U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program--Proceedings
of the Technical Meeting, Colorado Springs, Colorado, September 20-24, 1993,
Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4015
Determining the Relative Age, Transport,and Three-Dimensional
Distribution of Atrazine in a Reservoir Using Immunoassay
by
James D. Fallon (U.S. Geological Survey, Mounds View, Minnesota)
and E.M. Thurman (U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas)
Abstract
The age, transport, and distribution of atrazine in a reservoir were
determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A pulse of stormwater runoff
containing atrazine concentrations as much as nine times greater than the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for
drinking water (the MCL for atrazine is based on an annual average concentration
of 3.0 micrograms per liter) was monitored as it moved through Perry Lake,
northeastern Kansas, during the 1992 growing season. The drainage basin
of Perry Lake is the first Pesticide Management Area designated by the State
of Kansas. The leading edge of the pulse marked the boundary and mixing
zone between atrazine applied in previous years and freshly applied atrazine.
Deethylatrazine-to-atrazine ratios (DAR) further defined the relative age
of atrazine in the reservoir. Runoff entering the reservoir immediately
after herbicide application was identified by its small DAR values (0.095
to 0.134). Water with increasing DAR values (0.135 to 0.254) entered the
reservoir as the year progressed and gradually displaced water with smaller
DAR values. Four hundred and twenty (420) samples from four detailed reservoir
surveys (pre-application, post-application, summer, and autumn) were analyzed
by immunoassay to determine the distribution of herbicide concentrations
in the reservoir. Also, weekly samples were collected from four fixed sites
located upstream, within, and downstream from the reservoir. One hundred
(100) of these samples were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
to confirm immunoassay results and to determine deethylatrazine and deisopropylatrazine
concentrations. A combination of immunoassay and DAR values could prove
useful in developing reservoir-release strategies to mitigate atrazine concentrations
in reservoirs and their outflows.
|
|