Marines Blog

The Official Blog of the United States Marine Corps

Subscribe by RSS

Energy efficient. Combat effective.

President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union Jan. 24, noting that the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy.

In his 2012 State of the Union address, President Barack Obama called on all Americans to do their part in redefining our infrastructure and encouraging Congress to follow the military’s example.

“At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, [the Armed Forces] exceed all expectations. They’re not consumed with personal ambition. They don’t obsess over their differences. They focus on the mission at hand. They work together.”

The Department of Defense took one of the hardest hits when the budget cuts were announced last year. Over the next 10 years, the DoD will be required to drastically reduce spending, forcing the services to bury their respective budget perspectives and work as a team to find at least $450 billion in savings through 2021.

Since the announcement, there has been plenty of buzz about where this money will come from – personnel cuts, force structure and program reductions. But, according to the President, the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy.

Did you know? The DoD is the nation’s largest energy user.

In recent years, the DoD has launched several initiatives to improve energy efficiency and is shifting to renewable energy to meet operational and installation needs.

The Corps established the Expeditionary Energy Office to reduce energy consumption, with the goal of increasing combat effectiveness by reducing the need for liquid fossil fuel 50 percent by 2025.

The Office of Naval Research, in conjunction with the Marine Corps Warfighting Lab, developed the Experimental Forward Operating Base, or ExFOB, which identifies and evaluates energy efficient capabilities that can reduce risks to Marines and increase our combat effectiveness.

(U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. M. C. Nerl)

In less than a year, technologies demonstrated at the first ExFOB were deployed to combat with promising results:
• Two patrol bases operated entirely on renewable energy
• 90 percent reduction in fuel required at a third base
• Three-week foot patrol executed without battery resupply, reducing load on Marines by 700 lbs.

The price of addiction to liquid fuel in war can be measured in many ways: number of convoys at risk on the road, IED incidents, patrols diverted for force protection, operations delayed waiting for resupply, weight and cube exceeding air and sealift, and dollars per barrel .

Ultimately, it must be measured in lives risked—and lost . During a three-month period early in 2010, six Marines were wounded hauling fuel and water to bases in Afghanistan during just 299 convoys . That is one Marine wounded for every 50 convoys.

As the Marine Corps draws down from Afghanistan, energy efficiency will be a critical enabler for our future missions. By reducing the need for fuel, expeditionary forces will minimize their exposure to the enemy, increase range and flexibility as a highly self- sufficient force, and operate in places where others more dependent on logistics cannot.

 

More information on the Corps Expeditionary Energy efforts:

Marine Corps Expeditionary Energy Strategy and Implementation Plan

Marines thrive in employing renewable energy, saving lives

 

View more ways the Corps is going green:

Ground Renewable Expeditionary Energy System – GREENS

Green Bullets

Catch a Few Rays for Extra Plays

Renewable Energy Mission Module

    Related Posts

  • Marine

    Most green tech doesn’t “fail” they are just not “cost effective” at the current price of fuel. If you reduce the convoys for fuel, you still reduce casualties regardless of water. I would think before I spoke. Just my 2 coppers.

  • Stack

    LtGen Castellaw, USMC, Ret, has made many statements about the need for our Marines to be as energy independent as possible.  Energy dependence is one of the major national security problems – water being a close second.  We can look at making our homes and vehicles more efficient, and that will save us (individually) a considerable sum of money.  We can stop importing fuel from out of state or from other nations to make our balance of trade more positive by utilizing alternative energy sources, or from conservation. And our military forces have to look at being as expeditionary as possible by not having to rely upon indigenous sources for fuel and water.  I commend the Commandant and his predecessors for having the foresight to utilize new technologies both on the battlefield and in our bases stateside.
    I speak as a retired Marine engineer officer and a current Certified Green Professional who has a son who has survived 3 deployments in the sandbox. By one estimate, it costs us $400 per gallon for fuel to be delivered to a Forward Operating Base. We need for our troops to be as independent as possible, as that will give them the mobility to be more combat effective.  The statistics for what it is costing us now, both on dollars and wounded/dead Marines, are staggering.  Yes. let’s let the public know what we are doing to alleviate this probem and get more support.  This is beyond politics, it is the right thong to do.

  • Pjkulcze

    “Did you know? The DoD is the
    nation’s largest energy user.”  Some people
    may know this.  However, most people probably
    don’t know about the plethora of energy saving and environmental programs that
    the Marine Corps accomplishes.  Each day
    Marines go above and beyond to save energy and resources from the Command level
    all the way down to the individual Marine.   Not enough is done on our part to convey this
    to the American public.   It seems the only
    time we make an effort is on Earth Day.  More
    stories should be pushed out about the environmental efforts accomplished by
    our Marines.  From a Public Affairs stand
    point, American audiences need to know this.   We thrive on public support.  At a time when the military is drawing down
    forces, it is important to remember America doesn’t need a Marine Corps, America
    wants a Marine Corps.  Public Affairs
    should be pushing out more information reminding the public of what a great bargain
    the United States Marine Corps is to America.Philip Kulczewski

  • Rodkt57

    I think our Marines have sacrificed enough…our son got to call home we’d night and we had not heard from him n over a month…..now I realize our troops have a lot to give up…but the first thing our son said was PLEASE MAIL FOOD….they’re is no lunch given to them and a small breakfast and dinner, but not enough to go around so they all have very small portions…I THINK THIS PATHETIC….for Obama to get up in front of the nation and want our nation to do more…I call it “sacrifices”….just how much more are we suppose to take….BUT I BET ONE THING ….. I BET HIS A#& goes to bed with his belly full.!!! Folks, I’m just fed up with our military being the ones that ALWAYS has to be the CHOSEN ones to change the world…being a retired military wife and civilian service retiree….thinks our son shouldn’t have to beg for food to be sent when they’re fighting War on Terror!!!

  • Sgtrobke

    So what your saying is we should just give up and not even try? It’s too hard I guess! Too lofty a goal! It’ll take too long and be expensive to get there right? I don’t know where this attitude came from these days. I thank god though that the WW2 generation didn’t have that attitude because who know where we would be today.

  • T627l

    6 Marines were injured while delivering fuel and water. How do they plan to replace water which is generally delivered on the same convoy as the fuel? How much are these experimental exercises costing? Will these “green” technologies save any money or end up costing the tax payers billions before failing like every green technology his far.