publications > poster > salvaging sontek ADVM data using a one beam solution for a bad transducer
Salvaging Sontek ADVM Data Using a One Beam Solution for a Bad TransducerCollecting velocity data with Sontek SL (side-looker) acoustic instrumentation requires two beams with comparable signal to noise (SNR) values to properly measure velocity data. On occasion SNR values for each beam may begin to diverge due to a bad transducer, interference from debris in the path of only one beam, or from severe bio-fouling over one beam face (Fig. 1). Data collected during these conditions can exhibit significant bias depending on the magnitude of difference in SNR between the two beams.
Data collected during conditions such as these can be salvaged with some simple techniques and trigonometry. The standard method for beam transformation from any frequency Sontek SL is the xyz coordinate system. This system assumes transducer calibration and similar signal strength is put out by both beams. When one beam has been affected by the issues listed above then the calculations used for this coordinate system can bias velocity X data. This bias is evident when data is examined in beam coordinate transformation (Fig. 2). Data displayed in beam coordinates should be a mirror image of the other beam when transducers are functioning properly. When there is a biased beam the beams will begin to show differences when plotted in beam coordinates. The bias will make velocities appear lower then they may actually be (Fig. 3) resulting in lower computed discharge.
Despite a bad transducer, data can be salvaged by exporting the raw data from View Argonaut © in beam coordinates. The data from the good beam must then be run through the following formula so that you can derive velocity X values from the good beam.
It is important when examining the velocity data in beam coordinates that the sign of beam you will be transforming matches the original raw data file velocity direction. The bank the instrument is deployed on will determine which beam may need a sign change to translate into the proper flow direction. The raw data file while biased in xyz coordinates, will give the correct flow direction provided one of the two transducers is still working properly. Using biased velocity data will also lead to biased discharge data when the velocity rating is applied (Fig. 4). The uncorrected velocity data, when used to compute discharge with the existing rating, had a percent error of approximately 30%. Once the data was transformed using the equation the percent error reduced to approximately 9%. Care must be taken to not assume that the beam with the lower SNR values is the bad one. Examination of beam velocities in the beam coordinates plot will be necessary to verify which transducer is actually experiencing problems. An example of a bad transducer with a higher SNR value then the good transducer is shown in figure 5. If an instrument is identified as having problems with one of the transducers then it is critical that ADCP measurements are performed prior to instrument removal. Data collected from the ADCP measurement will be critical for determining if this method to correct your data will be valid when related to your index-velocity rating.
Special thanks to Christian Lopez, Shane Ploos, Carrie Boudreau, and Stephen Huddleston for their long hours in the field collecting and analyzing data. Poster displayed at 2008 National Data Conference, sponsored by CHIDER, Tunica, MS June 16-20, 2008 Related information: SOFIA Project: Freshwater Flows to Northeastern Florida Bay |
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/posters/salvage_advmdata/index.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 31 October, 2008 @ 10:07 AM (KP)