M I S Survey Results

So far, RSA has received 15 answers on this survey.

Responses by state

States Number of responses Percent Pennsylvania 7 46.67% Arkansas 1 6.67% Florida 1 6.67% Illinois 1 6.67% New Mexico 1 6.67% New York 1 6.67% Oklahoma 1 6.67% South Carolina 1 6.67% Virginia 1 6.67%

Pennsylvania   7   Arkansas   1   Florida   1   Illinois   1   New Mexico   1   New York   1   Oklahoma   1   South Carolina   1   Virginia   1

Responses by affiliation

Affiliation Number of responses Percent State Agency staff 8 53.33% Other (please identify) 3 20.00% SRC member 2 13.33% (no answer) 1 6.67% Advocate 1 6.67%

State Agency staff   8   Other (please identify)   3   SRC member   2   (no answer)   1   Advocate   1

Responses to Question 1 - The entire review process for FY 2010 facilitated the sharing of information among participants in the review process regarding the agency's performance.

Answer Number of responses Percent 5 Strongly agree 4 26.67% 4 Agree 4 26.67% 3 Neither agree nor disagree 3 20.00% 2 Disagree 1 6.67% 1 Strongly disagree 1 6.67% No answer 2 13.33%

5 Strongly agree   4   4 Agree   4   3 Neither agree nor disagree   3   2 Disagree   1   1 Strongly disagree   1   No answer   2

Responses to Question 2 - The entire review process for FY 2010 considered opinions from different perspectives.

Answer Number of responses Percent 5 Strongly agree 4 26.67% 4 Agree 6 40.00% 2 Disagree 2 13.33% 1 Strongly disagree 1 6.67% No answer 2 13.33%

5 Strongly agree   4   4 Agree   6   2 Disagree   2   1 Strongly disagree   1   No answer   2

Responses to Question 3 - The entire review process for FY 2010 fostered collaboration among all review participants.

Answer Number of responses Percent 5 Strongly agree 4 26.67% 4 Agree 2 13.33% 3 Neither agree nor disagree 4 26.67% 1 Strongly disagree 2 13.33% No answer 3 20.00%

5 Strongly agree   4   4 Agree   2   3 Neither agree nor disagree   4   1 Strongly disagree   2   No answer   3

Responses to Question 4 - The entire review process for FY 2010 identified the agency's strengths.

Answer Number of responses Percent 5 Strongly agree 4 26.67% 4 Agree 6 40.00% 3 Neither agree nor disagree 2 13.33% 2 Disagree 1 6.67% No answer 2 13.33%

5 Strongly agree   4   4 Agree   6   3 Neither agree nor disagree   2   2 Disagree   1   No answer   2

Responses to Question 5 - focused on issues regarding the agency's performance.

Answer Number of responses Percent 5 Strongly agree 5 33.33% 4 Agree 5 33.33% 3 Neither agree nor disagree 1 6.67% 2 Disagree 2 13.33% No answer 2 13.33%

5 Strongly agree   5   4 Agree   5   3 Neither agree nor disagree   1   2 Disagree   2   No answer   2

Responses to Question 6 - was efficient.

Answer Number of responses Percent 5 Strongly agree 6 40.00% 4 Agree 2 13.33% 3 Neither agree nor disagree 3 20.00% 2 Disagree 1 6.67% 1 Strongly disagree 1 6.67% No answer 2 13.33%

5 Strongly agree   6   4 Agree   2   3 Neither agree nor disagree   3   2 Disagree   1   1 Strongly disagree   1   No answer   2

Responses to Question 7 - included effective communication.

Answer Number of responses Percent 5 Strongly agree 6 40.00% 4 Agree 1 6.67% 3 Neither agree nor disagree 4 26.67% 2 Disagree 1 6.67% 1 Strongly disagree 1 6.67% No answer 2 13.33%

5 Strongly agree   6   4 Agree   1   3 Neither agree nor disagree   4   2 Disagree   1   1 Strongly disagree   1   No answer   2