Skip Navigation
Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
 
Slide Tray
0 slides

Return to Slide Library

Slides

Add Search Results to Slide Tray Search:

"patient outcomes"

Slides: 1–12 of 16
Early vs. Late Operative Intervention for Rotator Cuff Tears
Earlier operative treatment has been proposed to improve patient outcomes and result in an earlier return to work and decreased costs; therefore, patients face several decisional dilemmas, including whether to opt for early surgical intervention or if and when to forgo nonoperative treatment for operative intervention.
Comparative Effectiveness or Operative Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears
In general, the studies showed few differences in function between interventions. Analysis of comparative studies provided a moderate level of evidence that functional patient outcomes were similar across each of the following surgical interventions: open vs. mini-open; mini-open vs. arthroscopic; open or mini-open vs. arthroscopic; and arthroscopic with or without acromioplasty. The strength of evidence was low for the remaining comparisons examined in the studies, precluding any conclusions regarding their comparative effectiveness.

Considerations for Comparisons Across Different Treatment Modalities (3 of 3)

Clinical Questions Addressed in the CER: Clinical Outcomes of Interest From Treatments

Noninvasive Technologies for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Disease in Women: Other Findings

Pages: [1] 2 Next