U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Question 214: (a) If the individual had not been
monitored at his previous employer while receiving an
occupational dose (i.e., the dose there had been determined
not likely to exceed 10% of the limits), and the current
employer, Licensee Z, determines in advance that the
worker's annual dose for both licensees will exceed 10%
(although the dose at Licensee Z will not exceed 10%), must
Licensee Z monitor for external dose? (b) If the
individual worked for several previous employers during the
year, some who badged and some who did not, and Licensee Z
makes a prospective determination that its own activities
will result in a dose less than 10%, must Licensee Z
monitor for external dose?
Answer: (a) No. The criteria to determine whether
monitoring is required is independent of exposures received
at any other place of employment prior to or subsequent to
employment with Licensee Z.
b) No. (Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502, 10 CFR 20.2104,
Regulatory Guide 8.34)