|
|
ACF Home | Services | Working with ACF | Policy/Planning | About ACF | ACF News | HHS Home |
---|
Questions?
|
Privacy
|
Site Index
|
Contact Us
|
Download Reader
![]() ![]() |
---|
The ACF archive website is where you will find content and resources of historical or research interest. The archive includes information on budgets, programs, initiatives, policies and other historic documents. ACF archive content is NOT current information, is not being updated, and may contain broken links. The above Search does NOT search the current, updated ACF website. To find recent content, visit the ACF Website.
March 2007
Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families
Office of Child Support Enforcement
Nationwide, Regional, and State Box Scores, FY 2006
Program Charts and Graphs, FY 2006
Appendix
OCSE Data Report forms are available on the OCSE web site at: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/forms/
This Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) Preliminary Report, for fiscal year (FY) 2006, highlights financial and statistical program achievements for that year. The information is taken from state-submitted reports on program status sent to OCSE quarterly for financial and annually for statistical data. Data in the report show almost $24 billion in child support payments were collected and distributed, of which about $22 billion went to families and Foster Care; 1.7 million paternities were established and acknowledged; and over 1.2 million child support orders were established.
Caseload. OCSE defines a child support case as a parent (mother, father, or putative father) who is now or eventually may be obligated under law for the support of a child or children receiving services under the child support program, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. A current assistance case is one in which the children are: (1) recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) under Title IV-A of the Social Securi ty Act or; (2) entitled to Foster Care maintenance payments under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act. In addition, the children’s support rights have been assigned by a caretaker to the State and a referral to the State IV-D agency has been made. A former assistance case is a case in which the children were formerly receiving Title IV-A (AFDC or TANF) or Title IV-E (Foster Care) services. A never assistance case is a case in which the children are receiving services under the Title IV-D program, but are not currently eligible for and have not previously received TANF and Foster Care assistance. This includes cases in which the family is receiving child support services as a result of a written application (including cases in which children are receiving State, not Title IV-E, Foster Care services) or a case in which they are Medicaid recipients not receiving additional assistance.
In FY 2006, there were 15.8 million cases in the Child Support Enforcement Program. This represents a slight decrease of less than 1 percent in the caseload from FY 2005. In FY 2006, there were 2.3 million current assistance cases, 7.2 million former assistance cases, and 6.2 million never assistance cases reported (table 2). The decrease in the overall caseload was due in part to a drop in the number of current assistance families from FY 2005.
Paternities Established. Paternity establishment involves the legal establishment of fatherhood for a child. Paternity can be established by a voluntary acknowledgement signed by both parents as part of an in-hospital or other acknowledgement program. States must have procedures that allow paternity to be established or acknowledged at least up to the child’s eighteenth birthday.
In FY 2006, there were over 675,000 paternities established and over 1 million in-hospital and other paternities acknowledged (table 2). Paternity was established or acknowledged for 1.7 million children, a 3.8 percent increase from the previous year.
Orders Established. There were nearly 1.2 million orders for child support established in FY 2006. Current assistance orders comprised of 18.4 percent, former assistance orders accounted for 33.8 percent (table 2), and never assistance orders accounted for 47.9 percent of the support orders established in FY 2006.
Collections. Total distributed child support collections were almost $24 billion in FY 2006 (tables 1 and 3), a 4.0 percent increase over FY 2005. Child support payments are collected through various methods including: income withholding; unemployment compensation interception; and State or Federal income tax refund offsets.
Collections per Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Staff. There were over 60,000 FTE staff working in the States and jurisdictions in the Child Support Enforcement Program in FY 2006 (table 2). Nationally, the amount of child support collected per FTE was over $396,000, in FY 2006, compared to the $385,500 per FTE in FY 2005.
Expenditures. Total administrative expenditures were $5.6 billion in FY 2006, a 3.9 percent increase from FY 2005 (table 1). The Federal share of expenditures was $3.7 billion and the State share was $1.9 billion. The Federal government reimburses States and territories for 66 percent of allowable administrative expenditures and 90 percent for laboratory paternity costs.[1]
Collections Due and Distributed. In FY 2006, the total amount of current support due was over $29 billion (table 5). About $18.0 billion, or 60 percent of that amount was collected and distributed (table 5). The total amount of arrearages reported for all previous fiscal years was over $105 billion (table 5) and over $7 billion was collected and distributed (table 5). During the 1975 to 2006 period, more than $286 billion in child support payments was collected and distributed to families.
There were 11.1 million cases with arrears due and 6.7 million of these cases had collections in FY 2006 (table 6). Hence, 60 percent of obligors owing arrears made some payment toward their arrears in FY 2006. Also, $1.4 billion in interstate collections was forwarded to other States in FY 2006 (table 7).
Other Statistics. Also in FY 2006, program increases were noted for total cases in which a collection was made. At 8.5 million cases, this is a 2.7 percent increase over the number of paying cases from FY 2005 (tables 2 and 4).
The total cases with an order established in FY 2006 was over 12 million, a 1.8 percent increase over the number of cases with orders reported in the previous fiscal year (table 2).
The total number of children in the Child Support Enforcement cases totaled almost 17.3 million in fiscal year 2006, a 0.5 percent increase from the 17.2 million children reported for FY 2005 (table 2).
Cost-effectiveness represents the amount of child support collected for every $1.00 expended on the program. The cost-effectiveness ratio was $4.58[2] for FY 2006, unchanged from FY 2005 (tables 1 and 12).
The Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program distributed $12.9 million in total collections in FY 2006 (table 16). There were over 13,000 paternity establishments (table 14); the number of cases was 24,954 (table 13); and support orders established was 9,128 in FY 2006 (table 15)[3].
The attached charts and tables provide further details on collections, expenditures, caseload, paternities, orders established, and other program statistics, including Tribal child support tables for FY 2006. In some cases, current achievements are compared with those of previous fiscal years.
Table 1 - Financial Overview, FY 2005 and FY 2006
Table 2 - Statistical Overview, FY 2005 and FY 2006
Table 3 - Total Distributed Collections, FY 2006
Table 4 - Statistical Program Status, FY 2006
Table 5 - Current and Arrears Collections Due and Distributed, FY 2006
Table 6 - Cases with Arrears Due and Cases Paying Towards Arrears, FY 2006
Table 7 - Collections and Expenditures, FY 2006
Table 8 - Paternity Establishment, FY 2006
Table 9 - Net Undistributed Collections (UDC), FY 2006
Table 10 - Medical Support and Arrears-Only Cases with Orders Established, FY 2006
Table 11 - Health Insurance Provided as Ordered for FY 2006
Table 12 - Unaudited Incentive Performance Scores, FY 2006
Table 13 - Tribal Program Caseload for Four Consecutive Fiscal Years
Table 14 - Tribal Program Paternities Established for Four Consecutive Fiscal Years
Table 15 - Tribal Program Support Orders Established for Four Consecutive Fiscal Years
Table 16 - Tribal Program Total Distributed Collections for Four Consecutive Fiscal Years
Table 17 - Tribal Program Expenditures for Four Consecutive Fiscal Years
Table 18 - Tribal Program Total Collections Forwarded to States for Four Consecutive Fiscal Years
NATIONWIDE | % change from FY 05 | |
Collections Distributed | $23,933,384,257 | 4.0% |
- Current Assistance | $985,416,539 | -5.5% |
- Former Assistance | $9,238,893,026 | -0.2% |
- Never Assistance | $10,970,140,163 | 5.0% |
- Medicaid Assistance | $2,738,934,529 | 21.0% |
Total Expenditures | $5,561,444,218 | 3.9% |
Cost Effectiveness ($ Change) | $4.58 | $0.00 |
Paternities & Acknowledgements | 1,701,019 | 3.8% |
Orders Established | 1,158,866 | -1.8% |
Full Time Equivalent Staff | 60,417 | 1.2% |
Total Caseload | 15,844,238 | -0.1% |
- Current Assistance | 2,334,137 | -6.5% |
- Former Assistance | 7,269,813 | -0.3% |
- Never Assistance | 6,240,288 | 2.8% |
Cases
Figure 1 Total Caseload for Five Fiscal Years
Figure 2 IV-D Cases With and Without Orders Established for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Figure 3 Number of IV-D Cases for Which a Collection Was Made for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Paternities Acknowledged
Figure 4 IV-D and Statewide Paternities Established or Acknowledged for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Collections
Figure 5 Total Distributed Collections by Current, Former, Never, and Medicaid Cases, FY 2006
Figure 6 Total Collections Received by Method of Collections, FY 2006
Figure 7 Total Distributed Collections by TANF/Foster Care and Non-TANF Collections for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Figure 8 Undistributed Collections (UDC) by Category and Age, FY 2006
Figure 9 Interstate Collections for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Expenditures
Figure 11 Total Expenditures for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Figure 12 Total ADP Expenditures for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Number of Children
Figure 13 Number of Children in the IV-D Program for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Federal Parent Locator Service (FPLS)
Figure 14 Number of Unique Persons Matched and Number of Persons in the FCR by Participant Type for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Figure 15 Federal Offset Collections for Six Processing Years
Figure 1: Total Child Support Caseload by Current, Former, and Never Assistance for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
The total child support caseload decreased slightly in FY 2006 to 15.8 million cases due in part to a decrease in current assistance cases. Families formerly on public assistance comprise the largest portion of caseload.
Figure 2: Cases With and Without Support Orders Established for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Although, the total child support caseload decreased slightly in FY 2006, cases with orders increased by 2 percentage points over FY 2005.
Figure 3: Number of Cases for Which a Collection Was Made for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
The number of IV-D cases for which a collection was made has increased by 8.9 percent over the past 5 years-- from7.8 million in FY 2002 to 8.5 million in FY 2006.
Figure 4: IV-D and Statewide Paternities Established or Acknowledged1 for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
A total of 1.7 million paternities were established and acknowledged during FY 2006.
Figure 5: Total Distributed Collections by Current, Former, Never, and Medicaid Cases, FY 2006
Most child support collections are made for families who have never been on assistance. Former assistance and never assistance families received 85 percent of the child support collections in FY 2006.
Figure 6: Total Collections Received by Method of Collections, FY 2006
The most effective way of collecting child support continues to be through wage withholding in FY 2006.
Figure 7: Total Distributed Collections by TANF/Foster Care and Non-TANF Collections for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Non-TANF collections continued to increase in FY 2006, while TANF/FC collections declined due to a decrease in the TANF/FC caseload.
Figure 8: Undistributed Collections (UDC) by Category and Age, FY 2006
Tax offsets held for up to 6 months was the main reason collections remained undistributed in FY 2006.
Figure 9: Interstate Collections for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
In FY 2006, interstate collections showed a 19 percent increase over those obtained in FY 2002.
Figure 10: Interstate Cases: Cases Sent to and Received From Another State for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
The total number of interstate cases sent to another State consistently exceeded interstate cases received from another State for the past five years.
Figure 11: Total Administrative Expenditures for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
Total administrative expenditures in FY 2006 increased by 3.9 percent over last year.
Figure 12: Total ADP Expenditures for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
In FY 2006, Automated Data Processing (ADP) expenditures increased 5 percent over the previous year.
Figure 13: Number of Children in the IV-D Program for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years3
After dropping for several years, the number of children in the child support program increased by nearly 89,000 between 2005 and 2006.
Figure 14: Number of Unique Persons Matched and Number of Persons in the FCR by Participant Type for Five Consecutive Fiscal Years
The number of unique persons matched increased by 6 percent between FY 2005 and FY 2006. Children make up the largest portion of the participant types.
Figure 15: Federal Offset Collections for Seven Processing Years
Federal Offset collections for 2006 were $1.6 billion, a 0.7 percent increase over the previous year.
CSPIA INCENTIVE MEASURE FORMULAS | |
INCENTIVE MEASURE |
FORM AND LINE NUMBERS |
PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT PERCENTAGE (PEP): IV-D | |
Number of Children in the Caseload
in the FY or as of the End of the FY
Who Were Born Out-of-Wedlock
with Paternity Established or Acknowledged |
OCSE-157, Line 6 |
PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT PERCENTAGE (PEP): STATEWIDE | |
Number of Minor Children in the State
Born Out-of-Wedlock with
Paternity Established or Acknowledged During the
FY |
OCSE-157, Line 9 |
SUPPORT ORDER ESTABLISHMENT | |
Number of IV-D Cases with Support Orders |
OCSE-157, Line 2 |
CURRENT COLLECTIONS | |
Amount Collected for Current Support in IV-D Cases |
OCSE-157, Line 25 |
ARREARAGE COLLECTIONS | |
Number of IV-D Cases Paying Toward Arrears |
OCSE-157, Line 29 |
COST-EFFECTIVENESS | |
Total IV-D Dollars Collected |
OCSE-34A, Lines 8 + 5 + 13 of column (G) |
STATE COLLECTION BASE | |
2 times (Current Assistance + Former Assistance |
OCSE-34A: |
How an Incentive Payment is Determined
Because of the complexity of the incentives formula set forth in section 458 of the Social Security Act, we have included an example of how the system would work in a particular year for State A. Let's make the following assumptions regarding State A (See table A):
The maximum incentive for State A is:
Table A
Measure |
State A's Performance Level |
Applicable Percent based on Performance |
Weight |
State A's Collection Base (assumed to be $50,000,000) |
Paternity Establishment |
93% |
100% |
1.00 |
$50,000,000 |
Order Establishment |
74% |
88% |
1.00 |
$44,000,000 |
Current Collections |
59% |
69% |
1.00 |
$34,500,000 |
Arrearage Collections |
60% |
70% |
0.75 |
$26,250,000 |
Cost-Effectiveness |
$4.40 |
80% |
0.75 |
$30,000,000 |
State A's Maximum Incentive Base Amount |
$184,750,000 |
Table B
State |
Maximum Incentive Base Amounts |
State's Share of $318,750,000 |
Incentive Payment Pool $461,000,000 |
A |
$184,750,000 |
0.58 |
$267,199,216 |
B |
$84,000,000 |
0.26 |
$121,487,059 |
C |
$50,000,000 |
0.16 |
$72,313,725 |
Totals |
$318,750,000 |
1.00 |
$461,000,000 |
Table C6
If the Paternity Establishment or Support Order Performance Level Is:
At Least: |
But Less Than: |
The Applicable Percentage Is: |
At Least: |
But Less Than: |
The Applicable Percentage Is: |
|
80% |
100% |
64% |
65% |
74% |
||
79% |
80% |
98% |
63% |
64% |
73% |
|
78% |
79% |
96% |
62% |
63% |
72% |
|
77% |
78% |
94% |
61% |
62% |
71% |
|
76% |
77% |
92% |
60% |
61% |
70% |
|
75% |
76% |
90% |
59% |
60% |
69% |
|
74% |
75% |
88% |
58% |
59% |
68% |
|
73% |
74% |
86% |
57% |
58% |
67% |
|
72% |
73% |
84% |
56% |
57% |
66% |
|
71% |
72% |
82% |
55% |
56% |
65% |
|
70% |
71% |
80% |
54% |
55% |
64% |
|
69% |
70% |
79% |
53% |
54% |
63% |
|
68% |
69% |
78% |
52% |
53% |
62% |
|
67% |
68% |
77% |
51% |
52% |
61% |
|
66% |
67% |
76% |
50% |
51% |
60% |
|
65% |
66% |
75% |
0% |
50% |
0% |
Table D7
If the Current Collections or Arrearage Collections Performance Level Is:
At Least: |
But Less Than: |
The Applicable Percentage Is: |
At Least: |
But Less Than: |
The Applicable Percentage Is: |
|
80% |
100% |
59% |
60% |
69% |
||
79% |
80% |
98% |
58% |
59% |
68% |
|
78% |
79% |
96% |
57% |
58% |
67% |
|
77% |
78% |
94% |
56% |
57% |
66% |
|
76% |
77% |
92% |
55% |
56% |
65% |
|
75% |
76% |
90% |
54% |
55% |
64% |
|
74% |
75% |
88% |
53% |
54% |
63% |
|
73% |
74% |
86% |
52% |
53% |
62% |
|
72% |
73% |
84% |
51% |
52% |
61% |
|
71% |
72% |
82% |
50% |
51% |
60% |
|
70% |
71% |
80% |
49% |
50% |
59% |
|
69% |
70% |
79% |
48% |
49% |
58% |
|
68% |
69% |
78% |
47% |
48% |
57% |
|
67% |
68% |
77% |
46% |
47% |
56% |
|
66% |
67% |
76% |
45% |
46% |
55% |
|
65% |
66% |
75% |
44% |
45% |
54% |
|
64% |
65% |
74% |
43% |
55% |
53% |
|
63% |
64% |
73% |
42% |
43% |
52% |
|
62% |
63% |
72% |
41% |
42% |
51% |
|
61% |
62% |
71% |
40% |
41% |
50% |
|
60% |
61% |
70% |
0% |
40% |
0% |
Table E8
If the Cost-Effectiveness Performance Level Is:
At Least: |
But Less Than: |
The Applicable Percentage Is: |
5.00 |
100% |
|
4.50 |
4.99 |
90% |
4.00 |
4.50 |
80% |
3.50 |
4.00 |
70% |
3.00 |
3.50 |
60% |
2.50 |
3.00 |
50% |
2.00 |
2.50 |
40% |
0.00 |
2.00 |
0% |
Table F
Mandated Incentive Pool Payment, FY 2000-2008
The incentive payment pool is:
For each fiscal year following fiscal year 2008, the incentive payment pool will be multiplied by the percentage increase in the CPI between the two preceding years. For example, for fiscal year 2009, if the CPI increases by one percent between fiscal years 2007 and 2008, then the incentive pool for fiscal year 2009 would be a one percent increase over the $483,000,000 incentive payment pool for fiscal year 2008, or $487,830,000.
[1]OCSE charges an assortment of fees to States in return for services provided to State agencies administering the Child Support Program. These fees reduce the total amount of expenditures that are eligible for Federal Financial Participation (FFP). Total expenditures (including State and Federal shares) reported are net of these fees.
[2]See appendix for how the cost-effectiveness ratio is determined.
[3] Some tribes did not report data for all quarters in FY 2006.
[4]Because the measure has less weight.
[5]Because the measure has less weight.
[6]Use this table to determine the maximum incentive levels for the paternity establishment and support order performance measures.
[7]Use this table to determine the maximum incentive levels for the current and arrearage support collections performance measures.
[8]Use this table to determine the maximum incentive level for the cost-effectiveness performance measure.
Download FREE Adobe Acrobat® Reader™ to view PDF files located on this site.
OCSE Home
|
Events Calendar
|
Publications
|
Systems:
FPLS
|
FIDM
|
State and Tribal
|
State Profiles
Resources:
Grants Information
|
Información en Español
|
International
|
Federal/State Topic Search (NECSRS)
|
Tribal
|
Virtual Trainer's Library