Topics & Research: Data Trends and Indicators

Technical Assistance

Need help improving the conditions for learning in your school, district, state, or institution? Get Help

Upcoming Events

Supportive School Discipline Webinar Series: Addressing Truancy-- Innovative Approaches to Systemically Increasing Attendance and Reducing Chronic Truancy

February 27, 4:00-5:30 pm ET

What's New

HHS/Office of Adolescent Health Updates State-by-State Adolescent Mental Health Facts. The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Adolescent Health has recently updated its state summaries that focus on adolescent mental health. Each state page reports on positive social skills, depressive symptoms, depressive episodes and suicidal thoughts, attempts, and injuries. Learn More

Data Trends and Indicators

There are a number of data and indicators that can help inform the Nation on the nature of school climate. Below are a selection of national indicators from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) that can help provide context.

In addition, a report called, Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2011, presents data on crime at school from the perspectives of students, teachers, principals, and the general population from an array of sources--the National Crime Victimization Survey, the School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, the School Survey on Crime and Safety and the School and Staffing Survey. Data on crime away from school are also presented to place school crime in the context of crime in the larger society. Click here to read more.

Indicator 1: Percentage of Students Ages 12–18 Who Reported Being Targets of Hate-Related Words at School (various years, 2001–2009).
View Larger

Indicator 2: Percentage of students in grades 9–12 who reported using alcohol anywhere at least one day during the previous 30 days (various years, 1993–2011)
View Larger

Indicator 3: Percentage of Students in Grades 9–12 Who Reported Using Alcohol On School Property at Least One Day During the Previous 30 Days (various years, 1993–2011)
View Larger

Indicator 4: Percentage of students ages 12–18 who reported being bullied at school and cyber-bullied anywhere during the school years 2006–7 and 2008–9.
View Larger

Indicator 5: The Rate of Violent Victimizations Per 1,000 Students at School (2008–2010)
View Larger

Indicator 6: Percentage of High School Students Who Reported Attempted Suicide during the 12 months before the survey (various years 1993–2011)
View Larger

Indicator 7: Percentage of High School Students were Overweight (various years, 1999–2011).
View Larger

Indicator 1: Percentage of Students Ages 12–18 Who Reported Being Targets of Hate-Related Words at School (various years, 2001–2009).

NOTE: "At school" includes the school building, on school property, on a school bus, and, from 2001 onward, going to and from school. Hate-related refers to derogatory terms used by others in reference to students’ personal characteristics. For both 2007 and 2009, the reference period was the school year, whereas in prior survey years the reference period was the previous 6 months. Cognitive testing showed that estimates from 2007 and 2009 are comparable to previous years.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, School Crime Supplement (SCS) to the National Crime Victimization Survey, various years, 2001–2009.

Indicator 2: Percentage of students in grades 9–12 who reported using alcohol anywhere at least one day during the previous 30 days (various years, 1993–2011)

NOTE: The term "anywhere" was not used in the YRBS questionnaire; students were simply asked how many days did they have at least one drink of alcohol during the past 30 days.

SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS), various years, 1993–2011.

Indicator 3: Percentage of Students in Grades 9–12 Who Reported Using Alcohol On School Property at Least One Day During the Previous 30 Days (various years, 1993–2011)

NOTE: "On school property" was not defined for survey respondents. In the YRBSS questionnaire, students are simply asked how many days they had at least one drink of alcohol in the past 30 days on school property.

SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS), various years, 1993-2011.

Indicator 4: Percentage of students ages 12–18 who reported being bullied at school and cyber-bullied anywhere during the school years 2006–7 and 2008–9.

NOTE: "At school" includes the school building, on school property, on a school bus, or going to and from school. Bullying types do not sum to total because students could have experienced more than one type of bullying. In 2006-2007, the unit response rate for this survey did not meet NCES statistical standards; therefore, interpret the data with caution.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, School Crime Supplement (SCS) to the National Crime Victimization Survey, 2007 and 2009.

Indicator 5:The Rate of Violent Victimizations Per 1,000 Students at School (2008–2010)

NOTE: "Violent victimization" includes serious violent crimes and simple assault. Serious violent crimes include rape, sexual assault, robbery, and aggravated assault. "At school" includes inside the school building, on school property, or on the way to or from school.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey

Indicator 6: Percentage of High School Students Who Reported Attempted Suicide during the 12 months before the survey (various years 1993–2011)

NOTE: 95% confidence interval.

Indicator 7: Percentage of High School Students were Overweight (various years, 1999–2011).

NOTE: 95% confidence interval. Overweight students were definedbeing >= 85th percentile but < 95th percentile for body mass index, based on sex- and age-specific reference data from the 2000 CDC growth charts.

SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS), various years, 1999–2011.

Products
Research
Tools
Training
Other Resources

The Safe and Supportive Schools TA Center is currently reviewing resources for possible inclusion on the webpage. If you know of a free resource that could be posted here, nominate it by completing a nomination form.

Non-Federal | Federal

School Climate Survey Compendium (as of December 20, 2011)

To assist educators and education agencies in locating a valid and reliable needs assessment that suits their needs, the Safe and Supportive Schools Technical Assistance Center is developing a compendium of student, staff, and family surveys that can be used as part of a school climate needs assessment. Below is an initial list of school climate survey batteries. (Alternatively, click here to download a summary table (PDF) of each survey by respondent type.)

Please note that the Office of Safe and Healthy Students does not endorse any particular scale or survey presented in this compendium. Additionally, the database presented is not an exhaustive listing of available measures or survey instruments. If you would like to nominate a survey that is not currently included in the compendium, click on the link below.

Nominate a Survey

Alaska School Climate and Connectedness Survey

Constructs	Students - High Expectations, School Safety, School Leadership and Student Involvement, Respectful Climate, Peer Climate, Caring Adults, Parent and Community Involvement, Social and Emotional Learning, Student Delinquent Behaviors, Student Drug and Alcohol Use Staff - School Leadership and Involvement, Staff Attitudes, Student Involvement, Respectful Climate, School Safety, Parent and Community Involvement, Student Delinquent Behaviors, Student Drug and Alcohol Use
Respondents	Students, Staff
Reports	American Institutes for Research (2010). 2010 School Climate and Connectedness Survey Statewide Report: Student and Staff Results. Washington D.C. American Institutes for Research (2009). Alaska School Climate and Connectedness Student Survey Spring 2009 Scale Reliabilities Unpublished. Kendziora, K. and E. Spier (2011). Memo Regarding the Alaska School Climate and Connectedness Survey. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	These survey instruments are not publicly available. Please contact Kim Kendziora at kkendziora@air.org for more information about this survey.

American Institutes for Research Conditions for Learning Survey

Constructs	Safe and Respectful Climate, High Expectations, Student Support, Social and Emotional Learning
Respondents	Students
Reports	Osher, D., Kendziora, K, and Chinen, M. (2008).Student Connection Research: Final Narrative Report to the Spencer Foundation. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research Report. Available online at: http://www.air.org/expertise/index/?fa=viewContent&content_id=383. American Insitutes for Research (2007). Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Analysis Student Connection Survey Chicago 2007. Unpublished. Osher, D. (2011). Non-Original Items in AIR's 2007 Conditions for Learning Survey. Unpublished memo. Osher, D. (2011). AIR's 2007 Conditions for Learning Survey. Unpublished memo.
Survey Instruments	There is no charge for using this survey. Please contact David Osher at dosher@air.org for additional information.

California Healthy Kids Survey

Constructs	School connectedness, School supports - caring relationships, School supports - high expectations, School supports - opportunities for meaningful participation, Community supports - caring relationships, Community supports - high expectations, Community supports - opportunities for meaningful participation, Tobacco, alcohol, or drug use at school, Physical/ verbal/emotional violence victimization, Physical/ verbal/emotional violence perpetration, Harassment victimization, Peer supports - caring relationships, Peer supports - high expectations, Home supports - caring relationships, Home supports - high expectations, Home supports - opportunities for meaningful participation, Problem solving Self-efficacy, Cooperation and communication, Empathy, Self-awareness
Respondents	Students
Reports	Hanson, T.L. & Kim, J. O. (2007). Measuring resilience and youth development: The Psychometric properties of the Healthy Kids Survey. (Issues & Answers Report, -No. 034). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. Available online at: http://www.ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/west/pdf/REL_2007034_sum.pdf. Furlong, M. J., L. M. O'Brennan, and S. You. (Forthcoming). Psychometric Properties of the Add Health School Connectedness Scale for 18 Socio-cultural Groups. Under review for publishing. Hanson, T.L. and G. Austin (2011). Internal Consistency Reliabilities for Healthy Kids School Climate Survey Instruments. Unpublished. Hanson, T.L. (n.d.) School Climate Domains and Cal-SCHLS Measures to Assess Them. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	Please note that while a copy of the survey instrument is publicly available at http://chks.wested.org/administer/download, it is copyright protected. Information on obtaining the survey instrument can be found at: http://chks.wested.org/.

California School Climate Survey

Constructs	Collegiality, Resource provisions and training, Professional development – instruction, Professional development – cultural competence, Professional development – meeting student needs, Positive student learning environment, Caring and respectful relationships, High expectations of students, Opportunities for meaningful participation, Cultural sensitivity, Clarity and equity of discipline policies, Perceived school safety, Learning facilitative behavior, Learning barrier – risk behavior, Learning barrier – interpersonal conflict and destructive behavior
Respondents	Staff
Reports	You, Sukkyung, & Furlong, M. (nd) A psychometric evaluation of staff version of school climate survey. University of California, Santa Barbara. You, Sukkyung, O’Malley, M., & Furlong, M. (Under review). Brief California School Climate Survey: Dimensionality and measurement invariance across teachers and administrators. Submitted to Educational and Psychological Measurement. Hanson, T. and G. Austin (2011). Internal Consistency Reliabilities for Healthy Kids School Climate Survey Instruments. Unpublished. Hanson, T.L. (n.d.) School Climate Domains and Cal-SCHLS Measures to Assess Them. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	Please note that while a copy of the survey instrument is publicly available at http://cscs.wested.org/training_support, it is copyright protected. Information on obtaining the survey instrument can be found at: http://cscs.wested.org/.

California School Parents Survey

Constructs	Facilitation of parent involvement, Positive student learning environment, Opportunities for meaningful participation, Cultural sensitivity, Clarity and equity of discipline policies, Perceived school safety, Learning barriers
Respondents	Parents
Reports	Hanson, T. and G. Austin (2011). Internal Consistency Reliabilities for Healthy Kids School Climate Survey Instruments. Unpublished. Hanson, T.L. (n.d.) School Climate Domains and Cal-SCHLS Measures to Assess Them. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	Please note that while a copy of the survey instrument is publicly available at http://csps.wested.org/, it is copyright protected. Information on obtaining the survey instrument can be found at: http://cscs.wested.org/.

The Center for Research in Educational Policy School Climate Inventory

Constructs	Orderly School Environment; Instructional Leadership; Positive Learning Environment; Parent and Community Involvement; Well-Developed and Implemented Instruction; Expectations for Students; Collaboration among Administration, Faculty, and Students
Respondents	Teachers, Administrators and Professional Staff
Reports	Butler, E.D. and M.J. Alberg (1991). Tennessee School Climate Inventory: A Resource Manual. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Education Policy. Franceschini III, L.A. (2009). Convergent Validity Study of the School Climate Inventory (SCI) Using Archived Tennessee Department of Education Indicators. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy. Butler, E.D. and M.J. Alberg (1991). SCI-R Reliability Coefficients on the Seven Dimensions. Unpublished. Butler, E.D. and M.J. Alberg (1991). School Climate Inventory. Unpublished. Franceschini III, L.F. (2011). SCI/SCI-R Missing Values Protocols. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	This survey instrument is not publicly available. Please contact the Center for Research in Educational Policy at CREP@memphis.edu or 1-866-670-6147 for more information.

The Center for Social and Emotional Education Comprehensive School Climate Inventory

Constructs	Students - Orderly School Environment, Administration Provides Instructional Leadership, Positive Learning Environment, Parent and Community Involvement, Instruction is Well-Developed and Implemented, Expectations for Students, Collaboration between Administration, Faculty, and Students Staff - Rules & Norms, Physical & Emotional Bullying, Physical Surroundings, Social & Civic Learning, Professional Relationships, Respect & Diversity, Openness, Outreach to family members, Support for Learning, Administrator & Teacher Relationships Parents - Physical & Social Bullying, Respect & Diversity, Social Support -Adults (toward each other and toward students), Social & Civic Learning, Physical Surroundings, Rules & Norms, Student-Student Relationships, Support for Learning Community Members - Physical & Social Bullying, Respect & Diversity, Social Support -Adults (toward each other and toward students), Social & Civic Learning, Physical Surroundings, Rules & Norms, Student-Student Relationships, Support for Learning, and interest in supporting the school’s improvement efforts
Respondents	Students, Staff, Parents/Guardians, Community Members
Reports	Guo, P., Choe, J., & Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2011). Report of Construct Validity and Internal Consistency Findings for the Comprehensive School Climate Inventory. Fordham University. Higgins-D’Alessandro, Faster & Cohen, 2010). School Growth and Change: A Report Comparing Schools in 2007 and 2010. Fordham University and the National School Climate Center. Unpublished report, June 7, 2010. Sandy, S.V., Cohen, J. & Fisher, M.B. (2007). Understanding and Assessing School Climate: Development and Validation of the Comprehensive School Climate Inventory (CSCI). National School Climate Center. Unpublished paper.
Survey Instruments	These survey instruments are not publicly available. Please contact Darlene Faster, COO and Director of Communications, at the National School Climate Center at dfaster@schoolclimate.org or (212) 707-8799 x22 for more information on these surveys.

Communities That Care Youth Survey

Constructs	Community risk factors (low neighborhood attachment, community disorganization, transitions and mobility, perceived availability of drugs, perceived availability of handguns, laws and norms favorable to drug use); Community protective factors (opportunities for prosocial involvement, rewards for prosocial involvement); Family risk factors (family history of antisocial behavior, poor family management, family conflict, parental attitudes favorable towards drug use, parental attitudes favorable to antisocial behavior); Family protective factors (attachment, opportunities for prosocial involvement, rewards for prosocial involvement); School risk factors (academic failure, low commitment to school); School protective factors (opportunities for prosocial involvement, rewards for prosocial involvement); Peer-individual risk factors (rebelliousness, gang involvement, perceived risks of drug use, early initiation of drug use, early initiation of antisocial behavior, favorable attitudes toward drug use, favorable attitudes toward antisocial behavior; sensation seeking, rewards for antisocial involvement, friends’ use of drugs, interaction with antisocial peers, intentions to use); Peer-individual protective factors (interaction with prosocial peers, belief in the moral order, prosocial involvement, rewards for prosocial involvement, social skills, religiosity); Outcome measures (depression, antisocial behavior).
Respondents	Students
Reports	Community Youth Development Study. (2010). Communities That Care Youth Survey Item Construct Dictionary. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Arthur, M. W. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors 905, 1-26. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64-105. Arthur, M. W. (2011) The Communities That Care Youth Survey: Additional Information for Checklist Criteria. Unpublished memo. Monahan, K., Egan, E. A., Horn, M. L. V., Arthur, M., & Hawkins, D. (2011). Community-level effects of individual and peer risk and protective factors on adolescent substance use. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(4), 478-498. Fagan, A. A., Horn, M. L. V., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. (2007). Using community and family risk and protective factors for community-based prevention planning. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 535-555. Calkins, S. D. (2009). Psychobiological models of adolescent risk: Implications for prevention and intervention. Developmental Psychobiology, 213-215. Schulenberg, J. E., & Maggs, J. L. (2008). Destiny matters: Distal developmental influences on adult alcohol use and abuse. Addiction, 103(Suppl. 1), 1-6. Williams, J. H., Ayers, C. D., & Arthur, M. W. (1997). Risk and protective factors in the development of delinquency and conduct disorder. In M. W. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and resilience in childhood: An ecological perspective (pp. 140-170). Washington, DC: NASW Press. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R. D., & Hill, K .G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 153(3), 226-234. Johnston, L.D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2010. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
Survey Instruments	The 2010 survey instrument is not publicly available. Please contact Michael Arthur at marthur@u.washinton.edu for information about this survey.

The Consortium on Chicago School Research Survey of Chicago Public Schools

Constructs	Students - Academic Engagement, Academic Press, Peer Support for Academic Achievement, Teacher Personal Attention, School-Wide Future Orientation, Student Sense of Belonging, Safety, Incidence of Disciplinary Action, Student-Teacher Trust, Teacher Personal Support, Student Classroom Behavior Staff - Teacher-Principal Trust, Collective Responsibility, Teacher-Teacher Trust, School Commitment, Student Responsibility, Disorder and Crime, Teacher-Parent Interaction, Teacher-Parent Trust, Principal Instructional Leadership, Teacher Influence in Policy
Respondents	Students, Staff
Reports	Consortium on Chicago School Research. (n.d.) 2007 Consortium Survey Measures. Chicago: Author. Available online at http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/surveymeasures2007/ Consortium on Chicago School Research. (n.d.) A Primer on Rasch Analysis. Chicago: Author. Available online at http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/downloads/9585ccsr_rasch_analysis_primer.pdf Consortium on Chicago School Research. (n.d.) Alignment of the Five Fundamentals for School Success with Other Research. Chicago: Author. Available online at http://www.stratplan.cps.k12.il.us/pdfs/5_fundamentals/research_alignment-6-4-07.pdf Consortium on Chicago School Research. (n.d.) Dimensions of the Five Fundamentals for School Success. Chicago: Author. Montgomery, N. (2010). CCSR 5 Essentials Survey -2007 Scoring Sample. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	Student surveys are available at http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/downloads/17242009_my_voice__9th-11th_student_codebook_.pdf and http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/downloads/23532009_my_voice_senior_student_codebook.pdf. Staff survey is available at http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/downloads/2009/HS_Teacher_Survey09Cdbk_8-6.pdf. Please note that the student and staff surveys are currently being updated and are copyrighted. Please contact Nick Montgomery at nmontgomery@uchicago.edu for additional information on these surveys.

Culture of Excellence & Ethics Assessment

Constructs	Students - Competencies: Excellence (Version 4.2 only), Competencies: Ethics (Version 4.2 only), School Culture: Excellence, School Culture: Ethics, Faculty Practices: Excellence, Faculty Practices: Ethics, Student Safety, Faculty Support for & Engagement of Students Faculty/Staff - Competencies: Excellence (Version 4.2 only), Competencies: Ethics (Version 4.2 only), School Culture: Excellence, School Culture: Ethics, Faculty Practices: Excellence, Faculty Practices: Ethics, Student Safety, Faculty Support for & Engagement of Students, Leadership Practices, Faculty Beliefs & Behaviors, Home-School Communication & Support Parents - Perception of School Culture, School Engaging Parents, Parents Engaging with School, Learning at Home/ Promoting Excellence, Parenting/Promoting Ethics
Respondents	Students, Faculty/Staff, Parents
Reports	Khmelkov, V. (2010). Culture of Excellence & Ethics Assessment, Student and Faculty Survey: Reliability, Validity & Other Psychometric Data, High School Sample . (power point presentation) Institute for Excellence and Ethics, Inc. Available online at http://excellenceandethics.org/assess/CEEA_v4.5_Psychometrics_HS.pdf. Khmelkov, V.T., Davidson, M.L, et al. (2011). Culture of Excellence & Ethics Assessment Survey Conceptual Description. Institute for Excellence and Ethics, Inc. Available online at http://www.excellenceandethics.com/assess/ CEEA_v4.5_Conceptual_Description.pdf. Khmelkov, V.T., Davidson, M.L, et al. (2011). Survey Components and Scale Matrix. Institute for Excellence and Ethics, Inc. Available online at http://www.excellenceandethics.com/assess/CEEA_v4.5_matrix.pdf. Khmelkov, V.T., Davidson, M.L. (2011). Culture of Ethics and Excellence Assessment Student and Faculty/Staff Survey Psychometric Data: High School Sample. Institute for Excellence and Ethics, Inc. Available online at http://www.excellenceandethics.com/assess/CEEA_v4.5_Psychometrics_HS.pdf. Khmelkov, V.T. (2011). Memo regarding Culture of Excellence & Ethics Assessment (CEEA) surveys, version 4.5. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	These survey instruments can be used free of charge, subject to the conditions of the User Agreement, and can be found at: http://excellenceandethics.com/assess/ceea.php. Please contact Vlad Khmelkov at vkhmelkov@excellenceandethics.com for additional information.

Effective School Battery

Constructs	Students - Safety, Respect for Students, Planning and Action, Fairness of Rules, Clarity of Rules, Student Influence Teachers - Safety, Morale, Planning and Action, Smooth Administration, Resources for Instruction, Good Race Relations, Parent and Community Involvement, Student Influence, Avoidance of Grades as Sanction
Respondents	Students, Teachers
Reports	Gottfredson, G. D. (1999) The Effective School Battery User’s Manual. Marriottsville, MD: Gottfredson Associates, Inc. Available online at http://www.gottfredson.com/forms/ESBMan.pdf. Gottfredson, G.D. (n.d.) Selected Research Related to the Effective School Battery. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	Additional information and order forms for these survey instruments can be found at: http://www.education.umd.edu/EDCP/schoolassess/Tools/ESB/ESB.html. Please contact Eva Yui at climate-assess@umd.edu for additional information.

Perceived School Experiences Scale

Constructs	Academic Motivation, Academic Press, School Connectedness
Respondents	Students
Reports	Anderson-Butcher, D., A. Amorose, A. Iachini, and A. Ball. (2011). The Development of the Perceived Schools Experiences Scale. Unpublished. Anderson-Butcher, D., A. Amorose, A. Iachini, and A. Ball. (2011). The Development of the Perceived Schools Experiences Scale – Response Memo. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	There is no charge for using this survey. Please contact Dawn Anderson-Butcher at anderson-butcher.1@osu.edu for additional information.

Pride Learning Environment Survey

Constructs	School climate; teacher and student respect; student discipline; school safety; teacher to student relationships; teacher collaboration; student engagement; student encouragement; frequency of substance use; effect of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs; age of first substance use; perceived harmful effects of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs; parents’ feelings towards alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs; place of substance use; time of substance use; violence; bullying
Respondents	Students
Reports	Hall, D. (2011). Documentation Report for OSDFS-TES-LES. Unpublished. Hall, D. (2011). Learning Environment Survey Theoretical Framework. Unpublished. International Survey Associates. (2010). LES Item Dictionary. Unpublished. Hall, D. (2011). Analytic Strategies Employed for Pride Surveys Learning Environment Surveys. Unpublished. Hall, D. (2011). Factor Analysis Results 2011. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	Please note that while a copy of the survey instrument is publicly available at http://dbdemo.pridesurveys.com, it is copyright protected. Information on obtaining the survey instrument can be found at: http://www.pridesurveys.com/Order/info.html.

Pride Teaching Environment Survey

Constructs	Like Teaching, Like Administrators – My School, Like Administrators – Instructional Leadership, Effective Teaching, Teacher Evaluation, Principal Support, Teacher Respect, Participatory Decision-making, Staff Collegiality, Desired Involvement in Improving Teaching Practices, Current Involvement in School Policies and Practices, Desired Involvement in Teaching Practice Policies, Student Discipline, Student Conduct Rules/Policies, Teacher Stress, Classroom Support, Teacher Attitude, Interpersonal Relationships, Student Engagement, Teacher Pay, Facilities and Resources, Teacher Workload
Respondents	Faculty
Reports	Hall, D. (2011) Documentation Report for OSHS – TES – LES. Unpublished. Hall, D. (2011). Teaching Environment Survey (TES) Theoretical Framework. Unpublished. Hall, D. (2011). Analytic Strategies Employed for Pride Survey’s TES Survey Effort. Unpublished. Hall, D. (2010). TES Factor Analysis Results – Summary. Unpublished. International Survey Associates, LLC. (2010). TES Item Dictionary. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	Please note that while a copy of the survey instrument is publicly available at http://dbdemo.pridesurveys.com, it is copyright protected. Information on obtaining the survey instrument can be found at: http://www.pridesurveys.com/Order/info.html.

Search Institute Creating a Great Place to Learn Survey

Constructs	Students - Caring and Fair Staff, Parental Support and Achievement Values, Student Voice, Safety, Classroom Order, Peer Academic Influence, Academic Expectations, Active Learning, Sense of Belonging, Motivation Staff - Student-Staff Relationships, Staff Collective Efficacy, School-Community Relations, Staff Collegiality, Parental Involvement, Administrative Leadership, Academic Expectations, Students' Commitment to Learning, Safety, Classroom Order, Student Voice, Fairness and Consistency of Policies and Practices, Support for Instructional Improvement, Resource Adequacy, Commitment
Respondents	Students, Staff
Reports	Search Institute. (2006). Search Institute's Creating a Great Place to Learn Survey: A Survey of School Climate, Technical Manual. Minneapolis: Author. Available online at http://www.search institute.org/system/files/School+Climate--Tech+Manual.pdf Scales, P.S. (2011) Preparation of Dataset for Analysis. Unpublished memo.
Survey Instruments	These survey instruments are not publicly available. Please contact the Search Institute for additional information at http://www.search-institute.org/survey-services.

Secondary Classroom Climate Assessment Instrument

Constructs	Discipline environment, Student interactions, Learning assessment, Attitude and culture
Respondents	Students, Staff
Reports	Shindler, J., A. Jones, A.D. Williams, C. Taylor and H. Cadenas. (2009). Exploring the School Climate -- Student Achievement Connection: And Making Sense of Why the First Precedes the Second. Los Angeles: Alliance for the Study of School Climate. Alliance for the Study of School Climate (2011). Examining the Reliability and Validity of the ASSC/WASSC School Climate Assessment Instrument (SCAI). Unpublished (will be published on ASSC Website). Shindler, J. (2011). Untitled memo with psychometric information. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	Survey instrument is not publicly available. Please contact John Shindler, Director of the Alliance for the Study of School Climate at jshindl@calstatela.edu for additional information on the CCAI.

Secondary School Climate Assessment Instrument

Constructs	Students: Physical appearance of the school, Student interactions, Discipline environment, Learning/assessment, Attitude and culture, Community relations Faculty: Physical appearance of the school, Faculty relations, Student interactions, Leadership decisions, Discipline environment, Learning/ assessment, Attitude and culture, Community Relations
Respondents	Students, Faculty, Parents
Reports	Shindler, J., A. Jones, A.D. Williams, C. Taylor and H. Cadenas. (2009). Exploring the School Climate -- Student Achievement Connection: And Making Sense of Why the First Precedes the Second. Los Angeles: Alliance for the Study of School Climate. Alliance for the Study of School Climate (2011). Examining the Reliability and Validity of the ASSC/WASSC School Climate Assessment Instrument (SCAI). Unpublished (will be published on ASSC Website). Shindler, J. (2011). Untitled memo with psychometric information. Unpublished.
Survey Instruments	This survey instrument is not publicly available. Please contact John Shindler, Director of the Alliance for the Study of School Climate at jshindl@calstatela.edu for additional information on the SCAI.