President Obama Appears on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

President Obama was last night’s guest on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, a comedy show that satirizes real television news programs and uses humor to discuss current events in the U.S. and around the world. The show is especially popular with young people in the United States. A recent study by the PEW Research Center found that 74% of the show’s viewers are between the ages of 18-49.

Host Jon Stewart interviewed the president for approximately 22 minutes, during which time the two men discussed a wide range of political issues including health care, the economy, and the upcoming midterm elections.

When asked to discuss what his administration has done over the past two years the president named pieces of legislation he feels were successes and said, “Over and over again we have moved forward an agenda that is making a difference in people’s lives each and every day.”

There were some humorous moments, such as when Mr. Stewart asked the president if he had just been invited to the White House. “No,” the president replied.

At the end of the show President Obama encouraged Americans to vote, and reminded them that many can take advantage of early voting in their states.

Mr. Obama first appeared on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart back in 2008 when he was a candidate for president.

U.S., E.U. Face Issues Ahead of Summit || New Trends in Farming || President Obama on MTV

The United States and the European Union prepare for a summit. Woman are taking the lead in agriculture in many developing countries. Meet Modadugu Gupta, a pioneer in the field of aquaculture. And President Obama appears on MTV.

Critical Issues Ahead of the G20 Summit
In October 2008, at the peak of the financial crisis, world financial leaders cooperated to take “exceptional action” to stabilize the global financial system. However, in recent months, trans-Atlantic differences have emerged over a variety of international financial issues. Now, less than one month before the summit of the Group of 20 major economies in Seoul, South Korea, the United States and European Union are facing a critical test of their will to agree on financial issues critical not only to their own economies, but to the rest of the world too. Above, Obama with other G20 leaders.

Growing Opportunities for Women Farmers
In rural Kenya, women have very few resources of their own, but are primarily responsible for feeding their families and doing the bulk of the household and farm work. Now, 80 percent of the farmers are women. In this feature, we profile women who have taken the initiative to change their lives, and, in the process, increase the perception that women can contribute economically to their society.

Photo Gallery: A Pioneer in Fish Farming
Modadugu Gupta, who witnessed the struggles of local fisherman while growing up in eastern India, is a biologist and humanitarian whose work has multiplied the quantity of edible fish in Asia and improved the lives of farmers. Gupta was also instrumental in getting women involved in fish farming, and now they outnumber male fish farmers in many countries. “My father used to take me to the seashore, and I saw the fishermen coming in. They could hardly meet their daily needs. That’s where my interest in fisheries started,” says Gupta, who received the World Food Prize in 2005. Learn more about Gupta and his techniques in this photo gallery.

President Obama on MTV
President Obama led a discussion on MTV last week; an appearance that helped him connect with the country’s youth.  Approximately 250 people attended the event, and many more tuned in on MTV, Country Music Television (CMT) and Black Entertainment Television (BET), all of which are known to attract young audiences.

President Obama on MTV

President Obama led a discussion on MTV yesterday; an appearance that helped him connect with the country’s youth.  Approximately 250 people attended the event, and many more tuned in on MTV, Country Music Television (CMT) and Black Entertainment Television (BET), all of which are media organizations that are known to attract young audiences. 

Participants asked the president a range of questions, including, “what is your administration planning to do to improve comprehensive primary education and address college affordability?” and “if the economy does not improve over the next two years, why should we vote you back in?” 

President Obama pointed out what he sees as the strength of younger generations when he said:

“The amount of interaction, the amount of understanding that exists in your generation among people of different races and different creeds and different colors is unprecedented… That’s why I remain confident about America’s ability to compete in the world, precisely because we’ve got a little bit of everybody in this country. But what is important is that we make sure to work together, that we understand our strength comes from unity and not division.  And that’s going to be something that I think your generation is going to be especially important because if all of you lead, then your parents and your grandparents tend to follow.”

Many political figures in the U.S. have used MTV as an outlet for connecting with young voters, including Bill Clinton, John McCain and George W. Bush.

You can read the entire transcript of the president’s MTV discussion on the official White House website.

Democracy and iPods (and iPads and Xboxes and PlayStations)

You may read my title and wonder where this blog entry is going. What do democracy and iPods have to do with one another? Well, I’ll tell you. Actually, I’ll let the president of the United States tell you.

In a speech to Hampton University graduates May 9, President Obama spoke to these students about how as they leave school behind and enter the so-called real world, they have a democratic duty.

“Now that your minds have been opened, it’s up to you to keep them that way. It will be up to you to open minds that remain closed that you meet along the way,” Obama said. “That, after all, is the elemental test of any democracy: whether people with differing points of view can learn from each other, and work with each other, and find a way forward together.”

Obama cited Thomas Jefferson, who recognized that America, built on the tenets of democracy, would survive only if its citizens were informed and engaged.

Now, here’s where the iPod fits in. In today’s digital age, differing viewpoints are everywhere and there are countless ways to engage, but there are downsides to this. “You’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t always rank that high on the truth meter,” Obama said.

“With iPods and iPads, and Xboxes and PlayStations … information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment,” he said. “All of this is not only putting pressure on you, it’s putting new pressure on our country and on our democracy.”

The president laid out his argument. What’s your opinion?

The Library of Congress Has Your Tweets

The U.S. Library of Congress is the proud owner of such historically significant pieces as the draft of the Declaration of Independence and one of the only three perfect vellum copies of the Gutenberg Bible. And as of last week, it can add to its impressive collection an archive of all of the tweets sent out on Twitter since the social media site began in March 2006. That’s approximately 50 million tweets.

The list includes famous highlights, such as when Barack Obama announced he had won the presidency:

@Barack Obama: We just made history. All of this happened because you gave your time, talent and passion. All of this happened because of you. Thanks (11:34 AM Nov 5th, 2008 via web)

But it also includes not famous (and some would say, not important) tweets, such as when people tweet what they are having for lunch that day.

Of course, you could argue that the tweets about meals are just as important as the tweets about winning the U.S. presidential elections. After all, won’t those messages be of use to cultural anthropologists who want to learn about the eating patterns of early 21st Century human beings?

Are you among the Twitter users whose messages will now be archived by the Library of Congress?

Seeing Africa through African Eyes

Salim Amin is one of many entrepreneurs coming to the Presidential Summit on Entrepreneurship from countries with sizeable Muslim populations, April 26-27. He heads a media conglomerate in Kenya that includes a video and photo news agency, publishing house, TV news channel and journalism school.

American journalist Roger Mudd has had a distinguished career in television news. In the early 1960s, he joined CBS News as a congressional correspondent and became well known while covering the debate over the 1964 Civil Rights Act. He later anchored evening news for CBS and NBC and hosted Meet the Press.

Salim Amin with father's portrait

Salim Amin with father's portrait

Salim Amin:
I inherited my love for Africa from my father, photo-journalist Mohamed “Mo” Amin.

He gave up his youth, his family, his left arm and eventually his life for the continent he loved and for his conviction that his photos could depict it objectively. [Mo Amin lost his arm to a grenade while covering strife in Ethiopia. He worked as a photo-reporter until 1996, when he died on board a hijacked Ethiopian airliner that crashed.]

When Mo started his career in the 1960s, the term “African journalist” was derogatory. He turned it into something symbolizing pride and achievement. My father believed Africa could be covered best by African journalists, who understand African history and culture. Under his tutelage, I worked as a frontline photographer during conflicts in Somalia, Rwanda and Congo.

My father’s images of the 1984 famine in Ethiopia brought international attention to the crisis and helped save the lives of millions.

His career inspired me to do what I do now.

After my father’s death, I took over his business, Nairobi-based Camerapix, Africa’s first online agency for news video and photography.

In 1998, media pros David Johnson and Christel de Wit and a Nairobi-based college helped me launch the Mohamed Amin Foundation to develop local journalistic talent to tell African stories to an international audience. In 2008, I started Africa 24 Media, Africa’s first online delivery site for materials from journalists, broadcasters and NGO’s from around the continent — another step in making my father’s dream a reality.

As equipment gets cheaper, smaller and more efficient, Africans will become better informed and bridge the communications gap between themselves and the outside world. I want to see an Africa that has its own voice. I want to see an Africa that will not be viewed as the poor relative looking for a hand-out, but as a pioneer in a new world, leading and not following.

The media can go a long way in realizing this vision. But we must unite as a continent and wisely use support from our friends around the world.

See also a Huffington Post interview with Salim Amin.

Roger Mudd

Roger Mudd

Roger Mudd:
I agree with Salim Amin’s father that journalists should have an understanding and feeling for the history and the culture of the country they are covering. But I’m not so sure that African journalists can “best” cover Africa if what is meant by “best” is coverage that promotes Africa as a “pioneer in a new world, leading and not following,” to quote Salim Amin.

My view is that the best coverage is an even-handed coverage, reporting the successes as well as the failures. My view is that journalists have no business marching in the parade; that they should be standing on the curb watching the parade go by and reporting on what they see.

In 1964, working for CBS News, I was assigned to cover the Senate’s civil rights filibuster on television. Most conservatives, which meant most of the southern senators, regarded CBS News as part of a very powerful, very liberal network with little sympathy or understanding of the South and its culture. In the beginning, I hit a stonewall with the southerners. Even though I had southern roots, had been educated in the South and loved southern politics, they were suspicious of me as just another liberal reporter out to denigrate them.

It was not until the senators realized that when I interviewed Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota, the floor manager of the bill, I also interviewed Richard Russell of Georgia, the southern field general and that for every TV piece with Jacob Javits of New York there was a piece with Sam Ervin of North Carolina.

Soon enough, press secretaries for the southerners began calling me with tips, off-the-record comments and not-too-subtle suggestions that I interview their boss.

In the end, it was not so much my knowledge of the South that gained the trust and respect of the filibusterers as it was steady and even-handed reporting.

A Change in Plans Creates a Change Agent

Junaid Iqbal is one of many entrepreneurs coming to the Presidential Summit on Entrepreneurship April 26-27, 2010, from countries with sizeable Muslim populations. He heads BMA Financial, a financial products distributor. Educated at University of Michigan, he worked for American Electric Power before returning to Pakistan to anchor a stock market show on Geo TV, work for the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan and host CNBC‘s Power Lunch.

Liesl Riddle is a professor at George Washington University and co-director of the GW Diaspora Research Program . She has written extensively about diasporas and international entrepreneurship.

Junaid Iqbal

Junaid Iqbal

Junaid Iqbal:
I always wanted to come to Pakistan and do something for my country, but I never thought it would happen this way. I was living the normal American life: you go to work, you go out with your buddies, you take a couple of trips to Vegas or Miami. My job was at American Electric Power.

But my mother wrote: “This new TV channel is really revolutionizing Pakistan. You’d be amazing [working there.]”

I wrote back: “Are you out of your mind?” But when I returned to Karachi to renew my visa, I met a guy from Geo TV and we clicked. That Sunday night, my first TV show went on air.

I was still an AEP employee waiting for my visa. The show really picked up over a few months, with some of the biggest players coming on. The CEO said: “We want you to start a full-time, daily live stock market show.” It was a big challenge. He pulled out, “your country needs you.”

I went back to the U.S., took care of stuff there and resigned. Almost everyone in my family, other than my mom and my brother, thought I had gone mad. I’m leaving this cushy job in the U.S. as an energy trader and I’m going to: a) come back to Pakistan and b) join the media.

Nature gives you those opportunities. It was the greatest decision I ever made. Then, I wrote a business plan to introduce the one-stop model of buying mutual funds from just one company.

There is a big spirit of entrepreneurship in Pakistan because we have a very strong family support system. My father is an entrepreneur. My grandfather was an entrepreneur. I took a risk, have equity in a business, but in my father’s eyes, he doesn’t consider me to be an entrepreneur.

Liesl Riddle

Liesl Riddle

Liesl Riddle:
You are the perfect example of the power of diaspora “institutional change agents”: migrants who bring new ideas and new ways of doing things to their countries of origin and thereby contribute to global development. Stories like yours inspire me to study the amazing phenomenon of diasporans and the transformative impact that their actions have on the economies and societies of their birth.

Today, approximately 3 percent of the world’s population (more than 150 million people) is made up of migrants.

Innovations in transportation and communications now allow migrants to psychologically and physically connect with their countries of origin in ways that were unimaginable in the past. Global media provide migrants with a constant stream of information about their origin countries. Diaspora-oriented Facebook groups and other social network communities offer migrants interactions with each other and individuals in their country of origin.

Some migrants return home permanently, but many more “circular migrate,” traveling back and forth between their country of residence and country of origin.

For many diasporans, the experiences and opportunities they are exposed to abroad inspire them to contribute to their countries of origin. You are an example of a diasporan who returned to radically transform an existing industry — in this case, media and financial literacy. By asking different questions and taking a different perspective, you have contributed to the quality and nature of business information in Pakistan.

You can tell your father that you are not only an entrepreneur but a change agent, and I am sure there are many investors in Pakistan who would agree with me!

On behalf of the GW Center for International Business Education and Research and the GW Diaspora Research Program, I invite you to come to our campus in Washington to share your experience with our students!

Google and China

The Blogosphere is buzzing with talk of Google and China.  Here are some examples of the different points of view of bloggers who are following the issue:

Global Voices contributor Oiwan Lam gives her take on Google’s migration to Hong Kong:

http://globalvoicesonline.org/2010/03/23/china-google-cn-migrated-to-hong-kong/

Another find from Global Voices:

http://globalvoicesonline.org/2010/03/23/china-singing-farewell-to-google/

Democracy Digest wonders if the Google-China row will eventually confirm what they term, “democracy’s comparative advantage:”

http://www.demdigest.net/blog/regions/asia/china-google-row-will-eventually-confirm-

And the Center for International Private Enterprise weighs in on a blogging initiative in China and its relation to the Google incident:

http://www.cipe.org/blog/?p=4503

Are Social Networkers in Fact “Disconnected”?

The Internet and social networking were supposed to bring people together. But could it be that it “disconnects” them in certain ways?

That is what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested January 21 when answering questions after her major foreign policy speech on Internet freedom.

Near the end of her appearance at the Newseum, the secretary took a question about Muslim youth being disaffected from their own governments and that of the United States. In her answer, Clinton suggested that youth the world over suffer from this “disconnect.” The reason: the Internet!

Here’s what she said: “Young people across the world are increasingly disconnected from authority, from government, from all kinds of institutions that have been historically the foundations of society, because they are so interconnected through the Internet….”

She noted that some young people spend more time on the Internet than with their families, and she added that this phenomenon was “something my generation can’t really understand.”

Well, I’m part of Clinton’s generation, and her comment was a real shocker to me! Why? Because, as a heavy user of the Internet, I often feel “disconnected,” too. In my case the disconnect is with what I see as a somewhat befuddling world of social networking.

Clearly there is a generation gap at work here, and Clinton addressed that: “When you think about the power of this information connection to young people, I don’t think it should cause panic in people my age…. We ought to figure out how to better utilize it.”

Here at America.gov, we’ve been working hard at reaching young people via Twitter, Facebook and blogs like this one. How effective do you think these efforts are? What do you think is the best way for government to meet the information needs of and connect with young people?

A Debate that Helped Transcend “Sound Byte Politics”

Republican lawmakers raise their hands to challenge President Obamas policies.

Republican lawmakers raise their hands to challenge President Obama's policies.


We Americans are used to our watching our political leaders savage each other with bold short statements and sound bytes that seem made to fit in one-minute TV and radio segments. For that reason, I found it refreshing and very informative to watch President Obama and Republican Congressional Representatives engage in a real debate on Friday in Baltimore. Unlike most televised U.S. political debates, the questions to the president came directly from his opponents, rather than through a moderator, and neither side had to stay within the confines of a short time limit.

Peter Baker of The New York Times told PBS Television’s Gwen Ifill that the exchange had been “remarkable,” in both its civility, given the extreme partisan acrimony that has festered between Democrats and Republicans, and also because it was substantive, giving viewers a much clearer idea of where the two sides agree and differ on issues, free of sloganeering and generalities.

“We haven’t seen anything quite like this in a while. I’ve covered a number of presidents. I’d be hard-pressed to remember a time when we saw a president exchange views and debate the opposing party for an hour and a half on live television,” Baker said.

Dan Balz of The Washington Post compared it to Prime Minister’s Question Time in the British House of Commons.

Obama told his Republican hosts to challenge his ideas and said he was prepared to respond in kind, saying a real debate is “absolutely essential” for the well being of the country.

“It’s only through the process of disagreement and debate that bad ideas get tossed out and good ideas get refined and made better. And that kind of vigorous back and forth — that imperfect but well-founded process, messy as it often is — is at the heart of our democracy,” he said.

Let’s end the mutual demonization in the media, he said. While political rivals can energize their supporters by portraying an opponent as an extremist, it also “boxes us in in ways that makes it difficult for us to work together, because our constituents start believing us,” Obama said. “They don’t know sometimes this is just politics what you guys — or folks on my side do sometimes.”

The climate of extreme partisanship plays into the “slash-and-burn-style” that gets a media response, he pointed out. Responding to a question from Representative Paul Ryan from Wisconsin, Obama said if he told him “I think Paul Ryan is a pretty sincere guy and has a beautiful family,” those remarks would not make the news and they would not give the congressman much credit with his constituents.

“And by the way, in case he’s going to get a Republican challenge, I didn’t mean it,” Obama continued over laughter. “Don’t want to hurt you, man.”

Reading the press accounts afterwards, it seemed that spokespeople from both sides were declaring a victory in the debate. But I’m looking at it more as a victory for American voters than the politicians. I learned a lot about how the two sides truly see solutions to challenges like health care and the economy, rather than the simplistic and inaccurate charges of “Bolshevism” and “nihilism” that have been lobbed back and forth for the past year. More such debates, please!