IV. Exemption 3 Statutes,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
A. This section lists the exemption 3 statutes invoked by NARA in responding to FOIA ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
requests; the types of information withheld most often and court decisions supporting ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
these withholdings.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Statute,Type of Information Withheld,Case Citation,Total Number of Times Relied upon by Agency,,,,,,,,,,,
10 U.S.C. § 424,"Organization or any function of, and certain information pertaining to, employees of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency","Miller v. DOJ, 562 F. Supp. 2d 82, 112 (D.D.C. 2008); Wickwire Gavin, P.C. v. Def. Intelligence Agency, 330 F. Supp. 2d 592, 602 (E.D. Va. 2004).",2,,,,,,,,,,,
18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-20,"Wiretap requests and the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication obtained through wiretaps","Mendoza v. DEA, No. 07-5006, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22175 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 14, 2007) (per curiam); Lam Lek Chong v. DEA, 929 F.2d 729, 733 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Payne v. DOJ, No. 96-30840, slip op. at 5-6 (5th Cir. July 11, 1997).",2,,,,,,,,,,,
(Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act),,,,,,,,,,,,,,
26 U.S.C. §§ 6103,Certain tax return information ,Church of Scientology v. IRS 484 U.S. 9 (1987),3,,,,,,,,,,,
(Internal Revenue Code),,,,,,,,,,,,,,
50 U.S.C. § 403g (Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949),"Intelligence sources and methods; certain information pertaining to Agency employees, specifically: ""the organization, functions, names, official titles, salaries, or numbers of personnel employed by the Agency""","Larson v. Dep't of State, 565 F.3d 857, 865 n.2 (D.C. Cir. 2009); Berman v. CIA, 501 F.3d 1136, 1137-38, 1140 (9th Cir. 2007); Makky v. Chertoff, 489 F. Supp. 2d 421, 442 (D.N.J. 2007), aff'd on other grounds, 541 F. 3d 205 (3d Cir. 2008).",3,,,,,,,,,,,
50 U.S.C. §421,"Identities of US Undercover Intelligence Officers, Agents, Informants and Sources",,2,,,,,,,,,,,
(Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982),,None,,,,,,,,,,,,
"50 U.S.C. § 435 Note Sec. 1082, P.L. 102-190",Information concerning US Personnel Classified as POW/MIA during the Vietnam and Korean Conflicts,,2,,,,,,,,,,,
,,None,,,,,,,,,,,,
F.R.Cr.P. 6(e),Grand Jury Information,"Sussman v. USMS, 494 F.3d 1106, 1113 (D.C. Cir. 2007); Fund for Constitutional Gov't v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 656 F.2d 856, 867-68 (D.C. Cir. 1981); Durham v. U.S. Atty. Gen., No. 06-843, 2008 WL 620744, at *2 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2008); Cozen O'Connor v. U.S. Dep't of Treasury, 570 F. Supp. 2d 749, 776 (E.D. Pa. 2008).",11,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
V. FOIA Requests,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"A. Received, Processed and Pending FOIA Requests",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,Number of Requests Pending as of Start of Fiscal Year,Number of Requests Received in Fiscal Year,Number of Requests Processed in Fiscal Year,Number of Requests Pending as of End of Fiscal Year,,,,,,,,,,
Agency Overall,"5,781","18,581","17,508","6,854",,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
B (1) Disposition of FOIA Requests — All Processed Requests,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,Number of Full Denials Based on Reasons Other than Exempt,,,,,,,,,,,
,Number of Full Grants,Number of Partial Grants/ Partial Denials,Number of Full Denials Based on Exemptions,"No
Records",All Records Referred to Another Component or Agency,"Request
Withdrawn","Fee-
Related
Reason","Records not
Reasonably
Described","Improper
FOIA
Request
for Other
Reasons",Not Agency Record,"Duplicate
Request","Other
Explain in chart below ",TOTAL,
"AGENCY
OVERALL ",430,135,7,"16,596",44,19,6,97,39,6,27,102,17508,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"B. (2) Disposition of FOIA Requests — ""Other"" Reasons for ""Full Denials Based ",,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"on Reasons Other than Exemptions"" from Section V, B (1) Chart.",,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,Component,Description of “Other” Reasons for Denials from Chart B (1) & Number of Times Those Reasons Were Relied upon,TOTAL,,,,,,,,,,,
,Agency Overall,Presidential Records Act  102,102,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
B. (3) Disposition of FOIA Requests — Number of Times Exemptions Applied,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"Ex.
1","Ex.
2","Ex.
3","Ex.
4","Ex.
5","Ex.
6","Ex.
7(A)","Ex.
7(B)","Ex.
7(C)","Ex.
7(D)","Ex.
7(E)","Ex.
7(F)","Ex.
8","Ex.
9"
AGENCY OVERALL,81,17,55*,9,19,107,1,0,34,19,5,1,0,0
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"* According to our data there are thirty instances where (b)(3) was cited as the reason for withholding information, however no qualifying statute was identified.",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
VI. Administrative Appeals of Initial Determinations of FOIA Requests,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"A.Received, Processed and Pending Administrative Appeals",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"Number of
Appeals Pending
as of Start of
Fiscal Year","Number of
Appeals Received
in Fiscal Year","Number of
Appeals
Processed in
Fiscal Year","Number of Appeals
Pending as of End of
Fiscal Year",,,,,,,,,,,
29,43,66,6,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
B.Description of Administrative Appeals — All Processed Appeals,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"Number Affirmed
on Appeal","Number Partially
Affirmed & Partially
Reversed/Remanded
on Appeal","Number Completely
Reversed/Remanded on
Appeal","Number of
Appeals Closed
for Other Reasons",TOTAL,,,,,,,,,,
49,5,7,5,66,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
C.(1) Reasons for Denial on Appeal — Number of Times Exemptions Applied ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,Ex.,
1,2,3,4,5,6,7(A),7(B),7(C),7(D),7(E),7(F),8,9,
1,1,4,0,4,7,0,0,4,3,0,0,0,0,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
C. (2) Reasons for Denial on Appeal-- Reasons Other Than Exemptions,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"No
Records",Records Referred at Initial Request Level,"Request
Withdrawn","Fee-
Related
Reason","Records not
Reasonably
Described","Improper
Request
for Other
Reasons",Not Agency Record,"Duplicate
Request or Appeal",Request in Litigation,Appeal Solely on Denial of Request for Expedited Processing,"Other
",,,,
14,1,3,7,3,1,11,1,0,0,3,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"C. (3) Reasons for Denial on Appeal-- ""Other"" Reasons from Section VI, C (2) Chart",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Description of “Other” Reasons for Denial on Appeal from Chart C (2) & Number of Times Those Reasons Were Relied upon,TOTAL,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"1.        Multi-faceted appeal concerning expedited processing, fees, and declassification of records.",3,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
2.        Appeal withdrawn after requester accepted NARA’s explanation that no documents were withheld after reviewing the files in the Archives II Research Room.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
3.        Appeal withdrawn because the subject of the request was no longer being considered for a presidential appointment. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
C. (4) Response Time for Administrative Appeals,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Median Number of Days,Average Number of Days,Lowest Number of Days,Highest Number of Days,,,,,,,,,,,
586,18,3,"1,404",,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
C. (5) Ten Oldest Pending Administrative Appeals,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"DATE OF RECEIPT
OF 10TH OLDEST
APPEAL
AND NUMBER OF
DAYS PENDING",9th,8th,7th,6th,5th,4th,3rd,2nd,"DATE OF RECEIPT
OF OLDEST
APPEAL
AND NUMBER OF
DAYS PENDING",,,,
,N/A,N/A,N/A,N/A,"July 23, 2009","May 1, 2009","October 1, 2008","September 29, 2009","August 4, 2008","June 6, 2008",,,,
AGENCY OVERALL,0,0,0,292,49,106,251,256,292,332,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
VII. FOIA Requests: Response Time for Processed and Pending Requests,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
A. Processed Request-- Response Time for All Processed Perfected Requests,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,SIMPLE,,,,COMPLEX,,,,EXPEDITED PROCESSING,,,,,
,MEDIAN NUMBER OF DAYS,AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS,"LOWEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS","HIGHEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS",MEDIAN NUMBER OF DAYS,AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS,"LOWEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS","HIGHEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS",MEDIAN NUMBER OF DAYS,AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS,"LOWEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS","HIGHEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS",,
Agency Overall ,5,10.91,1,"1,409",41,264.16,2,"2,978",N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
B. Processed Requests--Response Time for Perfected Requests in Which Information Was Granted,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,SIMPLE,,,,COMPLEX,,,,EXPEDITED PROCESSING,,,,,
,MEDIAN NUMBER OF DAYS,AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS,"LOWEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS","HIGHEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS",MEDIAN NUMBER OF DAYS,AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS,"LOWEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS","HIGHEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS",MEDIAN NUMBER OF DAYS,AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS,"LOWEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS","HIGHEST
NUMBER
OF DAYS",,
AGENCY OVERALL,15,72.23,1,"1,182",75,353.07,1,"2,978",N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"*Note: At this time NARA’s data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of requests seeking expedited processing.  We track and respond to expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion.  We expect to have the issue resolved in time for the FY 2010 report.",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,VII.C.  PROCESSED REQUESTS -- RESPONSE TIME IN DAY INCREMENTS,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,SIMPLE REQUESTS,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,1-20 DAYS,21-40 DAYS,41-60 DAYS,61-80 DAYS,81-100 DAYS,101-120 DAYS,121-140 DAYS,141-160 DAYS,161-180 DAYS,181-200 DAYS,201-300 DAYS,301-400 DAYS,401+ DAYS,TOTAL
AGENCY OVERALL,"15,595",741,321,174,67,41,27,38,11,9,2,8,44,"17,078"
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,COMPLEX REQUESTS,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,1-20 DAYS,21-40 DAYS,41-60 DAYS,61-80 DAYS,81-100 DAYS,101-120 DAYS,121-140 DAYS,141-160 DAYS,161-180 DAYS,181-200 DAYS,201-300 DAYS,301-400 DAYS,401+ DAYS,TOTAL
AGENCY OVERALL,181,34,13,18,21,4,3,9,7,11,21,15,93,430
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,REQUESTS GRANTED EXPEDITED PROCESSING,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,1-20 DAYS,21-40 DAYS,41-60 DAYS,61-80 DAYS,81-100 DAYS,101-120 DAYS,121-140 DAYS,141-160 DAYS,161-180 DAYS,181-200 DAYS,201-300 DAYS,301-400 DAYS,401+ DAYS,TOTAL
AGENCY OVERALL,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"*Note: At this time NARA’s data system, Performance Measurement and Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of requests seeking expedited processing.  We track and respond to expedited requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion.  We expect to have the issue resolved in time for the FY 2010 report.",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
D.Pending Requests — All Pending Perfected Requests,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,SIMPLE,,,COMPLEX,,,EXPEDITED PROCESSING,,,,,,,
,"Number
Pending","Median
Number
of Days","Average
Number
of Days","Number
Pending","Median
Number of
Days","Average
Number of
Days","Number
pending","Median
Number
of Days","Average
Number
of Days",,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL","1,308",832,948.30,"4,411",986,1224.31,N/A*,N/A*,N/A*,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"*Note: At this time NARA's data system, Performance Measurement and ",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"Reporting System, is not programmed to calculate the processing times of ",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
requests seeking expedited processing. We track and respond to expedited ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
requests but cannot follow them through the life cycle to completion. We expect ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
to have the issue resolved in time for the FY 2010 report.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
E.Pending Requests — Ten Oldest Pending Perfected Requests,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"10TH OLDEST
REQUEST
AND NUMBER OF
DAYS PENDING",9th,8th,7th,6th,5th,4th,3rd,2nd,"OLDEST
REQUEST
AND NUMBER OF
DAYS PENDING",,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL","3/14/1994
5,721 days","3/5/94
5,760","2/22/94
5,771","1/4/94
5,820","11/09/93
5,876","10/10/93
5,906","9/9/93
5,937","8/31/93
5,974","10/22/92
6,259","9/21/92
6,209",,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
VIII. REQUESTS FOR EXPEDITED PROCESSING AND REQUESTS FOR FEE WAIVER,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
A.Requests for Expedited Processing,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"Number
Granted","Number
Denied","Median
Number of
Days to
Adjudicate","Average
Number of
Days to
Adjudicate","Number
Adjudicated
Within Ten
Calendar Days",,,,,,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL",13,39,5,5,52,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
B.Requests for Fee Waiver,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"Number
Granted","Number
Denied","Median
Number of
Days to
Adjudicate","Average
Number of
Days to
Adjudicate",,,,,,,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL",3,171,5,174,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
IX. FOIA PERSONNEL AND COSTS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,PERSONNEL,,,COSTS,,,,,,,,,,
,"Number of
""Full-Time
FOIA
Employees""","Number of
""Equivalent
Full-Time
FOIA
Empyees""","Total
Number of
""Full-Time
FOIA Staff""","Processing
Costs","Litigation-
Related
Costs",Total Costs,,,,,,,,
AGENCY OVERALL,0,25,0,"2,758,186",N/A,"2,758,186",,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
X. Fees Collected for Proccessing Requests,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"Total Amount of Fees
Collected",Percentage of Total Costs,,,,,,,,,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL",$433.00,<1%,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"XII. BACKLOGS, CONSULTATIONS, AND COMPARISONS",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
A.Backlogs of FOIA Requests and Administrative Appeals,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"Number of Backlogged
Requests as of End of
Fiscal Year","Number of Backlogged
Appeals as of End of
Fiscal Year",,,,,,,,,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL","6,856",6,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"B.Consultations on FOIA Requests — Received, Processed, and Pending Consultations",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"NUMBER OF CONSULTATIONS
RECEIVED FROM OTHER
AGENCIES THAT WERE
PENDING AS OF START
OF THE FISCAL YEAR*","NUMBER OF CONSULTATIONS
RECEIVED FROM
OTHER AGENCIES
DURING THE FISCAL YEAR","NUMBER OF CONSULTATIONS
RECEIVED FROM OTHER
AGENCIES THAT WERE
PROCESSED DURING
THE FISCAL YEAR","NUMBER OF CONSULTATIONS
RECEIVED FROM OTHER
AGENCIES THAT WERE
PENDING AS OF END OF
THE FISCAL YEAR",,,,,,,,,,,
0,0,0,0,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
C. Consultations on FOIA Requests — Ten Oldest Consultations Received from Other Agencies and Pending at NARA,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,"10th Oldest
Consultation
and Number
of Days
Pending","
9th","
8th","
7th","
6th","
5th","
4th","

3rd","

2nd","Oldest
Consultation
and Number
of Days
Pending",,,
,"AGENCY
OVERALL",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"D.Comparisons of Numbers of Requests from Previous and Current Annual Report — Requests Received, Processed, and Backlogged",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,NUMBER OF REQUESTS,RECEIVED,NUMBER OF REQUESTS,PROCESSED,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"Number Received
During Fiscal Year
from Last Year's
Annual Report","Number Received
During Fiscal Year
from Current
Annual Report","Number Processed
During Fiscal Year
from Last Year's
Annual Report","Number Processed
During Fiscal Year
from Current
Annual Report",,,,,,,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL","14,075","18,581","13,472","17,508",,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"Number of Backlogged Requests
as of End of Fiscal Year from
Previous Annual Report","Number of Backlogged Requests
as of End of Fiscal Year from
Current Annual Report",,,,,,,,,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL","5,781","6,856",,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
"E.Comparisons of Numbers of Administrative Appeals from Previous and Current Annual Report — Appeals Received, Processed, and Backlogged",,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,NUMBER OF APPEALS RECEIVED,,NUMBER OF APPEALS PROCESSED,,,,,,,,,,,
,"NUMBER RECEIVED
DURING FISCAL YEAR
FROM LAST YEAR'S
ANNUAL REPORT","NUMBER RECEIVED
DURING FISCAL YEAR
FROM CURRENT
ANNUAL REPORT","NUMBER PROCESSED
DURING FISCAL YEAR
FROM LAST YEAR'S
ANNUAL REPORT","NUMBER PROCESSED
DURING FISCAL YEAR
FROM CURRENT
ANNUAL REPORT",,,,,,,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL",42,43,21,66,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,"Number of Backlogged Appeals
as of End of the Fiscal Year
from Previous Annual Report","Number of Backlogged Appeals as
of End of the Fiscal Year from
Current Annual Report",,,,,,,,,,,,
"AGENCY
OVERALL",29,6,,,,,,,,,,,,