Case Nos. 89-ERA-40; 91-ERA-31; 94-ERA-5; 95-ERA-9; 95-ERA-26; 95-ERA-32
IN THE MATTER OF
GEORGE M. GILLILAN
Complainant
v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Respondent
RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above case came on to be heard on the parties' joint motion to dismiss, and, it
appearing that the parties have agreed that the matters in controversy in this proceeding have
been fully conciliated; that the parties have further agreed that this proceeding should be
dismissed with full prejudice; and that the conciliation agreement, having been reviewed
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 5851(b)(2)(A)(1994), is fair to all parties and consistent with the
provisions of law;
It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this proceeding be dismissed with full prejudice.
Daniel A. Sarno, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
DATED: April 18, 1996
Newport News, Virginia
NOTICE: This RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
and the administrative file will be forwarded for review by the Secretary of Labor to the Office of
Administrative Appeals, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-4309, Frances Perkins Building,
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210. The Office of Administrative Appeals
has the responsibility to advise and assist the Secretary in the preparation and issuance of final
decisions in employee protection cases adjudicated under the regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 24
and 1978. See 55 Fed. Reg. 13250 (1990).