U.S. Army Medical Department, Office of the Surgeon General
Skip Navigation, go to content

ACCESS TO CARE External Link, Opens in New Window

ABOUT ARMY MEDICINE

ARMY MEDICINE PORTAL (AKO Users)

LEADERS

ORGANIZATION

BALANCED SCORECARD (AKO Users)

HEALTHCARE COVENANT

AMBASSADOR PROGRAM

NEWS &
INFORMATION


OMBUDSMAN
PROGRAM


FOIA/PRIVACY External Link, Opens in New Window

JOBS & TRAINING

REPORTS

TRICARE® External Link, Opens in New Window

WOUNDED SOLDIER AND FAMILY HOTLINE

MERCURY NEWSPAPER

AMEDD VIRTUAL LIBRARY External Link, Opens in New Window

WARRIOR MEDIC
MEMORIAL
External Link, Opens in New Window



Facebook Twitter YouTube Flickr

West Point Cadets Try to Improve MEB/PEB System

News & Information - The Mercury - February 2009 Mercury

by Emily Tower
West Point Pointer View

The pressure has been building on a small think tank inside Mahan Hall at West Point, N.Y.

The fact the Army's top general will hear their ideas isn't entirely what makes the senior project of four U.S. Military Academy cadets so important. Their work could change the lives of Soldiers and their Families.

"It's not really for a grade," Senior Andrew Hansen said of the project. "It's making a contribution to something that affects our lives."

Hansen and Seniors David Black, Derek Merkler and Dan Smith have developed a list of recommendations to improve medical and physical evaluation board procedures. They have provided their ideas to retired GEN Frederick Franks Jr., who is scheduled to brief Chief of Staff of the Army GEN George Casey about improving the boards.

Franks, USMA class of 1959, was asked by Casey to develop an improvement plan. He turned to USMA to find what engineers call systematic methodology—making decisions based on creating the solution that provides the greatest value to its stakeholders. In some cases this could mean scrapping the current process and starting over.

The cadets, all from the Department of Systems Engineering, "are bright young people who feel an intense connection to (Soldiers and their Families)," Franks said.

"They have the ability to apply theoretical systems engineering principles to a real-life set of circumstances."

The cadets realize those circumstances could be their own some day or those of a Soldier entrusted to their care.

"This is not just busy work. It matters what we come up with," Smith said.

The cadets' studied reports about the boards by several agencies, including the Government Accountability Office. They developed surveys and interviewed wounded Soldiers. Then the cadets applied a dose of common sense and objectivity to develop their recommendations, Black said.

"We are unbiased," Black said. "The only thing we have in it is our future. We are complete outsiders."

To make the recommendations, the cadets used what's known as the systems decision process, said LTC Scott Crino, the systems engineering instructor overseeing the project. This process, which was developed by faculty in the USMA systems engineering department and also is known as value-focused thinking, "starts with identifying stakeholders and decision-makers, defining the problem at hand, generating a set of feasible alternatives, then selecting from those that provide the greatest value to the users of the system," Crino said.

Franks and Crino said the cadets' skills and willingness to tackle the problem helped them be successful.

"Four minds, regardless of experience and time in the military, can come up with some great possible solutions," Crino said.

Though the cadets have not had experience with boards, they know the Warrior Ethos—particularly the portion proclaiming a Soldier will never leave a fallen comrade—and have a dedication to doing what is right for the mission, Franks said.

"I have been quite pleased to see their thoughtful and thorough work, which is not surprising considering the kind of work they do," Franks said. "I am very grateful to them because the end benefit is for the Soldiers and Families."

From the February 2009 Mercury, an Army Medical Department publication.