Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis Beetle & Young
 
 
 

 Wyoming big sagebrush
 
Prepared by: Sheryl Harrison
 
 
  Taxonomy
  Scientific name: Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis Bettle & Young.
Latin name meaning: The species name, tridentata, refers to the 3-toothed leaves.
Family: Asteraceae.
Common names: Wyoming big sagebrush.
Similar species: Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata (basin big sagebrush) and ssp. vaseyana (mountain big sagebrush). Mountain big sagebrush grows at higher elevations over 1,150 m (6,29,36), basin big sagebrush grows at intermediate elevations, on sites more mesic than those supporting Wyoming big sagebrush, and is over 2 m tall (6,29). Wyoming big sagebrush grows at the lowest elevations of the three subspecies, and sheds 60-65% of its foliage under severe drought (6,29). Another similar species is Artemisia tripartita (threetip sagebrush). Threetip sagebrush is smaller, has leaves that are deeply cleft into three narrow, linear divisions and has 5-8 disk flowers (36).
Associated species: Agropyron spicatum, Balsamorhiza sagitatta, Stipa lettermanis Poa fendleriana, Achillea lanulosa, Penstemon spp. and Aster spp (38).
   
  Key Identification Characteristics
  Growth form: Wyoming big sagebrush is an erect, branching, evergreen, aromatic shrub (36).
Stem: The woody stem of this species is branched, over 7 cm in diameter and shredding on older branches, but densely hairy on young twigs (36,48).
Leaves: Leaves of Wyoming big sagebrush are mostly 3-toothed, but can be entire near the apex of the plant, 1-3 cm long, densely hairy on top and bottom surfaces, and persistent through the winter (36,48). The leaves contain oils giving them a distinct odor when crushed (48).
Roots: Wyoming big sagebrush has a long taproot and shorter fibrous roots. It absorbs moisture from deep within the soil and move it up, releasing it in the upper part of the soil profile at night (11). The roots can penetrate deep enough to break protective barriers at hazardous waste sites (8).
Inflorescence/flowers: The inflorescence of Wyoming big sagebrush is an elongate, loose panicle (36,48). The flowers are in composite heads of 3-5 disk flowers, and are small and yellow (36).
Fruit: The seeds of Wyoming big sagebrush are sparsely hairy (36).
   
  Ecological & Physiological Relations
  Life history: Wyoming big sagebrush is a native perennial shrub (36,48).
Photosynthetic pathway: Wyoming big sagebrush is a C3 shrub.
Phenology: Twig elongation for Wyoming big sagebrush begins in mid-April and lasts until late June (13). Flowers of this species appear in late August (13,36,48), but flower bud development can last from mid-June until early September (13). Wyoming big sagebrush forms and sheds seeds between October and December (13,48). Seeds remain viable in the soil for one year (48). Seeds may be transported by wind, water or animals, but most seeds remain near parent plants (18). Average germination for Wyoming big sagebrush over a 3 year study was 54% (20) at temperatures between 2 and 30C (14,19,32). Seeds require light for germination, but if the pericarp is removed or short chill treatments are given to the seeds, light requirements decrease (33). Wyoming big sagebrush reaches maximum growth 2 weeks sooner than the other two subspecies, enhancing its ability to survive on xeric sites (7)
Distribution: Wyoming big sagebrush grows in the Intermountain west, east of the Continental Divide in Montana, Wyoming and parts of Colorado. It is scattered in Mixed Grass Prairie in Northern Great Plains and east to the Black Hills. Wyoming big sagebrush is common in the grasslands of southern British Columbia.
Habitat: Of the three subspecies, Wyoming big sagebrush is most adapted to poor, infertile sites. Wyoming big sagebrush is intolerant of alkaline soils (36). It grows on dry, gravelly, shallow sites ranging from 725 m to 2,500 m (4,31). Wyoming big sagebrush grows on the warm desert fringe to forests and meadows (33) and can survive on sites receiving less than 282 mm of precipitation annually (16).
Ground Cover/LAI/Height: Wyoming big sagebrush is usually less than 1 m tall (48). Small mammals and birds seek this species for cover (15) more than other species growing in association with it (40). Sage grouse choose Wyoming big sagebrush for cover 71% of the time when nesting (42).
Succession: Wyoming big sagebrush is a late successional species, occurring in climax communities.
Indicator value: An abundance of Wyoming big sagebrush, indicates an overgrazed site and/or a site that has not burned for a long time. It is also an indicator of a soil with low fertiliy.
Competition: Wyoming big sagebrush is competitive and reduces perennial grass production (23,48).
   
  Management Considerations
  Forage value: Crude protein of Wyoming big sagebrush averages 8.5% when plats are growing (17).
Grazing: Of the three subspecies of big sagebrush, Wyoming big sagebrush is the most palatable. Preference ranges from poor to fair for cattle and horses (46) and fair to good for sheep (15). Overgrazing by domestic livestock allows Wyoming big sagebrush to increase.
Wildlife: Wyoming big sagebrush is commonly eaten by elk and mule deer (49). It also makes up 76% of pronghorn diets in the spring (35). Ground squirrel burrows increase the amount of spring recharge of soil moisture, which enhances productivity of Wyoming big sagebrush (30).
Burning: Wyoming big sagebrush is killed by burning (3,9,26,34,39,45). Wyoming big sagebrush will regenerate quicker on small burned sites than on large ones because seeds can move in from surrounding plants (27). Smoke from burning Wyoming big sagebrush enhances leaf production and elongation of native grasses (5).
Restoration: Several years may be required to re-establish this species because it grows on infertile, low producing sites (12,46).
Special management: Wyoming big sagebrush is the most common woody species in western U.S. rangelands, occupying over 60 million ha (46). Rest from grazing has decreased its cover by 29% (46). Burning is the most effective method for removing Wyoming big sagebrush, followed by chemical and mechanical methods (34,46,48). Burning or spraying this species can increase production of associated species in subsequent years (28,41,46,). Applying 2,4-D at 1.3 kg/ha or 2,4,5-T at 2.8 kg/ha kills Wyoming big sagebrush (28,41).
Other: Native peoples from the southern Interior of British Columbia used the leaves and branches of this species to make teas for colds and used the leaves as a fumigant (36). The bark was woven into mats, bags, and clothing (36). The aromatic leaves of Wyoming big sagebrush inhibit the oviposition of Mexican bean weevils (Zabrotes subfasciatus) (46).
   
  References
 
  1. Abbott, M.L., L. Fraley Jr., and T.D. Reynolds. 1991. Root profiles of selected cold desert shrubs and grasses in disturbed and undisturbed soils. Environ. Exper. Bot. 31:165-178.
  2. Blaisdell, J.P. 1958. Seasonal development and yield of native plants on the Upper Snake River Plains and their relation to certain climatic factors. USDA Tech. Bull. No 1190. Washington, DC.
  3. Blaisdell, J.P. 1953. Ecological effects of planned burning of sagebrush/grass range on the Upper Snake River Plains. USDA Tech. Bull. 1075. Washington, DC.
  4. Blaisdell, J.P., R.B. Murray, and E.D. McArthur. 1982. Managing intermountain rangelands-sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. 134. USDA Forest Serv., Intermountain Forest and Range Exper. Stat. Ogden, UT.
  5. Blank, R.R. and J.A. Young. 1998. Heated substrate and smoke:Influence on seed emergence and plant growth. J. Range Manage. 51:577-583.
  6. Bonham, C.D., T.R. Cottrell, and J.E. Mitchell. 1991. Inferences for life history strategies of Artemisia tridentata ssp. J. Veg. Sci. 2:339-344.
  7. Booth, G.D., B.L. Welch, and T.L.C. Jacobson. 1990. Seedling growth rate of three subspecies of big sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 43:432-436.
  8. Bowerman, A.G. and E.F. Redente. 1998. Biointrusion of protective barriers at hazardous waste sites. J. Environ. Qual. 27:625-632.
  9. Britton, C.M. and R.G. Clark. 1985. Effects of fire on sagebrush and bitterbrush. In: Sanders, K. and J. Durham eds. Rangeland fire effects:a symposium:Proc. of the symposium. U.S. Dept. Int., Bureau of Land Manage., Idaho State Office. Boise, ID.
  10. Brown, R.W. 1971. Distribution of plant communities in southeastern Montana badlands. Amer. Midl. Natur. 85:458-477.
  11. Caldwell, M.M. and J.H. Richards. 1989. Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia 70:1-5.
  12. Clifton, N.A. 1981. Response to prescribed fire in a Wyoming big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass habitat type. Thesis. University of Idaho. Moscow, ID.
  13. Coyne, P.I. and C.W. Cook. 1970. Seasonal carbohydrate reserve cycles in eight desert range species. J. Range Manage. 23:438-434.
  14. Daubenmire, R.F. 1970. Steppe vegetation of Washington. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 62.
  15. Ditterner, P.L. and M.R. Olson. 1983. The plant information network data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. U.S. Depart. Inter., Fish and Wildl. Serv. Washington, DC.
  16. Driese, K.L., W.A. Reiners, E.H. Merrill, and K.G. Gerow. 1997. A digital land cover map of Wyoming, USA: A tool for vegetation analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 8:133-146.
  17. Fajemisin, B., Ganskopp, D.R. Cruz, and M. Vavra. 1996. Potential for woody plant control by Spanish goats in the sagebrush steppe. Small Rumin. Res. 20:229-238.
  18. Goodwin, D.L. 1956. Autecological studies of Artemisia tridentata Nutt. State College of Washington; Ph. D. Diss. Pullman, WA.
  19. Harniss, R.O. and W.T. McDonough. 1975. Seedling growth of three big sagebrush subspecies under controlled temperature regimes. J. Range Manage. 28:243-244.
  20. Harniss, R.O. and W.T. McDonough. 1976. Yearly variation in germination in three subspecies of big sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 29:167-169.
  21. Harniss, R.O. and H.A. Wright. 1982. Summer grazing of sagebrush-grass range by sheep. J. Range Manage. 35:13-17.
  22. Hironaka, M., M.A. Fosberg, and A.H. Winward. 1983. Sagebrush-grass habitat types of southern Idaho. Bull. No. 35. University of Idaho, Forest, Wildlife and Range Exper. Sta. Moscow, ID.
  23. Hull, A.C., Jr. 1941. Competition between sagebrush and reseeded species on a burned-over area in southeastern Idaho. Proc. Utah Acad. Sci. 18:12.
  24. Hull, A.C., Jr., N.A. Kissinger, Jr, and W.T. Vaughn. 1952. Chemical control of big sagebrush in Wyoming. J. Range Manage. 5:398-402.
  25. Jensen, M.E. 1989. Soil characteristics of mountainous northeastern Nevada (USA) sagebrush community types. Great Basin Natur. 49:469-481.
  26. Johnson, A.H. and R.M. Strang. 1983. Burning in a bunchgrass/sagebrush community:The southern Interior of B.C. and northwestern U.S. compared. J. Range Manage. 36:616-618.
  27. Johnson, J.R. and G.F. Payne. 1968. Sagebrush reinvasion as affected by some environmental influences. J. Range Manage. 21:209-213.
  28. Johnson, W.M. 1958. Reinvasion of big sagebrush following chemical control. J. Range Manage. 11:169-172.
  29. Kolb, K.J. and S.J. Sperry. 1999. Differences in drought adaption between subspecies of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Ecology 80:2373-2384.
  30. Laundre, J.W. 1998. Effect of ground squirrel burrows on plant productivity in a cool desert environment. J. Range Manage. 51:638-643.
  31. Lentz, R.D. and G.H. Simonson. 1987. Correspondence of soil properties and classification units with sagebrush communities in southeastern Oregon. II. Comparisons within a multi-taxa soil vegetation unit. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 51:1271-1276.
  32. McDonough, W.T. and R.O. Harniss. 1974. Effects of temperature on germination in three subspecies of big sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 27:204-205.
  33. Meyer, S.E., S.B. Monsen, and E.D. McArthur. 1990. Germination responses of Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae) to light and chill processes: Patterns of between population variation. Bot. Gaz. 151:176-183.
  34. Mueggler, W.F. and J.P. Blaisdell. 1958. Effects on associated species of burning, rotobeating, spraying and railing sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 11:61-63.
  35. Ngugi, K.R., J. Powell, F.C. Hinds, and R.A. Olson. 1992. Range animal diet composition in southcentral Wyoming. J. Range Manage. 45:542-545.
  36. Parish, R., R. Coupe, and D. Loyd. 1996. Plants of Southern Interior British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Lone Pine Publishing. Vancouver, BC.
  37. Pitt, M.D. and B.M. Wikeem. 1990. Phenological patterns and adaptations in an Artemisia/Agropyron plant community. J. Range. Manage. 43:350-358.
  38. Price, R. 1938. Artificial reseeding in oak-brush range in central Utah. USDA Circ. No. 458.
  39. Ralph, M.H. and F.E. Busby. 1979. Prescribed burning: Vegetative change, forage production, costs and returns on six demonstration burns in Utah. J. Range Manage. 32:267-270.
  40. Saab, V.A. and J.S. Marks. 1992. Summer habitat use by Columbian sharp-tailed grouse in western Idaho. Great Basin Natur. 52:166-173.
  41. Schumaker, G.A. and C.L. Hansen. 1977. Herbage response after mechanical and herbicide treatment of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis) in southwest Idaho. Publ. Agric. Res. Serv., USDA. NO ARS-W-46.
  42. Sveum, C.M., J.A. Crawford, and D.W. Edge. 1998. Use and selection of brood-rearing habitat by sage grouse in south central Washington. Great Basin Natural. 58:344-351.
  43. Tisdale, E.W. 1947. The grasslands of the southern Interior of British Columbia. Ecology 28:346-382.
  44. Tisdale, E.W. and M. Hironaka. 1981. The sagebrush grass region: A review of the ecological literature. Bull. 33. University of Idaho, Forest, Wildlife, and Range Exper. Sta. Moscow, ID.
  45. Watts, M.J. and C.L. Wambolt. 1989. Economic evaluation of Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis) control methods. Weed Tech. 3:640-645.
  46. Wambolt, C.L. and G.F. Payne. 1986. An 18 year comparison of control methods for Wyoming big sagebrush in southwestern Montana. J. Range Manage. 39:314-319.
  47. Weaver, D.K., T.W. Phillips, F.V. Dunkel, T. Weaver, R.T. Grubb, and E.L. Nance. 1995. Dried leaves of Rocky Mountain plants decrease infestation of stored product beetles. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:127-142.
  48. Whitson, T.D., L.C. Burill, S.A. Dewey, D.W. Cudney, B.E. Nelson, R.D. Lee, and R. Parker. 1996. Weeds of the west. Western Society of Weed Science. Newark, CA.
  49. Wood, M.K, B.A. Buchanan, and W. Skeet. 1995. Shrub preference and utilization by big game on New Mexico reclaimed mine land. J. Range Manage. 48:431-437.

  Home