susan.Smichenko@dot.gov |
Ryan Brumfeld Transportation Specialist FHWA Office of Safety Office Phone: (304) 347-5473 Email: ryan.brumfeld@dot.gov |
Timothy Taylor Highway Safety Engineer FHWA Resource Center Office Phone: (404) 562-3560 Email: Timothy.Taylor@dot.gov |
David Perlman Operations Research Analyst Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Office Phone: (617) 494-3178 Email: David.Perlman@dot.gov |
|
New Hampshire Event Planners | |
Martin Calawa Safety and Traffic Operations Engineer FHWA New Hampshire Division Office Office Phone: (603) 228-3057 x108 Email: martin.calawa@dot.gov |
Stuart Thompson Highway Safety Engineer New Hampshire Department of Transportation Office Phone: (603) 271-1407 Email: gthompson@dot.state.nh.us |
Craig Green Assist. Dir. of Project Development New Hampshire Department of Transportation Office Phone: (603) 271-7419 Email: cgreen@dot.state.nh.us |
|
Attendees | |
Michael Allen 3M Traffic Safety Specialist 3M Company – Traffic Safety Systems Office Phone: (401) 368-0438 Email: mdallen@mmm.com |
Kimberley Griswold Vice President, Client Planning and Strategy wedu Office Phone: (603) 647-9338 Email: kim@wedu.com |
Darren Benoit Transportation Manager McFarland Johnson Office Phone: (603) 225-2978 Email: DBenoit@MJINC.com |
Gary Guzouskas Coordinator Keene State College-Driver Education Instructor Preparation Program Office Phone: (603) 313-1864 Email: gguzouskas@keene.edu |
Roberta Bourque Business Systems Analyst DOS/DMV Office Phone: (603) 227-4041 Email: roberta.bourque@dos.nh.gov |
Howard Hedegard Highway Safety Specialist Injury Prevention Center at Dartmouth Office Phone: (603) 848-0078 Email: nhtrafficsafety@yahoo.com |
Robin Bousa Director of Transportation Systems VHB Office Phone: (603) 644-0888 Email: rbousa@vhb.com |
John LeLacheur Captain NH State Police Office Phone: (603) 223-8514 Email: john.lelacheur@dos.nh.gov |
Angie Byrne Regional Program Manager NHTSA Region 1 Office Phone: (617) 494-2682 Email: angie.byrne@dot.gov |
Robert Letourneau Motorcycle Education Specialist DOS-DMV-MRT Office Phone: (603) 227-4111 Email: robert.letourneau@dos.nh.gov |
Kevin Carter Division Administrator USDOT – FMCSA Office Phone: (603) 228-3112 x103 Email: Kevin.Carter@dot.gov |
Mark Liebl Lieutenant NH State Police Office Phone: (603) 223-8520 Email: Mark.Liebl@dos.nh.gov |
Chip Cooper EMS Research and Quality Management Coordinator NH Bureau of EMS Office Phone: (603) 223-4226 Email: richard.cooper@dos.nh.gov |
Nathan Miller Senior Planner UVLSRPC Office Phone: (603) 448-1680 Email: nmiller@uvlsrpc.org |
Keith Cota Chief Project Manager NHDOT Office Phone: (603) 271-1615 Email: kcota@dot.state.nh.us |
Pat Moody Director Public Affairs/Traffic Safety AAA Northern New England Office Phone: (207) 780-6916 Email: pmoody@nne.aaa.com |
Jo-Ellen Courtney Child Passenger Safety Specialist Injury Prevention Center/Dartmouth Office Phone: (603) 653-8355 Email: jo-ellen.courtney@dartmouth.edu |
Sam Newsom Civil Engineer NHDOT Office Phone: (603) 485-3806 Email: SNewsom@dot.state.nh.us |
Richard Crate Chief of Police Enfield Police Department/NH Chief of Police Office Phone: (603) 632-7501 Email: rcrate@enfield.nh.us |
Patricia Rainboth Executive Director Victims Inc. Office Phone: (603) 335-7777 Email: pat.rainboth@victimsinc.org |
Kathleen Daley MRT Coordinator DOS-DMV-MRT Office Phone: (603) 227-4051 Email: kathleen.daley@dos.nh.gov |
Debra Samaha Program Director Injury Prevention Center at Dartmouth Office Phone: (603) 653-8357 Email: debra.samaha@dartmouth.edu |
Marco Damiata Regional Program Manager NHTSA Office Phone: (617) 494-3657 Email: Marco.Damata@dot.gov |
Kevin Sheppard Public Works Director City of Manchester Office Phone: (603) 624-6444 Email: ksheppard@manchesternh.gov |
Glenn Davison GIS Project Manager NHDOT Office Phone: (603) 271-7145 Email: gdavison@dot.state.nh.us |
Rhonda Siegal Injury Prevention Program Manager New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Office Phone: (603) 271-4700 Email: rsiegel@dhhs.state.nh.us |
Michael Desrochers Senior Project Manager Jacobs Office Phone: (603) 666-7181 Email: Mike.Desrochers@jacobs.com |
David Smith Assistant Administrator Bureau of Turnpikes - NHDOT Office Phone: (603) 485-3806 Email: dssmith@dot.state.nh.us |
Kathy DesRoches Director WFD Manchester Community College Office Phone: (603) 206-8161 Email: Kdesroches@ccsnh.edu |
Christopher Storm State Trooper New Hampshire State Police-Troop-A Office Phone: (603) 223-8490 Email: Christopher.Storm@dos.nh.gov |
Kimberly Eccles Principal VHB Office Phone: (919) 834-3972 Email: Keccles@VHB.com |
Peter M. Thompson Coordinator NH Highway Safety Agency Office Phone: (603) 271-2131 Email: pthomson@nhhsa.state.nh.us |
Jim Esdon Program Manager Injury Prevention Center at Dartmouth Office Phone: (603) 653-8360 Email: jim.edson@dartmouth.edu |
Friedrich von Recklinghausen Trauma Program Manager DHMC/DMS Office Phone: (603) 650-6064 Email: Friedrich.M.Von.Recklinghausen@hitchcock.org |
Diana Fenton Assist. Attorney General NH Department of Justice Office Phone: (603) 271-6771 Email: diana.fenton@doj.nh.gov |
Steven Wade Executive Director Brain Injury Association of NH Office Phone: (603) 225-8400 Email: steve@bianh.org |
Debra Garvin Program Manager NH Highway Safety Agency Office Phone: (603) 271-2131 Email: dgarvin@nhhsa.state.nh.us |
Brad Weilbrenner Research Program Specialist NH DOS - Bureau of Emergency Medical Services Office Phone: (603) 223-4200 Email: Brad.Weilbrenner@dot.nh.gov |
Steve Gratton CEO Lovering Family Foundation Office Phone: (603) 848-2131 Email: sgratton@tds.net |
Glen Wilder FARS Analyst/Fatal Crash Unit State of NH DOS/DMV Office Phone: (603) 227-4185 Email: Glen.Wilder@dos.nh.gov |
Wednesday, May 18, 2011 – Peer Exchange | |
---|---|
8:00 A.M. | Welcoming Remarks
|
8:20 A.M. | Workshop Overview/Expected Outcomes (Stuart Thompson, Highway Safety Engineer, NHDOT) |
8:30 A.M. | Overview of FHWA's Safety Program (Martin Calawa, FHWA NH Division Office) |
8:45 A.M. | Overview of New Hampshire's Data Program (Roberta Bourque) |
9:00 A.M. | Presentation on International Motorcycle Scanning Tour (Keith Cota, Chief Project Manager, NHDOT Highway Design) |
9:15 A.M. | Peer Presentation (John Milton – WSDOT Director, Enterprise Risk Management) |
9:50 A.M. | Break |
10:00 A.M. | Peer Presentation (Gary Modi – Chief, Safety Management Division / Jeffery Roecker – Transportation Planning Specialist, Pennsylvania DOT) |
10:35 A.M. | Peer Presentation (Scott Jones – Safety Programs Engineer, Utah DOT Traffic and Safety) |
11:10 A.M. | Q&A for Peers |
11:30 A.M. | Lunch |
12:30 P.M. | SHSP Update – Breakout Groups
|
1:30 P.M. | Report Out |
2:00 P.M. | Break |
2:10 P.M. | Large Group Discussion
|
3:00 P.M. | Breakout Groups – Emphasis Area Action Plans for Implementation
|
3:45 P.M. | Wrap-Up |
4:00 P.M. | Adjourn |
Thursday, May 19, 2011 – PEER EXCHANGE Workshop | |
8:80 A.M. | Welcome and Logistics |
8:15 A.M. | Emphasis Area Groups Breakout – Action Plans for Implementation
|
9:30 A.M. | Report Out |
10:00 A.M. | Break |
10:15 A.M. | Emphasis Area Groups Breakout – Action Plans for Implementation (continued)
|
11:15 A.M. | Report Out |
12:00 P.M. | Lunch |
1:00 P.M. | Emphasis Area Groups Breakout – Action Plans for Implementation (continued)
|
2:00 P.M. | Report Out |
2:30 P.M. | Break |
2:45 P.M. | Future Expectations and Next Steps |
3:30 P.M. | Adjourn |
Emphasis Area | Goals | Example Strategies |
---|---|---|
Lane Departure | Keep vehicles in their lanes. | For horizontal curves:
|
Minimize the likelihood of a crash or vehicle overturning. |
|
|
Reduce the severity of lane departure crashes. |
|
|
Tracking Performance |
|
|
Performance Measures |
|