skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > WIA/JTPA/CETA Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
California Health & Welfare Agency v. USDOL, 96-JTP-11 (ALJ Oct. 17, 1996)


UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
800 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 400N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001-8002

Date: October 17, 1996

Case No.: 96-JTP-11

In the Matter of:

CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE AGENCY,
    Complainant,

    v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
    Respondent.

ORDER OF CLARIFICATION

    The above-captioned matter is before the Office of Administrative Law Judges upon Complainant's request for a hearing, and a Prehearing Order was issued on August 5, 1996. The Department of Labor's representative submitted a motion to clarify the notice requirements in this Prehearing Order.

    The Prehearing Order provides that "[t]he Grant Officer shall notify all present and former applicants for the grant at issue of their opportunity to participate in the hearing" and that the Grant Officer shall inform them that their entitlement to this grant and future grants could be affected. The Department states that California is the only state which appealed the Grant Officer's final decision by requesting a hearing. Because the other states did not timely protest the determination, as required by 20 C.F.R. § 636.10(a)(1), the Department suggests that they have waived any complaint with regard to the selection process in this case and that participation by all these states (38) would be unnecessary and cumbersome. Thus, the Department seeks verification that providing notice to these parties, which were not awarded grants and which did not request a hearing, is not required by the Prehearing Order.

    However, on October 10, 1996, this Office received a letter from the Department of Labor of the State of New York seeking to join in the appeal of the State of California in this matter. This correspondence raises the issue of whether or not the State of New York timely requested a hearing on its denial of funds. Thus, to ensure that the appeal rights of the State of New York and the other applicants are adequately protected, the Department of Labor is ORDERED, as specified in the Prehearing Order, to notify all the applicants for this grant of their opportunity to participate in this hearing, regardless of whether the Department of Labor considers them to have


[Page 2]

timely requested a hearing.

    SO ORDERED.

      JOHN M. VITTONE
      Chief Administrative Law Judge

JMV/cy



Phone Numbers