Skip Navigation
Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
 
Slide Tray
0 slides

Return to Slide Library

Slides

Add Search Results to Slide Tray Search:

"prevalence"

Slides: 37–48 of 79

Rating the Strength of Evidence From the CER

Prevalence of Comorbidities in Women With Noncyclic CPP

Knowledge Gaps and Future Research Needs (2 of 2)

Rating the Strength of Evidence From the Comparative Effectiveness Review

Background: Prevalence and Burden of Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Factors Affecting the Accuracy of NITs in Diagnosing CAD in Women

Rating the Strength of Evidence From the Comparative Effectiveness Review

Example: Summary Table of Prevalence Findings. This table includes four columns for respondents and response rate, type of assessment method, age of respondents (mean and range), and the prevalence of the condition (overactive bladder) being measured. Each row begins with an abridged citation of a study, and relevant information from each study is included in each column.

Example: Summary Table of Prevalence Findings

Rating the Strength of Evidence From the Comparative Effectiveness Review

MEDLINE Alone Is Not Enough. Study 1 (Sassi et al., 2002): sensitivity and specificity of using MEDLINE versus nine databases. This study focused on ability to retrieve economic analyses from January to March 1997. MEDLINE-only searches had a sensitivity of 72 percent and a specificity of 75 percent versus nine databases. Study 2 (BetrĂ¡n et al., 2005): systematic review of the prevalence of maternal mortality and morbidity from 1997 to 2002. Multiple databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, LILACS). 60 percent of citations were found in more than one database. The MEDLINE search had 20 percent of nonreplicated citations, EMBASE had 7.4 percent, and LILACS had 5.6 percent.

MEDLINE Alone Is Not Enough

Pages: Previous 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next