Modern Weather Science Awareness & Geo-Engineering Discussion Forum

"The repeated claim of CO2-driven climate change without acknowledgment of geoengineering-related environmental intervention is a severe perversion of both meaningful scientific inquiry and public opinion with overwhelming implications for all life on earth"  

Lives and proper readiness depend on understanding modern weather science and geoengineering  in our sky. There are two major modern day components to our weather that people are just now beginning recognize: (1) Aerial Spraying seen almost daily in our sky appearing as jet condensation trails, but in reality are long lasting, cloud forming hydrolyzed cocktails usually composed of aluminum, barium and strontium and sometimes carbon black and other chemicals. (2)  High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) -- essentially a giant 3-km by 3-km, 1000-megawatt microwave with the door left open while it operates to heart the upper atmosphere. 

Scientists are ahead of our weather forecasters. Without tracking and incorporating the aerial spraying and microwave bursts into our short range weather forecasts lives are being lost as mild weather forecasts turn instantly (24-to-72 hours) into server weather.  Our group believes Public Safety Readiness compels this technology to be discussed publicly with active congressional oversight. Please join us in this discussion.  

How these technologies MAY affect atmospheric conditions (based on emperical evidence and experimentation) is interesting. But, to shape a topic and conversation with the presupposition that it DOES affect weather is, in my opinion, not a fruitful endevor. Hurricanes kill people and destroy infrastructure; a proven fact worthy of maximum efforts of planning and preparation.  "Geoengineering's" cause/effect on weather, and thus FEMA related prep/response issues, is unproven, and therefore, unitl it is; I feel there are other forums better suited for it other than this one. 

Hi Mr. Green,

Thank you for your thoughtful guidance. We are prepared to post "proof" on this site but feel it would be a distraction into side issues of statistical analysis of (a) patent law and (b) inappropriate posting of classified information. What level of proof do you personally seek from us?

There is no other public, government forum to our knowledge anywhere in the world that focuses on emergency preparedness, and posting of information for saving lives and assisting other CERT members to evaluate and understand modern atmospheric geoengineering and weather modification science and its impact on weather forecasts and storm level intensity. 

We appeal to FEMA's duty towards it's professed mission to allow us to us this website, subject to your posted restrictions, in furthering the expansion and dissemination of this important life saving knowledge.  

Thank you for your reply as well. I am sympathetic to your concerns about pulishing proof of your findings, but I must say that you misunderstood me regarding your area of concen:  I'm not interested in reading about proof of your claims on this site, I'd be happy to review that on your own website. Postings on this forum tend to include: Notice of drills and training classes for various disaster response, new members and in what way are the involved or interested in disaster response, new legislation affecting FEMA and other related organizations, FEMA grants and loan info., opinions related to the way FEMA attracts interest in topics (e.g- Are the use of 'zombies' a good way to attract young people?, etc... It's my understanding is that site is dedicated more to the 'responder', than to theories related to climate study, plate tectonics, suns spots, etc.. On this site we can all choose (or not) to plan disaster drills and response with the belief that hurricanes are getting stronger and more frequent, without (and I mean no disrespect) the need for your orgainzation's theories. I would suggest the National Scienenc Foundation, NOAA,  or numerous other public and private web forums where you can discuss and debate your theories. If however you are looking for info on how and where to obtainCERT trainging, and FEMA info, I think you've come to the right place.

Discussion groups that are overly-moderated are of little value. My post on the geoengineering activities of DHS was censored even though I provided a link to the government document.  If we can't talk about hurricane mitigation then what else are we not allowed to discuss?

CERT Volunteers find Weather 1O1 useful in readiness preparation: (A) NOAA has put forward in a 1-hour 23-minute video as of Dec 4, 2012 it's introductory acknowledgment featuring NOAA's Climate Monitoring Branch chief scientist Dr. Michael MacCracken entitled: "Ethics and Issues Surrounding Geo-engineering To Mitigate Climate Change" originally filmed October 2002. Only 1-decade late! During the decade we have discover much on our own. (B) "Dutchsince" blog with 29-Million hits ( currently 2-million+- hits per month) on the other hand, has been carefully instructing CERT volunteers how to accurately use NOAA weather satellite feeds and other public weather feeds to OVERRIDE weather forecasts of mild weather and accurately predict severe weather by checking specific HAARP tracking radar sites explained by Dutchsinse. This is useful safety information. 

Mr. Buckley,  I absolutely agree that the ability to read weather satl. info and deciphering data, is very important in positioning disaster resources. But simply because a NOAA officail mentions geoegineering, does not mean that that topic is also importnat to CERT members. We can agree to disagree. I'll leve it the the moderators to decide.

Matt,

I understand that you like to keep this website's focus on FEMA instead of Geo-engineering / weather modification. However, your statement above that calls geo-engineering "classified information" is highly mistaken.

Geo-engineering / cloud seeding has taken place since 1923. We also know that there are over 200 cloud seeding bases in America today for ground-location cloud seeding. 

This is encyclopedia / public information, not "classified."

So, FEMA was dispatched to the location of Joplin Missouri during the tornado just a few short years ago, correct? As you can see from the Doppler Radar archives on that particular day, Joplin Missouri's tornado was created via cloud seeding.

I do not need to explain the science behind clouds in this message, but they do not form over Texas land mass. "Natural clouds" form when water heats above 200 degrees and forms accumulating condensation.

In other words, FEMA and cloud seeding / weather modification / geo-engineering have a direct relevance to every single "act of God" that FEMA comes to "save us from."

This post and these comments are directly relevant to the information, and geo-engineering schemes are illegal, immoral, and absolutely disgusting.

Michael

I don't recall using the word "classified' but if I did it was probably in responce to your earlier message where you stated your reluctance to publish 'copyrighted' materials. or such. As you stated your topic of interest is not "classified", which suggests it is available for people to research and learn about. I'm just not intrested in doing that here. I have no opinion regarding your 'Texas Tornado' other than bringing your proof to the attention of  local and state representatives affected by the storms.

I don't find this board 'overly moderated' at all. I can't even recall a prior posted complaint from a CERT memeber or concerned beginner mentioning that their topic was censored. If Shakespere will forgive the parphrase;..perhapse the fault lies not in FEMA..but yourself.