USGS - science for a changing world

Kansas Water Science Center

Homehome Sudieswater data & studies Research Labresearch lab Pubspublications Floodflood Droughtdrought Contactcontact
Contract All | Expand All
PUBLICATIONS
DATA CENTER
WATER DATA & STUDIES
INFORMATION CENTER
ABOUT KANSAS WSC
USGS IN YOUR STATE

USGS Water Science Centers are located in each state.

There is a USGS Water Science Center office in each State. Washington Oregon California Idaho Nevada Montana Wyoming Utah Colorado Arizona New Mexico North Dakota South Dakota Nebraska Kansas Oklahoma Texas Minnesota Iowa Missouri Arkansas Louisiana Wisconsin Illinois Mississippi Michigan Indiana Ohio Kentucky Tennessee Alabama Pennsylvania West Virginia Georgia Florida Caribbean Alaska Hawaii New York Vermont New Hampshire Maine Massachusetts South Carolina North Carolina Rhode Island Virginia Connecticut New Jersey Maryland-Delaware-D.C.

Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring—A Valuable Tool for TMDL Programs

By Teresa J. Rasmussen, Andrew C. Ziegler, Patrick P. Rasmussen, and Thomas C. Stiles

Abstract

Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) typically are developed and monitored using analysis of discrete water samples collected on a fixed schedule. However, TMDLs estimated on the basis of discrete samples may not adequately represent the daily, monthly, or annual constituent load variability in a watershed system. An alternative approach has been used in Kansas by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and other Federal and local agencies, in which data from continuous water-quality monitors and regression relations developed from analysis of discrete water samples collected throughout the range of flow are used to provide continuous (hourly) estimates of constituent concentrations and loads. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that continuous water-quality monitoring and regression estimates are beneficial to TMDL programs because they describe variability in water-quality conditions better than discrete samples alone.

Sensor technology currently is not available to directly measure many chemicals of interest in streams; therefore, regression models are used to estimate stream chemical concentrations from the relation between laboratory-analyzed samples and in-stream sensor measurements such as turbidity and specific conductance. Continuous hourly values from in-stream sensors (turbidity, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, pH, and water temperature) and regression models make it possible to estimate concentrations and loads for different time periods--daily, weekly, monthly, or annually. Hourly values help characterize load fluctuations under changing streamflow and seasonal conditions and in response to different contributing areas within a watershed. Uncertainty in regression-estimated concentrations is defined using prediction intervals and typical regression diagnostic statistics including mean square error (MSE) and the coefficient of determination (R2). The continuous estimated data, associated uncertainty, and probability and duration curves for selected stream monitoring sites in Kansas are available on the World Wide Web at URL: http://ks.water.usgs.gov/rtqw/.

Continuous data provide the foundation for a more comprehensive evaluation of the variability in loading characteristics and water-quality degradation than provided by discrete water-quality samples. Continuous concentration estimates can be used to construct cumulative frequency distribution (duration) curves to determine percentage of time that estimated concentrations exceed water-quality criteria. Estimated concentration and load duration curves can be used to evaluate current water-quality conditions and estimate the duration and magnitude of potential water-quality degradation. Examination of the differences in regression-estimated concentrations and loads at a series of sensor stations along a stream allows the analysis of upstream-to-downstream changes in water quality. In situations where discrete samples and constituent concentration data are necessary for regulatory requirements, monitoring by continuous sensor data allows regulatory agencies to optimize sampling efforts. When continuous estimates are considered over the long term, it may be possible to identify changes in water-quality conditions resulting from land-use changes and implementation of best management practices in the watershed.

Rasmussen, T.J., Ziegler, A.C., Rasmussen, P.P., and Stiles, T.C., 2003, Continuous water-quality monitoring—a valuable tool for TMDL programs, in Proceedings of National TMDL Science and Policy 2003 Speciality Conference, Chicago, Illinois, November 16–19, 2003: Water Environment Federaton, compact disk, session 11, 17 p.

Additional information about real-time water-quality and TMDL studies in Kansas can be found at: http://ks.water.usgs.gov/rtqw/ and http://ks.water.usgs.gov/studies/TMDL/

For additional information contact:

Andy Ziegler
U.S. Geological Survey
4821 Quail Crest Place
Lawrence, KS 66049-3839
Telephone: (785) 832-3539
Fax: (785) 832-3500
Email: aziegler@usgs.gov

USGS Home Water Resources Biology Geography Geology Geospatial

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: /pubs/abstracts/tmdl04tjr.htm
Page Contact Information: GS-W-KS_info@usgs.gov
Page Last Modified:Wednesday, 17-Sep-2008 12:53:51 CDT