Management System: Environment, Safety, and Health
Subject Area: Facility Safety Authorization
Procedure 2. Reviewing and Approving Safety Documents for Nuclear Facilities Downgraded Below Hazard Category 3 Threshold Quantities by Analysis
Subject Matter Expert: | CAROL SOHN |
---|---|
Management System Owner: | PATRICK SMITH |
Secondary Management System Owner: | KARL MORO |
Issue Date: 09/11/2012
SCMS Revision: 4.0
1.0 Applicability
This procedure applies to Office of Science (SC) Hazard Category 2 and 3 nuclear facilities that have been downgraded to below Hazard Category 3 threshold quantities (TQs) by analysis. This procedure does not apply to facilities which have inventories below the Hazard Category 3 TQs, based on inventory alone (i.e., radiological facilities), unless the SC Site Office has withdrawn the contractor’s authorization to approve these documents (e.g., radiological Auditable Safety Analysis [ASA]). This procedure provides the SC staff with a consistent method to review and approve safety documents for nuclear facilities downgraded to below Hazard Category 3 TQs by analysis and Radiological facilities submitted by contractors.
2.0 Required Procedure
Step 1 | The SC Site Office Manager, if applicable, designates a responsible individual to lead the review of safety documentation to downgrade a nuclear facility to below Hazard Category 3 TQs by analysis or safety document for a Radiological facility in which the contractor’s Approval Authority has been withdrawn. NOTE: Site Office procedures may designate the Review Team Leader (with Approval Authority agreement). This approved designation eliminates the need for Steps 2 and 3. |
Step 2 |
NOTE: The memorandum is normally prepared in advance of the safety basis documentation being submitted for approval. |
Step 3 | The Approval Authority formally approves the Review Team Leader appointment and provides that information to:
NOTE: Safety basis documents to be submitted for DOE approval must be formally transmitted from the contractor to the responsible SC Site Office. |
Step 4 | The Review Team Leader evaluates the scope of the review effort to determine what, if any, additional resources are required. The Review Team Leader requests support as needed from SC Site Office, Integrated Support Centers (in conjunction with SC Site Office) and HQ. |
Step 5 | Using a graded approach, the Review Team Leader prepares and submits a review plan to the SC Site Office Manager for approval. Review Team membership should include program representation and other disciplines consistent with the degree of changes in the safety document, nature of the hazards and/or work being requested for approval. |
Step 6 | The Review Team Members review the safety document, evaluate its technical accuracy and adequacy, and document any comments or issues identified. |
Step 7 | For nuclear facilities downgraded to below Hazard Category 3 TQs by analysis, the Review Team Members ensure the technical bases and assumptions used to support the facility hazard categorization downgrade are consistent with DOE‑STD‑1027‑92, Change Notice 1, Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE Order 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports, and Nuclear Safety Technical Position (NSTP) 2002‑2, Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear Facilities from Category 3 to Radiological. |
Step 8 | The Review Team Members ensure that the safety document(s) identifies, analyzes, and controls the hazards. The team also ensures that controls are specified to appropriately maintain the conditions, parameters, and assumptions that form the basis for the downgrade. |
Step 9 | For safety document approval:
|
Step 10 | The Review Team Leader promptly communicates
comments/issues generated during the review to the contractor through formal
communications from the SC Site Office Manager or designee. The Review Team
Leader elevates areas where agreement cannot be reached through the chain
of command for resolution.
|
Step 11 | For nuclear facilities downgraded to below
Hazard Category 3 TQs by analysis:
|
Step 12 | After the safety document is approved, the SC Site Office Manager or designee prepares and formally transmits to the contractor the approval letter with a copy of the SER or SER‑like document. The transmittal letter establishes DOE’s expectations regarding any implementation issues (e.g. changes and/or amendments to the safety documents). |
Step 13 | The SC Site Office Manager or designee ensures the contractor has properly implemented the safety document requirements. The SC Site Office Manager or designee ensures that the conditions, parameters, and assumptions that form the bases for the downgrades are protected and linked to an overall inventory control process. The SC Site Office Manager or designee also ensures that the contractor periodically revisits the safety documents to ensure the hazard categorizations remain valid (recommended to be annual). NOTE: The submitted safety documents for downgrading the nuclear facility to below Hazard Category 3 TQs by analysis (e.g., Final Hazard Categorization Documents) and safety documents for the Radiological facility in which the contractor’s approval authority has been withdrawn (e.g., Auditable Safety Assessment, Health and Safety Plan), the SER or SER‑like document, and supporting documentation associated with DOE’s review and approval of a safety basis document (e.g., review plan, review comments, resolution matrices, transmittal correspondence between the contractor and DOE and between the Approval Authority and the SC Site Office, independent analyses or calculations performed by or for DOE) are quality assurance records and must be controlled and maintained by the responsible SC Site Office organization. |
3.0 References
-
10 CFR 830, Subpart B, Nuclear Safety Management, Safety Basis Requirements
-
DOE‑STD‑1027‑92, Change Notice 1, Hazard Categorization and Accident Analysis Techniques for Compliance with DOE O 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports
DOE‑STD‑1104‑2009, Review and Approval of Nuclear Facility Safety Basis and Safety Design Basis Documents
- Nuclear Safety Technical Position (NSTP) 2002‑2, Methodology for Final Hazard Categorization for Nuclear Facilities from Category 3 to Radiological
This is not the online OFFICIAL SCMS COPY of this file. Before using this printed copy, verify that it is the most current version by checking the Last Major Revision and Last Minor Revision dates (at the bottom of each document) on the SCMS Web site.
This is the online OFFICIAL SCMS COPY of this file. Before using a printed copy, verify that it is the most current version by checking the Last Major Revision and Last Minor Revision dates (at the bottom of each document) on the SCMS Web site.
Send a question or comment to the
SCMS Help Desk.
Disclaimer
Last Major SCMS Revision: 09/11/2012