Highlights | Description
of TEDS | Trends
in Admissions | Characteristics
of Admissions | State
Data
Topics
of Special Interest | Appendices
|
Table of Contents
List of
Tables
List of
Figures
|
4. State
Data: 1994-1999
TEDS aggregates data
collected through the disparate data collection systems of the Single State
Agencies (SSAs) for substance abuse treatment. States have cooperated with
the Federal government in the data collection process, and substantial progress
has been made toward developing a standardized data set. However, because
each State system is unique and each State has unique powers and mandates,
significant differences exist among States. These differences are compounded
by evolving health care payment systems.
State-to-State comparisons must be made with extreme caution. Table
4.1 presents key characteristics of State data collection systems for
1999. However, these characteristics can change as State substance abuse
treatment systems change, and thus may be responsible for some year-to-year
variation within States. Sources of apparent variation in State-to-State
substance abuse patterns include:
- Completeness
of reporting. Completeness of reporting at the cut-off date
for preparation of this report varied from State to State. Future submissions
of 1999 data are unlikely to affect the percentage distributions that
are the basis of this report but may affect State-level counts and rates
of admission. In addition, States review and improve their data collection
and processing. Occasionally, States send revised data for earlier years
to TEDS.
Figure 26 shows individual State admissions reporting patterns by month.
-
Facilities
included. Most States require facilities that receive State/public
funding to report data to the State. State/public funding
generally refers to funding distributed by the SSA, but may also include
funding distributed through another public agency. Some States require
that additional categories (e.g., private facilities, methadone clinics,
etc.) also report. In some States, other categories of facilities
report voluntarily. See Table 4.1 for additional
details.
-
Clients included.
Most States report data on all clients in a facility that is required
to report to the State. However, some States report only those clients
whose treatment is paid for with State/public funds. See Table
4.1 for additional details.
- Admissions and
transfers. Great variation is seen in the States ability to
identify and report client admissions and transfers. The goal for the
TEDS system is to identify treatment episodes. Thus a change in service
type or a change in provider, without an interruption in treatment,
would ideally be categorized as a transfer. This requires, however,
that clients be assigned unique IDs that can be linked across providers;
not all States are legally and/or technologically able to do this. About
half of all States can identify transfers that occur when a client changes
service type within the structure of a given provider. However, far
fewer can identify a transfer that occurs when a client changes providers.
Several States do not track transfers themselves, but report as transfers
those clients who are discharged and readmitted within a specified time
period (which may vary from State to State). See Table
4.1 for additional details. Annual counts of admissions, transfers,
and codependents are shown in Table 4.2.
|