Digital Coast

You are here

Who is Nate Herold?

Nate Herold's picture

I am with the Coastal Remote Sensing Program at the NOAA Coastal Services Center in Charleston, South Carolina, where I lead the Center’s land cover mapping activities, managing the Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP).

Read more…

Recent Posts

Change is Ninety Percent Based on the Data...and the Other Half is Based on Your Interpretation

Submitted by Nate Herold on January 22, 2013

 

I produce land cover change data…Have I mentioned that before? One thing I see/hear a lot is people getting confused by percentages of change that are quoted to them or people incorrectly stating the percentages of change relating to features in the data they are using. 

Here’s what I’m talking about: we have a mythical geography that is 20 units in size…think square miles, acres, scrupulums (it’s an ancient Roman measure for area…I looked it up). In the initial date (where our story begins) there were 4 units of forest. Between this time period and the following date, 1 unit of forest is added. 

diagram percent change

 

So what percent did the forest increase?

A) 40%

B) 5%

C) 25%

D) a bazillion %

E) one dollar (Price Is Right rules, right?)

F) I’m still trying to think of a joke related to scrupulum

 

 

The answer is both  B and C…It is all depends on your perspective.

If you’re thinking of this new forest area as it relates to your entire geography, then 20 units is your 100% and the area of change is 1 out 20, or 5%. When spoken this would be stated as “5% of the county changed to forest.” If you’re thinking about this new forest as it relates to the amount of forest you started with, then 4 units is your 100%, and the area of change is 1 out of 4, or 25%. When spoken this should be stated as “forests experienced an increase of 25%,” or “forests experienced a 25% growth in area.”

diagram percent changediagram percent change

Neither of these ways of stating the percent of change are wrong, but just be sure to clarify which you are discussing and what that might mean to you. For example, you may state that there was only a 5% increase in developed area, but if you had 200 square miles to begin with, that 5% increase translates to 10 square miles of new development (which is not a small number at all). On the other hand, you may state that you had a 100% increase in development (sounds big huh?), but if you started with only 1 square mile, that means you only added 1 square mile more. Very different numbers indeed.

And, if you're still hung up on getting a joke related to scrupulum, I don’t blame you…let me know if you come up with a good one.


Submit Comment to Moderator