Masthead banner of Park Science: Integrating Research and Resource Management in the National Parks; ISSN 1090-9966; link to current issue
Volume 29
Number 1
Summer 2012
Arrowhead symbol of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior
Home + About + Author Guidelines + Archive + Library Availability + Subscribe + Advanced Search
+ GO +
View from above of a line of hikers ascending the Half Dome cables route in Yosemite National Park during a busy summer day. Park Operations
Half Dome visitor use management
Optimizing park operations and visitor experiences through empirical evidence
By Bret Meldrum, Steve Lawson, Nathan Reigner, and David Pettebone
Published: 10 Sep 2012 (online)  •  1 Oct 2012 (in print)
Pages
 
Abstract
  Introduction
Visitor use research
Management action
Conclusions
Acknowledgments and references
About the authors
+ Printer Friendly +

+ PDF +
Introduction
Visitors queue along the Half Dome cables route as a result of crowding.

NPS Photo

Figure 1. Visitor queues form at the base of the Half Dome cables as a result of crowding. While queuing was not found to occur frequently, conditions far less crowded than shown (90 people on the cables from the top of visual range to the first stanchion) impeded free-flow conditions on the cables. This photo represents three times as many people on the cables at one time as the standard the park is seeking to maintain.

Yosemite National Park is recognized for its towering granite cliffs and surreal waterfalls. Located in the Sierra Nevada of California, the park is also renowned as a popular recreation destination that at times experiences high levels of visitation. While the experiences of most visitors are concentrated in the easily accessible areas of Yosemite Valley, high levels of visitor use are also documented on wilderness trails (Broom and Hall 2010), including the Half Dome Trail (HDT) (fig. 1, above).

The HDT hike has long been the setting of an iconic experience in Yosemite National Park. The trail leads visitors up the only route accessing the summit without technical climbing. The hike is 16 miles (26 km) round-trip ascending 4,000 ft (1,219 m), and is an undertaking that culminates with the last 400 ft (122 m) of the ascent exposed and on the Half Dome cables (fig. 1, above, and fig. 2). This structure consists of pairs of heavy-gauge cables approximately 32 inches apart secured to the rock surface at varying intervals of 82 to 296 feet (25–90 m) in length. The cables are suspended by stanchions that vary from waist to shoulder height and provide handholds, while boards anchored to the stanchions afford footing (fig. 2 inset). The cables form a corridor that facilitates travel to the summit of Half Dome. The structure is typically installed by the trail crew in mid-May and available for use through mid-October, dependent upon weather.

In recent years this hike has transformed from what was historically thought to be a multiday wilderness experience to an epic day hike for most visitors, with an increasing number of search-and-rescue incidents. Fourteen falls and four deaths have been recorded in the vicinity of the Half Dome cables since 1969, with eight incidents occurring since 2006. Most of these falls were caused by weather events resulting from wet surfaces, but three falls occurred when the cables were down while one happened under crowded conditions.

Iconic park destinations can require extensive operations to minimize the effects of crowding, manage traffic, improve safety, protect wilderness values, and provide search-and-rescue services. This article illustrates and outlines a process in support of science-based decision making to manage visitor use on the Half Dome Trail. The cables section of this trail does present an additional opportunity to frame visitor experience with safety as the biggest driver in determining daily use levels. This investigative process provides rationale for decision making that maintains high-quality visitor experiences and is designed to withstand public scrutiny. The defining elements of this process are issue identification, scientific investigation, interim management measures, park planning commitments, monitoring, and operational refinements.

Return to top

This page updated:  10 September 2012
URL: http://www.nature.nps.gov/ParkScience/index.cfm?ArticleID=561&Page=1


Page 1 of 6 • Next +
Departments
 
From the Editor
Information Crossfile
In Focus
Notes from Abroad
Field Moment
Upcoming Issues/Deadlines
Masthead Information
FEATURES
 
  Half Dome visitor use management
Using GIS analysis to help determine Civil War cannon locations in Manassas National Battlefield Park
Hot research/Cool science: An investigation of permafrost in a changing alpine environment
Live Interactive Virtual Explorations provide students with glimpse of life at the Old Point Loma Lighthouse in the late 1800s
Boston Harbor Islands All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory
The challenges of documenting biodiversity
Paleoblitz
Monitoring park landscape dynamics through NPScape: Saguaro National Park
Finding and acquiring NPScape products
Mitigating encroachment of park experiences
Developing an accessible methodology for monitoring visitor use patterns in open landscapes of Yosemite National Park
Understanding endangered plant species population changes at Eureka Dunes, Death Valley National Park
Related Publications + Explore Nature + NPS.gov + Privacy + Disclaimer + Contact Editor
Web Site Last Updated: 13 February 2013