Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Medical 'C-code' not a deployment disqualifier
 
Photos 
Medical C codes
(U.S. Air Force graphic/Sylvia Saab)
Download HiRes
Medical 'C-code' not a deployment disqualifier

Posted 6/1/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Debbie Gildea
Air Force Personnel, Services and Manpower Public Affairs


6/1/2012 - JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO - RANDOLPH, TEXAS (AFNS) -- Contrary to common belief, a medical assignment limitation code, commonly known as the "C-code," does not disqualify an Airman from deployment, and it does not identify an Airman for medical discharge.

A "C-code" applied to a member's profile for medical reasons is one of the various tools AFPC officials use to put the right person in the right place at the right time, said Lt. Col. (Dr.) Keryl Green,  the Air Force Personnel Center Medical Retention Standards branch chief.

"Our branch belongs to the assignments directorate," she said. "We don't actually make assignments, but we are integral to the success of assignment processes.
 
"We're part of the medical evaluation process, so we work closely with the 76 Air Force medical treatment facilities, the physical evaluation board and AFPC enlisted and officer assignment experts."

Ultimately, the branch's goal is to make sure Airmen are able to support the mission, Green said.

"We do that by first evaluating referred cases and identifying if a member's medical condition is compatible with continued service," Green said. "If it is, we will assign the most appropriate code, if any, to make sure those who can serve, do so in a location where appropriate medical facilities are available."

The process begins when a base medical practitioner refers a case for evaluation. Treatment facilities follow Air Force policy to decide whether to send referrals for medical-evaluation- board processing.

There are three critical components of a referral, Green said.

The first is the narrative, a subjective and objective medical summary submitted by the medical professionals responsible for an Airman's care. It provides medical background and treatment information and is foundational in referral decisions, she explained.

The second is the commander's letter, which describes, from a nonmedical perspective, how the illness or injury has affected an Airman's ability to perform his or her duties or deploy, and how the illness or injury may hinder the unit mission.

The third component is the member's AF form 469, which is commonly known as a "profile." This document gives a clear picture of the official physical restrictions that are related to the medical condition, Green said.

"To improve the referral process, we're implementing a procedure change whereby all medical evaluation board referrals will come through this office. AFPC providers will screen each case and determine whether or not a service member can remain on active duty with his or her medical condition," the doctor explained.

If a medical retirement or separation is warranted, the full medical evaluation board will be accomplished by the medical treatment facility and forwarded to the physical evaluation board.

"If we determine that a member's condition does not interfere with their continued military service, we will make an adjudication that the member can be returned to duty, and, when it is warranted, apply the appropriate C-code to the member's personnel file," Green said.

Airmen identified for an assignment limitation will be coded as a C-1, C-2 or C-3, Green explained, but even the most restrictive code doesn't automatically disqualify you from deployment or permanent change of station.

"For a condition expected to resolve in a short time, there may be no C-code. But a chronic condition, one that won't be resolved quickly, that prevents certain activities or that requires specialized medical care, will be identified with an assignment limitation code," she said. "A situation that warrants consideration for medical retirement or separation is referred to the physical evaluation board."

The C-codes give Airmen an idea of their status and eligibility, but options vary depending on individual conditions.

C-1 is the least restrictive code. C-1 coded Airmen can move to any continental United States assignment, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, and Hawaii, without a waiver. A C-1 coded Airman may also move to most overseas bases without a waiver, as long as those bases have a fixed medical treatment facility, Green said. A waiver is required for a move to locations with limited care, such as South Korea; Lajes Field, Azores; Eielson AFB, Alaska; Moron Air Base, Spain, and to deployed locations.

C-2 is more restrictive, but permanent change of station and deployment options remain numerous, Green said.

"C-2s can go anywhere in the continental United States, Hawaii and Elmendorf without a waiver, but assignments to Eielson AFB, Alaska, overseas assignments and deployments require a waiver approved by the gaining major command surgeon general," Green said. "Waiver approval for C-2 Airmen is relatively common, though."

C-3 is the most restrictive code, but members with a C-3 can still move to any CONUS base, Hawaii, or Elmendorf without a waiver, she said. To get a waiver to any other location or to deploy, a line general officer, wing commander or civilian equivalent must endorse the request, certifying that the member is essential for mission accomplishment and is the only member qualified and available for the job.

Just more than 3 percent of the active-duty Air Force population has an assignment limitation code, and less than a half of a percent of the 10,000 C-coded Airmen carry a C-3 designation, Green said.

"The application of a C-code is a tool we use to ensure members have access to the medical care they need, thus protecting both the member and the mission," Green said. "But first, we need to ensure they are able to continue to contribute to the Air Force mission."

Being C-coded doesn't mean Airmen will remain coded for the rest of their career. Annual follow-up assessments ensure those who can be cleared will be. For more information about assignments and other personnel issues, visit the myPers website.



tabComments
6/11/2012 11:21:43 AM ET
Dessert King: You are corect for 90 percent of the C-coders are fakers out there. But the 10 percent that are acctually broken and still want to deploy like me but due to a convoy roll over injury, I can't. Yes, they know who they are. The ones with back problems, but can still lift couches when they move and still do what they want on weekends and all of a sudden have limp only at work. I see you. You fakers are giving the real injured a bad name.
SSgt, USAF
 
6/11/2012 9:20:57 AM ET
Hey Desert King, you are what's wrong with the Air Force. I sustained a spinal injury on deployment and ended up being C-coded. While i was waiting what seemed like forever for my MEB, I was treated like garbage by my fellow Airmen for being a dodger. I think people like Desert King need to act like adults and realize that sometimes people get hurt and that the person who it's not fair to is the injured Airmen who now has a permenent injury and a permenent loss of respect from their peers.I will be dropping my papers in 3 months and all I can say is good riddance.
C-Code Airman, CA
 
6/11/2012 9:14:35 AM ET
People bashing people for holding a C-Code need to just stop. Do you think we WANTED to get injured Most of us were injured on the job and a lot of those injuries occured during deployment. So just shut up about the whole pulling your weight BS. As for the Air Force's handling of C-Coded personnel, it's a joke. I know of many C-Coded personnel myself included that have faced endless harassment by our so-called leadership because of our inability to deploy, do PT, our need to be on convalescent leave after whatever surgical procedures we have faced, tec. It's a joke. And they keep doing these force shaping measures and separate perfectly healthy Airmen. How about redoing the MEB for every C2 or C3 coded person and separate or retire us. That way you keep a higher percentage of able bodied personnel on hand and the coded people can get on with their lives and not have to face endless ridicule day after day because they are sick or injured. Everyone badmouthing injured pe
1MadTSgt, CONUS
 
6/8/2012 1:13:19 PM ET
So let me get this straight. Because I am C coded I am worthless? I have deployed in the past, but because of something that medical staff did to me in the past it has caused me to get coded--in fact I now have to have surgery so I have a fighting chance to stay in the Air Force--. If an office of 50 people had 49 deploy and 1 stay behind because of C coding, then that means the home station mission can still get done. If it was not for the C coded person, you would come back to all that work you missed. Also, do not forget we can say the same about you always deploying; we have to pick up YOUR slack here at home station. As someone else stated, we are one team one fight. Get over the issues and move on.
Matt, Robins
 
6/6/2012 8:39:34 AM ET
It seems we spend more and more time on here with articles defending policies and segments of our forces. Look it's not -service before self as long as everyone else has to do the same thing-. Does the military need a more stringent way of examining retention of medically limited members? Yes. Does it need a better waiver system that doesn't hog tie C-codes who want to go? Yes. Is carrying on like another person's medical condition is your business something that a person or a leader of character and integrity does? No. Shut up and serve. If you don't like deploying multiple times in the present construct... don't reenlist.
JB, VA
 
6/6/2012 7:29:21 AM ET
Facts are facts, in today's air force it is a death sentence. Anyone telling you any different is not being honest with you. Force shaping cuts are to be made.
David, Goodfellow AFB
 
6/6/2012 1:40:50 AM ET
I have a C-code and I work really hard to make sure I'm good for my deployments. As soon as there's an inkling of notification, I let my PCM and team know we need to get a RILO started. What takes the longest time is the medical stuff...once it gets to AFCENT, there's usually a good turn-around time and I can get out the door. So please don't lump all us C-coders together most of us are trying to deploy.
Deployed C-coder, SWA
 
6/5/2012 8:22:48 PM ET
Someone needs to fix this website so I stop getting errors when trying to submit posts.
TSgt V, OCONUS
 
6/5/2012 5:35:38 PM ET
To all those slamming C-Coders: You should not stereotype your fellow Airmen. There are many Airmen who are C Coded due to injuries/conditions sustained as a result of a deployment. There are also many C Coders that have pulled their fare share of deployments in the past prior to being coded or are pulling them right now as we speak. I for one have deployed on numerous occasions during my 21 plus years of service and have no remorse or guilt for being C Coded. You anti C Coders are commenting on Airmen not pulling their weight, but I challenge you to stop complaining and pull your own weight. The time you spent typing up your comment and posting it has required a C Coder to pull your work. We are all one team, whether at home or in a deployed location so stop the judging.
Anonymous C Coder, Eglin
 
6/5/2012 3:30:48 PM ET
Agree.
anonymous, Eglin
 
6/5/2012 2:47:29 PM ET
I am now retired, but the last six years of my career I had to carry the burden of the C-code. With a C1 in theory, I should have been able to deploy, but often what happens is the C-code becomes an albatross hanging around the neck of the member...
Retired C-Coded, Peterson AFB
 
6/5/2012 2:16:04 PM ET
Waiver process You get tasked by your CC with a firm date and place. You have an appointment with your provider. They write a narrative summary saying your condition is stable and you're good to deploy. Your PEBLO sends that in an email to AFCENTSG. They review and email back approval. Takes a couple days. I tried to get my wavier approved early AFCENT replied basically they rack and stack based on RDD and mine would wait until the departure date got closer. I got the approval about 8 weeks prior but the entire time I knew it would get approved. still just have to go through the bureaucracy of the process. If you've been MEB'd before you'll understand the red tape... Just remember that Airmen with ALC's may have been afflicted with a serious condition at no fault of their own. So sure you might have to deploy once more but would you rather have had cancer or another serious illness Just keep things in perspective.
ALC-1, SWA
 
6/5/2012 12:54:35 PM ET
I have a C-2 assignment limitation code and I have experienced what Anonymous has described in the first comment post. Short-notice deployments would pop up and my leadership would not put my name against them. Reason- they did not know how the waiver process worked. Furthermore, since these deployments were often short-notice, there was no guarantee that the waiver would be done in time or that it would come back as approved. Would it be possible to have an AF.mil article written that describes the waiver process in-depth AFI 41-210 does not provide enough detail.
Capt, US
 
6/5/2012 7:00:51 AM ET
Let me deploy... I'll go for all of you.
Belt-Fed Viking, Pope
 
6/5/2012 5:27:51 AM ET
I've got no qualms with Johnny or Jane C Coded Deployment Dodger. Thanks for keeping the home station's additional duties and continuity afloat while I work the real mission and collect a wad of cash. Keep up the dodging so those of us that want to deploy can continue. And besides, those binders aren't going to update themselves
Desert King, Deployed Again
 
6/4/2012 8:05:40 AM ET
I'm C-1 coded and went through the process to deploy. It is not a hard process. In today's AF where manning is short and deployments are high, why are we geting rid of our good operational people and keeping our C-3 personnel who dodge the deployments. This does not make sense today when we are getting leaner and we need every able body for quick reaction.
Anonymous, Fort Belvoir
 
6/4/2012 3:56:16 AM ET
I'm often amazed at the vitriol spewed by those who think that they are being treated 'unfairly' because they seem to 'pick up the slack' for others especially those who have medical profiles. I am one of those who have a Code C...C-2 to be exact. I write this message while deployed for a 2nd time in as many years. I have deployed every time my turn has come up since my Code C was established...and have done my part to ensure I'm ready when the time comes. There's a little more paperwork and a few more doctor appointments but 'I' make sure I'm good to go. This current process makes it so I can deployand its important that people who supervise those with medical profiles as well as the members themselves understand the process so when the time comes they too can deploy. As for those who think they're getting a raw deal -- stop raising your hand every four years and go do something else. and stop using fair as some kind of crutch. Life isn't fair. what makes you think the US
C2-Deployed Again, SWA Again
 
6/4/2012 1:52:34 AM ET
Sounds to me like the Air Force kicked too many people out for PT and medical issues. Now they want people that are C coded to be aware that they can still PCS to solve their manning issues.
Anonymous, Holloman AFB
 
6/3/2012 4:27:44 PM ET
I agree with Mr. Anonymous below. I'm still running into people with 12 years service who have never deployed or to anywhere significant. The folks who stay healthy keep getting screwed over.
UDM, CONUS
 
6/1/2012 9:29:16 PM ET
The C Code limitation members need a waiver for deployments to the AOR but no one ever submits waivers for these members that are coded. Instead the non coded members continue to deploy over and over and pick up the slack for the c coded members. A deployment to Hawaii Alaska etc during OIF OEF OND and Afghanistan is unacceptable especially when we have been at war for 12 years. There is no reason why these members that are coded C-1 and sometimes even C-2 can't deploy to the AOR where there is a medical treatment facility especially such as Balad AB or Bagram. Hopefully the coding process for these limitations improves dramatically in the near future so deployments overall can be fair across the Air Force.
Anonymous, Lackland AFB
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Life Extension Programs modernize ICBMs

SecAF visits basic military training

Through Airmen's Eyes: Airman battles breast cancer

Remains of two Airmen lost in 1969 identified, honored

Top female AF general tells personal examples of women's progress in military

Wizards salute Andrews Airmen, service members

Online access simplifies dependent updates

Aviano unveils first locally painted F-16

'Green Flag' keeps Airmen, Soldiers mission ready

Contingency Response Airmen battle elements at JRTC  1

AF awards $25K to essay winners

Through Airmen's Eyes: Ultimate wingman helps save friend's life  12

Declassified document shows 'real' flying saucer

Hurlburt Airman found dead after boating mishap identified

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Teal ropes to spotlight sexual assault response  37

Air Force Academy energy research will yield global benefits


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing