A&I Login
|
Contacts
|
Feedback
|
FMCSA.GOV
|
FMCSA Portal
|
DOT.GOV
Safety Measurement System (SMS)
Driver Information Resource (DIR)
Driver Safety Measurement System (DSMS)
GOTHAM
Bus Safety
Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP)
State Safety Data Quality
Supplemental Reports
FARS/MCMIS Matching Tool
State Data Analysis Reports
Police Accident Reporting
National Statistics
State Statistics
Large Truck Crash Causation Study (LTCCS)
State Crash Records
Reviews
Roadside Inspections
Traffic Enforcement Inspections
Passenger Carrier Statistics
Hazardous Materials Statistics
North American Free Trade Act (NAFTA) Statistics
Program Effectiveness
Compliance Review Effectiveness Model (CREM)
Intervention Model
Resource Allocation
Quarterly Report/Data Dashboard
State Safety Performance Measures (SSPM)
CVSP Toolkit
State Data Summary
Home
SMS
Carrier/Driver Safety
Data Quality
Crash Stats
Safety Programs
MCSAP
Analysis & Reports
A&I Home
>
Reviews
>
Acute Violations
Overview
Reviews
By Type
By Month
Safety Rating
By Fleet-Size
Planned Action
Reason
Viol. Summary
Acute Violation
Critical Violation
Safety Audits
Roadside Inspections
Activity Summary
OOS Rate
By Level
By Month
By Fleet-Size
By Operation
By Weight (GCWR)
Driver Violation
Vehicle Violation
HazMat Violation
Other Violation
Level VI Inspection
Level VI Violation
Traffic Enforcement
Activity Summary
OOS Rate
By Level
By Month
By Fleet-Size
By Operation
By Weight (GCWR)
Viol. Summary
HM Statistics
Passenger Carrier Stats
NAFTA Statistics
Program Effectiveness
Reviews, Acute Violations
Domicile
All Domiciles
United States
Mexico
Canada
Carrier Type
All Carriers
HazMat
Passenger
Motorcoach Only
Household Goods
Report Focus
National
State
-- Select State --
United States
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Dist. Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
American Territory
American Samoa
Guam
Northern Marianas
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
Time Period
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
Fiscal
Calendar
Reviews, Acute Violations (2013 - Fiscal)
Previous page
|
page:
1
2
of 2
|
Next page
Violation Code
Violation Description
# of Reviews
# of Acute Violations
% of Total Acute Violations
1
382.115A
Failing To Implement An Alcohol And/Or Drug Testing Program
255
255
41.06%
2
382.305
Failing To Implement Random Controlled Substance Or Alcohol Testing Program
116
116
18.68%
3
383.37A
Allowing Driver To Operate With Suspended/Revoked/Etc. Cdl
38
38
6.12%
4
390.35
Requiring, Permitting Or Making False Statements Or Records.
29
35
5.64%
5
387.7A
Inadequate Or No Financial Responsibility
33
33
5.31%
6
382.215
Using A Driver Who Has Tested Positive For A Drug
20
20
3.22%
7
396.9C2
Operating An Oos Vehicle
16
16
2.58%
8
383.51A
Driving A Cmv (Cdl) While Disqualified
12
12
1.93%
9
391.11A
Using An Unqualified Driver
10
10
1.61%
10
172.800B
Transporting Hm Without A Security Plan.
9
9
1.45%
11
391.11B41
Using A Physically Unqualified Driver.
7
7
1.13%
12
387.31A
Bus -- Inadequate Or No Financial Responsibility
6
6
0.97%
13
753.63
Unknown
6
6
0.97%
14
TRC.522072A1
Unknown
5
5
0.81%
15
391.45A
Using A Driver Not Medically Examined And Certified
5
5
0.81%
16
391.11B4
Driver Lacking Physical Qualification(S)
4
4
0.64%
17
390.19A
Unknown
4
4
0.64%
18
365.105A
Unknown
4
4
0.64%
19
382.211
Using A Driver Who Refused To Take Drug / Alcohol Test
4
4
0.64%
20
TRC.522072A3
Unknown
3
3
0.48%
Total number of Acute violations in FY 2013:
621
Data Source: FMCSA Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS) data snapshot as of
1/25/2013
, including current year-to-date information for 2013. The data presented above are accurate as of this date, but are subject to update as new or additional information may be reported to MCMIS following the snapshot date.
For more information see the
Report Description