If you’re interested in just how many people visited The League in 2012, who the top commenters were, or what our  most popular posts happened to be, check out this nifty Annual Report that WordPress.com put together. For those of you who commented many thousands of times I applaud your fervor, though I question whether you have time to do much of anything else….

All told, it was an incredible year for us both in terms of traffic and the evolution of the site. The community of writers, commenters, and readers continued (and continues) to grow. The site regularly generates enormous comment threads, and we’ve seen some really neat symposiums and other discussions in a year largely defined by the election.

What was your favorite post of 2012? What would you like to see in 2013?

 

{ 28 comments }

Post image for What Would Liberals Do?

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here.

by Phillip H.

When the Newtown , Connecticut school shootings occurred, I went through a series of stages, sort of akin to grief.  First there was shock mixed with grief then a resorting to my own faith tradition to see what my real call to initial action might be.  At that point I put aside my virtual pen, as there seemed to be a flood of posts coming forth on the shooting, the topic of gun violence, and how our Nation should respond.

Over the holidays, I went to the Bob and Rocco Gun Show in Green Bay, WI with my father in-law.  He’s a gun owner and formerly active hunter and target shooter, but is now mostly a collector of ammunition and artifacts – his sarcoidosis has diminished his lung capacity, so he doesn’t shoot much anymore.  I went as much to people watch and eavesdrop as anything, but one encounter there perfectly sums up my life experience as a liberal, employed-by-the-federal-government gun owner and shooting sports enthusiast. Continue reading this post…

{ 209 comments }

Post image for Excusing the NRA, Remembering Ourselves

Now that the fiscal cliff fight is over, (for a spell) now that the inauguration is almost upon us, we’re finally ready to have the national conversation about guns (maybe, unless fighting over Chuck Hagel carries us all the way to the next debt ceiling climax). Before it gets going, though, I want to think through a surprising something that’s bothered me about the last month of national gun policy discussions. Believe it or not, this isn’t a post about the NRA or the substance of gun policy. It’s about how a democracy works—how it has to work, if it’s worth having at all.


It’s relatively obvious that the NRA did itself no favors with its bizarre press conference after the Newtown shooting. The event stood in stark contrast to their reputation. After this shooting, like nearly every other shooting before it, the received wisdom has been that the NRA is too strong and politically savvy to allow substantive changes in American gun policy.

Or, rather, that was the received wisdom, because the chaotic presser showed none of the clinical, calculating power the NRA’s reputed to possess. This wasn’t a damage control of nefarious Beltway puppeteers. It was an outburst of “tone-deaf” nonsense from an organization too inflexible to know when it’s in serious trouble.

Arming police in every one of America’s 98,817 public schools? Saving money on that ~$3.3 billion proposal by asking for armed volunteers to guard the schools? Are we screening them for mental illness? Are we providing ongoing monitoring? Why wouldn’t we insist on similar procedures for ordinary citizens who’d like to buy assault rifles, handguns, etc? How can we be sure that these volunteers are “good guys with a gun?”

And on and on. NRA executive vice-president Wayne LaPierre called for the federal government to maintain “an active list of the mentally ill,” who he later referred to as “lunatics.” He charged the media with various “moral failings,” which mostly consisted of airing violent films, music videos, and other such immoral dreck.

Perhaps some isolated elements of the NRA’s response are viable, politically serious responses to an epidemic of mass shootings. Maybe.

BUT: Taken as a whole, the proposals were thorough evidence of how strange and out of step the organization is. I still think this is about right:

In “a war of all against all,” the only plausible answer to violence is more violence, but this is an absurd response in civil society—especially when we’re talking about decentralizing the threat of violence. Absurd. Exceptionally absurd.

But the left still talks as if the NRA were a secret, all-powerful shaman living in the Capitol’s eaves. After that press conference, though, surely it was clear that they’re better despised than feared. Really? We’ve been afraid of these guys?

Yes. Any opponent, no matter how serious, looks better with hype. Strip that away, however, and you’ll have some idea of how much of their strength is real and how much is only apparent. This is all they are. This is all that they ever were. 

Again, though, this isn’t a post about how terrible the NRA has gotten. It’s a post about democracy and taking responsibility. Continue reading this post…

{ 60 comments }


Really, this is not only sweet and moving (and yes, I laughed…I cried…) it’s also entirely unfair. For those poor saps not yet married, there’s simply no way they’ll ever top this.

For those of us already married, we must hang our heads in shame. It’s not just the creativity of the proposal, either—for me, the wonderful thing about this video is seeing all the friends and family who helped out.

Marriage isn’t just between two people, after all. It’s a social contract that is as much about family and community as it is about love; or rather, it’s about a broader kind of love than merely romance. The terrible thing about divorce is often not merely the end of a marriage, but the awkward and devastating impact of that separation on children, extended family, friends, and so forth.

I don’t want to preach politics here, but I do want to note that this is why I consider myself pro-family, and why I think it would be good if more people were given the right to marry rather than fewer. (It’s also why I tend to support pro-family politics such as better safety-nets, paid maternity—and paternity—leave, and education spending.)

Marriage should bring communities and families closer together, even if that isn’t always easy. Perhaps widening the scope of who is allowed to marry in this society would help heal some deep and persistent wounds.

In any case, this is fantastic. What a joy to watch.

{ 56 comments }

Post image for A Well Regulated Militia

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here.

by M.A.
Much is occasionally made about the second amendment as some sort of fail-safe; some sort of methodology by which the Founding Fathers, in enshrining the Ten Commandments of the “Bill of Rights” etched in stone by the hand of G-d and never to be altered or debated again, created a Big Red Button named the Second Amendment which was always destined to end in a violent overthrow of the US government at some point.

It’s pure fertilizer-grade bull manure, but it gets a lot of play in the gun owner circles and especially gets play amongst sorts of people who probably shouldn’t have guns to begin with: Oath Keepers, Weekend Warrior “militiamen”, “Survivalists” who are convinced that the End Times Are Upon Us, Sovereign Citizen Movementers, and dead-enders who believe that there is some sort of anarchy or calamity coming.

Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it… and we don’t teach the lessons of history anymore. Nobody pays attention to this stuff.

So here’s some historical perspective: Continue reading this post…

{ 71 comments }

(Previously: The Knock Down, Part 1 and Part 2,and a Placeholder)

James Fallows, after Aurora, The Certainty of More Shootings:

“[T]he additional sad, horrifying, and appalling point is the shared American knowledge that, beyond any doubt, this will happen again, and that it will happen in America many, many times before it occurs anywhere else.”

Fellow Leaguester Jason Kuznicki, in his post Great Fact, Little Fact:

“Suppose I were to find a $100 bill on the street in Washington, DC. That’s an exceptionally rare event, but not an unwelcome one.

“Afterward I would not — I mean, not ever — think to have an Important Family Conversation about whether I should quit my job and devote more time to searching the gutters of our nation’s capital. I’d probably buy a bottle of champagne, or give the cash to malaria prevention, or maybe just put it in Alice’s college fund. I might consider finding the money’s owner, but I don’t seriously think I’d be able to. So there things would stand, just as they should.

“I would take what happened, not lose my composure, and recall the words of Chrysippus: “We must live according to the experience of what usually happens in nature.” And not by whatever grabs our monkey brains in a given moment.”

Yours truly, in my post The Knock-Down, Part 1:

“We are hit by a blast of wind, 40 or 50 knots I’d guess, and an instant INTEMPERANCE goes from sailing upright to horizontal, spreaders in the water, a 16,000lbs bluewater cruiser (with a 6,500lbs deep keel) laid on her side like a children’s toy caught by a summer zephyr.”

Me again, in Feasibility, Normalization, Carbon Footprint, and Buyer Beware:

“[For a USCG Inspected Passenger Vessel] there’s a mathematically determined maximum sailplan, and that sailplan is not calculated against the sort of 5kts light-air days that had us putting up those big bright sails on INTEMPERANCE; the sailplan calculation is made to make sure the boat stays on her feet when she’s hit by the unexpected gust, or when (mis)handled by a skipper unfamiliar with her sailing characteristics.

“Or put another way, the Coast Guard is saying: Six pack is kind of a wild-west, seat of the pants designation. It puts most of the burden on the skipper to maintain his vessel and operate it properly, and on his paying customers to exercise their judgement about whether or not they should even step aboard in the first place. And whatever happens, people are only going to get killed six at a time.” Continue reading this post…

{ 2 comments }

My Three Sons

by Rose Woodhouse on January 8, 2013

in Family

Post image for My Three Sons

Forgive me for not having an upshot with this post. It’s just a jumble of thoughts about the relationship that my sons have with each other, a topic I wrote about briefly once before. Someone recently sent me the book Far From the Tree, about parents who raise children who are quite different from they are. The interesting thing is that I hadn’t really thought about my child with disabilities that way before, i.e., as very different from my husband and me. What I have thought about quite a bit is that I am raising children who are wildly different from one another. Continue reading this post…

{ 9 comments }

Post image for Remembering Dr. J. Blaine Hudson (1949-2013)

I was saddened yesterday to hear that my favorite professor from my time at the University of Louisville passed away over the weekend. I was lucky enough to see him last year at a book signing for Two Centuries of Black Louisville: A Photographic History and reconnect, unaware that his time with us was short. I felt it was important to honor his memory and I can think of no place more fitting to do so then here at the League. From a short piece in the Courier Journal:

In 1969, Hudson was arrested and expelled after occupying the same dean’s office he would later hold. He and other protesters demanded more black faculty, African-American representation on the board of trustees and the creation of a Pan-African Studies Department.

Hudson taught history and Pan-African studies classes for years while holding various administrative posts. He was Pan-African Studies Department chairman from 1998 to 2003 and was an associate dean from 1999 to 2004.

Hudson, a lifelong Louisville resident, received his doctorate in higher education administration at the University of Kentucky and his master’s and bachelor’s degrees from U of L.

Hudson was active in the community, working to teach others outside the university setting about black history and working to combat violence in western Louisville.

Hudson has been chair of the Kentucky African American Heritage Commission and founded a program called the Saturday Academy, an enrichment program to teach people about African-American history and world history from an African-American perspective. Continue reading this post…

{ 5 comments }

It’s one of those typical dark, rainy January days here in Portland; the kind of day where you look out the window and try to think of an excuse to stay  in your pajamas for the day.

My excuse is that I have been pretty damn sick this week, and I feel like crap.  In need of some serious medicine, I am, and so I’m taking healthy doses of Lake Street Dive and Obadiah Parker.

Here is Lake Street Dive performing a fabulous cover of George Michael’s Faith:


And of course, Obadiah Parker’s cover of Outkast’s Hey Ya.


Enjoy.  And of course, consider this an open thread.

Follow Tod on Twitter, view his archive, or email him.

{ 1 comment }

Post image for How A Progressive Christian Pastor Made His Peace With Guns (Kinda Sorta)

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here.

by Dennis Saunders

Growing up,  I was taught by my mother that guns were not good things.  Having come of age in Flint. Michigan that started to see a rise in violent crime in the 1980s, that message was only drilled into me further.  The urban environment that I come from taught me one thing: guns were bad, very bad and it was stupid to give people access to handguns, let alone semiautomatics.  I guess I was like a lot of mainline/progressive Christians in seeing no real good use for guns in light of all the damage they cause.

Sitting here as a middle-aged man, I still think there should be some types of restrictions on guns like background checks.  I still don’t like the NRA.  I also don’t think I’m going to pick up a gun anytime soon.  But my attitude towards guns has changed.  I don’t have the same negative attitude that I used to have when I was younger.  While I still think guns have had an impact in our cities among the poor and persons of color, I’ve also met folks-most who live in rural areas- that use guns and are not the “gun nuts” that I thought they were.  I met people who were normal people.  They liked to hunt with guns, or carried guns with them through concealed carry laws or had them in their home for protection.  While I don’t endorse an anything-goes when it comes to guns, I’ve come to well, tolerate them.  Not everyone who has a gun is going to become the next mass shooter.

In April of this year, Gregg Garrett wrote an article on the Christian Response to gun ownership.  As articles go it was pretty standard response from a liberal Christian.  He never says guns are evil and should be banned, but he might as well have.  Garrett does talk about how Christ practiced pacifism and maybe we should follow his lead. Continue reading this post…

{ 23 comments }

Post image for The Guns In America Symposium: Epilogue

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here.

After today, we’ll be winding down the Guns In America symposium.  There are a few other contributors who have said they may post an additional piece over the next week or so, but you can probably expect the days ahead to be more typical League fare.

This seems like as good a time as any, then, to thank everyone involved for making this symposium a success:

We posted more than thirty compelling pieces of writing we were proud to publish; we received twice that number of submissions, any of which we’d have been equally proud to publish had we the space.  So thanks to everyone that took the time and effort to put your thoughts forward.

Guns are an easy enough topic to discuss when everyone is of like mind; however, it is one of the most difficult to tackle with all sides at the table.  To be honest with you, we were a little concerned that the topic might attract commenters more comfortable with the hostile, crazy, ALL-CAPS style of discourse.  Instead, the new voices we’ve heard from have been both thoughtful and respectful.  So thanks as well (and as always) to those that kept the dialogue going in the threads.

I also want to acknowledge the League regular contributors that not only wrote front-page posts, but also took the time to act as hosts in the threads – but perhaps a special shout out is owed to Mike Dwyer for providing yeoman’s work from beginning to end.

Lastly, of course, a thanks to everyone that stopped by to read what we all had to say – and our stats suggest there were a whole lot you.  If you’re already a League regular, thanks for your continued support.  If you’re new and only dropped in because of the symposium, we’d like to invite you to stick around as we discuss every other topic under the sun.

Follow Tod on Twitter, view his archive, or email him.

{ 41 comments }

What I’ve Learned from the Guns In America Symposium

by Guest Authors January 7, 2013
Thumbnail image for What I’ve Learned from the Guns In America Symposium

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. by Mad Rocket Scientist I’ve been reading this symposium pretty carefully while trying to stay on top of the discussions, and there have been somethings mentioned I’d like to try and explore further.So first off, a point I concede that I was wrong about in ...

220 comments Read the full article →

Nominations Towards Normalcy

by Nob Akimoto January 7, 2013
Thumbnail image for Nominations Towards Normalcy

The Weekly Standard and other neoconservative rags have started their predictable braying for blood after President Obama today nominated Chuck Hagel for Secretary of Defense and John Brennan for CIA Director. Most of the sound and fury has been against Hagel’s supposed “anti-Israel” stances, and better writers than I will handle the demolition of those shameless voices. Meanwhile, I’d like to focus on what the nominations of Brennan and Hagel mean for the overall tenor of the War on Terror. If you’d ...

58 comments Read the full article →

Movie notes: The Killing of America

by Rufus F. January 7, 2013
Thumbnail image for Movie notes: The Killing of America

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. We’re having this discussion because rampage shootings have occurred with enough frequency in recent years to bring to mind those calamities visited upon ‘stiff-necked’ nations in the Old Testament. And indeed, many are trying to read the prophecy in these recent massacres. The ...

15 comments Read the full article →

My Lucky Day

by Guest Authors January 7, 2013
Thumbnail image for My Lucky Day

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. by Ramblin’ Rod Sometimes you just get real lucky, you know? Like the time, I guess it was forty years ago now, when I was about 12 or 13, and I was hanging out with my best friend in his upstairs bedroom. I think it ...

53 comments Read the full article →

Why Zero Dark Thirty?

by Ethan Gach January 7, 2013
Thumbnail image for Why Zero Dark Thirty?

I went into Zero Dark Thirty with several preconceptions. I followed the debate between film critics and political journalists very closely. I was aware of the movie’s major plot points and already had a list of key moments, and other people’s interpretations of them, floating around in my head by the time the hunt for Osama bin Laden opened in a theater near me. And yet none of these preconceptions about Zero Dark Thirty prepared me to confront what would be my ultimate reaction to ...

35 comments Read the full article →

Another Question

by Kazzy January 7, 2013
Thumbnail image for Another Question

Recently, I queried folks here on the appropriateness of our differing responses to hunting, which we generally consider acceptable or even laudable, and activities like dog fighting or turtle squashing, activities that are largely condemned as abhorrent and immoral.  Most people were able to make cogent arguments that there were inherent differences to these activities and that our differing responses were largely appropriate.  It was a refreshing conversation to hear, especially since I tend to think their is a lot ...

106 comments Read the full article →

Still Dead

by Will Truman January 7, 2013

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. –WARNING: This post contains graphic content.– Walt and I were sitting in the bleachers of the football field of my middle school. What we were doing there, I don’t know. I just knew I was so happy to see him. Ecstatic, even. Enough ...

24 comments Read the full article →

I’m wearing shorts and a t-shirt, walking down the street with a camera (and a gun).

by David Ryan January 6, 2013

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. A lot of the post that I’ve made here at the league have been concerned with norms and signaling, especially around class, as I’ve made my transition from filmmaker to boat builder and boat driver, and with that in mind, I’d like to make my ...

16 comments Read the full article →

Guns in Three Acts

by Mike Dwyer January 6, 2013
Thumbnail image for Guns in Three Acts

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. This post should really be three smaller posts but in the interest of not being too greedy with the symposium I’m going to mash them together. I hope readers will indulge me… Act I The first hunting I did with my father was chasing ...

110 comments Read the full article →

A Strange Definition of Success…

by Nob Akimoto January 5, 2013
Thumbnail image for A Strange Definition of Success…

Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Guns In America. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. Recently a shooting in San Antonio has been making the chain email rounds. This chain has been followed by breathless speculation as to why the media hasn’t covered it in more detail. For those without the patience to click through the links a precis on the ...

50 comments Read the full article →