E-mail Updates- Home
- Search for Research Summaries, Reviews, and Reports
EHC Component
- EPC Project
Topic Title
- Handling Continuous Outcomes in Quantitative Synthesis
Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews -- Overview and Chapters
- Overview
- Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
- Principles in Developing and Applying Guidance for Comparing Medical Interventions
- Identifying, Selecting and Refining Topics for Comparative Effectiveness Systematic Reviews
- Developing and Selecting Topic Nominations for Systematic Reviews
- Finding Evidence for Comparing Medical Interventions
- Finding Evidence and Assessing for Reporting Biases when Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
- Selecting Observational Studies for Comparing Medical Interventions
- Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions
- Assessing the Applicability of Studies When Comparing Medical Interventions
- Assessing Harms when Comparing Medical Interventions
- Conducting Quantitative Synthesis When Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
- Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions: An Update
- Avoiding Bias in Selecting Studies
- Using Existing Systematic Reviews to Replace de Novo Processes in CERs
- Updating Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: Current Efforts in AHRQ’s Effective Health Care Program
Methods Guide – Chapter – Aug. 7, 2012
Handling Continuous Outcomes in Quantitative Synthesis
Formats
This draft methods guide chapter is available in PDF (295 kB) form only. Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this file. For additional assistance, please contact us.
Return to Top of Page