[DOE LETTERHEAD]
National
Nuclear Security Administration
October 13, 2005
The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger
Chairman
Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board
625 Indiana Avenue, NW
Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20004-2901
Dear Mr. Chairman:
This is in response to your July
29, 2005, letter concerning National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Policy Letters. Two interrelated actions
have been initiated by NNSA with regard to policies and procedures.
On August 18, 2005, NNSA
transmitted to the Office of Management proposed revisions to Chapter VII
(Exemptions) of DOE M 251.1.1A,
“Directives System Manual”. This
language, drafted by the NNSA’s former General Counsel, is intended to make the
exemption process of Chapter VII consistent with the requirements of the NNSA
Act to provide for review of our exemptions by the appropriate parties and to
establish a reasonable time frame (30 days is the prescribed time period in the
current manual) and to fill a procedural gap in the current process. The current process permits final approval of
an exemption if no objection is received from the Cognizant Secretarial
Officer, the Office of Primary Interest, or the DOE General Counsel within 30
days and allows for those offices to request additional information, with no
time frame for considering it. The draft
submittal by the NNSA would permit the NNSA Administrator to approve the exemption
14 days after NNSA submits any requested additional information, provided that
there is no further objection from the interested DOE offices. We have requested that this language be added
prior to RevCom review of the revised manual which is expected shortly.
The NNSA has agreed in principle
to revisions in the framework for policy guidance. The NNSA Policy Letter system (NAP-1) will be
eliminated and replaced with a new directives system for NNSA. The enclosed White Paper describes the system
in detail. The highlights are:
When the Office of Management
advises the date for release of the revision to DOE M 251.1-1A into RevCom for
review, we will provide a timeline for execution and implementation of the
actions described above. In the
meantime, we are proceeding by vetting the White Paper proposals with staff at
the NNSA Site Offices and Service Center. Their input is essential to acceptance and implementation
of a revised policy system.
We look forward to working with
you to ensure that the Board has an opportunity to review the NNSA Directives
that affect health and safety at defense nuclear facilities.
Sincerely,
Linton F. Brooks
Administrator
cc: Mark B. Whitaker, Jr., Departmental
Representative to the DNFSB